WRAP THESIS Sawhney 1996

University of Warwick institutional repository: http://go.warwick.ac.uk/wrap A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of Warwick http://go.warwick.ac.uk/wrap/4333 This thesis is made available online and is protected by original copyright. Please scroll down to view the document itself. Please refer to the repository record for this item for information to help you to cite it. Our policy information is available from the repository home page.

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism Deepak Narang Sawhney Thesis submitted for the Degree of Ph.D. University of Warwick Department of Philosophy May 1996

Contents Acknowledgements Declaration Summary Key to Abbreviations and Thesis Outline i Introduction 1 I Consuming the Future 13 H Body without Organs 50 III The Stratification of the World-Economy 79 IV Geopolitics: Antisysternic Movements of Resistance 116 V Palimpsest: Toward a Minor Literature in Monstrosity 152 Concluding Remarks: 'Class Consciousness'and 'The American Rhizome' 174 Tables 192 Bibliography 195

Acknowledgments I would like to acknowledgeDr. Nick Land for his invaluable support throughout this project, and to my family for their love and patience.

Declaration The following is a list of chaptersfrom Axiomatics: TheApparatus of Capitalism that are published in abridged form: Chapter HI: 'The Stratification of the World-Economy', in Must Me Burn Sade?,Deepak N Sawhney (ed) (NJ: Humanities Press, 1997) Chapter IV: 'Geopolitics: Antisystemic Movements of Resistance', in Gilles Deleuze and Minoritarian Becomings, Dorothea Olkowski (ed) (forthcoming, 1997) Chapter V: 'Palimpsest: Toward a Minor Literature in Monstrosity', The Difference of Deleuze, Keith-Ansell Pearson(ed) (London: Routledge, 1997) Certain sections of the thesis have been presentedat conferences,most notably: 'Biocapital', presentedat Culture and Identity: City, Nation, World Second Themy, Culture and Society Conference,Berlin, 10-14 August 1995 'Geopolitics: Antisystemic Movements of Resistance', presentedat the 19th for Association Philosophy for International The and annual meeting Literature: Virtual Incorporations, Textual Spaces Villanova University, Pennsylvania,USA May 10-13 1995 'Capitalism, Schizophrenia,and Geopolitics', presentedat Difference Engine workshop, University of Warwick, March 16 1995 'CyberpocalypseNow', presentedat The Inhuman conference,University of Central Lancashire,June 25 1994

Summary The thesis critically appropriatesthe collaborative philosophy of Gilles Deleuze and Rlix Guattari to argue that the general tendency of capitalism is towards the disintegration of high-level control structures (for instance, the nation-state). This disintegration doesnot entail a movementtowards total chaosor anarchy.I argue that capital generatesits own guidance mechanisms,but ones that act at a low-level, and respond flexibly to changing conditions (an instance of micro-politics). One of the difficulties of this project stemsfrom the fact that the canon of philosophical discourse itself operatesas a high-level control structure. In Marx, the development of capital is controlled by a secularizedHegelian dialectic that determinesthe outcome of capital in socialism. For'Freud, th& low level organization of the unconsciousis subjectedto high-level control through the universality of the Oedipus complex. By addressingthe need for new philosophical instrumentsto understandcapitalism, the thesis produces critiques of Marx and Freud, and advancesa philosophy of economics by examining the function of axiomatics. Moreover, in critiquing presupposed structures (for example, the unconscious as a theatre of representation),the thesis argues for an immanent system (mulliplicity) of interaction within capitalism. The researchundertakento complete the thesis has consisted of contemporary experiments in complexity theory, and current socio/economic interest been has labour Of the current demarkets. analyses of particular industrialization that has taken place in the west coast of the United States.With the influx of a periphery into the core area of Los Angeles, the current role of urban literatures desire (most Shakur's unleash notably autobiography) politics and minor into the circuit of the city. I conclude with a re-examination of micro political/economic movementsthat have manifestedthemselvesinto the economy of Los Angeles. By decoding locally impoverished economic and cultural sectors, emergentproperties have sprouted by realigning subversive activity onto the apex of immanence (an to capitalist processes). capital

i Key to Abbreviations and Thesis Outline Key to Abbreviations The following is a key, unless otherwise indicated in the body of the text, to the reference material used in the thesis. In order to assure consistency of the material cited in the thesis, I have kept to the original spelling that appearsin the texts. For a complete referenceguide please refer to the bibliography. Axiomatics, Robert Blanch6 ACCM Allitudes, Chaos and the Connectionist Mind, Richard Eiser A0--- Copitalism and.Schizophrenia,-vol.1, Anti-0edipus, -Gilles Deleuze & ..... Mix Guattari ATP Capitalism and Schizophrenia, vol. 2, A Thousand Plateaus, Gilles Deleuze & Mix Guattari Bergsonism, Gilles Deleuze Complexity. The Emerging Scienceat the Edge of Order and Chaos, Mitchell Waldrop 'CAL' 'California Rages Against the Dying of the Light', Richard Walker 6C"9 'Capitalism: A Very Special Delirium', Gilles Deleuze cc Civilization and Capitalism 15th Commerce,vol. 2, Femand Braudel ccc Civilization and Capitalism 151h- 18th Centuty.- YhePerspectiveof the Morld, vol. 3, Femand Braudel cl Capital, vol. 1, Karl Marx CHI Capital, vol. 111,Karl Marx OF Commerce InfernationaL La Fin des Avantages Acquise, Gerard Lafay & Colette Herzog CLU CommunistsLike Us, Mix Guattari & Antonio Negri CQ City of Quartz: Excavating the Future in Los Angeles, Mike Davis 18th Century The Wheels of

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism ii 'CRC' 'The Chinese Road to Capitalism' Richard Smith Icycl Tyberwar is Coming! ' John Arquilla & David Ronfeldt DIA Dialogues, Gilles Deleuze & Claire Pamet DOE The Death of Economics, Paul Onnerod DR Difference and Repetition, Gilles Deleuze DRC Di-eaming the Rational City. The Myth Amefican City-Planningi -of Christian Boyer Ethics,.Baruch Spinoza EBRCR Economics,Bounded Rationality and the Cognitive Revolution, Simon Herbert 'EU 'Energumen Capitalism', Jean-FrangoisLyotard EP Expressionismin Philosophy Spinoza, Gilles Deleuze ES Empiricism and Subjectivity.- An Essay on Hume's Theoty of Human Mature, Gilles Deleuze 'EYW' 'Everywhere You Want to Be: Introduction to Fear', Brian Massumi Foucault, Gilles Deleuze FLE Fh-sl and Last Emperors, Kenneth Dean & Brian Massumi Gnindi-isse,Karl Marx 'GEAPI 'The Global Economy as an Adaptive Process', John Holland GG GM Geopolitics and Geoculture: &says on the Changing Morld-System, Immanuel Wallerstein On The Genealogyof Moi als and Ecco,Homo, Friedrich Nietzsche 'IE[NM' 'Homes: Meshwork or Hierarchy?', Manuel Delanda

Key to Abbreviations and Thesis Outline iii 'IENI' 'The Informational Economy and the New Internal Division of Labor', Manual Castells 61V 'Intellectuals and Power: A Conversation Between Michel Foucault and Gilles Deleuze, Michel Foucault Kajka: Toward a Alfinor Literature, Gilles Deleuze & Mix Guattari KMSW Karl Marx: Selected Mritings, edited by David McLellan L. Libido: The Erench Existential Theories, AlPhonso Lingis _. LC Late Capitalism, Ernest Mandel LE Libidinal Economy, Jean-FrangoisLyotard LS Logic of Sense, Gilles Deleuze LTC The Long Twentieth Century: Money, Power, and the Origins of Our Times, Giovanni Arrighi Monster: The Autobiography of an L.A. Gang Member, Sanyika Shakur, aka Monster Kody Scott 'AIAIM' 'Markets and Anti-markets in the World Economy', Manuel Delanda NNW 'The Myth of'the New Deal', Ronald Rodosh MR Molecular Revolution: Psychiahy and Politics, Mix Mr Macchina Tempo,Antonio Negri 'NOL' 'Nonorganic Life', Manuel Delanda 'NNVW' 'The Next World War: World System Cycles and Trends', Christopher Chase-Dunn& Bruce Podobnik oc Order Out of Chaos: Man's New Dialogue ivith Nature, Ilya Prigogine & Isabelle Stenger PG Postmodern Geographies: The Reassertionof Space in Critical Social Themy, Edward Soja Guattari

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism iv PVM The Politics of [Vorld-Economy. The States, The Movements,and The Civilizations, Immanuel Wallerstein SDBP 'The Society of DismemberedBody Parts', Alphonso Lingis SP Speed and Politics, Paul Virilio ss Society of the Spectacle, Guy Debord 'TCU 'The Challenge of Complexity', Ilya Prigogine & Peter Allen TCCDM Thinking in Complexity, The Complex Dynamics of Matter, Mind, and Mankind, Klaus Mainzer TD The Theatre and Its Douhle, Antonin Artaud 'TGM' 'The Geology of Morals: A Neo-Materialist Interpretation', Manuel Delanda TKM The Thought of Karl Marx, David McLellan 6UC9 'Beyond Blade Runner: Urban Control and the Ecology of Fear', Mike Davis UG A User's Guide to Capitalism and Schizophrenia, Brian Massumi TEESR' 'Virtual 'Environments and the Emergence of Synthetic Reason', Manuel Delanda WAIM War in the Age of Intelligent Machines, Manuel Delanda vm Miat is Philosophy?, Gilles Deleuze & Mix Guattari IVVKLAiI 'Who Killed Los Angeles? A Political Autopsy', Mike Davis 'Y4MAH' 'Who Killed Los Angeles? Part Two: The Verdict is Given', Mike Davis

Key to Abbreviations and Thesis Outline V Thesis Outline IntroductionI YO9 e-w-5 Deleuze and Guattafi's Work Braudel a) Power Centresand Third World Zones b) 'The Perspectiveof the World' Wallerstein a) Relationship to Braudel b) Antisy§ternic Mov6fiients of Resistance 1) Geopolitics 2) Minoritarian Becomings L-1- 5 IV Delanda a) Relationship to Braudel 1) Historical Attractors 2) Self-organizing Systems 3) Stratification b) TVat-in the Age of Intelligent Machines 1) Machinic Phylum v Significance of Geopolitics a) Cartography of the Centre and Internal Third Worlds 1) Building-block Segments 2) Resistance VI Los Angeles: Geopolitical Medium a) Minoritarian Becomings b) Pragmatics c) Socio-economicHistory d) Stratification 8 VII Mike Davis: Los Angeles Historian a) Relationship to Braudel 1) Mapping Strata and Micro-fissures 2) Genealogy of Power 3) 'Power-lines' b) Socialist Politics 1) Historical Suppression c) South Central Los Angeles d) Third World Zones 2 4

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism VIII vi Minor Literature: Shakur's Monster: The Autobiography of an L.A. Gang Member a) South Central Los Angeles b) Relationship to Strata c) Geopolitical Immediacy 1) 'Machine in Motion' d) Relationship to Braudel and Wallerstein 1) The Importance of Shakur a) Communicating a Machinic Potentiality Chapter 1: Consuming the Future Part I I Strata a) Capturing of Desiring-production b) Coding and Decoding Desire a) Territorial Production Function of Strata a) Transcendent Command Structures 1) Law 2) Shakur and Imprisonment 17)9 Part II Capitalism: Axiomatics a) Flux b) Opposition to Coding 1) Prices 2) Demand c) Abstraction d) The New Deal 1) Chile Capitalist Axiomatic a) Striation b) Power-Lines 1) Centre of Exchange 2) Expansion Absolute Limit a) Crisis: The Centre and Internal Third Worlds bý.'Anti-market' and 'Market' c) Limits d) Axiomatics e) Lines of Escape Qo ý C? 16

Key to Abbreviations and Thesis Outline vii Part 1111 Capitalism and Schizophrenia a) Relationship to Marx 1) Despot c) Divergence from Marx d) De-Socialization 1) Peripheral Zones a) Low-level Interactions 2) Displacement: Demographics a) Crisis 3) Fortification Stratification -a) 1) A Fortress of Desire 4) Models of Realization e) The Future 33 Part IV 43 Market Prices a) Uncertainty b) The Neo-Classical Approach (Orthodox Economics) c) Consuming the Future Meshwork Structures a) Intensive Economic arena b) Reductionist Model Organs Body Without Introduction to the c) Chapter 11: Body without Organs Part I Body without Organs: Assemblages (Repulsive) Machine Paranoiac a) b) Miraculating Machine (Attractor) System 'Destiny' the of q) Subject a) Attractive Attributes b) Repulsive Attributes Difference a) Eliminating Transcendence b) Spinoza's Contribution c) Immanence 5o 55 5K

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism IV Chronology/Machinic unconscious a) Lines of Flight b) Examples by Artaud and Massumi V Notion of History a) Movement within the Machinic Phylum b) What role does intensity have in the discourseof complex systems? VI Marx/Freud Polemic Pragmatics a) Fusional Multiplicity Part 11 %, --, H viii S4- SS ' Strata a) Splitting Intensity b) Fossilization c) Striatal Apparatus 0/19 Stratification a) Production of the 'World' b) Territorialization c) Relationship to Axiornatics qO Part 1111 State Formation (Despot) Striation Space of a) b) F irst and Last Emperors c) Recoding d) Appearing in a 'Single Stroke' 9-3 Introduction to the 'Anti-Market': The Stratification of the World-Economy Chapter 111:The Stratification of the World-Economy Part I Nomadic-MesMvork Structures Bloc-formations State a) b) NAFTA c) Chase-Dunnand Podobnik 1) Short Digression on China Part 11 81 9-? 94

Key to Abbreviations and Thesis Outline Mact-opolifics a) Top-down Imposition 1) East and West Hegemonies 2) Isomotphism 3) Braudel I ix la b) Antisystemic Movements 1) Economic Models for Investment 2) Synergetics 14 IV &V Parts 1111, I (Non)State Actors a) Delanda's Mar in the Age of Intelligent Machines b) Netivat- and Cyhei-war 1) Information Technology 2) Economic Micro-Systems 3) Mongols, as example II Criticism of Delanda a) via Cyberwar III Summary Chapter IV: Geopolitics: Antisystemic Movements of Resistance 119 Introduction Part I I Molar and the Molecular a) Niches Id Manuel Delanda Models Economic Top-down Traditional Problems with a) b) Reasonsfor Above c) Critique of Delanda )a) Part II Geopolitics a) Los Angeles: 'World City Economy' b) Power Centres c) Antisystemic Movements )go

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism x Chronicle of LA's Housing (1781) City Birth the a) of b) Reterritorialization/Exclusion 1) Homeowners' Associations 2) Anti-African Housing Associations 3) Jim Crow Laws Part III I De-industrialization a) PostmodernCapitalism b) Economic Micro-systems 1),Flexible Accumulation: Drug Trade a) Commodities-styleExportei-s' Association b) Statistics from The L,conomist c) WFIFTA, Andean Pact and Mercosur Agreements Experimentation on the Molecular Plane a) Probe Head in Geohistory, Geopolitics and Geophilosophy Chapter V: Palimpsest: Toward a Minor Literature in Monstrosity Application: Inscription a) Strata: Absolute Difference b) Law Introduction to Shakur's Monster: TheAutobiography ofan LA. Gang Member a) Function of the Minor b) Minor Literature H Stratigraphy a) Instance of High-level Control b) How is it possible to re-influence the strata? Monstrosity Enunciation: Collective Assemblage of c) d) Multiplicities 1) Deterritorialization with a Complementary Reterritorialization 2) Numbering Number 3) Third World Charting Shakur's life into Initiation the Gang World a) b) Tribalism 1) Lines of Race c).Youth Training School d) New Afrikan IndependenceMovement in Motion' 'Machine e) /SY

Key to Abbreviations and Thesis Outline xi Writing Machine 1) Discontinuous Assemblages 2) Cocking a Handgun a) Immanent Communication IV Palimpsest:Critique of Shakur a) Genealogical Suppression 1) Numbered Number Suppression 2) Differentiation )30 b) Folding Back: Reterritorialization c) Race as Minoritarian d) Stfength: Minor Language Concluding Remarks: 'Class Consciousness' and 'The American Rhizome' a) 'Class Consciousness'and 'The American Rhizome' 1) Identification with Class (Majoritarian) 2) The West: 'The American Rhizome' b) Minor Issues 1) Definable States 2) 'Crystals of Becoming' c) Diagraming Peripheral Movements 1) Los Angeles: The 'Worker' 2) Late Capitalism 3) Geophilosophy and Micropolitics d) Identification with Majoritarian Systems 1) 'Universal Consciousnessin the Proletariat' 2) Marxism 3) Capture by Strata 4) Alternative Strategies e) The Minoritarian and America 1) 'American Rhizome' 2) Mapping America and the West a) Geological Plates b) Rhizomatic Territory 3) Deleuze and Guattari's Relationship to Europe a) Relationship to EuropeanDiscourse 1) Class Consciousness 2) Capture PrecedesOppression Tagging Peripheral Zones 1) 'Tearing' Flows from the Centre )-74

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism xii 2) The Perspective on America 3) Limitations of Marxism g) The Importance of Geopolitics 1) Construction of Micropolitics 2) Minoritarian Becomings 110\ Tables Bibliography I q's

Introduction

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 2 A theory is exactly like a box of tools [ ] It must be useful. It must ... function. And not for itself. If no one uses it, beginning with the theoretician himself (who then ceasesto be a theoretician), then the theory is worthless or the moment is inappropriate. We don't revise a theory, but construct new ones; we have no choice but to make others [ ]A theory does not totalize; it is an instrument for multiplication ... and it also multiplies itself. It is in the nature of power to totalize and it is your position, and one I fully agreewith, that theory is by nature opposed to power. As soon as a theory is enmeshedin a particular point, we realize that it will never possess the slightest practical importanceunlessit can erupt in a totally different area (Foucault, '11", p.208). The primary importance of Deleuze and Guattari's joint work is in their analysis of capitalism. Of particular interest for this study is the displacementof internal Third Worlds into the Centre of the capitalist world-economy, a cartographyof a core power and peripheral zones. By addressingthe issues that are involved in this study, the introduction will provide a general overview of the problems concerninginternal Third Worlds, and will discuss certain writers that have an important role in this study. The conversationreported in the above excerpt, on the role of intellectuals in politics, took place between Gilles Deleuze and Michel Foucault on March 4 1972. In the sameyear, Gilles Deleuze and Mix Guattari published their critical thesis on 1 LAnti-Oedipe. Between this psychoanalysis,marxism, structuralism, and capitalism: first volume of Capitalisme et Schizophi-inie and the second-Mille Plateaux, which was published in 1980-Deleuze and Guattan also waged their positive critique against the canonical interpretations of Franz Kafka. Kajka: Pour tine fill6rature mineum (1975) set the agendafor re-evaluating traditional psychoanalytical interpretations of the author. By fragmenting transcendent,oedipalized notions within psychoanalysis, they set the stage for a machinic hecomingin Kafka's work. The machinic becoming 'As Lyotard notes: 'In spite of its title, Anti-Oedipus is not a critical book. Rather, like the AntiChrist, it is a positive, assertivebook-,an energeticposition inscribed in discourse [ ]' ('EC', p. 11). ...

Introduction is a positive assemblagethat bifurcates within a political, as well as an economic, arenaof imnianence:a minor literature. The two forces of the political and economic inextricably entwined. ]Immanencehas to be distinguished from transcendence,for are the former is matter in the play of forces. To designate the latter, namely transcendence,'[ ] is to fabricate a beneficentGod to explain geological movements' ... (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p.3). Their last joint work, Quest-ce que la philosophie? (1991), -is in certain respects-a summation of their venture in 'CapiOlism ý4nd Schizophrenia.However, there is a sombre ingredient to the text, a mode of thought unprecedented in their earlier books.2 Quest-ce que la philosophie? portrays a movement of possibilities confronting thought on the edge of chaos: an operation within the framework of the Arts, Scienceand Philosophy. In addition to Deleuze and Guattari's joint work, the writings of Braudel are of immenseimportance to understandingthe complex relationship betweencapitalism and peripheral sectorsthat are drawn on the Earth, a topography of power Centresand Third World zones. The evolution of 'anti-market' forces that systemize the commodification of surplus-productionare meticulously elucidated in Braudel's three volume set, Civilization and Capitalism 15th - 18th Century. Specifically, capitalism is not designated by particular stages of growth, as in the traditional view of economics,but rather through its ability to adapt to changing conditions: to slip from form in to times of crisis or one or sector another, notice at a moment's (Braudel, decline CC, p.433). The perspective of growth in profit rates' pronounced ýl am thinking of the opening sentencespennedby Deleuze to introduce What is Philosophy?: The question Owl is philosophy? can perhapsbe posedonly late in life, with the arrival of old age and the time for speaking concretely [...] It is a questionposed in a moment of quiet restlessness,at midnight, when there is no longer anything to ask [ ...] There was too much desire to do philosophy to wonder what it was, except as a stylistic exercise. That point of nonstyle where one can fwally say, "What is it I have been doing all my life? " had not been reached' (Deleuze & Guattari, TVIP,p. 1).

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 4 in the world-economy has traditionally baseditself upon various stagescapitalism has gone through in its path to 'maturity', a development resulting in 'true' capitalism. Braudel critiques the limitations posed by this thought that advocatescapitalism's progressiveand orderly growth to presentday 'maturity'. Instead, Braudel excavates the sedimentedelementsthat contribute to the formation of capitalism by analyzing the 'degreesof stratification' that have producedour economic history? A genealogy of economics.,Braudel's thesis of capitalism is found in the capturing"of ihtbn§ity'by the strata (capitalism), an operation that propagatesa core zone from which all flows of captured intensity are developed.Braudel's influence in this study is found in the analysis of Centre zones: the function of power and its relationship to the commodification of the Earth. Capitalism is always associated with power structures that axiomatize peripheral massesinto quantifiable zones. In appropriating Braudel's thesis of the Centre in the capitalist matrix, I also use the writings of Wallerstein. Wallerstein's work concerns itself with contemporary power structures that systemically monopolize desiring-production back into the Centre. The historical system that Wallerstein employs to isolate developmentswithin the capitalist worldeconomy is similar to Braudel's. More importantly, Wallerstein's diagram of antisystemic movementsof resistance plays a crucial role in this study's mapping of heterogeneous assemblagesthat resist the current power structures designed to axiornatize flows within a configuration of surplus-production. An instance of geopolitics, current antisysternicmovementsproducelow-level interactionsthat decode "It would however be a mistake to imagine capitalism as something that developedin a series or leaps-from- mercantile capitalism to industrial capitalism to finance capitalism, with some kind of regular progressionfrom one phaseto the next, with "true" capitalism appearingonly at the late stage when it took over production, and the only permissible term for the early period being mercantile capitalism or even "pre-capitalism"' (Braudel, CCC, p.621).

Introduction traditional models of socio-economic behaviour. Contemporary geopolitics concerns itself with the apparatusesof capturethat suppressminoritarian hecomingswithin the socius (Wallerstein, GG, p.68ff). The capacity to capture flows of production into homogeneoussectors on the surface of the Earth, is not only a continuation of Braudel's and Wallerstein's research,but it also provides this study with tools to map the current dynamics that veer the socius into diverse interactions. It is always a ' desiring-prbduction flows from leak that the 'tracking question'of stfata. The strata sediment flows into blockages by building upon captured intensity, intensity layering layering that fonns belts, interlinking the whole apparatus upon of a (re)inscribing base: the Earth, the to the world-economy a capitalist of capture power Centre zone. A re-inscription of desire, axiomatics are the regulating pathways and desire bridging that that the capitalist shape zones world-economy, conduits of traversesupon the Earth into commodified wholes, and creating internal Third Worlds in the midst of the Centre. Many socio-economic authors have applied the formulations derived from Braudel's inquiry into the relationship between power and capitalism to their individual writings. The first part of this study investigates such work. Of particular interest for this study has been the examination undertakenby Delanda, concerning he derives from bridging the and conclusions power structures; current models of seemingly disparate discourses, such as complexity science and socio-economic history, into a cohesive and tangible theoretical trajectory of desire. Thus, Braudel's 4'After 500 years (the period that this has beengoing on) we have begun to reach a relatively high degreeof commodification in the world-economy, a processwhose configuration logically approaches an asymptote.As the processapproachesthe asymptoteit becomesmore and more difficult to solve middle-run problems; this kind of process has created the long-nm so-called structural crisis that involves a long period of transition in which historical choices are wide open' (Wallcrstein, GG, p.40). The relationship betweenThird Worlds and the Centreis fully developedin the latter half of the study.

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 6 emphasisof carefully gauging the historical attractors(flows) that sedimentinto molar formations, is taken up by Delanda's current researchinto self-organizing systems. Delanda's materialist investigation explores the relationship between attractors capturedby the Centre, and the homogeneoussedimentationsthat inscribe on regions foundations body implementing by the theoretical the without organs; and provided of Deleuzeand Guattari and Braudel, Delandajuxtaposescurrent complexity sciencewith socio-economic,-analyses --in the t capitalist world-economy. For --instance,, by diagramming pathwaysthe nation-Statedevisesto captureintensity into homogeneous wholes, Delanda's fVar in the Age of Intelligent Machines examines the historical appropriation of the nomad war machine by the strata. The text utilizes the tools in is by Guattari Deleuze to that technology warfare and argue cybernetic produced imminent.' Moreover, in applying the tools provided by A Thousand Plateaus, in particular the conceptof the machinic Phylum, Delanda chartsthe particular attractors that determine the future behaviour of systemswithin specific mediums: 'figures of destiny' that have the potential to bifurcate the existing homogeneity of the Centre into potentially diverse set of relations.' Even though this study incorporates the theoretical foundation Delanda explicatesthrough Deleuze and Guattari and Braudel, it neverthelessproducesdifferent conclusionsthan those suggestedby Delanda. This is not to arguethat Delanda's contribution to current socio-economictheory is invalid, but that there are limitations to the coordinateshe develops within the concept of the 5"Me transfer of control from the body to the machine that inark-sthe beginning of the evolution of software was part of the process,describedby historian Michel Foucault in Discipline and Punish, the body to increaseits potential, while simultaneouslyreducing its mastery over its new of discipliningZD acquired skills' (Delanda, WAIM, p. 168). 641introduce the term "machinic phylum" to designatea single phylogenctic fine cutting through all matter, "living" or "nonliving, " a single source of spontaneousorder for all of reality' (Delanda, 'NOL', p. 138).

Introduction machinic phylum and the possibilities it presentsfor minoritarian becomings.While advocating Delanda's work throughout this study, I also elucidate the short-comings that are apparentwith his research. The second half of this study devotes itself to specific empirical trajectories that are presently changing the relationship between the Centre zone and peripheral sectorsinto geopolitical movements.,Geopolitics is the medium'by W10ch"hii-ndfitdriaii assemblagesconvergewith current socio-economichomogeneity,patterningnew levels of interactions between the Centre and Third Worlds, redistributing transcendent 'spatial apartheid' into local compositions, and realigning ghettoized sectors within post-industrial capitalism. Geopolitics is situatedwithin the cartography of the Centre and its internal Third World, bifurcating (molar) sequences of repression that systemically (re)capture desire within the stratification of the world-economy. By recoding desireinto commodified wholes, the strata (capitalism) demarcatezonesfrom which all flows are distributed from the Centre.The key to understandingthe complex dynamicsthrough which the stratareterritorialize flows of commodity production back into the capitalist world-economy, is to diagram contemporary, geopolitical systems that resist the molar striation of space. The coordinates that produce a topography intensity, layering layering buildingboundaries the the upon a city are of within of block segments that separate desire from itself. a core zone with internal Third Worlds. Having set up a theoretical systemthat specifically dealswith the perpetuation focuses in first latter in the the the the world-economy part, part of study of capitalism homogeneous Angeles Los the the that are presently challenging region on areasof

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 8 strata. In examining Los Angeles as the intersection of post-industrial capitalism (the Centre) and Third Worlds, this study appliesthe socio-economicfonnulations that are developed in the earlier part of the study to minoritarian.becomings. The pragmatics deal issues that minoritarian to this socio-economic empirically with of approachare becomings are presently confronting. Thus, the secondpart of this study zooms into the city of Los Angeles, producing vivid accountsof present day interactions within the confines-of the strata, documentingthe assemblagesthat resist fet&rritorializdtioh; into desire history that the a systemic socio-economic -sediments and analyzing Centres, is discuss It that perpetually to the power essential of mass. surveillance hand; into block desire to the at otherwise, a study segments, recode systems of itself limits to only abstract, the the of world-economy stratification critique of theoretical problems. This brings us to Mike Davis, urban critic and Los Angeles historian, whose work is discussedat length in the second half of this study. The levels Angeles, Future Los Davis Quartz: Excavating City in the a critique of author of becomings into isolate Centres that the a grid of ghettoized minoritarian power at 7 bases in Los history Charting the and power of class/racialsegregation suppression. Angeles, Davis engages in pragmatics similar to Braudel's discussion of the demonstrate both the genealogical axis the authors world-economy: stratification of that structure power bases around specific Centres; both specialize in mapping the intricate micro-fissures that crack the homogeneous Centre; and both trace the "Welcome to post-liberal Los Angeles, where the defenseof luxury lifestyles is translated into a by "armed in the ubiquitous undergirded space and movement, proliferation of new repressions response". This obsession with physical security systems, and, collaterally, with the architectural in become has boundaries, the narrative a master of urban a zeitgeist restructuring, policing of social debating Yet the role of built 1990s. theory, the urban whether contemporary of environment emerging dispersion discussing in "postmodem the technologies of urban or space", precipitating electronic fimctions acrosspoly-centeredmetropolitan "galaxies",hasbeenstrangelysilent about the militarization level' CQ, life (Davis, the p.221). visible at street city so grimly of

Introduction 9 coordinatesCpower lines) of the capitalist matrix that saturatedesire into suppression. By tabling the apparatusesof capture that have shapedand developed contemporary Los Angeles since the city's birth (1781), Davis's micro history is within Braudel's global perspective of the capitalist world-economY. By fusing the two authors, this study focuses on aspectsthat are not coveredby them individually; and by graphing the Los Angeles terrain, this study produces alternative strategies for minoritarian becomingswithin the stratification of the capitalist world-economy."'-*- --- -" Davis's writings cover a wide spectrumof American socialist politics, spanning the historical suppressionof labour (union) movementsin open-shopLos Angeles, to surveying the evolution of edge cities that have resulted from the Angeleno 'whiteflight', to covering regional movementsthat circumvent post-industrial 'depressions' arising from late capitalism, particularly, in South Central Los Angeles. Even though his approach to a socialist, socio-economic history is almost extinct in the contemporarywest coast of the US, Davis, nevertheless,combines the gritty realism of Los Angeles with Hollywood film noir, producing an elegant treatise that foretells the future of cities to come. Unlike many boostersof Los Angeles that are blind to the blue in Third Davis's the World the consists city, agenda of collar zones existenceof by late been has to the that periphery capitalism's postsystemically pushed class industrialism. This plane consists of African-Americans, Latin-Americans, Hispanics and a generally impoverished sector of the regional economy. To gauge the current micro-political movementsin Los Angeles and the levels of geopolitical resistancethat data this and statistics to negotiate of appropriates a plethora study are present, between what Davis argues is the current state of Los Angeles and what this study presentsas low-level, minoritarian becomings.Moreover, by utilizing current data on

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 10 the socio-economicsof Los Angeles, micro-political assemblagesare not only located within the striated belts of the capitalist world-economy, but they also provide an analysis of the apparatusof capture. The study also appropriates Deleuze and Guattari's minor literature, by mapping Sanyika Shakur's, aka Monster Kody Scott's, Monster: The Autobiography ofan L.A. Gang Member onto the cartographyof desire in South Central Los Angeles. The objective of zooming into'Shakur's autobiographyis-to focus 6ii"the'r6lati6fishio the strata have to an individual, chronicling the movements that propagate the deterritorialization (coupled with a complementary reterritorialization) onto the apex of post-industrialization. The geopolitical immediacy of Shakur's writing-machine is the becoming-minoritarian,an economyof immanent desirethat decodesthe sedentary in Universalization that advance. This locates the posits a plane of stratification suppressionof desire not only within the capitalist world-economy, but also in the socio-economic demarcation of race. Shakur's autobiography is the first-hand ' in Wallerstein internal Centre. Third Worlds While Braudel the and of experience discuss,at length, the elementsthat createsedimentationson the surface of the Earth, Shakur's tale is told from the other end of this European,capitalist 'experiment'. By producing an immanent architecture that re-influences the strata with machinic potentiality, Shakur's South Central Los Angeles dismantlesbinary oppositionsstored As (historical) the title suggests,Shakur's the the super-stratum. memory of within initiation into the gang world of Los Angeles; but the the rites autobiography charts 8'1have pushedpeople violently out of this existenceand have fathered three children. I have felt completely free and have sat in total solitary confinement in San Quentin state prison. I have shot in been in have I have South Central and been times myself shot seven gunfights people and numerous knife fights in Folsom state prison. Today, I languish at the bottom of one of the strictest maximum-security state prisons in this country' (Shakur, M, p.xiii).

Introduction II importance of the text is explicated in the assemblageof becoming-monster,such as ' a wolf. In designating a becoming, Shakur's 'Machine in Motion' is a tag, or, intensity, line functions locate that to the geopolitical of flight. Even though, molecular Shakur is presently confined to a maximum security prison in California, the machinic voices generatedfrom his autobiographyarethe antisysternicmovementsof resistance that challenge the presenthomogeneity of the strata.10 -..--- Connecting Shakur -to the authors discussed above is -polemical,- especially within academic discourse. And, yet, that is where his importance lies: having educated himself while serving his sentence(s) in prison, his writing is a journey into the myriad layers of captured intensity that keep us all bound to the strata. By cataloguingthe striation of spaceto the reterritorialization of desire to the suppression of the minor in Los Angeles, Shakur's prison-writing communicates a machinic potentiality that is reminiscent of such authorsas, de Sade,Genet and GeorgeJackson. To produce a perspective on capitalism that sets limits to its growth by creating Third Worlds," would be incomplete without witnessing the first-hand experience of an 9Referto Delcuze & Guattari, ATP, '1914: One or Several WolvesT pp.26-38, for an extended discussionon becoming-wolE Chapter IV briefly examinesthe function of becoming-wolf in relation to the stratification within psychoanalysis. "Ibe F.B.I. and the rest of the authorities have the namesof everyonewho has ever beento Youth Authority in a huge data bank in Washington. When you go to state or federal prison, they simply in bank. involved data If their you get anything they think is notewordW-and everything is update noteworthy to a hunter-they put it in your file in their data bank. ney know what you may do long before it happens,as well as what you have the potential to do. Becausegang actions are seen as selfdestructive and not a threat to the security of this country, it's not necessaryfor them to stop you. But if you begin to questionthe right of those in authority or resist the chains that constantlybind you, then you'll be elevated as a security risk and more than likely put in the Agitators Index file. I've been in the Agitators Index since 1986' (Shakur, M, pp.321-322). "Capitalism continually sets and then repels its own limits, but in so doing gives rise to numerous flows in all directions that escapeits axiomatic [ ...] It does not effect the "conjugation" of the deterritorialized and decoded flows without those forging ahead;without their escapingboth the axiomatic that conjugatesthem and the models that reterritorialize them; without their tending to enter into "connections" that delineate a new Land [ ] we are referring [ ] to the coexistence and ... ... inseparability of that which the system conjugates,and that which never ceasesto escapeit following

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 12 individual who surpassessuch zones of suppression. To localize a trajectory of becoming in Shakur's South Central Los Angeles is the revolutionary potential that 12 desire. Shakur's minoritarian language is the capacity to deterritorialize charts Centres of power to a machinic becoming, to supplant zones of control to decoded desire, and to fonnulate a strategy... and, yet, he is confined to a solitary cell in Northem Califomia... 13 'Writing has nothing to do with signifying. It has to do -with -surveying, mapping, even realms that are yet to come' (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, pp.4-5). lines of flight that are themselvesconnectable' (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, pp.472-73). "'It is this plasticity or viscosity that traces everywhere and nowhere the difference between political economyand libidinal economy, and owing to which in particular, a great savageconfiguration (a great apparatus)-for examplcý-canbe disinvested,pipes and filters can fall into obsolescenceand the libido can be distributed differently in another configuration: it is thus in this viscosity that all revolutionary potential lies' (Lyotard, 'EC', p.26). "'To break-with the set, I'd had to draw on my well of strength and sum up the courageto step out of myself, my set, my learned ways and take an objective look at what was going on in the world around me. This had been neither easy nor comfortable. The process was slow, often obscured, and always painful. I'd had to look back beyond the good times and happy days to the tears and griefstricken faces of mothers who had lost their children. I've found that unless you have children you'll never know what it's like to lose a child. I'd had to open my eyes and earsto hear the soundsof clips being pushed in and weapons being cocked, screeching car tires, running feet, the hunted and the hunters, the suddenblasts of gunfire; to see the twisted, lifeless bodies, the wounded still trying to run or crawl, the yellow homicide tape being strung, the tears over a family's lack of funds for a proper burial, die drugs, the alcohol, the angry faces-this process,the way of fife for so many, repeateditself over and over. These are the scenesthat contributed to my awareness:a firsthand knowledge of life and death on the lines of all-out war' (Shakur, M, p.376).

Chapter I Consuming the Future

[ ] Subjectivity is not necessarily uniform, but rather very differentiated. It is ... differentiated as a function of the requirementsof production, as a function of racial segregations,as a function of sexual segregations,as a function of x difference, becausethe objective is not to create a universal subjectivity, but to continue to reproducesomething that guaranteespower [ ...]. Mix Guattari, interview (1985)

Chapter 1: Consuming the Future 15 I The rule of continually producing production, of grafting producing onto the product, is a characteristicof desiring-machinesor of primary production: the production of production (Deleuze& Guattari, AO, p.7). [ ] Breaks or interruptions are not the result of an analysis; rather in ... and of themselves, they are syntheses.Synthesesproduce divisions. (ibid, p.41). Capitalism and Schizophreniais a machinic assemblagethat dismantleshomogeneous tiers -(strata);- a --pi-agmatics-rather than-a claim -to Truth, a- model--that--activates ' immanence is diagrammatic Its production. of machinic rather than textual: processes at variance with the transcendent apparatusesthat have occupied the history of ' philosophy. What is at stake is its functionality, a production of a plane (plateau)that perpetuatesitself, a line that intersects with other machines of desh-e: molecular ' machine, writing machine, revolutionary machine... In this chapter, we discuss various aspects of the apparatus of capture that stratifies desiring-production. Of interest function becomings in is the minoritarian of relation to the capitalist particular into discussing Centre, Third Worlds By the the capture we of world-economy. "Philosophy does not consist in knowing and is not inspired by truth. Rather, it is categorieslike Interesting, Remark-able,or Important determinesuccessor failure' (Deleuze & Guattari, WIP, p.82). "There is no difference betweenwhat a book talks about and how it is made. Therefore a book has no object' (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p.4). See Deleuze and Guattari, ATP, p. 141ff, for particulars surrounding the function of the diagram: 'The diagrammatic [ ...] does not function to represent,even something real, but rather constructs a real that is yet to come, a new type of reality' (p.142). 'Desire-desiring-production-is a compassused throughout Capitalism and Schizophrenia,as well as this study, to chart the (de)stratification of the world-economy and molecular (re)tcrritorializations. Though other ternis will be usedto tag desire,suchas 'gangs', 'assemblages','nomads', 'multiplicities', 'minor processes','antisystemic movements of resistance' and 'market exchanges',they nevertheless J ] desire by desire: does not take as its object persons or things, flux is that to the generated refer ... but the entire surroundingsthat it traverses,the vibrations and flows of every sort to which it is joined, introducing therein breaks and captures-an always nomadic and migrant desire [ I' (Deleuze & ... Guattari, AO, p.292). And: 'To desire consists of this: to make cuts, to let certain contrary flows run, to take samplingsof the flows, to cut the chains that are wedded to the flows. There is no meaning, no interpretation to be given, no significance' (Guattari, Chaosophy,p.76).

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 16 diagram the minoritarian as being a continuous process.In playing an important role in Deleuze and Guattari's writings, the minoritarian processis the zone of machinic becomings, a mapping of heterogeneouselementsthat bifurcate the layers of strata that bind desiring-production to a molarization." The strata depend upon the capture of desiring-production (machinic flows desiring-production impedes An thwarts of capture of and processes). apparatus - The-strata them- from leaking out of the social strata,''an instance of -aXidms. desiring-production, intensity. The strata are an overcoding of reterritorialize constellations of rigid and homogeneouslinks that coordinate and produce a global molarization, thereby allocating desiring-production as something above production itself The capturing of desiring-production to a transcendent globalization is the (re)coding by the strata: 'To code desire-and the fear, the anguishof decodedflows-is the business of the socius' (Deleuze & Guattari, AO, p. 139). The strata code and decodedesiring-production in order to maintain an equilibrium between the fields of forces of the transcendentState,and in order to prevent intensity from bifurcating into 'Bifurcations are important to Deleuze and Guattari's analysisof capitalism. They suggestthat there hand, incremental, in the there the two types are gradual changes,an one of change capitalism: on are instance of variation; and, on the other, there are the sudden catastrophic changes of regimes. The bifurcation is By is bifurcations. kind variation and at what at stake with placing of change second opposite endsof the continuum of change,Deleuze and Guattari designatethe different transformations that occur in the socius. Biffircations split homogeneoussystems, or apparatusesof capture, into diverse, molecular for These the possibility of dynamic and creative movements to take transformations allow elements. place within the apparatusof capture. The primary importance of bifurcations lies in this process that bifurcations By diagramming the the within the socius, we can map strata. of configuration challenges bifurcations by '[ ] the the the that world set up of mechanisms strata: coding escape assemblages ... The IVAIM, 9, 236). 'world in (Delanda, the p. nature' note source of creativity andvariability represents of bifurcations' plays a crucial role in the analysisof internal Third Worlds that are placed in the Centre of the capitalist world-economy. The relationship that existsbetweenthe deterritorialization of the strata ] lies '[ The process of desiring-production 'source this the creativity'. of within recapturing of and ... incamating bifurcations into attractorsand these,in turn, into concretephysical systems,has beengiven the name of "stratification": the creation of the stable geological, chemical and organic strata that make up reality' (ibid).

Chapter 1: Consuming the Future 17 ' (minoritarian bureaucracy desire. The machinic potentiality assemblages):a of compartmentalization and cellular partitioning of desiring-production erects a judgement of God by reterritorializing intensity to a categorization of life forms, stratified through the representationsof genus and species. Desire, however, is not representationalbut entirely productive; it is the machinic production of the reaL Since desire, in its molecular usage, does not have an-object,there-is -nodifferentiation betweenreality and desire."Tlfdf'd*i§-fi66fit6l69i6'dl difference between desire and its effect and at no level of analysis can there be a separationof desirefrom its production. 'There is no needto distinguish here between producing and its product' (Deleuze & Guattari, AO, p.7); desire is entirely positive ' is is is the the and outcome of machine: nothing outside of what produced. Desire only becomesrepresentationalwhen the strata capture intensities into homogeneous units, an implementationthat unifies minoritarian assemblagesinto globalized wholes. The capturing of desire is a resurfacing of production into tangible units of identity, 5,[ ] Codes continue to exist-even as an archaism: they assumea function that is perfectly -but ... contemporary and adapted to the situation within personified capital (the capitalist, the worker, the mercliant, the banker) [ ...] flows ofcode that are both interior and exterior to the machine, forming the elements of a technology and even a science' (Delcuze & Guattari, AO, p.232). 'Input and output are the binary operationsof the connective synthesis,the particular assemblages of desire being equivalent to a flow. The flows are energetic or libidinal in continuously varying quantities. The binary series of input and output are the partial objects of the priniary process in that there is a perpetual assemblageof desire. This being the ininianent plane of the synthesisit details the be At the the stage can process connective axis. no consummatedas a self-sufficient usage of partial global object on the molecular axis, as was evidencedby the earth being the first global and molar whole socius.This leadsDeleuzeand Guattari to clarify processesbetweenthe non-specific and specific, whereby the former is the molecular usageinsofar as wholes are additive and the latter is the process of substituted wholes. The earth as specific entails a global molarization of its process of an endless stream of partial objectsjumping to the end of the assemblage.In other words, it is an attempt to build from the start that which is going to be assembled(producing global objects from non-specific processes).'If desire produces,its product is real. If desire is productive, it can be productive only in the real world and can produce only reality. Desire is the set of passive swithesesthat engineerpartial objects, flows, and bodies, and that function as units of production. The real is the end product, the result of the passive synthesisof desire as autoProductionof the unconscious.Desire and its object are one and the same thing: the machine, as a machine of a machine. Desire is a machine, and the object of desire is another machine connectedto it' (ibid, p.26).

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 18 an apparatusof (re)coding. By stratifying desire into a global object, a unity emerges in advanceinsofar as desire becomescontingent upon what is libidinally available.' Under the conditions of territorial production we find the first socius and the is The the than of earth as something other above production! earth placement or seenas territorial or standing above itself This is an attempt to collapse all machinic into is The the transcendence. transcendent the usage of synthesis processes presupposition of an outcome-in advance-ofthe,flows connecting.- Tife ýobius is the locus of transcendencesince it develops from the notion of a social being (a global entity that accountsfor production). Society is hierarchically organized as a substitute for the whole. Wherever there is a socius, there is a transcendentusage of desiring- machines. The function of the strata fundamentally lies in their capacity to capture intensity for the purposesof composing a substituted whole from partial, molecular flows. This is achievedthrough transcendentcommand structuresthat bifurcate local variables of heterogeneous intensity into a genealogy of suppression-'[ ...] one suspects,we shall find a great deal of severity, cruelty, and pain' (Nietzsche, GM, is is law One the transcendent 64). that the worth noting of apparatuses of capture p. that is inscribed (coded) and reinscribed (recoded) on the palimpsest of desire. The 'See Table I for the differences resulting from the molecular and molar usage of desiringproduction. "For there is no less an econonzy,an energeticsin that which will regulate lineagesand alliances and thus distribute the flows of intensity in concretionsof roles, personsand goods on the surface of the socius, finally producing what is called the organization of savagesociety (an organism that is in fact never unified, always divided betweenthe thousandpoles of small, multiple organs,partial objects, libidinal segments[ ] )-no less an economy in the laws of kinship, no less an economy even in the ... distribution of the libido on the surface of the organlessbody, in the hooking-up of small, desiring, energy transforming, and pleasure-seeking organs,than in the economics and distribution of capital, no less of a producing-inscribing apparatusthere than here' (Lyotard, 'EC', p. 18).

Chapter 1: Consuming the Future 19 palimpsest can be the body of 'The Penal Colony'-[ ...] the penalty that writes both the verdict and the rule that has been broken' (Deleuze and Guattari, AO, p.212)-the prescription and the paradoxical aspectof writing the punishmentupon the body, even through the letters will go unread by the guilty who is being punished. The inscribed law appears as the juridical forra which arises in a single stroke; '[ ]a pure and ... empty form without content, the object of which remains unknowable: the law can be expressedonly through a sentence,-andthe *sentence-can--belearned-only-through' a punishment.No one knows the law's interior'(Deleuze & Guattari, K, p.43). The strata loom acrossthe horizon, appeanng with a strategy in a single moment, manifesting an abstract unity that renders desiring-production up to a cartography of the State machine.The strata are separatedby an eternal,non-negotiabledistinction that covers the entire production apparatus:a judgement of God. Desire is, therefore, striated into a hierarchically orchestrated zone of repression, juridically binding itself to the apparatusof the Statemachine, and assuringthe continuous recoding of heterogeneity to a systematicmanipulation of desire.' 'Even though I present an in-depth discussion of Sanyika Shakur's, aka Monster Kody Scott's, Monster. The Autobiography of an L.A. Gang Member in chapter V, the following is an excerpt that provides an inverse to the juridical economy set up by the strata. Imprisonment is also an inscription the law inflicts on an individual's life, a recoding that is rarely erased,placing an 'indelible scar' on an existence.The representationalmodel of imprisonment is to display punishment to the rest of the socius: the higher the security of the prison the more lethal the crime; the stricter the prison the harsher the inscription of the law on a life: an organizedand precisemodel implementedto deter transgressions within the strata.Yet, as Shakur explains, the inscribing system the stratautilize to recodea life through imprisonment fractures immanently, creating an implosion that reversesthe purpose of capturing a life behind bars. When respectincreasesdue to the higher level of security that one is in, the function of imprisoning someoneis collapsing: 'What we did in the juvenile tank was reflected inside the prisons where we were headed.The rank systemnever ended.Just as it was on the streetwith continuouslevels of recognition, so too was it in jail. Those in placement-foster homes--looked up to those in juvenile hall, those in juvenile hall looked up to those in camp, those in camp looked up to those in Youth Authority, and those in Youth Authority looked up to those in prison. Most of us in the juvenile tank looked up to those in prison, becausethat's where the district attorney was trying to send us' (Shakur, M, p. 163). Furthermore,recent statistics releasedby the US Government tell a shocking story of race determining incarceration: '[ ] 565 out of every 100,000 Americans are behind bars. And although ... blacks comprise only 13% of the population, they account for almost half the country's 1.4m inmates' (The Economist,December9-15 1995). It is not surprising, then, that Shak-ur'snarration of recognition,

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 20 III [ ] The decodingof flows in capitalism has freed, deterritorialized, and ... decodedthe flows of code just as it has the others-to such a degree that the axiomatic machine has always increasingly internalized them in its body or its structure as a field of forces (Deleuze & Guattari, AO, p.233). Capitalism forms with a general axiomatic of decodedflows (Delouze & Guattari, ATP, p.453). Capitalism is stratified. The strata are the social machinery that axiomatize desiring-production in the socius. Axiomatics are a socio-economic apparatusthat capture (reterritorialize) desire in the capitalist world-economy. Axiomatics function as a social machinery by implementing solutions quantitatively, as opposedto codes that have predefined solutions already built into the system. Axiomatics allow for a materialist account of application" by tracing the quantitative flows of the strata. The general axiomatic of decoded flows representsa flow theory of production and consumption whereby capital is not reinstated into a governing, all-encompassing class, that controls all aspectsof law, wealth, religion and writing. It is rather via the channel of perpetually decoding and deterritorializing (for example naked tabour or independentcapital), that capitalism disintegratescoding by employing flows of profit " be in to to threshold. continuously reabsorbed order reach a capitalist and capital being basedon a hierarchically structured system ('looked up to'), relies on the level of imprisonment one is in to have acknowledgement.Granted,this systemof recognition (and respect) is similar to what the strata institute (for example,'the boss'), but, nevertheless,the palimpsestof inscription crackswhen recognition is based upon the higher the level of incarceration that one is in: 'It is a matter of relationships of intensities through which the subjectpasseson the body without organs,a processthat engageshim in becornings, rises and falls, migrations and displacements' (Delcuze & Guattari, AO, p.84). "Application is the processof overlaying one set of elementsor attributes over another. This will be expandedin the following chapters. "'A new threshold of deferritorialization' (Deleuze & Guattari, A TP, p.453).

Chapter 1: Consuming the Future 21 However, disintegration is not to be seenas the abolition of coding since capitalism cannot form or operate without the use of coding; in other words: 'capital never operatesas a code. It operateson codes' (Massurni, UG, p. 134). Riding the coding " left by despotic the synthesis, capitalism integrates its own processesof system interaction and communication resulting in the abrogationof the State insofar as there is no '[ ] longer a need for a State, for distinct juridical and political domination, in ... Thd bddn*Orfiý order to -ensure appropriation; which'has, become directly ecdnbniid**" constitutesa world axiomatic, a "universal cosmopolitanenergywhich overflows every bond", (Deleuze [ I' & Guattari, convertible a and substance mobile restriction and ... ATP, p.453). Emerging from the despotic socius, the axiomatic engineers codes that have become decodedand deterritorialized flux (pure energy or intensity). Essentially this takes place between capital and labour insofar as they need to become abstractsince the axiomatic '[ ] deals directly with purely functional elementsand relations whose ... immediately is realized in highly varied domains nature not specified, and which are simultaneously [ ...]' (ibid, p.454). The despotic regime initially has opportunities to by labour thereby making the and capitalism capital emergence of severing prohibit between ] '[ potentiality: express specific relations codes ... capital virtual, a machinic formal by higher (overcoding) be that subsumed a unity cannot qualified elements " indirect (ibid, in fashion' by transcendenceand an p-454). The axioms' except "For an extendeddiscussionregarding despotismrefer to Deleuze & Guattari, AO, p. 192ff. "Overcoding is essentialin the despotic structure to directly realign language, social norms and religion via a transcendenthierarchy. Overeoding can be defined as a process of resurfacing that produces a new cartography. 'A code is always of a "miIieu", or relatively stable, often statistical, mixing of elements [ ...]a code is the same as a "form" (an order and organization of functions)' (Massumi, UG, p.51). Through the resurfacing, the despot enforces the overcoding of the conquered territory to constitute the 'essenceof the State' (Deleuze & Guattari, AO, p. 199ft).

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 22 opposition to coding is essentiallybasedupon an external-internalrelation dichotomy: the axiom is a transformation from an internal system (as evidenced in codes) to an external process. For example, axiomatics can be added and subtractedwhile codes are woven together by an internal, transcendentconnection; and axioms are flexible and have the capacity to reprogramme or re-channel themselves in the capitalist market than do codes(since they are bound by a State logical apparatus).Axiomatics are quantitative in fonn. in as much as they index abstraction-vis-&vis -codes.Axioms have no specific types, there is only difference in quantity. Being able to enter into relations of isomorphic resources,axioms are fundamentally abstractin nature. Codes " into due being by to their never enter relations specific nature. Codes specify a solution insofar as any society that is coded (territorial) or over-coded (despotic) has " inherently into built to the certain solutions problems system. The system (socius) is guided entirely by regimenting codes,whilst axioms enumerateproblems in abstract quantitative terms and feed them into the market. For example, axiomatics set up a demandthat the market is to resolve. Ratherthan capital being coded and a particular result following, Deleuze and Guattari arguethat instead capital is fed a quantitative problem and any system operating with axioms will translate and produce a solution via prices, and not be stringently held by an internal mechanismthat relies on rituals, "For a discussioninvolving the actual and the virtual in relation to axiomatics and coding refer to Deleuze's Difference and Repeliflon: 'The virtual possessesthe reality of a task to be performed or a problem to be solved: it is the problem which orientates,conditions and engenderssolutions, but these do not resemble the conditions of the problem' (Delcuze, DR, pg. 212). As Deleuze and Guattari suggest, codes operationalize the virtual as if it were a whole, a conduction (wiUn the plane of consistency)that adopts a virtual array from which selectionsare made. 15Themost abstract and deterritorialized coding operation means nothing more than that two simultaneousprocessesare taking place. A codeimplies a fusional apparatus,rather than a constructive operation (or axiomatic). With coding there is no escape,or possibility of changing intensity, because the variations are only of a homogeneoustype. Homogeneity is the building-block- of complementary reterritorialization. To garner heterogeneousmultiplicities is to produce lines of flight.

Chapter 1: Consuming the Future 23 festivals, initiations etc. When prices are set up they are placed on a terrain styled by axioms so that particular price levels will be the solution to the problems, while a coded apparatusis a direct imposition of the solution insofar as it is fulfilling a direct task set by an authority." [...] Axiom bears on the condition of metamorphosis and transfer: exchangevalue. Axiom and not code: energy and its objects are no longer marked with a sign; properly speaking, there are no more signs since there is no more code, no referenceto an origin, to a norm, to a cpractice',''to a supposednature or surreality or'reality. 'to-d"Piffadigmor to a Great Other-there is nothing left but a little price tag, the index of exchangeability: it is nothing, it is enormous, it is something else (Lyotard, 'EC', p.20). The advent of de-socializationis the one resourcecapitalism has in order to perpetuate itself For example, capitalism is a parasiteof social disillusion and alienation in the work force. The worker and the capitalist are found at opposite endsof the continuum in both though the same processof desiring-production. are even Capitalism continuously rips up codes, propagates an immense deterritorialization of flux from carefully engineeredchannels,thereby breaking down and dismantling thesechannels.Channelsof labour and wealth are turned into abstract continuities: abstract labour and abstract wealth. Being built on experimentation, capitalism is the source for surplus value. However, without channels of 16 Furthermore,the axiomatic is constructive: any unit of code can be decodedif given the principle and elementsurrounding the assemblage.It is purely functional. Axioms are a decoding movement that branch out of intrinsic codesinto constructivevalues.This movementby-passescoding machineriesand recognition mechanisms.Axioms are'[ ...] operativestatementsthat constitute the serniological form of Capital and that enter as componentparts into assemblagesof production, circulation, and consumption' (Delcuze & Guattari, ATP, p.461). This is the basis for the perpetuation of capitalist development. Coding is always operating from a binary-opposition, relinquishing immanenceto transcendence,while axioms are entirely immanent.Axiomatics function through an abstractionthat is independentfrom each other, and are primary statements,which do not derive from or depend upon another statement' (ibid).

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 24 17 representation, capitalism is schizophrenic,since it cannot generateits own coding apparatus;as stated earlier, capitalism's processis the shredding up of codes,and the only generativeaccessto the production of codesis tei-ritoty. 'But this is precisely the in sense which the State is termed "territorial". Capitalism, on the other hand, is not at all territorial, even in its beginnings: its power of deterritorialization consists in taking as its object, not the earth, but "materialized labour", the commodity' (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP,,-p.454). The abstraction within capitalism is the system of feedback (for example, Marx's formula of profit Mý-C-M) that operateswithin itself to propel further into its it is limits the time capital same expansion; sets own while at continuously germinating and multiplying: 'One sometimeshas the impressionthat flows of capital would willingly dispatch themselvesto the moon if the capitalist State were not there to bring them back to earth' (Deleuze & Guattari, AO, p.258). The hyperbole is this associatedwith rocketing effect of capitalism regulatedand maintained through stringent axiomatics that are constantly evolving to accommodate present day economics.The immanenceof axiomatics is presentedin A ThousandPlateaus as if it like believe ] '[ to that us confronts the limits of the Universe, capitalism would ... the extreme limits of resourcesand energy.But all it confronts are its own limits (the periodic depreciation of existing capital); all it repels or displaces are its own limits (the formation of new capital, in new industries with a high profit rate)' (Deleuze & 17'Representation no longer relates to a distinct object, but to productive activity itself The socius as full body has become directly economic as capital-money; it does not tolerate any other preconditions' (Delcuze & Guattari, AO, p.263).

Chapter 1: Consuming the Future 25 Guattari, ATP, p.463).'s *** Circulation constitutes capital as a subjectivity commensuratewith society in its entirety. But this new social subjectivity can form only to the extent that the decodedflows overspill their conjunctions and attain a level of decoding that the State apparatusesare no longer able to reclaim: on the one hand, the flow of labor must no longer be determined as slavery or serfdom but must become naked and free labor; and on the othei- hand, wealth must no longer be determined as "A Thousand Plateaus furthers the development of the axiomatic from the first volume by distinguishing two desiring-production processesthat occur in present day economics. 'It is not only in periods of expansionor recovery that axioms multiply. What makes the axiomatic vary, in relation to the States, is the distinction and relation between foreign and domestic markets' (ibid, p.462). Essentially, Deletize and Guattari specify differences emerging from a social democracy State to a totalitarian State. For instance, the New Deal (an 'axiom laboratory') in the United States was a rigorous attemptto assurethat capital did not decodeinto schizophrenia.By integrating social, economic and familial codes into an abstract, solution based model of axiomatics (an application), F. D. Roosevelt's plan suggestsa highly stratified structure the federal government implemented to control and pattern levels of chaotic intensities (for example, the crash of the stock market in 1929 and the Depression) to a more regulated and contained system: an 'anti-mark-et' zone of interaction. For instance,the Statedefined its true jurisdiction through the New Deal when the United Statesgovernment yielded to the fact that the depressionwould not dissipatethrough individual state participation. The federal governmenthad to enforce its domain in order to direct the country into more stablemeans.'No government bureau ever directly touched the lives of so many millions of Americans-the old, the jobless, the sick, the ncedy, the blind, the mothers, the children-with so little confusion or complaint [ I The federal government was at last chargedwith the obligation to provide its citizens a measure ... the general welfare began a new phase of of protection from the hazards and vicissitudes of life national history' (Rodosh,AIND, p.42). To contrast the above example of social democracy, the totalitarian State is found in the developmentof Chile and its role in political policies. The degreeof totalitarianism to subtract an axiom The tendencyto withdraw, equalsthe level of politicization that is placed upon the Stateapparatus. subtract axionis [ ...I One falls back on a very small number of axioms regulating the dominant flows, while the other flows are given a derivative, consequentialstatus [ ...] or are left in an untamedstate that does not preclude the brutal intervention of Statepower, quite the contrary' (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p.462). Chile elucidatesthe pure totalitarian Statealleviating any internal domesticpressureto produce solutions (for example,imports) for a crisis. The division from code (an internal apparatus)to axiomatic is acceleratedby Chile insofar as problems are fed quantitatively into the market and result in pure mechanismsof export culminating in completede-regulation.On the other hand, social democracyrelies heavily on the political and reterritorializing axiomatic whereby there is a perpetual insistence on an internal, domestic equation: regulation. 'A very general pole of the State, "social democracy," can be defined by this tendencyto add, invent axioms in relation to spheresof investment and sourcesof profit L ] In this case,they aremasteredby the multiplication of directing axioms' (ibid). The difference lying ... between the New Deal and the advent of the Chilean 'anarcho-capitalist' participation in the world economy, is the basis of the axiomatic as it is presentedin Capitalism and Schizophrenia, volume 11 (p.462ft). The New Deal was a re-axiomatization of flows in an internal domestic economic structure to restoreequilibrium. Chile's policy toward re-axiomatizationafter its crisis was to navigate away from a stringent mechanism of regulation, with the intention of opening up their markets to the world economy and thereby increasing the process of deterritorialization. 'At the limit, the only axioms that are retained concern the equilibrium of the foreign sector, reserve levels and the inflation rate; "the population is no longer a given, it has become a consequence"'(ibid, p.462).

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 26 money dealing, merchant's or landed wealth, but must become pure homogeneous and independent capital (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p.452). The strata (capitalist axiomatic) construct a socius that continuously deterritorializes itself, expansion is the only operation, whereby the capitalist worldeconomy (conjunctive synthesis) is an inherent parasite of the globe, creating within its immanent system a surplus value for the propagation process to continue. The limits of capital--and-the decoding of flows intenninably'expos&"iftfd-k-rdifibld-iýa: &h other upon the myriad planes of the representational strata. Representation is production on the socius as the full body becoming: '[ ...] directly economic as capitalmoney [ ...]' (Deleuze & Guattari, AO, p.263). With this expansion in the capitalist world-economy, the social machinery limits flows of desiring-production from escaping into schizophrenia. The strata compose representational models to (re)territorialize desiring-production within a matrix of realization, " to produce a global whole from partial objects, and to displace the peripheral mass into a Third World. " Deleuze and Guattari argue that flows (through limits) present us with a systemic apparatusthe strata utilize to prevent desiring-production assemblagesfrom decoding the entire socius (ibid, p.175ff). Thus, the stratified lines coordinate flows within a matrix of production: an apparatusthat prevents an escapeinto molecular desire.The stratastriate smooth spaceinto criss-crossedlines by (re)coding the surface of the body without organs,by expandingthe capitalist world-economy to the ends of the Earth, and by generating surplus-productivity, a demarcation of specific trade zones from which the Centre controls and navigates trajectories of exchange. The "Or, models of realization. 2OThiswill be expandedin the following sections.

Chapter 1: Consuming the Future 27 geometric topography that surfaces the body without organs is the sectioning of the entire orbital diameter of the planet, a capacity that decodesall desire into surplusproductivity. Every part is connected to every other part through the bands of distribution that are processedthrough the Centre. This movement establishespowerlines acrossthe surface of the body without organs, axiornatizing specific regions for into labour quantifying surplus-productivity and surplus exchangeablecommodities. The-Jines--of'-striation that- (re)inscribe' upon--the body 'without -'dtgdfis'funttioh to capturesectorsof heterogeneousintensity by linking them to a mediated Centre.With all flows of surplus-productivity being negotiatedthrough the Centre of exchange,the ends of the Earth are procured for surpluses from which the Centre can expand continuously: 'Long-distance trade certainly made super-profit: it was after all based on the price of difference between two markets very far apart, with supply and demand in complete ignorance of each other and brought into contact only by the activities of the middleman. There could only have been a competitive market if there had been plenty of separateand independentmiddlemen (Braudel, CC, p.405).21 The absolute limit has an important role in our discussion of the dynamics of limit is draws line in The the that crevice a of escape, crack absolute a a capitalism. axiomatization of the capitalist world-economy; it is the limit to what the strata can limitation frees desiring-production that through their operation, a coding onto achieve the body without organs, a revolutionary potential. It also presentsus with the crisis that results from the strata axiomatizing zones into peripheral massesof desire, the inability to capture flows of commodities and naked labour into surplus-productivity: I'llic function of the middleman will be expandedin chapter Ill. '

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 28 We shall speak of an absolute limit every time the schizo-flows,pass through the wall, scrambleall the codes,and deterritorialize the socius: the body without organs is the deterritorialized socius, the wilderness where the decodedflows run free, the end of the world, the apocalypse (Deleuze & Guattari, AO, p. 176). With the deterritorialization that generatesfrom this diffei-enceor divei-gence the '22 schizophrenicand the capitalist axiomatic are perpetually in a state of tension, where the former is the absolutedecoding of the socius, and the latter implements regulative control-onto-the socius by the axiomatic: 'With the result that schi;t6phrehid'OdNddeg the entire capitalist field from one end to the other. But for capitalism it is a question of binding the schizophrenicchargesand energiesinto a world axiomatic that always flows interior limits' (ibid, decoded the with new revolutionary potential of opposes p. 246). By quantitatively abstracting axioms to recode nomadic trajectories of escape into homogeneousplates of the world economy, the strata not only reterritorialize desire back into the Centre of control (First World), from which all exchange of surplus-productivity is mediated, but also push the socius to the absolute limit of desiring-production. However much the strata recode intensity into homogeneous surplus-productivity, there is always a movement to the periphery. For capitalism to be realized: '[ ] there must be a whole integral of decodedfloivs, a whole generalized ... (Deleuze & the that overturns apparatuses' overspills and preceding conjunction Guattari, ATP, p.452). Capitalism operates not only by appropriating desiring('preceding) but implements decoding apparatuses of also a capture, via production Centre through which all flows are exchanged. Braudel's thesis on the developmentof capitalism rests on power Centresthat dependent by flows that peripheral are on the producing zones control of exchange 22SeeDeleuze & Guattari, AO, p. 246.

Chapter 1: Consuming the Future 29 core for development. It is always a question of acquiring power through the axiornatizationof the world-economy, of sustainingdominanceover peripheral sectors that generate the surplus-production, of controlling market prices and the ' labour: 'anti-market'. The absolutelimit is the cusp that lies the commodification,of between the 'anti-market' apparatusesof capture and the 'market'. The 'market' bifurcates sequencesof control produced by the 'anti-market's' dominance over surplus-production: The absolute limit -diagrams the decoding' of* the 'sciciu§ by peripheral assemblages,as well as the re-axiomatizationthat reconstructsthe Centre's position in the 'anti-market'. The tendency,on the one hand, of pushing flows further into the schizophrenic is forces to take the capital an axiomatic root, other, perpetually machinery, while on the absolute limit's topography. The absolute limit is located between capitalist production and schizophrenic delirium, presenting the possibility of absolute deterritorialization that would lead one to acquiesceto 'decoded flows' operating at the limit, as expressedin Anti-Oedipus. Limits are the obstacles to the process of liquidating national boundaries and the labour force: 'society is no longer merely is by integrated it by the mode of absorbed entirely subsumed capitalist command; Capitalism (Guattari CLU, The & Negri, 49). [or of p. ability speed]' and production Schizophrenia to account for a philosophy of desire, portrays the 'destined' into leaking flows the and exchange production out of commodity assimilation of "Every world-economy is a sort of jigsaw puzzle, a juxtaposition of zones interconnected,but at different levels. On the ground, at least three different areasor categoriescan be distinguished: a narrow core, a fairly developedmiddle zone and a vast periphery. The ccntre or core contains everything that is most advancedand diversified- The next zone possessesonly some of thesebenefits, although it has some share in them [ ...] The huge periphery, with its scatteredpopulation, representson the contrary backwardness,archaism, and exploitation by others' (Braudel, CCC, p.39). We will elucidate the function of the 'anti-mark-et' in chaptersIII and IV.

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 30 'wilderness' of the molecular axis. This is referring more to the position outlined by the secondvolume, where Deleuze and Guattari state the following: 'The State-form, as a form of interiority, has a tendencyto reproduceitself, remaining identical to itself across its variations and easily recognizable within the limits of its pole, always seeking public recognition (there is no masked state)' (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, limit is The 360). p. absolute a singularity situated as an order spontaneously materializing -out -of chaos: 'The critical points,from incoherent-to"dohetehrare' singular thresholds marking the emergenceof order out of chaos' (Delanda, JVAIM, p. 15). The singularity is the potential for heterogeneousassemblagesto converge on the stratified belts of the world-economy, Aec,&A., 4 the socius to 'market' -a dynamics. By mapping the trajectory of the singularity, the peripheral mass realigns itself on the cuspthat lies betweencapitalism and schizophrenia,creating an immanent formula for exchangeby destratifying the layers that bind it to the Centre. And yet, the Centre's strategy to locate the peripheral mass within the matrix of the worldeconomy, is to saturate the heterogeneoussingularity with axioms. This assuresa reterritorialization within the confines of the world-economy, as well as providing the strata accessto zones in the Third World: a construction of a globalization out of partial objects. For the Centre, it a question of either adding or subtracting axioms to the socius, a control mechanismthat continuously manipulatesdesiring-production to the capitalist world-economy. Axiomatics striate smooth space into a unity of commodification and exchange,functioning to coordinate all processesof production into one quantifiable apparatus. 'The axiomatic method aims specifically at establishingisomorphismsbetweenapparentlyheterogeneousconcretetheories,thereby exhibiting the unity of the abstract system underlying them all' (Blanch6, A, p.36).

Chapter 1: Consuming the Future 31 The twilight of capitalism and the emergenceof antisysternic'markets' is the absolute limit. The absolute limit: [ I causesthe flows to travel in a free state on a desocialized body ... without organs. Hence one can say that schizophrenia is the exterior limit of capitalism itself or the conclusion of its deepesttendency, but that capitalism only functions on condition that it inhibit this tendency, or that it push back or displace this limit, by substituting for it its own immanentrelative limits, which it continually reproduceson a widened scale (Deleuze & Guattari, AO, p.246). Deleuze and,Guattari suggest that the second synthesis,' despotisnf,"all6wed for the possibility for capitalism, to germinate and propagate within the formation of economics,whereby limits within the disjunctive synthesisare abradedin order to let flows of capital circulate in the conjunctive deterritorialized-reterritorialized axiomatic " of capitalism. The absolute limit takes on an important role since this limit is the only real accessone has in deciphering between the two processesthat are taking place. [Capitalism] liberates the flows of desire, but under the social conditions that define its limit and the possibility of its own dissolution, so that it is constantly opposing with all its exasperatedstrength the movement that drives it toward this limit. At capitalism's limit the deterritorialized socius gives way to the body without organs, and the decodedflows throw themselvesinto desiring-production (ibid, pp.139140). The political expansionsthat were necessaryto alleviate the economic market, in order to encompassexternal investment, or the reduction in the number of axiomaticstaking " is [ ] 'organization defined by the ubiquitous, capitalism, ecumenical root, an ... '4'Capitalism is indeed the limit of all societies,insofar as it brings about the decoding of the flows that the other social formations coded and overcoded' (ibid, pp.245-246). 2'l am thirding of Deleuze and Guattari's contrastthat is developedin relation to social democracy and totalitarianism (with Chile as an example).

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 32 heterogeneous of social formations' (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, encompassment 26 43 5). There is no difference between capitalism,the axiomatic that stratifies or p. destratifies flows of desiring-production wkthe system of commodified exchange. Axiomatics absorbheterogeneousassemblagesby producing an underlying unity from which all levels of desiring-production can be perpetuated within the matrix of is discussed As there earlier, no difference between production and its exchange. is between is it difference there 'and -what what-it and with" capitalism, effect; no 27 produces. The immanence that perpetuatesintensity to the limits of the socius places axioms in a development that on the one hand, is presently breaking up mandates of political reterritorialization, while on the other, is manufacturing the velocity to produce a price index for all production of commodity and desire so that: Money becomes the general equivalent for rendering the outside peoples, their riches ('products), and their poverty ('needs'), determin(ing) buy [ ] they thus the which with goods commensurable ... it between determines because the calculable quantities, relations prices offers and demandsfor goods (Lyotard, LE, p.200). Monetary systems (or axioniatics of denumerablesets) are applications that stratify trajectories of desiring-production by quantifying intensity into a numerical surplusbody desire flows By travelling the through on enumerating monetary production. foreign Centre's Third Worlds through the are created appropriation of without organs, monetary systems, and immanent 'market' exchangesare axiomatized into a global field fusing in by housed Centre. The the the axiomatize strata entire social monopoly dominator: territories the a common money. The quantification within matrix of all 26Hencethe European Economic Community (EU), North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFFA), and the dawn of the Westem.HemisphereFree Trade Agreement (NVHFTA). "However, models of realization do allow us to differentiate between certain layers of the strata that function in varying degrees.This will be discussedin the following sections.

Chapter 1: Consuming the Future 33 of the axiomatic mechanism regulatesthe internal economic boundaries,producing an 'anti-market' apparatus, while the schizophrenic tendency liquifies processes of recaptureddesire. Capitalism [ ...] 'continually sets and then repels its own limits, but in so doing gives rise to numerous flows in all directions that escapeits axiomatic' (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p.472). It is always a question of capturing desiring- production: the flows that deterritorialize are re-axiomatized via a complementary reterritorialization.---,It is -always -a' movement of release-'and Thb homogeneousstrata operate through this binary opposition. The line of escapeis the crevice through which assemblages, that resist reterritorialization, formulate heterogeneoussequencesthat allow desiring-productionto bifurcate into multiplicities. Deterritorialization coupled with a complementary reterritorialization is the model from which axiomatics can abstract problems and convert them into quantifiable solutions. III 'Capital is the universal body without organs, a recording surface in which all the movementsof desire are inscribed and marked in the code of the abstractaxiomatics of money' (Lingis, L, p. 101). Capitalism and Schizophrenia systematically follows Marx's theories of expansion and the limits capitalism sets upon itself, and affirms Marx's predictions of automation and abstraction.Marx's fundamental thesis lies in the discovery of the force capitalist production placeson the creation and development of machinic flows: The real barrier of capitalist production is capital itsetf. It is that capital and its self-expansion appearas the starting and closing point, the motive and the purpose of production; that production is only production for capital and not vice versa, the means of production are not mere means for a constant expansionof the living process of the

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 34 society of producers (Marx, cited in McLellan, TKM, p.98). And: pursuing this tendency, capital has pushedbeyond national boundaries inherited beyond deification the and prejudices, of nature and selfsufficient satisfaction of existing needs confined within well-defined bounds,and the reproduction of the traditional way of life (Marx, cited in KAHTV, p.364). Images of the despotic regime and the evolution of capitalism fit into the overall schema delineated by Matx.'"However, Deleuze and 'Guattari cl,ýiffi...thfit- MArx i§ in his for following thesis the misguided reason: they argue that Marx should have written from the end of capitalism not its beginning, because there are various transformationsoccurring in the coding processof the capitalist machinery which his theory doesnot account for. Marx would be correct if there were a perpetualtendency to invest technical codes in the machine; however, if labour, as they argue, is decoding. be In other words, eachtime there then of can a constantprocess production you decode you displace the limit insofar as capital is a differential equation that cannot be resolved: The tendency's only limit is internal, and it is continually going beyond it, but by displacing this limit-that is, by reconstituting it, by by it internal limit be the means to surpassed again an rediscovering as of a displacement; thus the continuity of the capitalist process is displaced, in itself in break break that this this always of a engenders unity of the schiz and the flow (Deleuze & Guattari, AO, p.230). Beyond this time-scaled criticism, the axiornatization that produces capitalism from the despot is evident since the formation of surplus value is when money begets money, or value a surplus value. As Marx argues: the circulation of money as itself, is in for the valourization of value takes place only within this capital an end is limitless' (Marx, This therefore of capital movement constantly renewedmovement.

Chapter 1: Consuming the Future 35 CI, p.253). Since capital is the movement to the periphery there will be a pressure, like a ripple, to move to the circumference (which in turn is a spatial displacement). While pre-capitalist regimes are entirely situated in the past capitalism places variable capital into a movement in futural time. When capital is decoding, it is geared for the movement to the future: money as effective virtuality. The dynamic of capital is to expand to the limits on a futural scale as opposed to the past. For example, banks operate on forms of debt (credit or'loans) that'push capital and futural dimension based upon absolute speculation. The rate of profit in being geared toward debt (futural) is the schizophrenic turning point of capitalism. The more the decoded flows enter into a central axiomatic, the more they tend to escape to the periphery, to present problems that the axiomatic is incapable of resolving or controlling (even by adding special axioms for the periphery) (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p. 468). " The decoded flows that escape from axiornatization are pushed to the periphery, placing Third Worlds into the core of the hegemonic First, displacing workers from the nation-state, and realigning molar economies of desiring-production to minoritarian exchanges 29 The more production is allocated to a peripheral zone . in the capitalist axiomatic, the more underdevelopment takes root in the Centre of capitalism, resulting in a de-axiomatized mass of labour that is disjointed from the 'The above excerpt will be discussedagain in chapter III. "The more the worldwide axiomatic installs high industry at the periphery, provisionally reserving for the center so-called postindustrial activities (automation, electronics, information technologies, the conquest of space, overannament, etc.), the more it installs peripheral zones of underdevelopmentinside the center, internal Third Worlds, internalSouths. "Masses" of the population are abandonedto erratic work- (subcontracting,temporary work-, or work- in the underground economy) [ ] The opposition heAveenthe axioniatic and flieflows it does not succeeditz mastering heconiesall ... the more accentuated' (ibid, p.469; emphasisadded).

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 36 " the capitalist market. Minoritarian desiring-production becomesthe locus core of for heterogeneous,antisystemic interactions. The minor functions as the desiring sequencethat the Centre fails to appropriateinto its surplus-productivity. By placing desiring-production to a peripheral zone, the high-level control structures that fail to re-axiomatizeminoritarian the capital of surplus-production of perpetuate circuit flows of desire. This generatesa pragmaticsby which desiring-production is not fed into -a,high-level-plane of production, but into low-level, heterogeneousmultipliditi&§ that bifurcate high-level control structures.A subversion of the apparatusof capture, the decoded peripheral mass (labour) locate antisystemic movements that resist the homogeneity of the worldwide axiomatic. The positive feedback that amplifies the worldwide axiomatic, of feeding quantitative problems into the matrix of production, finds itself unable to cope with low-level assemblagesthat bypass its numerical apparatusof control. Capitalist production finds itself having to displace its production boundariesfurther afield from the Centre,creatingwithin its own core a mass(labour) that realigns itself immanently to a peripheral becoming. The demographicsof the Centreare re-axiomatizedto accommodatethe influx installing is The Third World. the the ghettoized core redrawn, of cartography of " deterritorializing Centre The from proliferate. which minoritarian assemblages zones 'As chapterIV will show, the deterritorialization of the worker in Los Angeles, particularly South Central Los Angeles, placed a peripheral mass of labour into a gridlock- that has only been partially relieved through antisysternic activities: '[ ...] the unionized branch-plant economy toward which decent jobs had for looked Chicanos) Blacks (and collapsed.As the Los Angeles always working-class industrial heartland East from American in "unplugged" 1970s to the the and rewired was economy Asia, non-Anglo workers have borne the brunt of adaptation and sacrifice' (Davis, CQ, p.304). "I am referring to the privatized Jim Crow Laws that were instigated to supersedethe Supreme Court's decision to aflow Affican-Americans the right to buy, seU and inhabit properties within Los Angeles. See chapter IV for details regarding Jim Crow Laws and Homeowners' Associations in Los Angeles; see chapter V for a discussion of minoritarian assemblages.

Chapter 1: Consuming the Future 37 is Perpetually re-dxiomatized by the strata. This reconfiguration is an attempt to separatethe periphery from the core, to re-axiomatize flows into surplus productivity, to reformulate space through land speculation, and to accentuate class structures through monetary divisions (Davis, CQ, p. 101ff). The inevitable and continuous crisis of capitalism results from the inability of the strata to recapture flows that have escaped:a construction of Third Worlds that shift the demographicsof control away from the Centre.Minoritarian assemblageslocalize desiring-produbtibrito &culate and distribute intensity that is not traceableby the strata, an instance of low-level control that maps desire to an immanent plane of interaction. The mapping of desire, as opposedto tracing, pusheslabour to the periphery, displacing the surplus-productivity the strata institute as the mechanism of capture. In other words, labour that escapes the re-axiomatization of the strata finds itself on the edge of surplus-productivity, a zone where the Third World intersectswith schizophrenia(Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p.469ff). This displacementof labour is the periphery of capitalism, where the 'mass' of desiring-productionfunctions through a localized variant. As noted earlier, surplusdecodes the that strengthens circuit and recodes desiring-production into production the capitalist axiomatic of profit. Once labour is not coded within an axiomatic of capitalism, it finds itself in an internal Third World as an expended layer of production on the planes of capitalism. 'The situation seemsinextricable becausethe axiomatic never ceasesto create all of these problems, while at the same time its axioms, even multiplied, deny it the means of resolving them [ ...]' (Deleuze & Guattari, A TP, p.468). The stratifying machinery that aligns desiring-production to an axiomatic of profit, inevitability finds itself having to peripheralize greater flows of desire to Third Worlds, to assurethe demographicplates of capture are not saturated

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 38 by schizophrenicshifts. The plates of capturereterritorialize to create a homogeneous whole by implementing a Centre through which all desiring-production is mediated. The deterritorialization and reterritorialization that operatesthe capitalist axiomatic of displacing and replacing desiring-production,is the pivotal point that createscrisis in capitalism. The necessity of high-level control and the dispersion of labour to peripheral zones.- placesthe-capitalistaxiomatic in a-precariousposition. Since labour that-cahnot be fed back into the capitalist axiomatic is decoded into a marginalized mass, the Centre increasingly has to fortify itself from its own Third World; thus assuring that an infiltration from a low-level, de-axiomatizedassemblagedoes not circumvent the Centre's hegemonicposition in the capitalist world-economy. The apparatusof capture that sustainsthe Centre's homogeneity over the internal Third World, manufactures transcendentconstructsto preserveits control. This preservesthe hegemonicposition of the Centre in relation to the marginalizedaxis of the minor. Transcendentconstructs discrepancies for Centre the that exist the to and economic social account enable between the two zones,to reterritorialize the peripheral in an inferior image to itself, to stratify the masswithin prison systems,and to implement strategiesthat keep the " in bay: 'It effect operateswith two "universals," the underdevelopedperiphery at Whole as the final ground of being or all-encompassinghorizon, and the Subject as the principle that converts being into being-for-us' (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p.379). A transcendentmeasurement,the strata systemically fortify peripheral massesthat cannot be axiornatized via the capitalist world-economy. The fear of assemblages "Chapters IV and V examine the particulars surrounding this formula of the capitalist axiomatic coupled with transcendentconstructs designedto sustain power centres.

Chapter 1: Consuming the Future 39 bifurcating into heterogeneous,antisystemic movements of resistance,introduces a surveillance of desireby the strata. The possibility of desiring-productiontrickling out of the layers of stratification and rupturing the legislative and homogeneousplanes of capitalism, compels the strata to subjugate the periphery back into double-pincer control. A fortress of desire, the modulations that cast heterogeneity within an apparatusof capture, bring to the surfacethe intricate web the strata weave to sustain " desire. The minoritarian, in -contestingits transc&ndeiit's"dgrdgdtion'ftdiii power over the Centre, finds itself stratified in a similar modulation that the strata have already employedto keep the peripheral massat bay. The danger lies in being capturedby the same mechanism the strata have implemented, even though, on the surface, it may seem as if the minoritarian assemblage is heterogeneously bifurcating into multiplicities. As we have already. discussed, Third Worlds are erected on the periphery of capital due to the inability of the strata to code (or re-axiomatize) the flows that are generated.Transcendentapparatusesof control are another layer on the stratification on the body without organs, assuringthat a division exists between the two worlds: a molecular infection that permeatesthe potentiality of minoritarian assemblagesby having desire fold back onto itself The stratification that leads to the inevitable crisis of capitalism is the nonterritorial aspectof capitalism itself. As statedearlier, capitalism only functions when it can commodify abstract labour by converting it into surplus-productivity; it takes as its object 'materialized labour' (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p.454). 'That is why "Modulations refer to Deleuze's article, 'Postscript on the Societies of Control', where he differentiates them from niolds: 'Enclosures are molds, distinct castings,but controls are a modulation, like a self-deforming castthat will continuously changefrom one movement to the other, or like a sieve whose mesh will transmute from point to point' (p.4). I am using modulations in the loose senseof control--microfascisms-for Delcuze goes on to discussthe role modulations play in the homogeneity of corporate life.

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 40 capitalism marks a mutation in worldwide or ecumenical organizations, which now take on a consistencyof their own: the worldwide axiomatic, insteadof resulting from heterogeneoussocial formations and their relations, for the most part distributes these formations, determinestheir relations, while organizing an international division of labor' (ibid). It is only when the State's models of realization," an axiomatic in itself, regulates territory (Centre versus the Third World) through transcendent constructs, do -we find a predefined solution built" into -the* to *Ted6dd " (intensive nondenumerablesets multiplicities). Since capital only functions and expands by abstracting labour through axiornatics, the crisis is intensified when the capitalist world-economy is unable to accommodate surplus-productivity into its quantitative, solution basedapparatus.With the intervention of the State's models of realization, we find the limitations inherent in the abstract,capitalist world-economy. The nation-state, a model of realization in itself, is a stratum that is designed to intervene and fill the gaps and fissures left by the abstract, axiomatic system. 'What is called a nation-state,in the most diverse forms, is precisely the State as a model of realization' (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p.456). The models of realization are derived from the inability to create a social subjection from which assemblagescan be coded back into homogeneity. When the strata implement a transcendentconstruct, in which desire itself dealing through, codes we are minoritarian with a system that stratifies 'The term niodels ofrealization is found in BIanch6's authoritative treatise on the axiom system, Axioniatics: 'Since the meaningsof the terms and consequentlyof all the propositions is only partially limited by the postulateswe can, if there are severalsystemsof values which equally well satisfy the relations statedby the postulates,give them different concreteinterpretations,or, in other words, choose between different realizations. These concrete realizations of an axiomatic system are called niodels' (Blanchd, A, pp.35-36). "The usageof an axiomatic and code is not a paradox in this context. When a constructis mediated through transcendentformulas of desire, a code is needed to provide an immutable, non-negotiable leverage from which the strata can operate.

Chapter I: Consuming the Future 41 desire through suppression.The strata institute an economics of desire that level the two planes of the body without organs (molar and molecular) into a megareterritorialization. On the one hand, we have the capitalist world-economy fragmenting and peripheralizing zonesof surplus-productionto internal Third Worlds; while on the other, the nation-state appropriatesdespotic codings of desire to block peripheral Worlds from leaking into the Centre. It is - within the framework - of the nation-State.- 'or *'of "'dAtiolial. subjectivities, that processesof subjectification and the corresponding subjectionsare manifested.The axiomatic itself, of which the Statesare models of realization, restores or reinvents [ ...] an entire system of " (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, 457-458). machinic enslavement pp. 'Deleuze and Guattari continue their description by emphasizingthat models of realization do not representan imperial machine,nor are they constitutedunder the transcendenceof a formal Unity (ibid). However, as we will discuss in the latter part of this study, the reterritorializing mechanism that compensatesfor the destratilying flows is found in the relationship that exists between race and territory. This is by far the most important aspectof transcendentconstructsthis study will investigate. The apparatusof differentiating colour, or the mythic voyage to rediscovering race, tribe, or sect, requires a transcendent Unity to 'authenticate' desire, as it reterritorializes upon itself This predominantly takes place by implementing race, or the differentiation that exists betweenraces,as the transcendentelement that separatesthe two zones in the capitalist world-economy. (Transcendence fulfills the task set up by the strata to code the gaps that cannot be completed otherwise). This separationof colour that exists betweenthe Centreand the Third World assuresthat the peripheral mass is coded once again via a high-level structure, thereby sustaining the gulf between the two worlds. Before posing a question regarding the suppression race inflicts in the stratification of minoritarian desire, Deleuze and Guattari realize the molar/molecular problems associatedwith the theme of race: 'We immediately see the dangers,the profound ambiguities accompanying in this enterprise,as if each effort and each creation faceda possible infamy. For what can be done to prevent the theme of race from turning into a racism, a dominant and all encompassingfascism, or into a sect and a folk-lore, microfascisms?' (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p.379). When minoritarian assemblages cataloguedesirethrough race, we are facedwith the peripheral massreterritorializing through the same operation the stratautilize to separatethe Centre from the Third World. Granted,the movementbetween the molar and molecular aspect of race is complicated,but it will be taken up again in the latter part of this study. 'Bastard and mixed-blood are the true namesof race' (ibid). '[.. ] Race is not something to be rediscovered[.. ] race only exists in the constitution of a tribe that peoples and traversesa smooth space' (ibid, pp.379-380). The conceptof immanenceis crucial to the abovediscussionregarding the theme of race. Even though we will examine the concept of immanence throughout this study, let us for the moment, juxtapose it to the transcendentconstruct of race. Deleuze and Guattari's concept of immanence is a trajectory of desirethat flows on a molecular plane,releasingassemblagesfrom the strata,reconfiguring multiplicities that bifurcate the levels of stratification, and effectuating a minor literature. 'Assemblages are passional,they are compositions of desire. Desire has nothing to do with a natural or spontaneous determination; there is no desire but assembling,assembled,desire' (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p.399). Immanenceis a topography of becoming minor: a movement that punctuatesthe cracks the strata have not coded; a movement that diagrams the fissuresresulting from the operations of deterritorialization and reterritorialization; and a movement that localizesheterogeneityto a war machine: it provides '[ ...]

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 42 The inevitable crisis that results from capitalism's inability to recode and reappropriate surplus flows of desiring-production back into the socius, is already etching its presencein our contemporary world. The consumption of the future has already erected numerous Third Worlds into the core of the First, resulting in institutionalized molar operations designed to suppress and subjugate minoritarian assemblagesto a homogeneousconfiguration. The future is the only assetthe strata have in their attempt to redesign the presentgrid of consumption. Yet, the future has already exhausted itself by the crisis that engulfs our present capitalist grid, as peripheral zones are engulfed in low-intensity warfare, as minoritarian assemblages fascistically reterritorialize on molar identities, as tribalistic sects fold back on desire through their allegiance to transcendent,mythical pasts, and as the Centre infiltrates desire by abstracting axiomatics to a transcendentlevel." IV becoming-molecular...' (ibid, p.473), so many weaponsfor the becoming of everybody/everything giving rise to desiring-production that escapethe axiomatic of capitalism. This formula for immanent movement eliminates or dismantles constructs of race that are utilized by the strata to control and homogenize flows of desiring-production. It is a question of creating other forms of interaction, of 'redefining' minor elementsin the socius, and of producing a micropolitics of desire: 'If minorities do not constitute viable States culturally, politically, economically, it is becausethe State-form is not appropriateto them, nor the axiomatic of capital, nor the corresponding culture. We have often seen capitalism maintain and organizeinviable States,accordingto its needs,and for the precisepurpose of crushing minorities. The minorities issue is insteadthat of smashingcapitalism, of redefining socialism, of constituting a war machine capableof countering the world war machine by other means' (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p.472). "The future intersecting with the present allows for many speculations-espccially post-BladeRunner scenariosin Los Angcles-and Mike Davis is no exception: 'Strikes broke out in assembly plants, security walls were set afire and toppled, the sale of guns, and their price, soaredin the elderly areas.The younger Latinos painted the elderly asparasites,who had enjoyed all the benefits of society when those benefits were free and now blithely continued to tax the workers to maintain their style of living. The elderly painted the younger Latinos as foreignerswho were soaking up benefits that should go to the elderly, as non-Americanswho were threateningto dilute American culture, as crime-ridden, diseaseridden, and lawless. Each side preparedfor a last assaulton the other' (quoted in Davis, 'UC', p. 15). The gulf betweenthe First World and its internal Third World continuesto widen, asmovements within the cartography of the Centre are restricted to the surplus-productive organizations, while the decoded flows that resist axiomatization are peripherahzed.

Chapter I: Consuming the Future 43 The entire society becomesproductive; the rhythm of production is the rhythm of life (Negri, Aff, p.285). Marx's account of capital being basedupon an historical, dialectical design, incorporatesnotions of inherited, accumulative,ancestralwealth which dominatesthe present mode of capitalist production; while Deleuze and Guattari propose an alternative spatial immanenceto accountfor a worldwide axiomatic that installs Third Worlds into-the-Centre zone -of production,-to -account'for'the'inability, of the'stratd to re-axiomatize flows of desiring-production into surplus productivity, and to implement strategiesthrough which heterogeneousassemblagesconvergeand repel the limits set by capitalism." Another perspective that needs to be considered, in addition to the stratification (axiornatics) of desiring-production and Third Worlds, is the function of market prices in the world-economy. The role of market prices is the integration of all known information that is capable of predicting future behaviour in the capitalist exchange.Prices reflect an anticipated future." As we witness in the global stock market, the buying and selling of commodities fluctuate according to forecasting, in ill-defined interaction that sometimesnebulous often results methodsof 'Capitalism: '[ ] does and does not have an exterior limit: it has an exterior limit that is ... schizophrenia, that is, the absolute decoding of flows, but it functions only by pushing back and exorcising this limit. And it also has, yet doesnot have, interior limits: it has interior limits under the specific conditions of capitalist production and circulation, that is, in capital itself, but it ftinctions only by reproducing and widening these limits on an always vaster scale. The strength*of capitalism indeed residesin the fact that its axiomatic is never saturated,that it is always capableof adding a new axiom to the previous ones. Capitalism defines a field of immanence and never ceasesto fully occupy this field' (Deleuze & Guattari, AO, p.250). '9'[.. ] (N)eo-classicaltheoreticalmodels arenot only basedon the assumptionthat somemysterious mechanismcan ensuresimultaneousmaximization of individuals' objective functions; they also assume that the model explaining the working of the system is simple enough to enable each of us to foresee the future, provided we know the initial conditions and the value of all exogeneousvariables' (Simon, EBRCR, p.14).

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 44 " amongstmarket controllers. A reasonfor misguided navigation in the stock market, for example crashes,is in feeding negative information into the overall apparatusof guidance (or periodic auractors). This limits the growth of the market, thereby " levelling its development. Since the market is an continuously an enclosure upon open system, the possibility for negative feedback into the stock, exchange is even more intensified by manipulating or inputting the wrong data. Moreover, uncertainty complicates-the futural aspect of commodity exchanges-further, while ''at the *9amd time, innovation in the technical sphere, for instance, places a conundrum on neoclassicalpredictions of the economy.As Herbert Simon explains: 'We can predict that there will be bigger and faster supercomputersin five years hencethan there are now, and that they'll be cheaper,without being able to design that future supercomputer. You have to separatethe ability to predict that things of a certain kind are going to happen from the ability to predict in detail what they are' (Simon, EBRCR, p.15). What is important to discuss within the present context of this chapter is Delanda's concept of meshwork structuresthat compromisesthe contemporarydebate surrounding the dogmatists, who assert molar processes,and the current science encompassingmolecular operations(Delanda,'HMH). As Manuel Delandaexplicates the current debate,he suggeststhat both perspectivesneed to be included in the non- 'As John Holland points out in 'The Global Economy as an Adaptive Process', anticipation can have adverseeffects upon the global market: 'In the global economy,the anticipation of an oil shortage or of a significant default of foreign loans can have profound effects upon the course of the economy, whether or not the anticipated events come to pass' ('GEAP', p. 119). "Researchers at the Santa Fe Institute speculate that as: J... ] non-linear systems grow more complex, they can become more unstable. When a system-say, an ecology,-whose componentsare tightly interlinked becomes unstable, small changes can cause massive consequences[ ] such ... unpredictablechangeis the hallmark-of non-linear systems[ ...] non-linear systems,like the weather [as well as the stock market], can react with sharp oscillations to small disturbances' (Thomas, 'Cashing in on Chaos').

Chapter I: Consuming the Future linear simulations of the economy,namely: 45 boundedrationality, that is, a realistic limited degreeof problem-solving skills, but also delays,bottlenecksand other sources of friction which are also key to their self-organization' (Delanda, 'HMH). By inputting energy continuously, self-organizing systems export entropy. Entropy is always veering towards an equilibrium state,whereasthe biosphere,for instance,ships out disorder and thereby establishesstability. Production in capital is always excessive and-overspills -into -crevices to propagate-its -expansion:" A complex system, such as the social system, is characterized by equations expressingthe interdependenceof the various actors of the system and that these intrinsic nonlinearities, in dialogue with fluctuations, result in the self-organization of the system, so that its structures, articulations, and hierarchies are the result, not of the operationsof some 'global optimiser,' some'collective utility fianction,' but of successive instabilities near bifurcation points (Prigogine & Allen, 'TCC', p.37). This position is antithetical to theories supportedby neo-classicaleconomics,whereby a rational component of supply and demandreachesan equilibrium state through the intervention of a knowledgeableagency.As Delandadiscussesthe role complexity has in our modem, intensive-economiO' arena, he suggeststhat history has shown that rational agents, or centralization of supply and demand, did not necessarily preside development: over economic Pre-capitalist markets, like those which existed in medieval Europe, in China or India, or indeed in many small towns even today, are "W. Brian Arthur illustrates positive feedback,or third order non-linearities, in his article, 'SelfReinforcing Mechanismsin Economics', concerning: '[ I factors that would drive some sector of the ... economy invay from equilibrium' (Waldrop, C, p. 138). 43Namely, time is taken to be the mutating variable in the open system, thereby having no limit to growth. This is contrastedwith an extensivemodel (time axis), where a regular, temporal, metric curve is positioned to plot extensively in increments.This model is peggedat regular intervals, and by plotting exponentially an increaseof variables againstregular incrementsis shown. An intensivemodel doesnot impose an external limit to the end of capitalism (or schizophrenia),rather pure speedis the governing singularity.

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 46 structuresthat emerge out of a decentralizeddecision-making process which brings heterogeneousneedsand offerings together. In modem nonlinear models, markets have very little to do with the 'invisible hand', involving complex processesof self-organization and not just demand and supply (Delanda, 'I-IMH'). Furthermore, the recent probing of self-organizing systems in the molecular sciences has assistedthe investigation of complexity scienceto permeateits discourseinto the economic sphere. The most compelling criticisms have been levelled against neoclassical,(or -orthodox) economics,- in particular, their obedience ta-strict"top-down analysis of how the economy functions and their well-versed predictions of the future ' the of market. The underlying force behind orthodox economicsstems from arguing that the whole can be dismantled into its separateparts and logical conclusions can be derived, therefore enabling an anticipation of what the market will produce in the future. By manipulating parts or subsetsof the system, the surface of the components of the economy will reach an equilibrium point since as the theory states, each rational agent within the system will have the necessaryaccessto all information governing the market, thereby a perfect supply meeting demand will arise. To trace the argument in more detail, it is important to examine the implications of the reductionist model. In essence, the model argues that by dismantling a complex whole (of a system), it is still possible to preserve the phenomenon, even though the process of the system has been dissected into its multifaceted regions. In other words, by analyzing the additive parts of the system separately,traditional economistsargue that the whole system's behaviour can then be predicted. 'The behaviour of such systemsat the aggregate,macro-level cannot be 4"Any reliable model embodying all relevant knowledge of the working of the economy can only be used to visualize possible scenarios through simulation processes [.. ]' (Simon, EBRCR, p. 14; emphasisadded).

Chapter I: Consuming the Future 47 deducedfrom simple extrapolation of the behaviour of a single individual. The whole is different from the sum of the parts' (Ormerod, DOE, p.91). As Deleuze and Guattari, along with contemporary studies in self-organizing systems,indicate, molar models, such as orthodox economics, postulate wholes as if they were logical substitutive wholes. This appearsas an index of the operation of power, a transcendent condition for production or manipulation of the economic forces that determine or anticipate- the future. The- pre-conditioning of neo-classical" ec6hoihits-"places' d transcendentmysticism to the operation of the market." The mirroring of prices to a calculatedmeasureof what the future is going to be is an attempt to create a perfect quantitative factor of all modes of production and labour. The body without organs presentsa glimpse into the functioning of the economic sphere,for the inscription of production is produced as a whole on the plane of the body without organs. Yet, the totalization of the body without organsdoes not correspondto the whole by counting and allocating the subsetsthat constitute the different frequenciesand wavelengths of the surface. Each component works alongside other flows on the field of the body " does Furthermore, the the to totality. without organs, and yet not unify process a concept of the whole misleads the calculation of pricing by subsuming the whole to its integral parts, and producing a unidirectional perspectiveof the production process. '5'The implication of such a situation is that there is not just one but many possible solutions to the equationswhich describe a competitive economy. In other words, there is not just one equilibrium in the economy, but many equilibria [ ] In other words, large changesaround any particular solution ... in the overall nature of the new solution at which the might lead to important and unforeseenchanges 0 system endsup, and which the free-marketsystemitself is quite unable to determine' (Ormerod, DOE, pp.86 & 87). "The body without organs is produced as a whole, but in its own particular place within the processof production, alongsidethe parts that it neither unifies nor totalizes. And when it operateson them, when it turns back upon them, it brings about transverse communications, transfinite (Deleuze & Guattari, summarizations,polyvocal and transcursiveinscriptions on its own surface AO, p.43).

Axiornatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 48 In other words, when new parts are addedto the system,the perspectiveof the whole has to be overhauled in order to conform to the current status of the subset. Selforganizing systems allow us to perceive the polemic surrounding heterogeneous fragmentsas not having to 'round off their rough edges', but rather a processin which the: '[ ] whole not only coexists with all the parts [ ] it is contiguous to them, it ... ... exists as a product that is produced apart from them and yet at the same time is related to-thom' (Deleuze & Guattari, AO, pp.43-44). In conclusion, this chapter has discussedthe current developments in late capitalism. Of particular interest for this chapter has been the function of axiomatics in relation to codes.We have argued that axioms are abstract in nature, and that they produce solutions quantitatively as opposedto codes. Since codes are based on an internal system of predefined solutions they do not enter into isomorphic relations. Moreover, we have utilized the function of axiomatics to discuss contemporary problems associatedwith late capitalism. In particular, the displacement of internal Third Worlds into the Centre of the capitalist world-economy. By peripheralizing sectorsof the capitalist world-economy into Third World zones, the Centre attempts to maintain power over economic regions. This respondsto the crisis resulting from capitalism's inability to re-axiomatize flows of desiring-production back into the overall matrix of the capitalist world-economy. We have also introduced minoritarian assemblagesthat challenge the present homogeneousstructure. The apparatus of 11 implements to that'Ch -. capture models of realization reterritorialize assemblages the present molar configuration. The last section introduces the function of market prices in the world-economY.We examinedrecentdevelopmentsin complexity science to argue that molar systemstrace wholes as if they were logical substitutive wholes.

Chapter 1: Consuming the Future 49 By investigating self-organizing systems,we can diagram molecular processesthat decode such molar apparatusesof control. The body without organs is the intensive spatium acrosswhich antisystemic movementsof resistancecan be mapped.

Chapter 11 Body without Organs

Capitalism only triumphs when it becomesidentified with the state, when it is the state. Femand Braudel (emphasisadded)

Axiornatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 52 I As there is no surface,the inside and the outside, the container and the contained,no longer have a precise limit; they plunge into a universal depth or turn in the circle of a present which gets to be more contractedas it is filled. Hence the schizophrenicmanner of living the contradiction: either in the deep fissure which traversesthe body, or in the fragmentedparts which encaseone another and spin about. Bodysieve, fragmentedbody, and dissociatedbody [ ...] (Deleuze,LS, p.87). We are passengersof the empty circle who only wish to arrive before they leave. Speedis a perfect will. to impotence (Virilio, SP, p.55). The strata depend upon the capture of intensities, producing resonance,a zone of homogeneity, an equilibrium machine. The apparatusof capture codes intensities by inducing the stratification process onto another plateau, a building block through segmentation.As Deleuze and Guattari suggest, it is on the most deterritorialized elementthat reterritorialization takes place. It is becauseof intensities having escaped that a particular line, or system of behaviour, becomes an inducer for the ' brings body This the to the rearrangementof strata. us without organs. In operating with a zero presupposition,a multiplicity or difference, the BwO occupies the space of transcendencewithout implementing domains of a higher unity to guaranteethe ' process. Thus the entergenteffect of production is immanent to the system: And God, who designatesnone other than the energy of recording, can be the greatestenemy in the paranoiacinscription, but also the greatest friend in the miraculating inscription. In any case, the question of a being superior to man and to nature does not arise here at all. 'Hereafter, referred to as BwO. 'Zero is punctual in that it has no extension due to its incommensurability with all other numbers. This is not to suggest that zero is not spatial, since it is distributed in smooth space,but it does not provide a metric measurement,as in the quantitative configuration of One. By taking zero out of stratified, numbered-number systems, it is assigned to the assemblages of singularitics. The philosophical crisis arises when the construction of the State is premised on the numeric One, as the constituting apparatusfrom which all intensity derives. The history of philosophy has subjecteditself to a similar division, whereby zero (body without organs) is numerated as a replicable piece of code through the essenceof One. This will be discussedin the following chapters.

Chapter H: ljody without Organs 53 Everything is on the body without organs, both what is inscribed and the energy that inscribes it. On the unengendered body, the nondecomposable distances are necessarily surveyed, while the disjoined terms are all affirmed (Deleuze & Guattari, AO, p.78). ' The BwO is the binary current betweenthe molecular and molar processes. As in the above reported excerpt, the paranoiac machine is a rage against the ' ' is The BwO the organism. organism asa permutation: a multiplicity. The system (the BwO) is absolutely plastic, the transcendental element of zero, with featureless componentsaddedto the multiplicity. The disjunctive synthesisis in the wake of the paranoiacmachine, a rewiring of the body, which then manifests itself in a grid of an " either-or apparatus. Even though zero intensity is indivisible, any reconfiguration to desire is via the BwO: nothing in principle can be integrated off. ' The BwO is the massive conveyor between the paranoiac machine (repulsive, or repellors) and the Refer to Table I. 'Recalling Artaud's schizophrenic immersion, the body is locked into a presupposed linear transcendence,abrogatingimmanenceto the functioning of the system: the organsare the enemy of the body. Or abstractionrevolts against the body: 'This is the real meaning of the paranoiac machine: the desiring-machinesattempt to break-into the body without organs, and the body without organs repels them, since it experiencesthem as an over-all persecutionapparatus' (ibid, p.9). 'The concept of multiplicity: '[ ] was createdprecisely in order to escapethe abstract opposition .. between the multiple and one, to escapedialectics, to succeedin conceiving the multiple in the pure state, to ceasetreating it as a numerical fragment of a lost Unity or Totality or as the organic element of a Unity or Totality yet to come, and instead distinguish between different types of multiplicity' (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p.32). 'Me birth of the State,with mechanismsof separationand hierarchies.For example,zero intensity operating on a continuum, via an abstract componentof the State machine. 'Intensity that is drawn and squeezedbetween the belts of the strata is the body without organs: zero. The body without organs is not relative to a system of representation:a static device uniformly overcoding intensities through signification, a numbered-numberquantification. Since the zero point never actualizes through transcendent representation, the body without organs is always real: a trafficking of intensities that leak from the coded mechanismsof the super-stratum,a commerce that escapesinto the machinic phylum of desire. This not only functions as a weapon for molecular becoming-a deterritorialization from codedtranscendenccýbut,at the sametime, is appropriatedby the strata (the molar State) to recaptureflows of desireback into stratification. The system of stratification is the fundamental machinic component of (re)capture. The strata belts produce a taxonomy of homogeneoussystemsof thought that supersedelocalized variations of heterogeneity.

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 54 nziraculating machine (attractor). The miraculating machine glues partial objects together by means of the BwO. Even though the BwO maps every particle of existence together, thus being the sole source of communication, it has no feature intrinsic to itself, it is only functional, a process. Moreover, reterritorialization by a miraculating machine is parallel to a recoding processthrough the BwO. The dependenciesof the functional mechanism (for- example, attractors) pass- directly - between the --singularitieg-c6ricefffed:' the distinction of inside/outside becomes obsolete. The primary territorialization' is replacedby a recoding. The dependencyis affected by way of the BwO, which in turn has the 'destiny' of the system mapped out. 'More specifically, the attractors define the more or less stable and permanent features of this reality (its long-term tendencies),and bifurcations constitute its source of creativity and variability. Or to put it more philosophically, attractorsareveritable "figures of destiny," for they define the future of many systems' (Delanda, 'NOL', pp. 138-139). The dependenciesthat are stratified at the point attractor are expressionsthat converge out of veneer substances of content. Any non-linear process involves a coupling of deterritorialization and " reterritorialization. A paradoxical relationship arises between deterritorialization and insofar feedback into itself needsto be constantly remapped. the as reterritorialization, This creates, as stated in A Thousand Plateaus, the absolute defet-fiforialization " back to convergencerunning away, and eventually crashing some primordial space. The first synthesis. 'As in the operation of capitalism. "Also see Deleuze and Guattari's What is Philosophy? for an extended discussion on absolute deterritorialization: Teterritorialization of such a plane doesnot preclude reterritorialization but posits it as the creation of a future new earth' (p.88).

Chapter Id: Body without Organs 55 The subject emergesas a consolidated machinic assemblage,and has as its foundation attractive and repulsive attributes that guide the partial objects into the orientation of subjectivity. Particles are tracked insofar as the disjunctive network " bifurcations: from intensity. Only positive deviations arise produces a magnitude zero from the sum total outcome between the attractive and repulsive machinic " processes. By the time intensity multiplies it germinates into a plexus, a loop on a particular point-on-the disjunctive zero intensity. This componeAt'-6fth&'r&dI*fill9 virtual space, an intensive amplitude that cannot be divided without changing its nature, because any attempt at cutting up intensities occurs by mutating the 13 processes. The subject is not part of an internal existence; rather the subject is the effect of an intensity: a cartography of attractive and repulsive forces. (Repulsion is the place holder of the connective synthesis.Theseparticular lines of repulsive forces produce an intricate network and integrate to an intensity). Plasticity is the BwO's absolute accumulation to events, and the desiring" heterogeneous the machine constitutes element of production. The elementscan be "'In mathematicalterminology, the eventsat the onsetof self-organizationare called "bifurcations". Bifurcations are mutations that occur at critical points in the "balance of power" between physical forces-temperature,pressure,speedand so on-when new configurationsbecomesenergeticallypossible, and matter spontaneouslyadopts them' (Delanda, 'NOL', p. 135). "The term, machinic enunciation, is the fusion of multiplicities arising from heterogeneous formations surfacing the BwO. 'Inasmuch as these heterogeneities are matters ofexpression, we say that their synthesis itself, their consistency or capture, forms a properly machinic "statement" or "enunciation. " The varying relations into which a color, sound, gesture, movement, or position enters in the same species, and in different species, form so many machinic enunciations' (ATP, pp. 330-331). "The reason for this is becausethere is no homogeneity or common characterthat is incremental in the stagesof intensity. 141heBwO is the vehicle for abstractmatter. Anti-Oedipus is influenced by Marx's notion of plastic labour power, as an abstractproductive capacity, and Freud's theory of abstract fibido. Both are units of desire that are not material. This is not to suggestthat abstraction is an idealization. For instance,

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 56 entirely different, since the functioning of the BwO is to integrate absolute diversity. For instance,partial objects in the BwO eradicatenotion of the same: a programmed ontology. Deleuze and Guattari's polemic againstthe history of philosophy stemsfrom their aversiontowards the hierarchy, and implementation,of molar modelsto navigate 15 nature's attributes. What they execute is a radicalization of bifurcations within " molecular elements, thereby eliminating dependencyon transcendentprinciples that constitute a, universalization-between-forces; and that which is mbdeled by *it. -The BwO becomesinfinitely abstractthrough this de-hierarchical process,since it equals nothing but zero. For instance, any specific character would be a molar concretion without any justification on the molecular plane. Furthermore, all elements lose intrinsic relatedness,since particulars have nothing in common with eachother except the BwO. Since the BwO is infinitely abstract,it can mistakenly lead one to sPecify it as having an a priori foundation. On the contrary, the BwO is purely desiring'The the cipher multiplicity, of plasticity. notion of multiplicity savesus production: from thinking in terms of "One and Multiple"' (Deleuze,B, p.43). There is no attempt to produce universal concepts of what radical difference would be, since to conceptualizesuch a concept of difference would lead back into a molar model, the very conflict waged by Deleuze and Guattari. Reminiscent of Spinoza, the BwO encompassessubstance and alft-ibutes that correlate to the repulsive and attractive capitalism produces abstract correlates through money, an axiomatization. These processesare not ideological positions, but purely quantitative indices of abstract matter that are a potentiality: an abstraction of intensity. 151nparticular, Aristotelian separation of genus and species. 16Schizoanalysis.

Chapter H: Body without Organs 57 forces engineeredwithin the process: The body without organs is the matter that always fills spaceto given degreesof intensity, and the partial objects are these degrees,these intensive parts that produce the real in space starting from matter as intensity=O.The body without organsis the immanent substance,in the most Spinozist sense of the word; and the partial objects are like its ultimate attributes, which belong to it precisely insofar as they are really distinct and cannot on this account exclude or oppose one another (Deleuze & Guattari, AO, pp.326-327). To read Spinoza as a superior empiricist is parallel to the apparatus of absolute difference and plasticity, in the network of the BwO. After all, is not Spinoza's Ethics the great book of the BwO? The attributes are types or genusesof BwO's, substances,powers, zero intensities as matrices of production. The modes are everything that comes to pass: waves and vibrations, migrations, thresholds and gradients, intensities produced in a given type of substancestarting from a given matrix (Deleuze & Guattari, 4TP, p. 153). Zero intensity is immanent to the production of destratification, insofar as there is no extrinsic reliance, or possibility, of analyzing intensity outside of its deviation. Spinoza's notoriety in Capitalism and Schizophreniais in atheological terms, insofar as not allowing space for a transcendentdivinity of any kind. As Deleuze states: 'Spinoza's ontology is dominated by the notions of a cause of itself, in itself and through itsetf(Deleuze, EP, p. 162). For Spinoza, substanceis immanent to itselfBy substanceI mean that which is in itself and is conceived through itself, that is, that the conception of which does not require the conception of anotherthing from which it has to be found (Spinoza,E, p.407). And: For an attribute is that which intellect perceives of substance as it its so essence,and must be conceived through itself constituting (ibid, p.41 1). Time does not extend the BwO, since the latter is the processfor all possible

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 58 temporization. The reason as to why the BwO arises is not associated with chronology, or a logical order; rather, it is the plasticity of the BwO and multiplicities germinating within. The BwO does not have an occult distinction of difference. BwO is a megamolecule that relates solely to difference by the connective synthesis. 'A plateau is a piece of immanence. Every BwO is made up of plateaus. Every BwO is itself a in plateau communication with other plateauson the plane of consistency.The BwO is, a component of passage" (Deleuze, & Guattari, ATP, p. 159),.* Its-friachinic7-dotiplingg differential the are elementsof the components.And these couplings switch over, as discussedearlier, to generatethe disjunctive synthesis on the molar axis. The three synthesesare sequentially derived so that the undifferentiable objects, as intensity, are articulated.When the BwO redistributesenergyvia the disjunctive synthesis,all partial objects are connectedup to the rest of the system. By means of the BwO there is a recording, registration' of all difference to disjunctive explication. And, for any machinic system,we have a machinic unconsciouswhich is a recording, or inscribing, of everything on it. However, the questionarises,how do the BwO and the disjunctive synthesisdeeply integrate?And, what is the pre-figuring domain of schizo-delirium? To answer these questions is to investigate the desiring-machine's function to the BwO. In a desiring-machine,there is always a virtual possibility of a line of flight that " is itself into disjunctive There the code. machinic a can propel communication system, whereby a recording is imprinted onto the network. This would be a schizoanalytical movement to the machinic unconscious.'One phase is for the fabrication of the BwO, the other to make something circulate on it or pass acrossit; the same proceduresare neverthelessused in both phases,but they must be done over, done "Of the machinic unconscious.

Chapter ILI:Body without Organs 59 twice' (Deleuze and Guattari, ATP, p. 152). The egg is the milieu of pure intensity, spatium not extension, Zero intensity as principle of production [ ] the egg always designatesthis ... intensive reality, which is not undifferentiated, but is where things and organs are distinguished solely by gradients, migrations, zones of proximity (ibid, p. 164). There is a distribution of intensive principles of organs, with their positive indefinite articles, within a collectivity or multiplicity, inside an assemblage,and according to machinic connectionsoperating on a BwO (ibid, p.165). This virtual delirium is displayed in phase space," which allows for all possible madnessor psychosisto generateas a collective machinic production. The inability to track to zero degree'9 in phase space, allows Deleuze and Guattari to speculate on the possibility of non-linear lines of flights that abrogatenotions of identity, gender, or psychoanalytical complexes that sustain the subject in a solidified mode of " representation. This collectivity is the processby which separationbecomesopaque, "'The dynamic state of a point particle is specified by position (a vector with three components) and by momentum (also a vector with three components).We may representthis state by two points, each in a three-dimensionalspace, or by a single point in the six-dimensional space formed by the coordinates and momenta. This is the phase space' (Prigogine & Stenger, OC, p.247). Or, the BwO. Phasespaceis the dimension of behaviourial optionsby which a systemcan modify itself For example, the production of territory is smeared across real phase space. And, territorialization is an inhibited range of movement in phase space; it is glued to a semi-predictablemachine. If a system has varied behavioursof territoriality, it is locked into a particular dimension of potentiality. It is territorial insofar as it is to do with processesin space,a relation of proximity that takes place through linkages. The system is the nexus of behaviour. The miraculating machine in phase space produces attraction, a capturing. By casting itself over intensities like a net, miraculating machines perpetuatestratification by inhibiting movement.The flipside of this processis the paranoiacmachine's production of repulsion, where intensity is continuously deterritorialized. This destratification is a movement to the edge, a line of ffight. "'[ I We must be cautious: arbitrarily small doesnot mean zero, and it is not certain a priori that ... this limiting process will lead to the possibility of consistently predicting a single well-defined trajectory' (ibid, p.248). 'Massurni paraphrasesDeleuze on the problematic surrounding the thought of representational thinking in State philosophy: J ] it reposeson a double identity: of the thinking subject, and of the ... conceptsit createsand to which it lends its own presumedattributes of samenessand constancy [ ...] Representationalthought is analogical; its concern is to establish a correspondencebetween these synnnetrically structureddomains' (Massumi, in DeIeuze& Guattari, ATP, p.xi). In The Logic ofSense, Deleuzeperverts the traditional stronghold philosophershave enjoyed since the Socratic identification

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 60 and the instigation of a mass movement to destratified areasof the BwO is ignited. Echoing the bellicose writings of Artaud relays the importance of this collectivity in his Theatre of Cruelly: Once the plague is establishedin a city, normal social order collapses. There is no more refuse collection, no more army police or municipality. Pyres are lit to bum the dead whenever men are available. Each family wants its own. Then wood, spaceand fire grow scarce,families fight around the pyres, soon to be followed by general flight since there are too many corpses.The streetsare already choked withcrumbling pyramids,of the -dead,the vermin'gilawing 'attIf6"edj6s. The stench arises in the air like tongues of flame (Artaud, TD, p. 14). Or as Brian Massumi places the disintegration of the socius in the following: An unspecified enemy threatensto rise up at any time at any point in social or geographical space [ ...] What society looks toward is no longer a return to the promised land but a general disaster that is already upon us, woven into the fabric of day-to-day life. The content of the disaster is unimportant. Its particulars are annulled by its here The times: of plurality possible agents and and to come enemy is virtual (Massumi, 'EYW', p. 11). Since thought is illegitimately coded, by tracing, or capturing, intensity onto body intersecting importance intensity the the planes on without organs, of stratified lies precisely in this incommensurability: there is no external referencepoint to judge validity or purpose. With no universal frame by which to compare intensities of thought, Deleuze and Guattari addressthe possibilities of transfon-ningthe behaviour of molar operations that stratify discourse, politics, and economics into models of transcendence.Thesepunctual transmutationscontinuously reconfigure the dynamics, thus breaking through threshold strata levels. To move out of a stratum is to find a of reason and virtue: The philosopher is no longer the being of the eaves,nor Plato's soul or bird, but rather the animal which is on the level with the surfacc-a tick- or a louse' (p. 133). Finally, Delcuze states the purpose of philosophical investigations: '[ ...]a philosophical theory is an elaborately developed question, and nothing else; by itself and in itself, it is not the resolution to a problem, but the elaboration, to the very end, of the necessaryimplications of a formulated question. It shows us what things are, or what things should be [ ...]' (Deleuze, FS, p. 106).

Chapter IT Body without Organs 61 line of decoding and destratification; a line that short-circuits double-pincer articulation. This involves a multiplicity that excites elements in the direction of deterritorialization: a line of flight assemblingexcitation within the system. This can take place from a molar assemblageby influencing the macro to the micro; or by exciting the molecular which moves from the micro to the molar. There is always a tendency for stratification to be molar, a normalization that emits a frequency, or a i-edundancy, --formed out of heterogeneousparticles. Philosophy has traditionally based its discourse by combining models of thought to a whole super-stratum,a hierarchy from which intensities interact and are coded.The global consistencyof politics-powei-is transcendentof control, a Unifying and Totalizing thread that binds discourse together. However, by fragmenting, or drawing lines of flight, mutation on a regional, or local, strata emerges to: struggle against power, a struggle aimed at revealing and undermining power where it is most invisible and insidious' (Foucault, 'IP', p.208). Since intensity is always tied flight levels draw line threshold the that strata, an can up with within assemblage a of ruptures solidified strata to de-stratify, thereby generating a new configuration. This is always possible with multiplicities. 21It is never a question of transcendence since 21Multiplicities arerhizomatic assemblagesexpressingintensities.Intensity is an unpredictableopen territory; a zone where the interacting parts do not dependon a central processingunit or an external code,to validate its function. This blurs the function and formation dichotomy that arisesout of binary oppositions. Rhizomes engagemachinically, thereby according a wide range of fertile zones that are extraordinarily effective in dealing with networks of interaction. Rhizomes are always operative and' circumvent homogeneoustraits of expression(specialty, or applicability). In other words, any point in a rhizome (or patch) can be linked to any other without mediating through transcendence.Rhizomes can be anywhereon the lattice beyond its zone of designatedapplicability; '[ ...] any point of a rhizome can be connectedto anything other, and must be' (Deleuze& Guattari, ATP, p. 7). This is the trait, or feature,that indicates intensity, since the rhizomatic is the quotient traversing the body without organs. The strength behind rhizomes is precisely in the assaultit wages against Unity, the form of the One. Even though, at times, it may seemto be a very low, subduedquotient of intensity, it is, nevertheless, a rhizome: 'Every rhizome contains lines of segmentarity according to which it is stratified, territorialized, organized, signified, attributed, etc., as well as lines of deterritorialization down which it constantly flees. 'Mere is a rupture in the rhizome whenever segmentarylines explode into a line of

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 62 it is putting at stake the elements that have been combined. This is opposed to Plurality which remains the same throughout the phase change. Multiplicities arise be is is this to confused with an essenceor nature when something produced; not in is it is fusion, innovation, the whose sole existence or a processing change,rather that fusion. There is nothing outside or aboveit; there is no type or category by which to define it; it is the i-eal: 'There is no universal capitalism, there is no capitalism in itself, -capitalism'is at the crossroadsof all kinds of formations,-it-isý'fi&&4pitalimi by face, both-all for face invents its It them the and and reshapes eastern western nature. intensity; it be by its is & Guattari, A (Deleuze TP, 20). It own can exhausted p. worst' designated,but not treated as a case. However much the concept seems to work, is Since has be there to no made and remade7-pragmatics. continuously multiplicity is binary intensity by to, to oppositions, multiplicity can refer such as concept which 22 dangerous zone. experimental, a potentially The real, abstract virtuality, is then the BwO. As previously delineated, the direct association of the BwO is to the desiring-machine. The BwO is reached by flight, but the line of flight is part of the rhizome' (ibid, p.9). 22Amultiplicity only changesquantitatively in the type of composition that inscribes on the body without organs; a function of decoding. There are remarkable similarities between Deleuze and Guattari's critique of transcendencer-atheatre of philosophy-and Lyotard's discussionof the fictional, has 'We tale should not continue to confuse the closure of provided: representation philosophical from dropping discovery, that the that of scales our eyes, by those sham sarcastic representation, thinkers who come and tell us: what is outside is really inside, there is no outside, the exteriority of the theatre is just as much its interiority - don't mix up this sad piece of news [ ...] And every intensity, scorching or remote, is always this and not-this, not at all through the effect of castration,of repression, but because intensity Zero, due tragedy to the pertains to an asynthetic, great of of ambivalence, by it is, but in less the that so rapid surface engendered at each any event complex, movernent,more or of its points, at the sametime this and not-this. Of no point, of no region, however small, can one say what either is, becausethis region or this point has not only already disappearedwhen one claims to speak of it, but, in the singular or aternporalinstanceof intensepassage,either the point or the region has been invested in from both sides at once' (LE, pp.4 & 15).

Chapter H: Body without Organs 63 deterritorializing the strata.' The dismantling of the socius is capitalism's voyage to the BwO. The BwO comes at the end of history, even though it has always operated throughout history. Moreover, zero intensity cannot be specified in a chronological series (even though absolute deterritorialization culminates in zero intensity, it is neverthelessindependentof any temporal, serial processes).Nothing constrains the BwO, thus there is no privileged outcome or narrative obtained, only positive difference: For one only has to replace the actual terms in the movement that producesthem to bring them back to the virtuality actualized in them, in order to see that differentiation is never a negation but a creation, and that difference is never negative but essentially positive and creative (Deleuze, B, p. 103). The BwO is always a function of desifing-production,and the socius is the integration into a general, desiring-production mechanism. The body without organs is permeatedby unformed, unstable matters, by flows in all directions, by free intensities or nomadic singularities, by mad or transitory particles [ ] (But) there simultaneously occurs ... inevitable is important, that the very phenomenon earth a upon beneficial in many respects and unfortunate in many others: forrn Strata Belts. They Layers, to consist of giving are stratification. matters,of imprisoning intensities or locking singularities into systems of resonanceand redundancy,of producing upon the body of the earth into large them and small and molar aggregates molecules organizing [ ] The strata are judgments of God; stratification in general is the ... body judgement God (but the the earth, or without of entire system of flees becomes judgement, that eludes and organs, constantly destratified, decoded, deterritorialized) (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p.40). This then subordinateshistory to a topography, whereby the subject is located in an historical chronicle due to the socius stratifying, or layering, upon the BwO. This 2'For stratification leads to the socius. This will be elaboratedin the forthcoming chapter.

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 64 doubling, namely, the machinic phylum" and the inscription of history, is on the one hand, an historical dynamic of capitalism that is an irreversible destratification;" while on the other, this zone of destratification is outside of any mode of territorialization. Essentially, this is between a synchronic versus a diachronic movement that leads to the different planes of the BwO. This progression temporally comes under stratification. Accordingly, communication betweenthe different strata, for instance, in features, intertwine the machinic machine-code,genetic code, micro/macro physical phylum. An a-temporal event would entail the navigation to infinitely abstractmatter (the end of the machinic phylum). The termination point on the plane of destratifying production illuminates a virtual simulation of having 'knowledge' of everything. In is displacement from the capitalism, or the apparatus movement a words, schizo other that axiomatizes every formation or flow within the phylum. The nomadic flight fracturing by to the thresholds: through escapes phylum The schizophrenic deliberately seeksout the very limit of capitalism: he is its inherent tendency brought to fulfillment, its surplus product, its proletariat, and its exterminating angel (Deleuze & Guattari, 40, p.35). However, the question then posed, is what role does intensity have in the discourse of complex systems?The answer to this arises from the notion of global inhibit functioning in the that of a complex units a certain senseobstruct, repressor frameworks intensity friction To the with global and associated elucidate system. by in Deleuze Guattari taken the up and schizoanalysis. combat should enlighten Spontaneousemergence(deterritorialized stratum) is the other side of the spectrum of 2"We always get back to this definition: the machinic phylum is materiality, natural or artificial, and both simultaneously; it is matter in movement, in flux, in variation, matter as conveyor of singularitics and traits of expression' (ibid, p.409). 'Hence, the tendency for capitalism to move to schizophrenia.

Chapter H: Body without Organs 65 an organizedsystem,for the latter entails a rigidifying or thwarting to its own process. Furthennore, one always seeks to find a transcendentvalidator, a heavily encoded inducer, that will producedefinite taxonomic outcomes.Being fabricated from the start to meet the teleological demands of an ordered system, the inverse is true for spontaneousemergence,for there is no need for organizers, but just the capacity for pre-individual multiplicities and absolute difference to emerge.The continuum is not contingent. upon,-a temporal--sequence. --Spontaneous intensity "is"'nbt 'spatiAlly of temporally determined.This is not to suggestthat the machinic production apparatus has cooled down on the molecular continuum, but any pattern of organization is in always play with forces: For the BwO already exists in the strata as well as on the destratified plane of consistency, but in a totally different manner. Take the is indeed a BwO that opposes the there stratum: organism as a organization of the organs we call the organism, but there is also a BwO of the organismthat belongsto that stratum (Deleuze & Guattari, A TP, pp.162-163). The underlying systemof desiring-productionlies betweenMarx's and Freud's work: a micro/pragmatic experimentation.Marx and Freud are to be understoodwithin the same medium, namely, abstract desiring-production. Marx's analysis of capital equatesto that of production, while for Freud, desire is sublimated to representation. This functioning is not a contingent theatrical mistake, but is programmed by the nature of capital, insofar as it is within the capitalist machine to split the convergence in two. This entails that the immanenceof desiring-production needsto be repressed

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 66 in a molar formation stemming from the two dichotomies." The heart of the social mechanism lies within the configuration of production and consumption, whereby work is instituted in order to consume, and consumption creates a movement to produce. 'The code of production itself always aims at the "infinite receptacle of consumption"' (Virilio, SP, p. 127). The responseby Deleuze and Guattari is to initiate a plane of schizoanalysis, micro-politics, or latter, in A Thousand Plateaus, a pragmatics-whereby-a return'to the'immanence of desire 'and 'production -can--bd reinstated independently of the crevice in capitalist production. Pragmatics, encompassingthe manoeuvre to access schizophrenia, is taken up in the second volume, 'How Do You Make Yourself a Body without Organs?. The project is tied up with taking down global control systems that in turn decode macro/political apparatusesof capture. This is an affair not of ideology but of economy and the organization "For instance, by simultaneously stratifying matter and abstraction, we are at the illegitimate production of the body without organs.This fusion addsa body to the organism,thereby trapping desire within the matrix of Oedipus. Oedipus is an axiomatized application, whereby the volcanic processof pure capitalism can find stability in a mechanismfor rescuing codes.The triangular family engenders a psychopathology(Oedipus) which representsa private familial neurosis,through a collective coding system. Oedipus is the major source of repressionemployed by capitalism to impede flows of desire from escaping: 'Oedipus is this displaced or internalized limit where desire lets itself be caught. The Oedipal triangle is the personal and private territoriality that correspondsto all of capitalism's efforts at social reterritorialization (Deleuze & Guattari, AO, p.266) [ ...] the familial determinations become the application of the social axiomatic' (ibid, p.264). The oedipalization of the unconscious via capitalism thrusts the family to the limits of the social field. Once the circulation of codesand flux are not describedwithin kinship, the family becomesavailable to produce an axiomatic within capitalism. The family becomes a reserve army to be deployed for another task, namely, Oedipus. Since the capitalist operation is not particularly concernedabout the family as an empirical function of society, fandlialism emergesas being the interlock betweenthe group and the social field, which in turn gets connectedto other sets of categories.The Mummy-Daddy-Me floats as a mobile, abstract,spiritualized set of categories. The application of familialism describesthe overlaying of '[ ...] social categories (centered around the family)' (Massumi, UG, p.77). 'It is only in the capitalist formation that the Oedipal limit finds itself not only occupied, but inhabited and lived, in the sensein which the social images produced by the decoded flows actually fall back in restricted familial images invented by desire' (Deleuze & Guattari, AO, p.267). And: 'Oedipus is a vector: 4,3,2,1,0... Four is the famous fourth symbolic term, 3 is the triangulation, 2 is the dual images, I is narcissism, and 0 is the death instinct. Oedipus is the entropy of the desirin&machine, its tendency to external abolition' (Guattari, Chaosophy,p. 128-29).

Chapter Id: Body without Organs 67 of power (pouvoir) (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p.175). [ ] (IF)he material problem confronting schizoanalysis is knowing ... whether we have it within our means to make the selection, to distinguish the BwO from its doubles:empty vitreous bodies,cancerous bodies, totalitarian and fascist (ibid, p. 165). On the micro level we have already arrived upon the BwO. There is no privileged scale determining the outcome in the course of singularities bifurcating. 'The BwO is what remains when you take everything away' (ibid, p.151). The question of the plateau is to think of the procedure as a fisional multiplicity. These multiplicities are machines within machines. Macro structure machines narrow or impede lines of flight from emerging due to molar structures. A BwO is made in such a way that it can be occupied, populated only by intensities. Only intensities pass and circulate. Still, the BwO is not a scene, a place, or even a support upon which something comes to pass. It has nothing to do with phantasy, there is nothing to interpret. The BwO causes intensities to pass; it produces and distributes them in a spatium that is itself intensive, lacking extension (ibid, p. 153). A perpetual and violent combat between the plane of consistency, dismantling frees BwO, the and all of the strata, cutting across which it block it that the or make recoil (ibid, surfaces of stratification and p.159). In summary,whenevermachinesconvergeand interact, they inscribe upon the 27 BwO. Nothing populatesthe BwO exceptintensities:the cooling down processis the coding of desiring-production into apparatusesof capture. An ontology of elements, distinctions and strata-signsproduce homogeneoustiers by which desiring-production is captured.Stratification is the judgement of God, insofar as the freezing of the strata "Ibe field of immanenceor plane of consistencymust be constructed.This can take place in very different social formations through very different assemblages[...] with different types of bodieswithout organs' (ibid, p. 157).

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 68 " divisions, by transcendent creates as evidenced mechanismsof repression. According to Deleuze and Guattari, processesof stratification occur [ ] ... in every sphereof reality. In other words, any sphereof reality [ ] can ... be defined in terms of flows of matter of energy and the reservoirs driving those flows. At any given point in time, portions of theseflows will be involved in any number of actively self-organizing processes; other portions of the flows, however,will have sedimentedor hardened into more or less stable structures (Delanda, 'NOL', p. 143). Il inStrata homogenization that the are engagedof intensities'placetht'nbmadic ,-, ---, traj.ectory in a division, a splitting of intensity in two. Complex systems locate the agitation the strataproduce,an effect that can be chartedthrough binary oppositions-a metaphysicsof dichotomies and hierarchies.We can now statethat the basic machinic ' is intensities the to through element of strata neutralize a complementarity. An intensity that is locked in a state of capture is in a reciprocal, neutralizing alignment. This is a relationship of mutual cancellation, whereby intensities that are aligned within a stratifying production sequenceare reterritorialized: the twin effect that cancels each other out produces an element of control. The epitome of the 'Having discussedthe function of the BwO, it is important to note the dangers Deleuze and Guattari explicate concerning destratification. 'There are, in fact, several ways of botching the BwO: either one fails to produce it, or one producesit more or less,but nothing is produced on it, intensities do not pass or are blocked. This is becausethe BwO is always swinging between the surfaces that stratify it and the plane that sets it free. If you free it with too violent an action, if you blow apart the strata without taking precautions,then instead of drawing the plane you will be killed, plunged into a black hole, or even draggedtoward catastrophe'(Delcuze& Guattari,ATP, p. 161). Precautionis utilized to ward off suicidal deterritorializations when experimenting with lines of flight. Camouflage-a renderingimperceptible-allows for movementwithin the stratified levels ofrepresentation.'It is through a meticulous relation with the strata that one succeedsin freeing fines of flight, causing conjugated flows to pass and escapeand bringing forth continuous intensities for a BwO' (ibid). How does one construct a relation to the strata?Movement. However, drawing on the plane requires sober caution: a pragmatic interaction with the body without organs and a mimicking of the strata. Caution is deliberately stressedin A ThousandPlateaus: 'You don't reach the BwO, and its plane of consistency, by wildly destratifying' (ibid). Tapping into the machinic phylum's head allows for a tracking of heterogeneousparticles of intensity that solidify on the strata. 2913y this, I am suggestingthat the complementarityis a homogenizing,quantitative andrecognizable strata part. It is constituted by an interchangeable, regularized unit that is interrelated by a commensurability to the super-stratum.

Chapter IJ: Body without Organs 69 malfunctioning strata is its upheaval-a processwhereby intensities line up to escape through the thresholds of control mechanisms(an instance of deterritorialization). It is essentialto diagram the departing intensities that flow out of this equilibrium state that the strata institute. Either intensities are (re)capturedby a new pincer of stratum (machinery),thereby crashinginto anotherzoneof homogeneousspace,or they simply disappearonto the body without organs. It is the capturing of the escaping element that. becomes the basis for the- new strata; an issue that -particularly - concerns the secondvolume of Capitalism and Schizophrenia.The filtering mechanismutilized by the strata to sort out differenceý--betweenthreshold and gradient and type and degreeP--undergoesa phasechange in order to accommodatethe implementation of the new layers of strata. The ruptured tendency of this operation is compressedand concentratedinto an extreme form of the new strata.Every stacking of strata is a relic of a recaptured,escapethreshold. In other words, whenever there are two strata,there is a testamentto a fossilized threshold portraying escapedintensities. We then find that the conjunction of singular names (proper names) and intensive numbers are adapted to the strata. Singular names and intensive numbers that pass through thresholds of (re)territorialization echo within the strata: a sequencethat excites the molarization of stratification by generalizing singular names and, at the same time, eliminating multiplicities. This flattens intensive numbers onto planes of reducible units of measure,thereby assuringthe twin effect of generality and homogeneity.The limited capacity of the despot's overcoding lies in absorbing one set of codes into 'The intensity of stratification is equivalent to the degreeof difference between the threshold and gradient phaseof the strata7-thisseparationis neverperfected.If it were perfected,then the break-within the strata would enable a concept of types and degrees,that are in principle distinguishable, to cease to be machinically operative. Ultimately, intensities need to be traceable in order to solidify flux into coded machines.

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 70 another, while decoding melts the apparatus of overcoding to a zone of 31 axiomatization. Stratification is defined by a series of plates that split intensities. The plates lock themselvesinto thresholds,whereby a particular point on the intensive gradient is captured by the machinery. The locking sequence prevents the restoration or immanent - integration of --intensity.- The strata -produce- the- 'world" through'this capturing of liquid flows into tangible wholes-a rigidifying of ambivalent points of 32 The outcome is a difference in type: the machinery intensity to representation. processingintensities into homogenizedand interchangeablelayers of transcendence, the vertical stacking up of flows to the apex of the despot-a judgement of God. The immanenttrajectory that thwarts this captureis a diagonal movement. This movement is directed at the machinic circuit that places intensities onto homogeneousbelts, an obstruction from integration.With stratification comesterritorialization: a geographical territory that is derived from a zone of implementation. (Writing, for instance, territorializes on speech,an inscription processimplemented by the despotto sustain the transcendentgulo. It is always a relationship of singularities commercing within "The stratifying processdoesnot have an existing internal code relation, rather it has an apparatus that appearsin a single stroke-the despot.Dcleuze and Guattari's emphasison the notion of code is an from divergence flatten transcendentmodels of to onto plane, a machinic a out processes attempt representation.Uie flattening out of material flows is essential due to the importance they attach to practical instances,a pragmatic model of interaction that advancescritique. 'Intensities allow us to map the myriad layers of stratification. Everything at issue is compatible with the strata.The reasonfor this is that the strataprovide a guide to the excavationthat is undertaken to harmonize intensities to an equilibrium. The application-the overlaying of one set of elementsto another-of folding desire back onto the strata Mines molar production. Strata have to be tagged as systems based upon split intensities; for instance, the apparatus that is constructed through detcrritorialization (coupled with a complementary reterritorialization) is a process of dividing and allocating zones,whereby intensities solidify into wholes. Everything that is used has to be stolen from the strata.

Chapter ll: Body without Organs 71 the field of territorialization. (A territory is always flat in accordanceto the strata). The application of codes produces a stable correlation between elements of two different plates, a production of correspondencebetweenthe strata. However, there is " limit be from to the what can always a achieved utilization of codes. The limited effect that is generatedfrom the use of codespresupposesthe axiornatization of the world-economy: capitalism. Axiomatics are unlike codes; they actually are the stratifying - machine,-a pure -stratification. Granted, axiomatics ar&'still "attdched 16 specific correspondences,such as the abstract machine that includes the- basic processesof economic organization, statusand space-timelocale; but axiomatics only quantify problems and their solutions produceabstractchange,while codesare always specific about particular outcomes. The actual concrete arrangementis peripheral to the abstract model of axiornatics. In other words, there is an axiomatic system wheneverwe are dealing with an open-endedseriesof quantitatively defined problems. The singularities that operatewithin the axiornatizedstratification build constellations of numeric entities. Everything dependsupon spatial distributions, such as enclosures, "Codes provide an essenceto space,wherebymultiplicities that convergeon (re)territorialized space have processesof coded material within their assemblages:the machine is frozen from its desiring flows. Dcleuze and Guattari arguethat codeshave no exogeneoussource,rather codesthat are chopped in particular formations are always peripheral to desire itself 'nie end resuIt is a physical aggregate , constitutedby a hylomorphic apparatusof discourse.The hylomorphic model is a clue to the apparatus of capture the strata institute. Before venturing into hylomorphic tracings, it is essential to restate Deleuze and Guattari's insistence that it is never a question of movementspopulating masseswith molecular desire, but a conjunction of couplings that immanently model the variables the strata condition for themselves.The artificial simultaneity that induces multiplicities to a homogeneousrelic of fossilized strata, is a hylomorphic model/construct that is coded by a topographical system of reference.Hylomorphism is the cultural trait of attributing form to an exterior element.Formlessmatter is elevated to an intrinsic eternal Ideal that is down-loaded from ajudgement of God The result is a stratifying process, whereby plateaus within the body without organs are solidified through the appropriation by the strata. The form is a harmonizing structure that corresponds to the strata reterritorializing escapedintensities.Needlessto say, Deleuzeand Guattari position it not as a: 'question of surrendering[.. ] then [as] following where it leadsby connecting operationsto a materiality, instead of imposing a form upon a matter: what one addressesis less a matter submitted to the laws than a materiality possessinga nonios.One addresseslessa form capableof imposing propertiesupon a matter than material traits of expressionconstituting affects' (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p.408). This is the significance of emergentproperties that level a critique of the strata.

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 72 breaks, seepages,and circuits of desire, that will present the opportunity for the diagonal movement out of the abstractenvelopmentof axiornatics. Axiomatics do not depend on systemsof predefined solutions to determine their outcome in the socius, as evidencedby the despot. Capitalism builds this axiom model of interaction into its system of behaviour-a potential migration to a new equilibrium. The compensatory alignment is the fragmentation of intensitiestwisting into mutual zones of articulation that, the 'anti-market' can utilize. Antisysternic movements are an' autonomous'and intensive singularity (numbering-number)that are not fundamentally determinedfrom 34 the homogenizing generality of the strata. By disengagingfrom the stratified, servile formation, these movementsclimb onto a cusp, a diagonal movement away from the strata, whereby the segmentation that binds the intensity is deterritorialized. (The diagonal composition is undistinguishable from mapping-it is always a question of finding a line that is not overcoded,or segmented).The spontaneousevent cannot be tracked in relation to a metric of speedor velocity; rather, thresholds and singularities 34Numbering-numberputs into practice a nomad numeracy, an antisystemic, vortical motion that consistsof an open-endedprocess.A division into itself, the movement that is effectuatedby the nomad is made not by: adding a higher dimension, but rather in the simplest ways, by dint of sobriety, with the number of dimensionsone already has available' (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p.6). These lines that constitute the destratification processconvergewith the lamella belts of the strata. To open up the space of movement is to let the nomad fold back onto itself (Nomadism is characterizedby its mode of occupying smooth space, a zone of interaction that is not coordinated by a grid of stratification). What provides the nomad machine with a numerical componentis its fine articulation that complicates molar space.(The numerical is anti-coded by the nature of its difference). The fundamental character of numeracy lies in its composition to detcrritorialize, an escape from numbered-number systems. Numbering-number is a sequencethrough which the nomos can be designatedas a free distribution on the plane(s) of the body without organs.Sincenomosis never divided or segmented,numbering-number is never assigneda (transcendent)value becauseit functions only in smooth space.(As nomos can only divide into itself, to assign a value would have to take place on an immanent plane, whereby the intensity would fold back on itself to bifurcate a new threshold of becoming: '[ I becoming is the ... concept itself. It is bom in Ilistory, and falls back into it, but is not of it In itself it has neither beginning nor end but only a milieu. It is thus more geographicalthan historical. Such are revolutions and [ ...] societies of resistance,becauseto createis to resist: pure becomings, pure events on a plane of immanence' (Deleuze& Guattari, IVIP, p. 110)). To compensate,the strataimpose numbered-number chains through a systemic manipulation of homogeneousspace. This strategy is assigned a value becauseit is positioned through a coordinatedspacethat can only register an external, geometric matrix of numberhood.

Chapter H: Body without Organs 73 " discharged to the provide a map numeracy. III The State seemsto rise up in a single stroke, in an imperial form, and does not depend on progressive factors (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p.359). We are compelled to say that there has always been a State, quite perfect, quite complete (ibid, p.360). We have now discussedthe formal operation the strata institute to trap nomad flows onto plates of homogeneity. This allocates featureless components within a molar domain, a binding apparatusthrough double articulation. The importance of discussingthis processlies in the function of stratification: the inhibition of intensive flows that eliminates friction through the capitalist axiomatic. The systemof planetary, capitalist overcoding places a grid onto smooth spacethat is further complicated by rigorous cross-sectionsof political and libidinal investment: a displacementof Third Worlds into the Centre matrix. The designatingbands that distribute intensity on the Earth geometrically section the orbital diameter of the planet, whereby every part is connected to every other by the Centre. A complete navigational apparatus is constructedfrom which the Centre controls desiring-production,a strategyof capturing intensity to a molar economy of desire. The machinic foice of the capitalist worldeconomy generatesnot only a deterritorializing space of commodity production, but also a complementary reterritorialization, that allows for the ever expansive developmentto continue. 'We are not only seeinga processof internationalization of "This should be taken with caution. The actual impact of singularities, the physical event accorded to the strata,is a diagonal line that is actualized(reterritoriahzed) as it attemptsto move away from the belts that hold it together. In other words, singularities that are on the point of convergenceare cut-up in their range of intensities producing a saturation of flows that will come together in the abstract machine. (nie two processesthat are essentialto the operation of the strata are the abstractmachine of mutation and overcoding. 'niese two processeswill be discussedin the forthcoming chapters).

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 74 the economy, but a processof globalization-that is, the interpenetrationof economic activities and national economiesat the global level' (Castells, 'IENF, p. 19). Before '6 discuss function 'market' the the the we of within capitalist world-economy, it is important to summarize the role of the (despotic) State within the context of the preceding sections. This will allow us to bridge the discussion of the preceding sectionsto the latter parts of the study. Of particular interest for the latter part of the study is the concept of models of realization in relation to the State.-However; for the moment, let us investigate the formation of the State and the process of coding that occurs to bind desiring-production to the strata. In addition to A ThousandPlateaus, we examine the first part of Kenneth Dean and Brian Massumi's First and Last Emperors in our discussion of the State apparatusthat captures intensity by coding heterogeneouselementsto a hierarchy of suppression. The opening part of Eb-stand Last Emperors provides us with a glimpse into the despotic terrain that regulates and commandsthe State, with all its methods of " in punishment and paranoia group-formations. This in turn recodesthe mass into a unified movement toward transcendence: The "individual" in a despotic state is a working part in a megamachine-or rather, a mega-organism.The people of the empire are organs of the emperor's body. The organicity of the system is supraindividual. In other words, body parts have been abstracted from individual bodies and recast as social formations (Dean & Massumi, FLE, p.80). 36The'market' diagrams movements that convergewith smooth space, a process that assembles minoritarian beconiings onto the matrix of the capitalist world-economy. 'Smooth space is a field without conduits or channels.A field, a heterogeneousmooth space,is weddedto a very particular type (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p.371). of multiplicity: nonmetric, acentered,rhizomatic multiplicity Deviating from an historical (despotic) State, and following a non-linear tracking, allows for 'market' processesto emerge and bifurcate on the BwO. 37Or, collectiveparanoid: '[.. ] bringing into operationeverything that militates againstany liberation of schizo desire in the social situation' (Guattari, MR, p.86).

Chapter H: Body without Organs 75 The strata fixate movement within the confines of territory. To achievethis sedentary plane, transcendencevia the emperor is instrumental in slowing down the processes of intensity that flow upon the BwO. Inscribing legislation not only on the earth, but " body, the upon enhancesthe credibility of the emperor as the dominion of truth. Repulsive and attractive forces position intensity to revolve around an abstract is State, the thereby that uni-directional to the mode coalescing a stratum machine of of -transcendence.Hence, the - State' orchestratesparticular'rndvýffidits 'throtigh -thd unfolding of predeten-ninedchannels,implementing transcendenceas the guarantor of the abstract State. 'it is an abstract process: a drive to "unity". To the extent that empirical states concretize that drive, they are one and the same. Every state is the state. The state does not evolve, nor even have an origin. It arrives, like fate, in a single stroke and fully formed, from a plane that cannot be located. Over and over again' (Dean & Massurni, FLE, p. 153). Unity, as composition of the whole, the one, is the 'probe head' of the abstract machine; the State propels further into the many strata of the BwO, capturing flows into coded matter. Recomposing, or continually drive into 'Any the to unity the terrain submission: and populace recoding, solidifies is necessarily a drive to dominion' (ibid, p. 194). By recodification, the levelling of strata integratesinto exteriority and interiority, leaving behind only tracesof lines, or in that turn assimilateand mould private and public space. of configurations, residues The etching onto the earth, transforming matter into codified material, is tapping into the vein of the phylum, aiding the liaison betweenthe molecular and the molar forces 'As in punislunent.

Axiornatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 76 " intensity. of As converter and capturer,the Statedoesnot just relativize movement, it reimparts absolutemovement.It does not just go from the smooth to the striated, it reconstitutes smooth space; it reimparts smooth in the wake of the striated (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p.387). The State strikes in a single stroke, emerging and giving birth to itself spontaneously.The attractorsgoverning the forces at play bifurcate in an instant and actualize the State formation with all its lines of movement. The awakening of territorial identity beckonsa domesticationof the populace into servitude, that in turn propels the identity of the despot, or exclusivedisjunctions, into motion. Yet there is always a leakage, a circulatory phase change that ceaselesslypushes flows to the outside, the exterior. The State responds by initiating a gamering of all facets of commerce to be plugged into the hierarchical plane of unity, thereby capturing all flows in order to recode and sanction them with legitimacy, within the confines of its apparatusof capture. One of the fundamental tasks of the State is to striate the space over which it reigns, or to utilize smooth spaces as a means of communication in the service of striated space.It is a vital concern of every State not only to vanquish nomadism but to control migrations and, more generally, to establish a zone of rights over an entire "exterior," over all of the flows traversing the ecumenon(ibid, p.395). The State launchesa teleological undertaking, capturing all movementswithin the phylum to be integrated in a linear formation. Feeding back into itself, but not find flows heterogeneously the emperorasthe apotheosis to assemble, we surrendering levels The of stratification determine the approximate locality of of all movement. (T)he sedentaryassemblagesand state apparatuseseffect a capture of the phylum, put the ]' traits of expressioninto a form or a code,make the holes resonatetogether,plug rý the lines of flight [ ... (Dcleuze & Guattari, ATP, p.415).

Chapter IL Body without Organs 77 heterogeneouselements that have been integrated into surplus-productivity.40Being orientated from the start, the State, with all its faciality traits, deems itself to be the impetus of division. Yet, as always, a crevice, a hole in the surface emerges:letting unbounded excess pour into the fissure of the phylum, whereupon a smoothing dimension seepsalong the cracks, evolving into a nomadic attractor that will have no territorial affiliation, only lines connecting points together onto the cartography of desire.--Multi-directional, sweeping and continually reabsorbing-into-the rhizomatic flight, the bifurcation point is the maximum thrust into capitalism." The despoticState collapsesunder it own homogeneousweight, and what remains is the decoding of all 4' The 'anti-market' sustains transcendence regulative mechanismsof command and . its mutant flows through abstract models of commodity production.43 It is not at all that the stateknows nothing of speed;but it requires that movement, even the fastest,ceaseto be the absolute state of a moving body occupying a smooth space,to becomethe relative characteristic of a "moved body" going from one point to another in a striated space. In this sense, the state never ceasesto decompose, recompose, and transform movement, or to regulate speed (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p.386). "If it can help it, the State does not dissociateitself from a process of capture of flows of all kinds, populations, commodities or commerce,money orcapital, etc. There is stillaneed for fixedpaths in well-defined directions, which restrict speed,regulate circulation, relativize movementýand measure in detail the relative movements of subjects and objects' (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, pp.385-386). 41'The capitalist State is the regulator of decodedflows as such, insofar as they are caught up in the axiomatic of capital [ ...] Once again, this axiomatic is not the invention of capitalism, since it is identical with capital itself On the contrary, capitalism is its offspring, its result' (Deleuze & Guattari, AO, p.252). '2'Homogeneousspaceis in no way a smoothspace;on the contrary, it is the form of striated space. The spaceof pillars. It is striated by the fall of bodies,the verticals of gravity, the distribution of matter into parallel layers, the lamellar and laminar movement of flows' (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p.370). 43'Death is felt rising from within and desire itself becomesthe death instinct, latency, but it also passesover into these flows that carry the seedsof a new life [ ...] flows of property that is sold, flows of money that circulates, flows of production and means of production making ready in the shadows, flows of workers becoming deterritorialized [ ]' (Deleuze & Guattari, AO, p.223). ...

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 78 In monitoring flows via transcendent codes, the State attempts to control desiring-production from leaking out of the strata. However, the future (capitalism) grasps the archaic remanentsof the State, and statutes of unity, to only invert the apparatus of coding. The centralized architecture of authority, symbolizing omnipotence,gives way to abstractcomponentsof deterritorialization that are always wavering at the edge. The border lies betweenan actualized constitution of ideology, that-controls'and limits integration of- heterogeneouspirticlesý,'and'the frehzy-tlfat'i§ prowling and meshing all flows within the machinic phylum. Speed annuls the synthesisof social identity that attemptsto fill the crevice betweenthe machinic flows " integrated of production and an mode of order. We must take quite literally the idea that man is a face drawn in the sand between two tides: he is a composition appearing only between two others, a classical past that never knew him, and a ftiture that will no longer know him. There is no occasion either for rejoicing or for weeping. Is it not commonplacenowadaysto say that the forms of man have already entered into relation with the forces of information technology [ ] which together create something other than man, ... indivisible 'man-machine' systems?(Deleuze, F, p.75). 44'The violence of speed has become both location and the law, the world's destiny and its destination' (Virilio, SP, p. 151).

Chapter III The Stratification of the World-Economy

The world-economy is the greatest possible vibrating surface, one which not only it. is level, but, depth It the the or manufactures at a certain conjuncture accepts huge the area, of over a which creates uniformity prices world-economy at all events is living It blood distributes throughout organism. a structure a as an arterial system in itself Femand Braudel

Chapter 1111: The Stratification of the World-Economy 81 I [...] We have seenthat the earth constantly carries out a movement of deterritorialization on the spot, by which it goes beyond any territory: it is deterritorializing and deterritorialized. It merges with the movement of those who leave their territory en masse[ ...] Movements of deterritorialization are inseparablefrom territories that open onto an elsewhere;and the processof reterritorialization is inseparablefrom the earth,which restoresterritories. Territory and earth are two components with two zones of indiscemibility-deterritorialization [ ...] and reterritorialization [ ...I (Deleuze & Guattari, JVIP,pp.85 & 86). The -industrial age -defined -as the age-of insects.-.Jt's --even worsenowadays: you can't even tell in advancewhich stratum is going to communicatewith each other, or in which direction. Above all, there is no lesser, or higher or lower, organization; the substratum is an integral part of the stratum, is bound up with it as the milieu in which changeoccurs, and not an increasein organization.' The concept of nomadic-meshwork structures argues that molar control is not systemically controlling the economic sphere. This is an instance of mapping selforganizing systems. The self-organizing system is desiring-production that does not designate substitutive wholes to the regulation of the market. As in the molar apparatusof control, the Stateappropriatesa mechanismof reproduction to sustain an identifiable level of power.' However, the State's function appearsto diminish with the advent of de-socialization in capitalism: flows are mediated through the implementations of axiomatics that produce solutions horizontally, as opposedto the vertical transcendenceof the despot. Thus, the role of the molar apparatusof control is made problematic by the modem State,and its relation to the worldwide axiomatic, capitalism. To map the function between the territorial State and deterritorializing 'Gilbert Simondon, Lindividu ef sa genise physico-hiologique, pp. 139-141, cited in Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p.69. 2'Therc is no State which does not need an image of thought which will serve as its axiomatic system or abstract machine, and to which it gives in return the strength to function' (Delcuze & Guattari, AO, p.88).

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 82 is further capitalism, compoundedby the different assemblagesboth utilize to circulate their intensities on the body without organs.3 The State, on the one hand, absorbsthe earth as its object of unity, a transcendent alliance in the form of recoding or subsuming multiplicities into a homogeneouswhole; while on the other, capitalism operates from a highly developed abstraction that replaces recoding with ' Wow, ' 'the axiomatics-'materialized commodif)ý. For capitalism to effectuate the commodification-of the earth,-the modem State cannot substitute,the -abstractionof axiornatics to a unifonned recoding apparatus.Unlike its predecessor,the 'despotic' State,fused all surplus and labour into a reterritorialization of the earth, a transcendent recoding. The modem State, in its desire to maintain an image of exleribriýV in the ever-expansiveworld capitalist axiomatic, replaces transcendent overcodings with models of realization to realign itself with the abstract flows of commodity ' production. Marx's genealogy captures 'differentiated capital' by tracing the developmentof town-form versus State-formmarkets; the State-form appropriatesthe town-form through taxation, thereby absorbing it in accordance to the State. 'Hereafter, referred to as BwO. 'Deleuze and Guattari state that capitalism's appropriation of private property is no longer but land the the the of production as such, of convertible soil, of means of or nor even ownership abstractrights' (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p.454). 'The dynamics of exteriority will be discussedlater in the chapter. 6',Ibe immenserelative deterritorialization of world capitalism needsto be reterritorialized on the modem national State [...] As Braudel shows, capitalism started out from city-towns, but thesepushed deterritorialization so far that immanent modem Stateshad to temper their madness,to recapture and invest them so asto carry out necessaryrcterritorializations in the form of new internal limits' (Deleuze & Guattari, JV1P,p.98). Granted the above is rather compressed,but these ideas will be unfolded throughout the chapter. 7Massumi speculateson the differential capital in postmodernity, a non-linear perspectiveon Marx's analysis. He is quick to point out that the State-form's appropriation of the surplus generatedfrom the town-form is not a contradiction in terms of generatingcapitalism itself, but the possibility of capital 'The do defline dense through the not of relation points capitalist models of realization: accumulation a contradiction or an opposition, but a differential (more or less surplus value, or this kind or that, with

Chapter HI: The Stratification of the World-Economy 83 However, even between the archaic meansof recoding and the present globalization of the world economic system, are economic bloc-forniations that are utilized axiomatics to ward off schizo flows from dispersing into the global sphere of dissipation.' For instance,incorporating regions into unified free trade zones regulate vast amounts of surplus and production to remain within certain boundaries,thereby allowing the commodification of labour within the apparatusof the State.The abstract machine-is the mediator between the hydraulic flows of commodity -production that assiststhe State to not only retain an image of itself, but at the same time corrodes the mechanismsthat sustain it. ' Thus: The abstract machine of overcoding ensures the homogenization of different segments, their convertibility, their translatability, it regulates the passages from one side to the other, and the prevailing force under which this takes place. It does not depend on the State, but its effectiveness depends on the State as the assemblage which realizes it in a social field (for example, different monetary segments, different kinds of money have rules of convertibility, between themselves and with goods, which refer to a central bank as State apparatus) (Deleuze & Parnet, DIA, p. 129). Bloc-formations intertwining betweenthe abstractmachine of overcoding and the schizo-flows that leak from the State,relay a mechanismthat perpetually impedes flows from supersedingthe role the Statepremisesitself on. The lateral dispersion of production, as opposed to the recoded, verticality of the despot, pressuresthe State or without the possibility of capital accumulation). When the capitalist relation is actualized, the particular content it receives displays an almost infinite variety of concrete forms' (Massumi, UG, p.203). 'Bloc-formations are a paradigm caseof modelsof realization, by which the modem Stateoperates. 'Ile mediation is betweenthe abstractmachine of overcoding and mulation, and will be discussed in relation to antisystemicmovementsin the next chapter.For the presentcontext, it is important to bear in mind that there: '[ ] is no dualism between abstractovercoding machines and abstractmachines of ... mutation: the latter find themselvessegmentariz4 organiz4 overcodedby the others,at the sametime as they undermine them: both work- within each other at the heart of the assemblage' (Deleuze & Parnet, DIA, p. 132).

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 84 mechanism to perpetually strive to apportion ruptures within its own boundaries. The 'lateral pressure"' exerted on the social machine demands a reterritorialization, not a " by despotic the the recoding, as evidenced apex of synthesis, but rather through axiomatizing solutions to harbour economic cycles and trends within the vicinity of the State's containment. The nineteenth century witnessed the British Empire's rise of controlling liquid flows of capital to a hierarchical, hegemonic super-stratum, that once in-motion; -captured the most -lucrative'trade territories for the assimilation, of goods. " In the twentieth century, America has followed in the British example of hegemonic command, though not through economic monopolization through what Arrighi labels as the "'proletarianization" of the globe, but rather 13 of nationalism' . 'The rise "See Nazil Choucri and Robert C. North, Nations ill Conflict. National Growth and International Violence, for a discussion of this concept. "'[ ] (I)n place of the territorial machine, there is a 'megamachine' of the State, a functional ... pyramid that has the despotat its apex, an immobile motor, with the bureaucraticapparatusas its lateral surface and its transmissiongear, and the villagers at its base, serving as its working parts' (Delcuze & Guattari, A 0, p. 194). "Admittedly, the rise of the British Empire in the nineteenth century is rather more complex than what I have elucidated in this section. My intention is to have a general link to the nineteenth century power Centre (London) that predominantly captured surplus-production for its expansion across the globe, to the discussion concerning US hegemony. Refer to Arrighi's The Long Twentieth Century, chapterIll, for more specific details concerningthe Empire in the nineteenthcentury. 'For the capitalist world-economy asreconstitutedunder British hegemonyin the nineteenthcentury was asmuch a "world empire" as it was a "world-economy" - an entirely new kind of world empire to be sure, but a world empire none the less' (Arrighi, LTC, p.58). "As Arrighi argues, US hegemony placed the welfare of all the subjects ("high mass consumption") above the absoluterights of property and the absolute rights of government. If British hegemony had expanded the inner-state system in order to accommodatethe "democratization" of nationalism, US hegemony carried the expansion further by selectively accommodating the "proletarianization" of nationalism' (LTC, p.66). The ability of the US military mandateto supplant any nation from attempting to override its position of nuclear domination also plays a role in Arrighi's discussion of hegemonic powers. America has provided economic assistance,or mini-Marshall Plans, to countriesin need,but this has always been included with military protection to thwart the expansion of 'communism', or 'un-democratic', systems.Coupledwith nuclear-umbrellaprotection, the economic homogeneity of the American core power has infiltrated peripheral zones since World War II: 'At the height of its hegemony [ ] the US government substituted itself for the "free worldisV' regimes of ... South Korea and South Vietnam in their respectivewar againstthe communist regimes of North Korea and North Vietnam. At the same time, however, it actively encouraged the greatest wave of decolonization the world had ever seen' (ibid, p.70). Since the focus of this study is to portray the

Chapter HI: The Stratification of the World-Economy 85 and maintenance of hegemony is a function of comparative advantage in leading economic sectorsand political/military advantagein the control of international trade and victory in world wars amongcore states' (Chase-Dunn& Podobnik, 'NWW, p.7). However, Wallerstein arguesthat, as we draw close to the end of the millennium, the US superiority is diminishing, as other forms of technological methods become available. Thesemodelsplace the hierarchial military structureto other self-organizing lattices;-such-as netwars and cyberwars." In, order to sustain-its economic"superiority in the light of a dwindling hegemony, the United States has embarked on a regionalising crusadeto combatthe post-industrializeddilemma that hascrushedmajor 15 in the city zones country. A recent incentive for the United States to fortify its economic boundariesfrom other competing regions has been the introduction of The contemporaryeconomic and geostrategicinterlink-,it is not possibleto discussthe historical role the US military matrix held during the height of its hegemony in the cold war. Specifically, this section concentrateson the current US agendathat is regionalising economic zones,particularly NAM and the imminent WIIFTA. This will be discussedshortly. "Cyberwar is information-related conflict at the military level. The tactics involved consist of a decentralized,decision-mak-ingprocess;andby redistributing information from the ground-up(or bottom up) enablesthe tactical forces to self-organize as the situation demands.Me information revolution implies the rise of cyberwar, in which neither massnor mobility will decide outcomes;instead,the side that knows more, that can dispersethe fog of war yet enshroudan adversary in it, will enjoy decisive advantages' (Arquilla & Ronfeldt, 'CYC'). By de-hierarchizing decision-making, information is transported within the immanent system to allow for efficient communication. Traditional forms of combat have always relied on centralized control that would then navigate the next position for the attack or defence. Cyberwar's contemporary objective is to incapacitatethe opponent's informational sphere through electronic contamination. This varies from blocking radio communication to fluid models, such as viral implants into the enemy's databasenetwork. 'This form of warfare may involve diversetechnologies,notably for C31,for intelligencecollection, processing,and distribution, for tactical communications,positionings, and idenfification-friend-or-foe (IFF), and for "smarV'wcaponssystems [ I it may also involve electronically blinding, jamming, deceiving, overloading, and intruding into an ... adversary's information and communicationscircuits' (ibid). This warfare dependsless on geography than on the ability to navigate virtual obstacles into communication. Netwar is the geostrategic resistance that converges with micro-economic systems on the periphery of the capitalist worldeconomy. Netwar and cyberwar will be fully elucidated in the following sections. "To situate the complexity surrounding the hegemony of core powers, Los Angeles will be discussedin the next chapter in relation to minoritarian assemblagesrealigning machinic processes through die post-industrialized, hyper-capitalism in the city. 'These'anti-mark-et' systemswill present a model that undermine molar organizations of the State.

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 86 North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). Arrighi arguesthat the lifting of tariffs that have traditionally isolated the three nations economically has led to a unification, by allowing cheapsurplus labour to be garneredin Mexico, while America " for (LTC, Canada 354ft). This is seen and are potential markets p. consumergoods as a potential for reducing costs by allocating the production of goods to a peripheral zone, thereby loosening the effects of high costs in the post-hegemonicState. This is to:-'[.,. j shift the,-locus of production to -lower-wagezones (from city -to country,--or from core to peripheral zone both within statesand within the world as a whole) [] (and) to redirect global flows of labor ("outward" from core towards periphery [ ]), (Wallerstein, PJVE,,p.99). Chase-Dunnand Podobnik's interpretation of NAFTA rests on the assumption that tariff-free trade has been the outcome of a hierarchial leadershipin the United States. As an attempt to salvagethe remaining remnantsof a hegemonic world power, they suggest: NAFTA is a contemporary functional equivalent of the bloc-formation is integration' kind 'international This more a economic process. of consequenceof rivalry among core states than a harbinger of global bloc-formation be integration [ ] the can seen as process of economic ... the functional equivalent of the colonial imperialism of past fortify to their respective core powers attempting centuries-with rival geopolitical positions by establishing dominance over the surplus accumulation of 'their' parts of the globe (Chase-Dunn & Podobnik, "More importantly, the influx of East Asian capitalism has played a significant role in the arrangementand ratification of NAFrA. As the following notes argue, in particular, China's current position in the capitalist world-economy, the US is extendingits peripheral boundariesto foreign sectors (Mexico), in an attempt to: '[ ] incorporate more thoroughly and extensively reservesof cheap labor ... closer at home' (ibid). Briefly: 'The real engine of growth in China today is the foreign-investedsector, most of which is concentrated in southern China, mainly in Guangdong. Considered on its own, Guangdongprovince is far and away the fastestgrowing economy in the world. Guangdong'sindustrial output climbed by nearly 20 per cent per year from 1980 to 1990, and 27 per cent in 1991 (Smith, 'CRC', p.90).

Chapter 1111: The Stratification of the World-Economy 'NWW', pp.II& 87 16). Initially, the above excerpt would be valid for a diminishing, hegemonic superpower to redefine its boundarieswithin a lucrative boundary, namely, a low-tax base, such as Mexico. In essencethen, the authors' polemic rests upon the following question with regardsto NAFTA's role in the coming century: is the emergenceof NAFTA an attempt to curtail the collapse of a core power by despotically recoding neighboring territories? And, -'doesthe sudden economic boom in Asia's special' economic zones (SEZ) contribute to the authors' argument?17Chase-Dunnand Podobnik would agree that North America's role in assertinga core block of trading partners would allow for a concentratedposition globally, due to the emerging markets sprouting in Asia, 18 China. By appropriating Mexico into the dominant economic power, particularly "China is the largestrecipient of foreign investment:$3.5 billion in direct foreign investment (DFI) poured into China in 1991 and an overwhelming $I I billion in 1992 (Nicholas D. Kristoff, New York Times, 15 June 1992). Furthermore: 'take any statistic and YVufind that China now affects the world substantially: imports in 1994 were around $115 billion; inflows of foreign capital totalled $40 billion in 1993; Hong Kong, which will become part of China in mid-1997, is the world's eighth largest stockmark-et' (The Economist, 28 January 1995; emphasis added). Following the trajectories, as delineatedin Table II, of nineteenyears in the world economy, affirms the immense growth pattern of a nation that has doubled its purchasing power. Compared to the other nations listed, China has surpassednot only its ability to attract foreign investmentbut has transplantedit directly into the SEZ. 'A major force in the surge of Chinese economicgrowth in the 1980shas been the increasein exports (10.4 percent per year in 1980-87) as the Chinesebegan to imitate their neighbours, following Deng Xiaoping's declaration that: "it is glorious to be rich"' (Castells, 'IENI', p.36). ]Furthermore,China's present exports have increasedto around twenty per cent of its GNP, and when comparedwith Japan (exports about twelve per cent of its GNP), the former's position is now being emulated by its neighboring countries. Finally, China is now the fifteenth largest exporter as opposedto ranking 34th in 1978 (Smith, 'CRC', pp.61-62). See also Lynn Pan, The New Chinese Revolution. 18However,the argumentfor China's ability to spectacularlysurpassthe World Bank's expectations needsto be noted. The structure employed by Chineseeconomistsis in the proficiency of opening up doors that had remained shut for decadesto any, and most foreign, competitive investments: 'Since 1979, foreign investors have pumped more than $30 billion into joint ventures and wholly foreignowned firms, and this foreign investment accountsfor a major, and in some industries, dominant share of the new capital investment' (Smith, 'CRC', p.70). This relates back to chapter1, where the contrast is developedin relation to social democracy and totalitarianism (with Chile as an example). The role of axiomatics is crucial to understandingthe processof production in capital. China is a paradigm of a modem day absolute limit. The political expansionsthat were necessaryto alleviate the economic market, in order to encompassexternal investment,or the reduction in the number of axiomatics taking root, have resulted from capitalism,

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 88 North America would sustain its economic influence globally. However, in equating the present status of NAFTA as the 'functional equivalent' of past exploitations is inadequate,since it dismissesthe integration of heterogeneousstructuresthat coexist with multiplicities, that in turn, propel market dynamics further. By engaging in a molar analysis of economic strategies of supply meeting demand fails to incorporate a molecular, or at least a meshwork design model, that would- allow, for- an infusion of different strata levels playing crucial roles--in the development of social and economic history. To present a marxist theory, or neolate classical economics, of capital perpetuating the gulf between core structures and peripheral regions, is still engagedin a linear mode of integration of commodities and surplus labour. In other words, Braudel's perspective challenges the traditional structures of capital by questioning the power relations that identify it with 'antimarkets', or Centre zones. Braudel arguesthat markets are molecular, whilst capital parasites on markets in order to expand, thereby striving to form monopolies that function to direct the flow of markets,that in turn, operatein a molar fashion. Marxist theoriescannot accommodatethe non-linear dynamicsthat emergeout of 'anti-market' processes.When the market has been subsumedwithin the apparatusof capture,then, according to marxist thought, capital resortsto regulating the whole procedure from historical detail fluxes An would or social alternative approach as not a molar axis. forming out of a homogeneoussuper-stratum,but rather cartographicprocessesviewed from the molecular axis. This would provide a more accuratepicture of a rhizomatic institutions interconnects history that molar and meshwork organizationswithin social

Chapter HL The Stratification of the World-Economy 89 the machinic phylum." The machinic PI-ocesses that act as sieves suggesta fluid form of reintegration of capitalist flows that allow for divergent systems. Deleuze and Guattari's suggestionof capital being one big independentState is occurring through a global attractor where commodity flows are being lured into this one phylum of exchange. Axiomatics are being pushed to deliver a further intensification of abstraction (naked labour, independent capital), that in turn delivers an enormous Machinic surplus: The role of the State in this regard, within the capitalist axiomatic, is the more manifest in that what it absorbsis not sliced from the surplus value of the firms, but added to their surplus value by bringing the capitalist economy closer to full output with the given limits, and by widening these limits in turn [ ...] The role of a politico-militaryeconomic complex is the more manifest in that it guarantees the extraction of human surplus labour on the periphery and in the appropriatedzones of the center [ ...] (Deleuze & Guattari, AO, p.235). Meshworks track the flows generating on the BwO to trace the current economicmilitary society that allows for trade regionalization, such as NAFTA. It is important to chart these flows in order to generatelines of flight that can steer the system to another bifurcation point. To posit North America's single position as an attempt to cling on to its homogeneity is misleading, for the purpose of core blocks forming for mutual trade is an isomorphic transition leading to an expansive global-economy, rather than an isolationist movement to protect boundaries by recoding others economically. To place such emphasison NAFTA, as a model of regional exploitation from their pat-is of the globe, implies a homogeneousimperialism that infiltrates third"For instance,to counter Chase-Dunnand Podobnik-'scritique of the presentstatusof NAFrA lies in their inability to incorporate the varied levels of the phylum that allow for a heterogeneousspaceof interaction. By preconceiving a unified systemwithin the politico-military-cconomic complex, they do not map the genealogyof the economic spherethat led to such a trade pact. Instead, they arguethat the processof engulfing Mexico is situated within the historical narrative of exploitation of surplus labour. By not taking into account the futural dynamics of late capital, their critique confines axiomatics to another form of despotic recoding.

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 90 world zones.Rather, regional consolidationsshould be conceived as global attractors occurring at this stage. Since Chase-Dunnand Podobnik's view is restricted to only three countries at present,their theory cannot accommodatethe extensionof NAFTA. Building on the recently completed NAFTA between the US, Mexico, and Canada, The Western Hemisphere Free Trade Agreement ()VHFTA) will be even more 20 joining dimensions by ] Americas '[ Whatever two the together ambitious or . ... has beginning, from this today, the capitalism mobilized may-have assumed quantities a force of deterritorialization infinitely surpassingthe deterritorialization.proper to the State' (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p.453). Chase-Dunnand Podobnik presupposea governmental molar structure that is looking to realign itself as it competeswith other regions, particularly with the Asian influx of cheap labour 2' The same problem is encounteredwith the analysis of an . " instability forecasting. By the that of will alleviate anticipated market price instance interaction, for homogeneous the the sphere process within of analyzing a State or each agent acquiring perfect knowledge within the market, is levelling a "Proponents predict that the US, the dominantindustrial power, would benefit most from increased exports of about $36bn a year [ ...]A free trade agreementlinking all of the western hemisphere [ ...] would build on rcgionalising trendsalready in place, notably NAFTA, the Mercosur and Andean Group agreementsand other sub-regional agreements'(Morris, 'Problems Widen with Trade Pacts', p.5). "To achieve this perspective, China allocated special areas,such as the SEZ, to experiment with deregulation of the labour force. Even though the United States Clinton administration is putting factrcmains 'humanize'the Chinese the to that through the working population, on government pressure privatization of the rural counties in the Guangdong'sPearl River delta: '[ ...] China's 18 million rural force, 23 the workor around 93 million workers (on averageoneof rural per cent enterprisesemploy third of rural per capita income [ ...I )' (Smith, 'CRC', p.86). Close to a 100 million peasantshave found work- in the SEZ, that would otherwise have been enslavedwithin a feudal type of imprisonment or starvedin the rural areas.'From 1979 through 1991 foreign investorspumped some $20 billion in direct foreign investment (DFI) into China. Forty per cent of this has gone into Guangdongwhich, together with Shanghaiand Fujian, accountsfor about 60 per cent of all DFI. Foreign investmenthas grown by 34 per cent per year since the mid 1980s' (ibid, p.91). 22Rcferto cbapter I regarding non-linear measuresof forecasting in the economy.

Chapter HL The Stratification of the World-Economy 91 myopic discourse,since the world-economy is not a closedsystemfunctioning towards a teleological equilibrium. Rather on closer examination, meshwork structures incorporate the diverse, multifaceted elements of interactions or flows that act as sieves to filter complex behaviourial patterns resulting from self-organizing 23 SySteMS. The-premise'ýofthe axiomatic states,that,the,processof deterritorialization-fulfills its own immanencewithin the socius, and realigns itself horizontally across the global zone without saturating the system of interaction. By enlarging its limits, the social axiomatic: '[ ...] functions well only by grinding, spluttering, and starting up again-all this implies social organs of decisions, administration, reaction, inscription [ ]' (Deleuze& Guattari, AO, p.251). Yet, acrossthe boundariesof assimilation there are always modes of resistancethat attempt to either sabotageor moderatethe speedby which the overcoding through axiomatics is taking place. Axiornatics operatewithin the apparatusof the molar, as well as within the molecular, plane of the BwO, thereby continuously reconfiguring the machinery within a meshwork network. By into Third the the Centre, the expansive utilization of cheap world regionalising labour, under the heading of 'free worker', is one of the two flows that capitalism is 'From a political perspective, the realization of NAFIFA has led to antisystemic movements of resistance,particularly so with the Chiapas resistanceheaded by the enigmatic Marcos, that clearly implies a tactical obstacleto the presentreintegrationof North America- This is probably the beginning: '[ ] of a long series of social protests which will be carried out in opposition to the regional ... restructuring implied by the NAFTA trade agreements'(Chase-Diinn& Podobnik-,'NWW', p. 16). This chapter will concentratespecifically on economicmovementsof resistance,as opposedto the political 'protests' that are presently occurring.

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 92 born frOM;24 the other flow is the decoding of money-capital, which propels the system to bifurcate into more complex meshwork structures. 'By substituting money for the very notion of a code, it [capitalism] has created an axiomatic of abstract quantities that keeps moving further and further in the direction of the deterritorialization of the socius' (Deleuze & Guattari, AO, p.33). This is contrasted to the indulgent paranoiac machine that results from the despotic State. The bi-polar distinction of -the -BwO. namely ,repulsive ,versus attractive flows; is - difficult to distinguish completely since both aspectsare manifestedin the recoding of the despot, as well as in the axiomatization of the capitalist. For instance,NAFTA presentsus with an attemptedrecoding of its territory through privatized exchange,by engulfing neighbouring zones on the BwO (an instanceof axiornatization), while also decoding its own despotic image through the acquisition of cheaper productivity and surplus labour. H Molar applications and molecular systems are virtually impossible to locate in capitalism as separateand distinct modes of operation. As we have discussed,the despot recodes the legislative, juridical and economic flows to a vertical structure, diverse between the elements consists of a central whereby any communication processingunit that delivers the law from an abstraction. Moreover, the birth of the State formation 'in a single stroke' complicates the problem, since it is difficult to linear historical, narrative of the State apparatusthat would allow us to produce an "The inclusion of all nations in the international debt economy and the creation of "peripheral" areasof underdevelopmentin the very heart of the Western world's largest capitals have blurred the boundariesbetweenthe "Erst" and "Third" Worlds' (Massumi, UG, p. 137). The eclipsing of thesezones will be fully explored in the next chapter.

Chapter III: The Stratification of the World-Economy 93 (or function in (The its application) organization capitalism. molar ascertain modem can only isolate coded elements through notions of Unity, Plurality and Totality: a tracing on the body without organs). Another approachwould be to seek the model is. definition State the that actually of what with would provide us a of contact However, to seek such a definition is hindered by the very role the State performs, State Since the to transcendent operates super-stratum. all elements a recoding namely, by a double,articulation of decoding and recoding, how is it possible to articulate the definition of the State,if all that is available is a binary-opposition oscillating between elementsof intensity and a transcendentmediator? In attempting to define the central unit in the contemporary capitalist world" impossible. The it is find that capitalist realistically untenable and economy, we labour in flows is the and of commodity a system which world-economic sphere in far larger located ] '[ than that of any political authority, zone a production are: ... decisions to the hence totally these of political set responsive processesare not and hegemonic to those of a state of any stateý-even 26 (Wallerstein, PTYE,p.105). The task is made difficult by the functioning of capitalism itself. The capitalist process is from heterogeneous micropolitical movementsthat elementsrising a combination of is This into bifurcate homogeneous the surface of to the other attractors. strata push "I'lic difficulty stems from the system depending:'[.. ] on the levels of activity of its various subIf levels in the the we try to of some sub-units affect one another. activity wWch on manner units, and "fix" all this activity by trying to define the entire state of the system at one time [ ...] we immediately lose appreciation of the evolution of these activity levels over time. Conversely, if it is the activity levels in which we are interested,we need to look for patterns over time' (Eiser, ACCM, p. 192; cited in Plant, 'On the Matrix: Cyberferninist simulations', p.6). 'The importance of the world economy lies within this context, namely, in its ability to create a homogeneousuniformity independentof the State,even though, as Wallerstein notes, it surpassesany immanent 'it dictates is it that As Braudel this system: an states, world-economy political stratification. is a structure in itself'.

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 94 desire: a line of flight, or singularity, that decodesthe apparatusof capture(or models of realization). However, the functioning and implementation of axiomatics into our modem arena isolates naked labour further. Modem day capital, executed by axiomatics, presentsthe cavity between capitalism and schizophrenia. The question that ariseswithin this context is the following: how important are molar applications and molecular systems to the operation of the capitalist world-economy? One important-site by-which to -answer-this question, is by investigating,the globalization process that has engulfed our contemporary world. Traditional modes of discourse have relied exclusively on linear methods to diagnose the complexity capitalism inflicts; this resorts to an historical narrative aligning modes of contact superficially. The emergenceof an ubiquitous, totalizing system, such as capitalism, captures all models of interaction and discoursewithin its production. 'The only universal history is the history of contingency [ ] The schizophrenicvoyage is the only kind there is' ... (Deleuze & Guattari, AO, p.224). 27 With the coupling of naked labour and money-capital, molar aggregation increasinglybecomesconcentratedin macropolifics. Macropolitics is a molar apparatus that processesflows by implementing a bureaucraticarborification. (rhis is contrasted to nomadic-meshworks). In other words, homogeneouscomponents realign flows intensity by into that segment a uniform recoding rigid captures within a particular, " functions One hierarchy. the of of macropolitics is to sustain the a centralized 'By examining singularities as a passagewayinto the developmentof the State,we: 'Always lookfor the molecular, or even submolecular,particle with which we are allied' (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p. 11). The following sectionswill explore this line of thought. 'The molar control structuresof the Stateare the arborescentorchestrationsthat producehigh-level beliefs to maintain and perpetuate a homogeneousstasis. An arborescent central processing unit accomplishesthis task by demarcatingzones of intensity to particular pathways. Reminiscentof Kalka, a whole bureaucraticmachinery is set up to meditate intensities via flux and code on the body without

Chapter HI: The Stratification of the World-Economy 95 identity of the State by placing segmented,partial objects into zones of unity; these overlap from homogeneouswholes to subaggregateddivisions within the unified image of the State: The modem political system is a global whole, unified and unifying, but is so becauseit implies a constellation of juxtaposed, imbricated, orderedsubsystems;the analysis of decision making brings to light all kinds of compar-tmentalizations and partial processesthat interconnect, but not without gaps and displacements(Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p.210). Without a transcendent unit to consolidate processes(or flows) to a hierarchy in capitalism, the role of macropolitics becomes essential in defining the State. Macropolitics acts like a sponge constantly trying to soak up the spillages that seep through the 'gaps and displacements' of the hierarchy. These movementsto the edge of uniformity locate nomadic-meshworks,or antisysternicmovements, traversing the BwO's molar axis. By demarcating intensity, that perpetually exudes into lines of flight, political and social history finds macropolitics into two domains or regions. As Deleuze and Guattari indicate, the defining characteristicsof the molar segmentarity, namely, the flows that escape, 'minuscule at first, then swelling', are the blocformations that divide the East and West spheres;for they are: '[ ] perpetually being ... by undermined a molecular segmentationcausing a zigzag crack, making it difficult for them to keep their own segmentsin line. It is as if a line of flight, perhapsonly a trickle to begin with, leaked between the segments,escaping their centralization, eluding their totalization' (ibid, p.216). By merging the discussion regarding the hegemonic status Britain and the organs. 'Arborescent systemsare hierarchical systemswith centersof significance and subjectification, central automataEke organizedmemories [ ...] an elementonly receivesinformation from a higher unit, and only receives a subjective affection along preestablishedpaths' (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p. 16).

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 96 United States possessedfor the last two centuries, the East can be considered the 29The (East for the two and West) zone molar aggregates peripheral core powers. suppressflows from unhinging into schizophrenia,and are defined more by the 'tiny trickles' that rupture segmentsinto a lingering deterritorialization than by their molar impositions. This is constantly driving the cycle of the world-economy to reconstruct its dynamics. On the one hand, NAFTA is a reterritorialization, and yet, at the same time; - the- states-involved- are deterritorializing (axioniatizing-production- forAhe is double-bind The the process that of complementary reterritorialization market). bifurcations The that occur within the the produces gaps at moment of phasechange. the system" allow nomadic-meshwork structures to emerge within the overall is flow This a pattern of a two-fold processthat, on the one of capitalism. circulatory intensity (commodity fluctuations decodes of of continuous quantities side, intensity takes the of or recoding, other side, a recapturing, production), while on from function the that The to escape up elements soak models of realization place. Centre be Surplus-production the the that of within matrix cannot axiomatized strata. finds itself in Third World sectors, a zone where antisystemic movements converge " becomings becomings. By the trajectories of molecular charting with minoritarian that circumvent the Centres of control found in the molar organization of the State, is decoding (regionalising Centre's territories) the change phase present capitalism's intermediary '[ ] Antisystemic the act: as crucial social movements control apparatus. ... 'This of courseis not the caseas we reach the millennium, for China's rapid redevelopmentfrom had East. has West 'state-capitalism' the the to of surpassed any notion communism 'The socius deterritorializing with a complementaryreterritorialization. "Refer to chaptersI and IV for a discussionof peripheral zones.

Chapter III: The Stratification of the World-Economy 97 32 (Wallerstein, PTVE, Bifurcations allow for gaps 104). of global systemic change' P. and seepages to expand on the terrain of the BwO, thereby forcing the system to interact in heterogeneous ways. The importance of the East and West dichotomy stems from the hegemonicsystem extending its homogeneity in all directions of the globe. As Deleuze and Guattari elaborateon this point, they suggesta careful analysis since homogeneityneedsto be distinguishedfrom isomorphismwhen detailing the expansive world.:.system: To the extent that capitalism constitutes an axiomatic (production for the market), all States and all social formations tend to become isomorphic in their capacity as models of realization: there is but one centeredworld market, the capitalist one, in which even the so-called socialist countries participate. Worldwide organization thus ceasesto pass"between" heterogeneousformationssince it assuresthe isomorphy of those formations. But it would be wrong to confuse isomorphy with homogeneity. Eor one thing, isomorphy allows, and even incites, a great heterogeneity among States (democratic, totalitarian, and, especially, "socialist" States are notfacades). For another thing, the international capitalist axiomatic effectively assuresthe isomorphy of the diverse formations only where the domestic market is developing and expanding, in other words, in "the center". (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p.436; emphasisadded). Hi Delanda's research on the function of hierarchies (molar constructs) and 'self(molecular fluxes) is or essential to the above consistent aggregates' rhizomatic discussion. Borrowing from Deleuze and Guattari, he maintains that either doctrine cannot sustaina full explanation of the behaviourthat occurs betweenprocessesin the capitalist market. Rhizomes are elementsof strata that are: defined not so much by the locus of control, as by the nature of the elementsthat are connectedtogether' "Wallerstein. proceedsto discussthe relevanceof the two antisystemicmovementsthat have taken place since the nineteenthcentury: the social movementand the national movement.Within the context of this chapter, we argue for economic movements of resistance that are based on commodity production, and not a form of socialism.

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 98 (Delanda, 'TGM'). On the other hand, the homogeneouscomponent of hierarchies is premised on the foundation of a nucleus that binds all the ingredients into consistent strata. Within this modeling of meshworking, 'goal-oriented organization' is evident in both cases,for as Delanda suggests,the molar organization of cities interlink and produce diversity, even in areasthat at first appearhomogeneous: [ ] cities are also the home of government,commercial, religious and ... in hierarchies, which decision-making is centralized, and the other defined decisions through well, of -travel chains of-command.-At -effects every level of this chain, that is, at every rank, the inhuman componentsare very homogeneous:the very processof rising through the ranks performs a sorting operation which results in more or less uniform behaviour within eachlevel. Indeed, the correct functioning of a command chain assumesthis uniformity and predictability. And yet, here as elsewhere, when we actually study a given hierarchical bound find to we mixtures of meshwork elements, even structure are if only in small proportions (Delanda, 'HN4H'). The BwO (or the machinic phylum) is the sifting mechanismrelaying between the two processesto engineerdifference,that in turn, allows the social stratum to stack levels of class (or strata) on the social body. As the layers are packed on the body of capital, there are some formations that resist deterritorialization. These layers harden to erupt a State apparatus, thereby, devising mechanisms of repression (through is forms The BwO to that the the socius that sedimentation on coding) retain unity. dictates from a theological and judicial domain, whereby all surplus is directed to preservethe super-stratum(despot). The organism is not at all the body, the BwO; rather, it is a stratum on the BwO, in other words, a phenomenonof accumulation, coagulation, in that, order to extract useful labor from the BwO, and sedimentation imposes upon it forms, functions, bonds, dominant and hierarchized organizations, organized transcendences[ ...] the BwO is the glacial foldings, the sedimentations, where alluvions, and reality coagulations, recoilings that compose an organism-and also a signification and a subject-occur (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p. 159). The strata territorialize liquid massesby decelerating (or hardening) flows into a

Chapter 1111: The Stratification of the World-Economy 99 recoding of desire. By charting the sieves, or abstract machines, of self-organizing mechanismsthat propel the BwO to bifurcate into strata, surface images appear to presentthe State with an exteriority. Once this is linked with the processof thought, the recoding of the mass is finalized." The double articulation presiding over the social stratum is (or occupies)the segmented,striated expanse(the State),and also the exteriority (thought") that produces the (external) facade; the 'double-headed' construct is at once a relay-mechanism-that is perpetually engagedin- an-exchangeof maintaining the other. 'They are the principle elements of a State apparatus [...] distribut[ing] binary distinctions, and form[ing] a milieu of interiority. It is a double articulation that makes the State apparatusinto a stratum (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p.352). And yet, with the historical (or linear) extension to exteriority, the State engagesin the destruction of its own image. However much the State desires to exteriorize reason for its own purposes,thought is always beyond the reach of the State. By exteriorizing thought to justify its teleology," the State relinquishes it to smooth space,a meshwork pattern that occupies:'[ ...] without counting, and for which there is no possiblemethod,no conceivablereproduction,but only relays, intermezzos, resurgences'(ibid, p.377). However much the accumulatedstacks of class (or caste) flows there are solidified, are nonetheless structures of matter that cannot be captured "But confining ourselves to the image, it appears that it is not simply a metaphor when we are told of an imperium of truth and a republic of spirits. It is the necessary condition for the constitution of thought as principle, or as a form of interiority, as a stratum' (Dclcuze & Guattari, ibid, p. 375). 'Massumi's analysis of the transcendent process utilized to partition the body in cellular models of repression is unsurpassed: 'Openings must be cut into its perception to provide entryways for generality; it must be coaxed into acquiescence or consonance with society's overall autonomic desire for stable equilibrium; it must be kneaded into shape, to make it physically able to fulfill the productive, reproductive, and destructive duties it will be assigned in the central molar domains of Work-, Family, War, its desire must be turned to glory; it must be marked [ ]' (UG, p. 113). ... "'The State gives thought a form of interiority, universality [ ...I' (ibid, p. 375). and thought gives that interiority a form of

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 100 16 'something coded, always escapes'. and To elucidate the current dynamics of power Centres and peripheral zones, it is important to engagein contemporary modes of warfare that antisystemic, economic movements of resistance" are utilizing against the mandate of the State. Moreover, it is essentialto consider how the gulf between power Centres and peripheral zones is being sustained,and yet,-at the-sameýtime,-how marginalized-group4ormationsarise to combat inequalities within the market compass.Thesemodels of autonomy present a relay into meshwork structuring, that once in motion, do not necessarilyrely on the desire to their accommodate of capital and social mobility. The nation-state been is have Braudel's that to the work portray particular attractors significance of impede flows formation immanent by State the to the of 'market' systems saturated from realizing their decentralized position. By tracing the role 'market' had in the history of decenteredcommunities provides a possibility for determining the peripheral is in 'anti-market' 'anti-market' The the model. construct contemporary, zones between by the producer and the as a mediator a middleman acting presented consumer.By 'fixing' prices from the onset, the 'anti-market' engagesin a striated in in level demand turn the economy. the which controls of supply and pricing system, By limiting supply, the producer can dictate price policy vertically, as opposedto the 36'Accordingto Deleuze and Guattari, all social formations are DEFINED BY WHAT ESCAPES THEM-the "lines of escape"or becomingsrunning through them-not by their contradictions. In other words, they are defted by how they try to contain escape(their apparatusesof capture)' (Massumi, UG, p.204). 37Or economic micro-systems.

Chapter III: The Stratification of the World-Economy 101 market determining the energetic forces that would createthe price." As Deleuze and Guattari suggest,the horizontal price configuration hasbeenwitnessedin decentralized communities, or nomad space. The fluid dynamics by which communities allocate resourcesindependentlyof middlemen, or by-passingthe model of supply and demand leads Delanda to stress that only in markets do: cartels, [ ] we have any idea of what the dynamics of price formation are. In ... other words, it is only in peasant and small town markets that decentralizeddecision-making,leadsto prices setting themselvesup-in a way that we can understand.In any other type of market economists simply assume that supply and demand connect to each other in a functional way, but they do not give us any specific dynamics through which this connection is effected (Delanda, 'TGM'). What relation do 'peasant and small town markets' have with current developments in the capitalist market? Moreover, is there a similarity between subversive activity aligning itself with a fluid price structure that resembles decentralizedexchangein primitive communities?By tracing recent developmentsin minoritarian group formations, is there a present tendency for nomad-meshwork by-pass in to structures conventionality traditional methods of interaction within the supply and demand ratio? Finally, how are these processesviewed by the molar apparatusthat continuously reaxiornatizesminoritarian becomings? The concept of nomadic-meshworksystems,or synergetics,suggests:'[ ...]a relationship betweenthe individual decisions and the macro-level of dynamical collective micro-level of processesof society [ ...] (and) is appropriatefor integrating the interactions of several sectors of a society [ ...] such as the relationship between the economy [...] and 3'Braudel diagnosesthis medium through: '[ ] the market economy, with its many horizontal ... cornmunicationsbetweenthe different markets [ ...] here a degreeof automatic coordinationusually links supply, demand and prices. Then alongside, or rather above this layer, comes the zone of the antimarket, where the great predatorsroam and the law of the jungle operates.This - today as in the past, before and after the industrial revolution - is the real home of capitalism' (Braudel, CC, pp.229-30; emphasisadded).

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 102 processes of migration' (Mainzer, TCCDM, p. 274). The thrust of minoritarian assemblagespush further into the liquidation of what the capitalist market has set through monopolies or oligopolies. Braudel's thesis rests on the proposition that the 'market' has never been inclined towards the Centre zone be have been to allowed never of capitalist production, since prices of commodities placed in a 'free' market enterprise.By distinguishing the three zones of contact of the -capitalist process-,Braudel, suggeststhat, the, core zone 'cbntr6lled'thd--flbWs' bf hegemonic (European) Centre the the thereby commodities and production, allowing dictate to the role of peripheral segments.These segmentswere capacity control and " into homogeneous craters of surplus-production. Aligned with Deleuze and placed Guattari's development of the capitalist decoding, Braudel, however, refines his cperspectiveof the world' into three arrangements: Every world-economy is a sort of jigsaw puzzle, a juxtaposition of least levels. but different On interconnected, the ground, at at zones three different areasor categoriescan be distinguished: a narrow core, The fairly developed centre or core middle zone and a vast periphery. a diversified. The is that next most advanced and contains everything zone possessesonly some of thesebenefits, although it has some share in them [ ] The huge periphery, with its scattered population, ... by backwardness, the archaism, and exploitation contrary representson " (Braudel, CCC, 39). p. others The function of the 'market' is the processwhereby deterritorialization fails to capture (recoding the or axiomatization) that complementary-reterritorialization and absorb "As Deleuze and Guattari state in A ThousandPlateaus, this formula is the: '[ ] modem version ... in The formula, the the conditions. archaic empires under (Efferent already obtained which oldest of back flows, it decoded flows that turned the the the more simulated empire ovcrcoded archaic more flows decoded The it it forced the to more enter into a central axiomatic, the more change. against and they tend to escapeto the periphery, to presentproblems that the axiomatic is incapable of resolving or controlling (even by adding special axioms to the periphery)' (p.468). 'Furthermore, the core zone is the intensive gradient for the production of the 'anti-market', while the periphery is the sector for 'market' dynamics. The latter is achieved through the acceleration of following be in This lowering the chapter. will with prices. cxplorcd production coupled

Chapter III: The Stratification of the World-Economy 103 allows for striated expansion on the BwO. The schizo-flows that escape recoding are the borderless elements. They deterritorialize the mechanisms that provide capital with its metric space of molar control. Accordingly, these totalities encompass a direction that intersects with 'anti-market' commerce by subverting homogeneity. 'Schizophrenia or desiring-production is the boundary between the molar organization and the molecular multiplicity of desire; this limit of deterritorialization must now pass into the interior-of the molar organization (Deleuze & Guattari,''AO, -p'. 102). The interior of the molar organization deterritorializes its image perpetually; desiring to engineer its complement, namely reterritorialization, it sustains the exteriority of empowerment. However, the striated space that holds commodities within a core territory is displaced or uprooted, realigning molar structures (monopolies oligopolies) into the crevice of schizo-deterritorialization. or Smooth space is the closest simulation of the BwO, and distance is not regulated through a centralized agency of resonance, but through points that waver between chaos and bifurcation. Thus: Smooth space is precisely the space of the smallest deviation: therefore it has no homogeneity, except between infinitely proximate points, and the linking of proximities is effected independently of any determined path. It is a space of contact, of small tactile or manual actions of content L...] (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p.371). The stratum that launches the State in a single sti-oke is undermined not only in the capitalist synthesis through axiomatization, but also in movements that continually subvert the operations of the 'anti-market' process. The latter are utilizations meshwork strategies that combat the established domain of the State. IV Mongols of the thirteenth century were almost always outnumberedby their opponents,yet they conquered,and held for over a century, the largest continental empire ever seen.The key to Mongol successwas their absolute dominance of battlefield information (ArquilIa & of

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism Ronfeldt, 'CyC'). 104 41 The distinction between cyberwar and netwar is essentialin this section, since these two paradigm shifts have succinctly depicted the future of warfare betweenthe molar Stateand geopolitical movementsthat resist. Manual Delanda's Mar in the Age of Intelligent Machines (TVAIAI) processesthe above reported excerpt in order to develop ideasof the warfare machinery intersectingthe machinic phylum." However, the significance of the above passageconsistsin the convergenceý of the nomadic'war machine and economic micro-systemsthat antisysternically deterritorialize the molar mechanismsof repression.Even though this convergenceof the nomadic war machine and economic micro-systems connectsto the machinic,phylum, it is, however, from the other side of the continuum of Delanda's discussion. Delanda's historical in is Age Intelligent TFar Machines, the in the arsenal, exposition of military of appropriated by the State to centralize nomadic warfare discharges that would, " deterritorialize latter, However, the the the molar position of system. otherwise, "The combatemployedby the Mongols consistedof 'hordes' that relied exclusively on information regarding the enemy. With their ability to consolidate small numbers of soldiers, they were able to thwart and break down the fortressesof the enemy.Specifically, infiltrating linear information networks they quickly adaptedto the positions the enemy kept. The non-linear dynamics of cyberwar that the Mongols engagedin, consistedof 'arrow riders' that were the precursors to the modem day satellite network."'Arrow riders" enabled field generalsto keep high command, often thousandsof miles from the theater of war, informed as to all developmentswithin four or five days of their occurrence.For forces, field between the Mongols also employed a sophisticatedsemaphoresystem that communication allowed for swift tactical shifts as circumstancesrequired' (Arquilla & Ronfeldt, TYC'). Within the implementations basic I that the this suggest required for netwar have already been of chapter, context in place since the highly developedMongol warfare. However, the importance of the Mongols' warfare is to show how economic micro-systems,with their contemporary interactions, have assimilated such tactics to impede the homogeneity of the State. "There have been six monumental instancesof the machinic phylum crossing 'right through the middle' of the war machine. SeeDelanda's IVAIAf for the particulars surrounding the intersection, and for the Mongols under Genghis Khan (pp.64 & 11,23,64, respectively). 'For instance, Delanda's discussion on the development of radar takes as its starting point the is demarcation fortifying boundaries This be State's the taken the to enemy. of against of problem 0 territorial sectorsto buffer, or to implement, a fortress againstnomadic infiltration: 'The development of radar resembles the evolution of fortress design in that it relied on the application of scientific

Chapter 1111: The Stratification of the World-Economy 105 namely, meshworksor netwars, are not exposedin contemporarywarfare in Delanda's text. As Deleuze and Guattari explicitly assert: '[ ] the state has no war machine of ... its own; it can only appropriateone in the form of a military institution [ ]' (Deleuze ... & Guattari, ATP, p.355). What is essentialto distinguish in this context is Delanda's discussion of the war machine as envisioned by the military complex, and the nonstate actors that metamorphosethe smooth spaceof the nomad war machine.Delanda provides* us-'with "'an' interesting 'moledulaf assemblagesconverged within a State apparatusto form the post-modem, military " that zones engulf our world. In other words, logistics provide the State with the necessaryapplication to implement netwar as an exteriority of the molar organization. Therefore, cyberwar becomesthe facadethat enablesthe State formation to constitute the war machine as exteriority." The medium of logistics is the combination of various elements of the 'agricultural, economic and industrial resources' (Delanda, TVAIM, p. 105) that navigate and manage a centralized control unit that disperses physical and infonnational aspectsof the Statemilitary machine: [ ] other self-sustaining feedback loops were establishedbetween the ... emerging military and industrial complexes [ ...] as armies became instruments of the State, they helped to bring internal cohesion and order, which in turn produced a marked increase in agricultural and industrial production. This surplus of taxable wealth could then be geometric thinking to the problem of maintaining a constant sweeping beam bearing on the enemy, a "beam" of bullets in the case of fortifications, as well as a beam of radio waves in the case of the dernaterializedwall' (Delanda, IVAIM, p.51). 'Of particular interest is the role RAND Corporation provided in the development of war games in today's contemporaryarmory: 'In the latest RAND Corporation design the SAM and IVAN automata simulate armageddonsin which politicians and diplomats (not to mention other humans) have been taken out of the strategic decision-mak-ingloop' (Delanda, TVAIM,p. 168). 45cltis not enough to affirm that the war machine is external to the apparatus.It is necessaryto reach the point of conceiving the war machine as itself a pure form of exteriority, whereas the State apparatusconstitutes the form of interiority we habitually take as a model, or according to which we are in the habit of thinking' (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p.354).

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 106 tapped by the State to fuel the growth of its standing armies (ibid, p.63). Furthermore, the mutating history in TVai-in the Age of Intelligent Machines delineatesthe weaponry developmentto only surrenderto the last human frontier. This consistsof the US (hegemonic)deploymentof cybernetictechnology, namely, the C'I, by the Pentagon.46Delanda only presents us with a telescopic component of the machinic phylum, that being the conjugation that assists the sedentary State to assimilate the 'subterranean' voyages of the nomad war machine. Delanda's thesis rests on cybet-war as it is envisioned presently by the State military. Granted this is an outcome, according to Delanda, of the State machinery having to recode nomadic warriors from antiquity to the presentmodel of warfare (as a form of exteriority). Yet, the ambitious text never quite graspsthe momentum behind the State's interminable implement innovate to voyage and continuously modes of warfare. What is the molar it Is to not the 'infinite' spacesthat exist betweenthe organization attempting combat? transcendentmodel of empowermentand the image that it portrays? Is there not a gap, a discontinuous repartition of blocks, with spacesbetween each one' (Deleuze 'See chapter2, 'Expertise', (Delanda, WAIM pp.167ff. 'Autonomous weaponsare only one of the applications of AI announcedin a 1984 Pentagondocument entitled "Strategic Computing" [ ...] these applicationssignal a new role for the military engineer:not only doeshe have to connectscienceto the war machine, he also has to transfer the expertise of individual scientists to a "knowledge base," the reservoir of know-how and heurisitics necessary for robotic warriors to reason like their human counterparts' (p. 161). Delanda's engagementis restricted, as in the above passage,to decentralized cyberwar, as forwarded by the Pentagon.However, what is at stake for a full analysis of the State war machine is not so much what the US government is implementing as a means to combat netwar, but rather, what methods are being exercisedby non-stateactorsthat push and launch methods for the State to retain its image. This in turn pushes the State to develop highly researchedweaponry that will perpetually sustain die cxteriority of the molar apparatus.In fact, the State: '[ ...] can only regulate piecesthat revolve around it at distancefrom it and from each other. It is an astronomical construction.' (Deleuze & Guattari, K, p.72). Tactics, such as decentralizing information to implanting viral devices into the enemy's database,are at the core for the future of State cyberwar. As The Economist's latest 'Defense Technology' survey speculates:'If you cannotsubvert the enemy's information flow, you can information war; destroying information systems ested of perhapsdestroy it. This is another sug mode =9 with weapons of pure information, such as computer viruses. Again, information warfare seems to provide impressive powers, allowing victory without a shot fired in anger' (10-16 June 1995).

Chapter HI: The Stratification of the World-Economy 107 & Guattari, K, p.72), that the State is eternally encountering,the nomadic-meshwork intensities following is 'infinite' By the that that the crevice? not addressing structure into investigation define the relationship the our ultimately process of cyberwar, between power Centers and peripheral zones remains incomplete: Politics on the grand scale can never administer its molar segments without also dealing with micro-injections or infiltrations that work in its favor or present an obstacle to it; indeed, the larger the molar aggregates,the greater the molecularization of the agenciesthey put into play -(Deleuze& -Guattari,'A TP, p.204). Netwar takes as its premisenon-stateactorssubverting the interior molar organization how demonstrates Age Intelligent Machines Delanda's Mar State. the in the the of of in bifurcating that turn the through phylum, systems within military complex emerges leads to the presenthomogeneous(molar or industrial) State war machine. However, to build on Delanda's text we need to diagram present models of netwai- that from Mongols follow the to present structures nomadic-meshwork comprehensively day economic micro-warfare. Both aspects of the phylum are portrayed in this diagram, for as Deleuze and Guattari state: [ ] the phylum simultaneously has two different modes of liaison: it ... is always connected to nomad space, whereas it conjugates with sedentary space. On the side of the nomadic assemblagesand war its it is kind gaps, detours, subterranean of rhizome, with a machines, On holes, the other side, the traits, etc. openings, passages,stems, State apparatuseseffect a capture of the and sedentary assemblages into form traits the or a code, make the expression a of phylum, put holes resonate together, plug the lines of flight, subordinate the technological operation to the work model, impose upon the (Deleuze & conjunctions connections a whole regime of arborescent Guattari, ATP, p.415). Tracing the machinic phylum's pi-obe head through antisystemic movements of flows insofar, State, the defines the the are of propellers as rhizomatic resistance

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 108 commodity production that slip through recoding." Cyberwar is the totality of the molar organization combating netwar. Netwar is the inevitable processthat subverts the apparatus of control. This links us back to the discussion surrounding the economy, and the model neo-classical economistshave provided for answering the " question of equilibrium. By placing a systemic (molar) ratio of supply meeting demand has led to fallacies governing the market process. By enclosing the -,the--systemis organization-within- a transcendentmechanismof vertical dominance, relinquished to narrativesthat harbour all flows within a systemic model of operation. Braudel has already mapped the development of the 'anti-market' by giving an account of how the process of military technology utilized by nomadic-meshwork structuresconvergedin the micro-economic sphere.Delanda's analysis only provides an account of how the 'anti-market' economy and the military warfare process intersected.The role of totalities, as representedby Delanda's discussion,of the State compartmentalizingmolecular aggregateswithin the compoundsof a molar synthesis, asks finally, how is the State to be defined if all that is portrayed is the molar organization of the State military as it attemptsto recode gaps and fissures within its 49 apparatuS? Jfat- in the Age of Intelligent Machines engages in the molar configuration of the State apparatus,and yet by-passessubversivenetwars that define 'See Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p.217ff. 'Refer to chapter I. "Modem technology, such as radar and radio communications,is skillfully explained within the context of tracing die historical intensities that led to bifurcations within the machinic phylum: 'Computerized radar, for example, is best understoodby placing it in die context of the history of defensetechnology, going back at least to the Middle Ages. In this context, the electromagneticcurtains of radar may be seen as a modern-day mutation of the old fortress walls of earth and stone' (Delanda, WAIM, p.5). However, the elements involved for such bifurcations are only observed from the State apparatus,and overlook precisely what is neededto understand why the sedentary nation needs to appropriate the war machine. Nomadic meshworks are the clue as to why the State comes about in a single stroke, and begins the obsessivejourney to recode all flows through transcendence.

Chapter HI: The Stratification of the World-Economy 109 what the State continuously is preparing for, namely, antisysternic movements of " resistance. Without engaging in a heterogeneous,molecular systemthat presentsthe Statewith its image of totality, namely, 'stems, opening, traits', Delanda's discussion presents the sedentary organization as the only totality that converges with the nomadic war image. We believe only in totalities that are peripheral. And if we discover such a totality alongside various separateparts, it is a whole of these parts-but-doesnot totalize them;'it is-a unity of all -of these-particular-, parts but does not unify them; rather, it is addedto them as a new part fabricated separately(Deleuze & Guattari, AO, p.42). As with the Mongols' example,military dispersionthrough non-linear communications aided the recod.ing of large sectorsof territory. The 'Mongol military praxis' contested traditional models of warfare with highly charged sequencesof non-linear, selforganizing attacks that left the enemy helplessto defend itself. Delanda's logistics are different from the strata levels of the machinic phylum, for example, stoneoperating made weapons to the human factor being corroded out of the loop by advanced computertechnology. If the gulf separatingthe sedentaryorganization (cyberwar) and nomadic-meshworkstructures(netwar) that bifurcate within the gaps and fissures the former cannot recode or reaxiomatize, then the following questionsneed to be posed to Delanda's exposition: Could it be that it is at the moment the war machine ceasesto exist, conqueredby the State, that it displays to the utmost its irreducibility, 'The following excerpt from A ThousandPlateaus situatesDelanda's text, by portraying the fmal outcome of the State's consumption of the war machine: 'War, it must be said, is only the abominable residue of the war machine, either afler it has allowed itself to be appropriatedby the State apparatus, or even worse, has constructeditself a State apparatuscapableonly of destruction. When this happens, the war machine no longer draws mutant lines of flight, but a pure, cold fine of abolition' (p.230). The question of why the State desires to segment the war machine is not taken up by Delanda's investigation.

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 110 that it scatters into thinking, loving, dying, or creating machines that have at their disposal vital or revolutionary powers capable of challenging the conquering State? Is the war machine already overtaken, condemned, appropriated as part of the same process whereby it takes on new forms, undergoesa metamorphosis,affirms its irreducibility and exteriority, and deploysthat milieu of pure exteriority that the occidental. man of the State, or the occidental thinker, continually reducesto somethingother than itselP (Deleuze& Guattari, ATP, p.356). Jfai- in the Age ofIntelligent Machines articulatesmodels of antisystemicmovements _'By-di;ikrarfiffimg through ndtWAr'. of resistance-the-'nomadwAr maýchifie'appropriates a model of totalized meshwork structuresproducedby the molar organization, that in turn privileges the State's image of exteriority (cyberwar), allows Delanda to answer the questions posed by Deleuze and Guattari in a limited manner. It is a distinction betweenhigh-level, homogeneouscategoriesthat emulate or simulate patternsof lowlevel intensified insurgency. This is always a question of tracking the phylum head, or the line of flight in Capitalism and Schizophrenia. By seeking levels of simultaneousoppositions that appear on the same plane of the BwO would open up 5' new possibilities of contact. However, Delanda only addressesone aspect of the BwO, namely, the sedentaryspaceof the State.This placesnetwar to be 'condemned, appropriatedas part of the sameprocess' that is envisionedas cyberwar. Netwar is the determining elementportraying the State's battle against antisystemic movements.In other words, the reader is left to surmise the functioning of the politico-military complex (the State) that entwines with the economic socius. This is independent of what the molar organization is attempting to thwart through its homogeneous ""Me outside appears simultaneously in two directions: huge worldwide machines branched out over the entire ecumenon at a given moment, which enjoy a large measure of autonomy in relation to the States [ ] but also the local mechanisms of bands, margins, minorities, which continue to affmn ... the rights of segmentary societies in opposition to the organs of State power' (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p. 360).

Chapter 1111: The Stratification of the World-Economy recodings. Coupled with infonnation technology, the revolution of integrating cyberwar into the context of contemporarywarfare, or deterrence(postfascism'ý, has interlaced both aspectsof the machinic phylum into two contesting oppositions. For on the one hand: the information revolution, in both its technological and nontechnological aspects,sets in motion forces that challenge the design " institutions. disrupts hierarchies the -around----of many and erodes -It which institutions are normally designed.It diffuses and redistributes power, often to the benefit of what may be consideredweaker, smaller actors. It crossesborders, and redraws [ ...] boundaries [ ...] It expands the spatial and temporal horizons that actors should take into account (Arquilla & Ronfeldt, 'CYC'). On the other hand, netwar applies to the dissemination of the tactics incorporated in decode deterritorialize the molar organization of striated space, that to or cyberwar hinders movement on the BwO. Furthermore, netwar's close proximity to the nomad war machine presents a convergence,in contemporary terms, of a technologically advancedcommunication lattice, and micro-economic systemsthat by-passmodels of interaction within the State apparatus.Netwars are: '[ ] societal struggles most often ... associatedwith low intensity conflict by non-state actors. Netwar representsa new entry on the spectrum of conflict that spanseconomic, political, and social, as well as "This is an interesting term found towards the end of '1227: Treatise on Nomadology-Ibe War Machine', A ThousandPlateaus. Postfascismis a term, in my opinion, to designatethe current role of cyberwar in the worldwide war machine. As Deleuze and Guattari state,postfascismis a war machine that: '[ ...] takes peace as its object directly [ ...] The war machine reforms a smooth space that now claims to control, to surround the entire earth. Total war itself is surpassed,toward a form of peace more terrifying still' (ATP, p.421). The parallel between cyberwar and postfascism is precisely in the ability for the dominant, molar organization to wipe out any threats that may impede its hegemonic position. And, yet, no shot is fired! The terrifying deterrentthrough which peaceis sustained(see The Economist, 'Defense Technology' survey, 10-16 June 1995). 'Of particular interest in this context would be the molar State.

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 112 " forms is (ibid). "war"' This type of engagement a nomadic-meshwork military of structure that eliminates the need for striated zones produced by the State apparatus. Coupled with smooth space, netwar tunes into gaps which the molar configuration fails to absorbin the overhauling of recOding.By intersectingon smooth space,netwar is a function of the nomad war machine through the generation of thrust that engendersmultiplicities instead of homogeneousattributes. Multiplicities are base interconnections-that by-pass all territorialities--of the State, and tlfcF-fecddirfg§t1fat. futural devised Netwars to the were sustain power. are aspect of the nomad war machine, since opposition is not directed towards a recoded passage,but rather the decoding of the capitalist, world market, or the de-axiomatization of the 'anti-market'. Netwar interactions are nomadic-meshworkstructures that resist recoding, since the elementsthat intertwine are not transcendent.To trace netwar in relation to the nomad war machine, it is important to bear in mind that the latter, or 'primitive', war lineal, State. is distinct from tenitorial the the of segmentation machine's composition Ratherthe convergencewith numerical, decentredintensitiesfacilitate a de-hierarchical formula for movement.In other words, rhizomatic assemblagescoalescethe rhythmic movement of flows, thereby surpassingthe molar model of transcendence;in turn, the harbour horizontal that of plane synergetics encompasses a primitive war machine immanenceas the thrust of multiplicity, allowing for a fusion betweenheterogeneous, " is Netwar the abstract axiomatization that pushes the molar meshwork elements. 'This working definition correspondsto Wallerstein's discussion of 'antisystemic movements of resistance'; a form of warfare not based on traditional State conceptions of logistics, but rather, economic and political liquidations of the molar segmentation. "The usageof 'primitive' is designedto designatea distinction betweenwhat Delcuze and Guattari term the nomad war machine, and what this chapterhas shown in light of modem technology (netwar). Granted,the two terms are interchangeable,but the slight differentiations between modem technology, for instance, bridging vast distances of space into an instant, electronic communication, and the

Chapter III: The Stratification of the World-Economy 113 apparatus to continuously expand. This soaks up the spillages resulting from " by deterritorializing labour further. As witnessed minoritarian assemblages naked by the nomad war machine, the State's signification of exteriority needsto be further internalized by pushing forth a reterritorialized image of itself" The importance of following Biblical-exodus narrative Deleuze and Guattari provide, need to be separated: leaving the Egyptian Statebehind, launching into the desert,he [Moses] begins by forming a war machine, on the inspiration,of the old past of the-nomadic Hebrews [ ] This -is the-machine,of the Just, -already a .. war machine, but one that does not yet have war as it object' (Deleuze & Guattari, A TP, p.417). Not only distanceis at stake in netwar, but the force of by-passing the molar organization globally, as the capitalist economicspherecontinuously expands,is the core of what schizoplu-eniais dispersingthrough absolute decoding. The level of intensity as pure speedis the only demarcationof netwar, as opposed to the above reported excerpt that relies on a relative deterritorialization through an exodus of a mass. Schizophrenia pervades the entire social field through absolute deterritorialization. Obviously, the similarities still preside over the two forms of the nomad war machine: for example,not integrating the war machine as a model for absolutewar, and not needing an image by which to recode a transcendent cxteriority. 'For example, the present 'anarcho-capitalism' developing in China's special economic zones presentsus with a vivid account of a molar apparatusproducing a 'State-capitalist' system, while on the other hand, the absolute limit teases out its inhibitions by placing labour as the most dcterritorialized; insofar as it is: 'without foundation or meaning, it neurotically succumbsto a process which deprives working people of knowledge [ ...] deterritorialized production signifies that work and life are no Ionger separate;society is collapsed into the logic and processesof capitalist development' (Guattari & Negri, CLU, pp.21 & 22). To briefly quote some data gathered from the SEZ regarding working conditions should enlighten the predicament of China's economy, as not only being at the forefront in export and foreign investment, but should also exemplify the deterritorializing force that is accumulatingin the employmentsector: '[ ] no less an authority than BusinessWeekreports that the ... 12,000 workers of a Shokou assembly operation of Kadar Enterprises Ltd-, Hong Kong's largest toy maker, typically work 14-hour days-often sevendays a week-for wages aroundUS$21 a month. Most of these employees are women from 17 to 25 years of age. They sleep six to a room in company dormitories (and) [ ] Chinese investigators found that in 40 out of 200 businessesinvestigated in .. Shenzhenemployed girls as young as ten and twelve years old, who worked 15-hour days for $10 a month [ ...] (Smith, 'CRC', p.95). The mechanismsoperatingin China's labour force incorporateMarx's vision as the future of labour, a work force that is naked and independent and yet, harbours no regulatory power allowing access to a better work reformation. Coupled with the instruments of technology in the factories, the labour power employed to maintain the high threshold of production succumbs to its own degeneration; insofar as China's position on the summit of economic deterritorialization dependson deregulating its work force. 'It is the flow of naked labour that makes the people, just as it is the flow of Capital that makes the land and its industrial base.It is in the form of the nation-state,with all its possible variations, that the state becomesthe model of realization for the capitalist axiomatic' (Dclcuze & Guattari, ATP, p.456). "'Ile State-form, as a form of interiority, has a tendency to reproduce itself, remaining identical to itself acrossits variations and easily recognizablewithin the limits of its poles, always seekingpublic recognition (there is no masked State). But the war machine's form of exteriority is such that it exists only in its own metamorphoses;it exists in an industrial innovation as well as in a technological invention, in a commercial circuit as well as in a religious creation, in all flows and currents that only secondarily allow themselvesto be appropriatedby the State' (Dclcuze & Guattari, ATP, p.360).

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 114 the 'anti-market' is to portray the element of. [ ] packs, bands, (that) are groups of the rhizome type, as opposedto ... the arborescenttype that centers around organs of power (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p.358). V 'One does not represent, one engendersand traverses' (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p.364). On the one side labour time, on the other circulation time. And the whole of the movement-appearsas unity-as labour time -and-circulation--time, of production and circulation. This unity itself is motion, process. Capital appearsas this unity-in-process of production and circulation, a unity which can be regardedboth as the totality of the processof its production, as well as the specific completion of one turnover of the capital, one movement returning into itself (Marx, G, p.620). The commodification of labour, or the plane of absolute deterritorialization, convergenceswith a highly abstract process engulfed within the confines of the capitalist 'anti-market'. The nomad war machine is the first to be appropriated systemically into a striated zone of labour-time, in turn, assuringsurplus labour to be fed back into the reproduction of capitalist expansion. Of course, the State had to appropriatethe nomad machine first, otherwise, how could it evolve its over-arching and repressive legislative transcendence.The limitations of Mar in the Age of Intelligent Machines are apparent in the primary conquest of the nomad-meshwork organization, since the birth of the State military, as well as the economic cantimarket', is from coding intensities" to serve the State model. The State apparatus "An intensity, for example,is not composedof addableand displaceablemagnitudes:a temperature is not the sum of two smaller temperatures,a speedis not the sum of two smaller speeds.Since each intensity is itself a difference, it divides according to an order in which eachterm of the division differs in nature from the others' (DeIeuze& Guattari, A TP, p.483). Intensive magnitude is differentiated from an extensive quantity, a number that is revealed by successiveaddition. Magnitude is an irreducible intrinsic whole; a whole as a deviation from zero degree.This study designatesintensities that traverse the various stratified domains of the world-economy. Intensities function as machinic tags, remaining elastically connected to singular names. By designating an intensity, we are indicating a deterritorialization with a complementaryreterritorialization, a mapping of the strata, as opposedto a

Chapter III: The Stratification of the World-Economy 115 desiring-production in recodes order to assurehomogeneity and striation on the BwO. The cutting and dividing of labour results in severing locality for infinite distance, as the means to implement control. To sustain the amount of least contact between nomad localities, the.molar organ tightens and constricts the BwO, thereby J flows within particular conduits via models of realization." By continually weaving and interconnecting all levels of interaction, the State subordinatesthe nomad war machine-into domestication.,-'In striated space, lines Or trajectbfieý 'tehd-'tci' b6 subordinatedto points: one goes from one point to another. In the smooth, it is the opposite: the points are subordinated to the trajectory' (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p.478). tracing. To be in contact with this territory is necessary, since intensities operate outside the realm of signification, a double pincer or the judgement of God. The boundary formations that constitute the dimension of movement, is an invention of the strata demarcating vertical structures of confinement. This study also maps a trajectory of difference by plotting a line of escape. The importance of difference fies in the featureless, arithmetic units that assemble packs into multiplicities. The movement of territorialization and deterritorialization is irreducible to absolute code-a capturing by the superstratum. (The super-stratum is never subject to processes of coding and territorialization-it arrives in a single stroke. Ile super-stratum is composed of a complementary action of reterritorialization. and recoding-a (re)capturing of intensive breaks, splits and spillages). Furthermore, the singularity that is distributed is never completely exhausted by any inscribing system. The vector that is functioning is a continuity of the nomad war machine in Capitalisni and Schizophrenia. The pragmatics lie in the molecular dimension that is not metrically overcoded by the super-stratum. In other words, molecular becoming presents us with a terrain of distribution that is not segmented, divided or partitioned through for distribution is It the the of multiplicities to take place. Whether this capacity centre. a power potential for an immanent trajectory is reterritorialized through the apparatus of overcoding-a centralized cartography of space--it nevertheless allocates a resource for smooth space, a mutant flow of desire. However, by juxtaposing elements that prolong and capture a decoding of the strata, the trajectory proceeds by deterritorialization and reterritorialization. This is not to suggest that this study is an insulated project of desire, rather, it presents the potentiality for stimulating the strata into zones of becoming: a vector transforming striated grids of molarization into a smooth space of heterogeneity. Chapter IV specifically deals with these issues. "Refer to DcIeuze & Guattari, ATP, regarding striated homogeneity: 'The more regular the intersection, the tighter the striation, the more homogeneousthe space tends to become; it is for this reasonthat from the beginning homogeneity did not seemto us to be a characteristic of smooth space, but on the contrary, the extremeresult of striation, or the limit-form of a spacestriated every where and in all directions' (p.488).

Chapter IV Geopolitics: Antisystemic Movements of Resistance

The centre of gravity of world commerce, Italy in the Middle Ages, England in [ ] half American Thanks North to the the times, peninsula now southern of modem ... California gold and the tireless energy of the Yankees, both coasts of the Pacific Ocean will soon be as populous, as open to trade and as industrialized as the coast from Boston to New Orleans is now. And then the Pacific Ocean will have the same in in had Middle has Mediterranean Atlantic the the the and antiquity now and role as Ages-that of the great water highway of world commerce; and the Atlantic will decline to the status of an inland sea [...] Marx and Engels

California sits on the cusp of an epochal change in the geography of capitalism in which its place is no longer secure. Richard Walker, 'California RagesAgainst the Dying of the Light'

Chapter IV: Geopolitics: Antisystemic Movements of Resistance 119 1 The strata are continually being shakenby phenomenaof cracking and rupture [ ...] everywhere there arise simultaneous accelerations and blockages, comparative speeds, differences in deterritorialization creating relative fields of reterritorialization (Deleuze& Guattari, ATP, p.55). This societywhich eliminatesgeographicaldistancereproducesdistance internally as spectacularseparation(Debord, SS, §167). This chaptercritically appropriatesthe collaborative philosophy of Gilles Deleuze and Mix Guattari to argue that the general tendency of capitalism is towards the disintegration of high-level, reterritorialized control structures(for instance,the nationstate).I argue further that this disintegration doesnot entail a movementtowards total chaos or anarchy. I suggestthat capital generatesits own guidance mechanisms,but flexibly low-level, deterritorialized to changing that and respond ones act at a conditions. This project is made problematic because the canon of philosophical discourse itself operatesas a high-level control structure. In Marx, the development of capital is controlled by a secularizedHegelian dialectic that determinesthe outcome of capital in socialism. Deleuze and Guattari specifically addressthe need for new in instruments Marx to critiques of understand capitalism, and produce philosophical their central text, Capitalism and Schizophrenia (volume 1). 1 defend Deleuze and Guattari's suggestionthat traditional socialist politics fails to addressthe difficulties in in AntiSituated 1968 France, by the post-May uprising capitalism. modem posed Oedipus was an attempt to combat the established regimes of thought that had continuously reduced politics to a high-level control (a fascism). Tactics, such as 'speaking for the people', rigidified politics into molar oppositions betweenparticular

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 120 contents of control! Capitalism and Schizophreniamoved beyond this stalemateby navigating through the formation of capitalism and how its impact in politics aided reterritofialized mechanismsof repression(the State apparatusrecoding, or marking, by placing a serniotic value on forms of discourse).The end result is a philosophy of desire outside the established domain of discourse. By abrogating presupposed structures (for example, the unconsciousbeing a theatre of representation),Deleuze And*Guattari-endeavourto elucidate'a'schizoanalysis:a project'that "Affikms'processes of multiplicity. Without being subjectedto molar constructions(political affiliations), multiplicity fractures divisions by allowing a fusion within the immanence of late 2 capital. Reminiscent of Spinoza and Nietzsche, multiplicity and immanenceward off 'In particular,the conversation betweenDelcuzeandFoueault on the role of intellectuals and (power) is 'This thispoint: politics exemplifies a struggleagainst power,a struggleaimedatrevealing It is notto "awakenconsciousness" andundermining powerwhereit is mostinvisibleandinsidious. thatwe struggle[...] butto sappower,to takepower;it is anactivityconducted thosewho alongside '11",p.208). strugglefor power[...IA "theory"is theregionalsystemof thisstruggle'(Foucault, 'Granted Deleuze and Guattari are careful about late capital's role in liberating flows that intersect on the body without organs. Of particular interest in this context is the role the State plays in its securing of homogeneity. This, of course, is placed in Anti-Oedipus as the State's 'antiproduction'. ('Antiproduction' can be seenin the State's manifestationof the New Deal, as diagnosedin chapter 1). As they explain: 'The State, its police, and its army form a gigantic enterprise of antiproduction, but at the heart of production itself, and conditioning this production. Here we discover a new determination of the properly capitalist field of immanence:not only the interplay of the relations and differential coefficients of decoded flows, not only the nature of the limits that capitalism reproduceson an ever wider scale as interior limits, but the presenceof antiproduction within production itself' (A0, p.235). Capitalism (or Braudel's 'anti-market') is production/circulation in accordancewith the requirements ofprofit; therefore,capitalismmust function by exclusion ofnon-profit making enterprises,for example, it must operateby meansof an efficient and rigorous form of control. We have seenDelanda's attempt to diagnose such developmentsto ascertainthe role the State played in the build-up of the politicomilitary State (see Delanda, IVAIM. And Massumi presents us with capital's fragmentation within economic zones: '[ ..] it has not usheredin an age of universal wealth and well-being and never will. All it can do is displace its own limits. The Emits of capitalism used to be external boundariesfalling between its formation and non- or precapitalist ones:between molarity and molecularity, the capitalist classand the proletariat, the "First World" and the "Third World, " resourcedepletion and technological progress' (UG, p. 137). This chapter will show the repressivemechanismsof capitalist development through Braudel and Deleuze and Guattari, but will offer insights into new models of interaction (nomadic-meshwork,structures)that allow for possibilities to arise within the axiomatized abstraction resulting from the 'anti-market'. This in turn pushesthe system to bifurcate into other combinations, whereby Third world peripheral zones can realign themselvesonto subversive activities in the Centre. 'And the Statesof the center deal not only with the Third World, each of them has not only an external Third World, but there are internal Third Worlds that rise up within them and work them from the

Chapter IV: Geopolitics: Antisystemic Movements of Resistance 121 edifices, such as the apparatusof capture. This chapter has two themes that intertwine between the molecular and the molar. On the one hand, a molecular approach to the dynamics of self-organizing it State, is is the the the as other, molar analysis of systems explicated, while on mediates intensities through a centralized agency that perpetually strives to solidify flows that continually exposethemselveson the body without organs. The rupturing' diagrams-the-attempt by molar --apparatusesof control to- mandate'movements by drives. However deterritorializations' much the such coding all and capturing relative State strives to implement blockages, there is always a movement to the edge, an initiate intensities fragmenting by itself form to to codes new alliances over-spilling of to traverse on the body without organs. 'One travels by intensity; displacementsand deterritorialization intensive depend figures thresholds of nomadic on spatial these deterritorializations: Yet, simultaneously define complementary, sedentary ATP, (Deleuze & Guattari, p.54), that are always producing reterritorializations' is formation through the stratification of capital, with and capture; apparatusesof ' function through the mode of coding, aswas The cannot capitalist process axiomatics. ' its disjunctive Being in the result, capitalism offspring, synthesis. evident the molar in feed to problems without the of axiomatics quantitative element utilizes inside. It could even be said in certain respects that the periphery and the center exchange determinations:a deterritorialization of the center, a decoding of the center in relation to national and territorial aggregates,causethe peripheral formation to become true centers of investments,while the & Guattari, ATP, 468-469). (Deleuze formations pp. peripheralize' central 3See Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p.55. 'This is contrastedto absolute deterritorialization. -'SeeDeleuze & Guattari, ATP, p.57. 'See Deleuze & Guattari, AO, p.252.

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 122 presupposinga predefined solution. This eliminates the hierarchy of the despot; in other words, capital collapses the structure of predefined solutions to problems that navigated the gulf in despotism. The fluidity by which the capitalist process operatesis not controlled from a molar agency,or institution; rather the internal mechanismsare continuously behaving to regeneratethemselves.' As was depictedwith the functioning of the body without organs,with its couplings of repulsive and attractive flows forming a,basigfrom-which the machinic phylum is directed, the samemechanismsguide capital in its voyage to exert itself into the realm of schizophrenia.In other words, capital is an extremely responsive system that continually readjusts to varying stimuli, not only from economic bursts or perplexities within the State apparatusof capture, but also from in barriers. incentives As John Holland or global scale states 'The Global Economy ý' Adaptive Process', capitalism is continually reinforced by niches that are as an perpetually arising from new technological advances,that in turn, aid and assist the development of the market. However, such growth is not always on a rising curve, since adaptation for the system is always on the verge of overspilling that could lead to catastrophe.'Niches are continually createdby new technologies and the very act of filling a niche provides new niches [ ...] Becausethe niches are various, and new from far (or the economy operates optimum created, global are continually niches improvements indeed, in Said way, are always possible and, occur attractor). another 7See,for example,Deleuze & Guattari, A TP, p.453: '[ I capitalism forms with a general axioniatic ... of decodedfloivs. A new direshold of deterritorialization'. "The real barrier of capitalist production is capital itself. It is that capital and its self-expansion appear as the starting point and the closing point [ ...I' (Marx, CHI, p.245). 9See The Economy as an Evolving Complex System, ed- Phifip Anderson, el aL

Chapter IV: Geopolitics: Antisystemic Movements of Resistance 123 regularly' (Holland, 'GEAT, pp.117-118).For instance,such advancesthat have led to the destratification of enclosedspacehave been due to multinationals since World War H." This acceleratedprocesshas abolishedterritorial localities, identity, or origin of products and services. Coupled with the inversion of the labour force further aids the necessarytransformations for capital to continually reabsorbitself to expansion." Probing further into non-linear adaptive systems, attractors,allure commodities to commingle into -adaptive strategies for survival. The profit margin'increment is conditional upon the 'right' attractors that will accessthe necessarybifurcations. As Delanda suggests,the economy has traditionally been viewed as a linear tracking model, composing a supply meeting demand.This passageto a state of equilibrium is essentiallyflawed, since the pre-conditionsto necessitatesuch a systemwould entail having a perfect competitive model among all those participating, and the ability to access all information governing the conditions of the market, so that one can 'oMultinationals envelopea veneer on smooth spacein order to deregulatethe State apparatusthat once had a recoding processin striated space: "Me multinationals fabricate a kind of deterritorialized smooth spacein which points of occupation as well as pole of exchangebecome quite independentof the classical paths to striation' (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p.492). Moreover, the development and implementation of technology into our modem arenadeterritorializes naked labour further. Executing the use of technology allows capitalism to function on a 'generalized decoding of flows', as 'the new massivedeterritorialization', for technology is the cavity betweencapitalism and schizophrenia.In other words, the technological revolution that has taken place since World War 11,has aided an overhauling of the basic mechanismsof production: 'The human being is no longer a component of the machine but a worker, a user [ ] subjected to the machine and no longer enslavedby the machine' (Deleuze ... & Guattari, ATP, p.457). "Deleuze and Guattari posit two reasons:'[ ] labor appearsonly with the constitution of a surplus, ... there is no labor that is not devoted to stockpiling [and] [ ] labor performs a generalizedoperation of .. striation of space-time,a subjection of free action, a nullification of smooth spaces[ ...]' (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, pp.490-491). In order to incorporateand integrate flows of exchangeon the global scale, the work force needs to become abstracted from any constraints that hinder production. Being componentsof the machine, labour, as Marx notes, is: '[ ..] not only the category, labour, but labour in reality has becomethe means of creating wealth in general, and has ceasedto be organically linked with particular individuals in any specific form [ ...I The category 'labour', 'labour as such' labour pure and simple, becomestrue in practice' (Marx, G, pp.104-105).

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 124 " fullest in to the maximize gain. Since the market does not operatein such a manner, a molecular approach dehierarchizes institutional momentum that has traditionally viewed economicsas instigating a linear courseto optimize the highest accumulation. By localizing planesof immanence,self-organizingsystemsintegrateflows to amplify conditions surrounding the emergence.As Delanda argues, this process does not guaranteea surplus to be reintegratedback into the system for the following: [.-.] presenceof nonlinear effects [ ] in investment:and-finance,to the ... multiplicity of delays, bottlenecks, surplusesand shortagesstemming from the limited rationality of economic agents-means that real markets must be able to cope with life far from equilibrium, and indeed, to create special buffering structures [ ] for this purpose. In ... short, to the extent that markets emerge and operate spontaneously, they are incapable of achieving optimal equilibria on their own (Delanda, 'NOL', p. 157). Delanda continues in the same fashion by concluding that: 'Other kinds of human organizations,on the other hand-the State, sedentaryarmies, large corporations-are more capable of goal-directed optimization [ ...I' (ibid). Delanda places too much emphasison this structural analysis.The counter-argumentto this position would stem from allocating multinational corporations as the new State legislating axioms to maintain a curve on self-organizing systems.Such measuresare in the form of labour laws, commodity exchanges,and the reinvestment of surplus derived from the first two. With the advent of corporations permeating their flexible capital, the only blockage to a self-organizing system would be the State. Granted, corporations themselvesare hierarchical, model systems,but that does not necessarily imply that a cluster of companiescannot produce a self-organized propellant that excels in the world economy. The discussion of the emergent effect coincides within this 12See Delanda, 'NOL', p. 156.

Chapter IV: Geopolitics: Antisystemic Movements of Resistance 125 framework. The emergenteffeCt13that was discussedin relation to the body without organs is essential to the discussion on economic attractors. As Delanda's 'Virtual Environments and the Emergence of Synthetic Reason' expounds upon stabilizing attractors, the emergent effect is a localized property of the population taken as a whole, and: '[ ...] not displayed by its individual membersin isolation'. This property 14 to pertains any population group, but for the purposes of this chapter, it will be restrictedto the abovediscussion.Emergentproperties are spontaneous-developments, that when 'isolated' or 'destined' to a bifurcation, move to a particular point attractor that stabilizes the system. Any corporation that is not being inhibited by State intervention will bifurcate to produce as much surplus as possible, to only be is into In that the words, structure not other a corporate system again. reinvested in imposed by by State, the attractors order will saturatepositive solidified sanctions to producethe most prosperousmeansfor it to generateitself again. 'Only dissipative, nonlinear systems generate the full spectrum of dynamical forms of stabilization (attractors) and of diversification (bifurcations)' (ibid). Moreover, these emergent effects traced on a molar axis have been depicted in phase space. Through the use of modem computerized screening, images of emergence on the molecular scale have spontaneously materialized to produce a coagulation of attraction. 'Today, emergent properties are perfectly legitimate dynamical outcomesfor populations stabilizedby attractors.A population of molecules in certain chemical reactions, for instance,can suddenly and spontaneouslybegin to pulsate in perfect synchrony, constituting a veritable "chemical clock". A population "or, emerkentproperties. 14 For example, cells, animals and humans.

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 126 of insects(termites,for instance)can spontaneouslybecomea "nest-building machine", when their activities are stabilized nonlinearly' (Delanda, 'VEESR'). The above excerpt posits the economy as not functioning by a mediating, or transcendentparty, but rather as an adaptive non-linear network. Coupled with the appearanceof niches to fuse multiplicities within the economy, adaptive non-linear networks are the 'building blocks' that are: '[ ] recombined and revised continually as the system ... system adapts' (Holland, 'GEAT, p. 1-17).,--, accurnulates'experienceý-the --- As Delanda suggests, 'we' need to search and tap into the Earth's 'probe heads', a project set up by Deleuze and Guattari in A ThousandPlateaus, to map: the attractors that define our local destinies and the bifurcations that could allow us to modify thesedestinies' (Delanda, 'NOL', p. 161)". This suggestionleadsus to posit that there should be a 'policy' allowing self-organizationwithin the economic market, lurk in least, be the there should a mediator negotiation, or at must always yet by it 'right' the that the to which attractor can attains process ensure shadows bifurcate. Such arbitrations would in theory allow capital to sway from the capocalyptic' vision of schizophrenia in Anti-Oedipus, but such a circumventing idea is. distorts the what capital very of manoeuver Capital can be given an image-in fact, it must have one in order to is [ ]a body it is imageless It without organs a as such. act-but ... is immediately of which relations, a selection network of virtual level, wherever one of capitalism's working actualized at ground images (organs) goes. These imagesare convergences(componentsof passage)(Massumi, UG, p. 129). Capital and its functioning are one and the same mechanism. As with the body "Furthermore, Delanda also discusseshis ecological argument in order to 'save' the earth from destruction: '[ ] from the hints of the machinic phylum that have recently become visible to us [ ...I ... seem to indicate there may be ways of evading our currently doomed environmental destiny' (ibid, p. 161).

Chapter IV: Geopolitics: Antisysternic Movements of Resistance 127 without organs,capitalism's miraculating conversioninverts a production for a relative itself in fixed (Deleuze ] '[ the as capital' machine surplus value: ... while embodying & Guattari, AO, p. 10). 'Capital is indeed the body without organs of the capitalist, or has being' (ibid). The the of consisted of maturation capital rather of capitalist formatted thus a within allowing a point attractor, particular multiplicities stabilizing body Capital: the through the to without organs. of oscillations process subsist produces-surplus-value, just as the body without organs reproducesitself, -puts forth (ibid). farthest branches to the the universe' out comers of shoots, and Meshwork elementsare found in the mixture of the two formations, namely, the molar and the molecular, in their intricate couplings that determine the 'destiny' filtering hydraulic forces integrate Meshworks the the of system as a of system. merging on the grid of striation. Braudel's geohistory representsspecific switchesthat bifurcated from one stable element to anotherto form the developmentof capitalism. By tracing the historical processes,Braudel examines particular attractors16that in turn determine the outcome of capitalism. 'Bifurcations are featuresof any system in interactions is, in dynamics that there the which are strong are non-linear, which between variables' (Delanda, 'MAM). By employing complexity theory to the formation of the market, Braudel engagesin the same movement that Deleuze and Guattari implement in their distinction of the molar and the molecular. The singularities (or abstract machines) bifurcating at certain indeterminate thresholds organize on the body without organs,pushing the system to self-organize. The molecular waves force sub-particles to coagulate and immerse themselvesinto order, since at: 16Attractorsareflows that continuously configure the system as a permutation, a multiplicity.

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 128 [ ] at the edgeof order and chaos[thesecomponents] [ ] never quite ... ... lock into place, yet never quite dissolve into turbulence, either. These information, both the that to are systems stable enough store and are yet evanescentenoughto transmit it. Theseare the systemsthat can be organized to perform complex computations,to react to the world, to be spontaneous,adaptive, and alive [ ] (Waldrop, C, p.293; cited in ... Plant, 'The Virtual Complexity of Culture', p.9). Emergent properties 17are vital to the understanding of complex systems, since they materialize without the intervention of a centrally governed apparatusthat controls the been in-synthetic'Al Ernergent properties'have simulated outcome: programming.'and are currently being investigated for their role in non-linear economic dynamics. As Delanda remarks: [...] before the 1960's it was virtually impossible to imagine the emergenceof order without a central agency behind it, today we are familiar with a growing body of knowledge about the spontaneous generationof order structuresin inorganic as well as organic (and even social) processes(Delanda, 'HMH'). As with the body without organs,emergentproperties are in a switching relay in direct proximity. The body without organs is a massive conveyor between the paranoiac machine (repulsive)" and the miraculating machine (attractor) that continuously configures the intensity" as a permutation, a multiplicity permitted by the system. Emergent properties inscribe upon smooth spaceto 'destine' the system into convergencewith other flows of intensity.20However, spaceis over-codedby an for: apparatus of capture, the State needs to subordinate hydraulic force to "Emergent properties are: '[ ] properties of die population as a whole, not displayed by its ... individual membersin isolation' (Delanda, 'VEESR', p.7). As Us chapterwill demonstrate,geopolitical movements are encompassedwithin the framework of synergistic properties. "or repellors. "'or organism. "Intensity is itself difference. '[ ] it divides according to an order in which each term of the ... division differs in nature from others' (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p. 483).

Chapter IV: Geopolitics: Antisystemic Movements of Resistance 129 conduits, pipes, embankments, which prevent turbulence, which constrain movement to go from one point to another, and space itself to be striated and measured, which makes the fluid depend on the solid [ ...]' (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p.363). The despot, with all its regimented apparatuses to code smooth space into segmented molar operations, is processed into hierarchical tiers. The securing of fluidity into dams and channels through a centralized agency devises a complete over-hauling of smooth space into a governing socius.- The 'homogeneity of captured space is- -the-State apparatusin conformity with what definesits: '[ ...] goals and paths,conduits, channels [and] organs [ ]' (ibid, p.374)." These power centres are points whereby flows ... interconnect and are converted into segments in the socius. They are molecular converters engaged in exchanging impulses into solidified signs of capture." Even though the socius is understood as a unity, there are several centres which resonate through the chamberof the State. This in turn diffuses the centralized apparatusas the focal point of intersection, for: 'The State in not a point taking all the others upon itself, but a resonancechamber for them all' (ibid, p.224). Each power center is also molecular and exercises its power on a micrological fabric in which it exists only as diffuse, dispersed,geared down, miniaturized, perpetually displaced,acting by fine segmentation, 23 in detail in details detail (ibid, 224). working and of p. The Stateapparatus'rigid segmentaritydisplays its lines of capturethrough the abstract machine of overcoding, that produces binary circuitries of exchange and "As Deleuze and Guattari state, it is an entire organon (ibid). 'See Dcleuze & Guattari, ATP, p.226. 'This is reminiscent of Foucault's notion of spacethat is: J ] capable of juxtaposing in a single ... real place several spaces,several sites that are in themselvesincompatible [but] function in relation to all the spacethat remains'.

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 130 resonance.Furthermore, with the abstract machine's usage of axiomatics there are biftircations and point attractors, but within the State apparatus there are only assemblagesof. '[ ...] reterritorialization effectuating the overcoding machine with given limits and under given conditions' (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p.223). Increasingly the State becomesto identify itself with the abstract machine, thereby into further a totalitarian machine. From the other perspective of the solidifying continuum is the -abstract-machine of mutation, that disperses:quAntum'-flows to migrate to lines of flight, propelling diversity and assuringthe connection-creationof floWS. 24 However, blockages and seals negotiated by the molar segments (molecular) flows from deterritorializing. The geopolitical simultaneously cease diagramming lines: '[ ] the fransduction translation molar and movement serves as by fissuresand cracks, and at other times lines of flight [ I drawn toward black holes, ... flow connections [ I replaced by limitative conjunctions, and quanta emissions [...] ... into (ibid, p.224). center-points' converted 11 To formulate a micropolitics within the Centre of the homogeneousState, it is important to investigate antisystemic movements of resistance in contemporary by interactions; and placing an urban spaceunder a microscope,the relationship urban between micropolitics and minoritarian becomings converges within a geopolitical figure, by 'minority ) is (L. A. Angeles the Los the as universal or which a site matrix. becoming-everybody/everything'(Deleuze& Guattari, ATP, p.470) is generated.Why Los Angeles? The concentrationlevelled at the current configuration of Los Angeles has exemplified not only the economic turbulence of the west coast, but the 'See Dcleuze & Guattari, ATP, p.223.

Chapter IV: Geopolitics: Antisystemic Movements of Resistance 131 devastatingconsequencesresulting from institutionalized power structuresengagedin the monitoring of massesthat do not fit into the equation of the right wing.2' Los Angeles is not only a paradigm caseof a peripheral zone in the Centre (state), but also portrays the future trend for cities within the world-economy. A global perspectivemay be useful. Los Angeles in 2019 will be the core of a metro-galaxy of 22-24 million people in Southern and Baja California. Together with Tokyo, Sao Paulo, Mexico City, and Shanghai[we would also include Shenzhen,in the Guangdongprovince 20--of China],- it will comprise anew evolutionary form: -mega-ncities-of 30 million inhabitants. It is important to emphasizethat we are not familiar larger type, but an talking of an old, merely about specimens absolutely original, and unexpected,phyla of life (Davis, 'UC, p.20). Geopolitics is the medium by which antisystemicmovementsor micropolitical lines of flight subvert institutionalized modes of discourse. These molecular approachesdecodesuch apparatusesof policy to circumvent regionally impoverished economic sectors by sprouting emergent properties and realigning subversive activity instance is This the of molecular movementschallenging an apex of capitalism. onto the current configuration of Third Worlds in relation to the Centre. These movements in by diagramming 'ghettos' be 'masses' the core the that populate will examined in Quartz: Yhe City Mike Davis the states of capitalist world-economy; as zone of 'The specific genius of the Crips has been their ability to insert themselves into a leading circuit of international trade. Through "crack" they have discovereda vocation for the ghetto in L. A. 's new "world city" economy' (p.309). Molecular movementsare the flows that define power structures in so far as leakagesand spillages tell a story of the State's apparatusof capture: [] by by defined them more what escapes or much power centersare 25The above sentence is paraphrased in chapter V in order to connect the context of Los Angeles to this chapter.

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 132 their impotence than by their zone of power. In short, the molecular, or microeconomics,micropolitics, is defined not by the smallnessof its elementsbut by the nature of its "mass" something always escapes (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p.217). Antisystemic movementsof resistanceveer the systemor socius to bifurcate at certain indeterminatethresholds,thereby supersedingestablishedcoding apparatusesinto new be development 'Urban cannot explained by the free will of single combinations. persons [ ...]' but is instead: '[ ...] the result of nonlinear interactions' (Mainzer, TCCDM, p. 10; cited in Plant, 'The Virtual Complexity of Culture', p. 13) that specify " bifurcations. Moreover, meshworksare becoming increasingly important to regional the role self-organizing systems have in determining the 'destiny' of the system. Meshworks incorporatediverseelementsin specifying possibilities the systemis going 27 to take within a given milieu. This is contrastedto hierarchieswhose componentsare 16Mainzer's theoretical concept of non-linear, urban interaction needs to be taken with extreme caution. In Thinking in Contpkxity, he suggeststhat the models incorporated into complex systems do follow a meshwork framework-,but his optimism in synergetic flows does not allow for an objective perspectiveon the actual birth and developmentof a city (seeMainzer, TCCDM, p.206fl). For instance, the micro-fascism that interweaved into the birth of Los Angeles, portrays a molar display of partitioning geographicalsectorsto certain race groups, as an attempt to sustain homogeneity.The city consisted of a handful of individuals that demarcatedurban space to ensure Whites did not have to associatewith minorities. To briefly quote somesourcesregarding the uniform evolution of Los Angeles will clarify both perspectives: 'The emergenceof suburban Southern California as a 'metrosea' of fragmented and insular local sovercignties-often depicted in urbanist literature as an 'accident' of unplannedgrowth-was in fact the result of deliberateshaping' (Davis, CQ, p. 164). And: 'Contrary to popular opinion, Los Angeles is a tightly plannedand plotted urban environment, especiallywith regard to the social and spatial divisions of labour necessaryto sustain its pre-eminent industrialization and consumerism' (Soja, PG, p.238). This chaptertakesas its premisethe homogeneity of Los Angeles, and will examine meshwork-systemsinteracting with abstractcapitalism to obstruct the perpetuation of an 'insular' apparatusof capture.It is a decoding of an already ovcrcoded assemblageunder the guise of the State.Since the State's role in overcoding processesis itself a liability in the world-wide axiomatic of capitalism, meshwork-systems totalize on this subversive commodity exchange, and force social interactions to bifurcate to heterogeneous'destinies'. "All milieus are territorially encompassedby vibratory rhythnis and chaos. Rhythm is the intensity between heterogeneous in-between lattice the milieus, and coordinating communicating space-times'(ATP, p.313); while chaosis the dissipativeintruder within the system. (Both are elements ofmeshwork-structures).Functioning in-betweenthesetwo intensities,milieus are the sievesintegrating meshworkheterogeneityto repetition (or a coderepeating),a territorialization within a given space-time. The concept of milieu is elaboratedextensively in '1837: Of the Refrain': 'Every milieu is vibratory [ Ia block of space-timeconstitutedby the periodic repetition of the component [ ] [the notion of the] ... ... milieu servesas the basis for another, or converselyis 'establishedatop another milieu, dissipatesin it

Chapter IV: Geopolitics: Antisystemic Movements of Resistance 133 hinged by homogeneous sectors, while meshwork structures: '[ ] articulate ... heterogeneouscomponents as such, without homogenizing' (Delanda, 'BNH'). By fusing both molar hierarchiesand non-linear molecular systemsin the following pages, will illuminate micropolitics, or economic-micro systems, as operating between a reassertionof decoded space. These transmutationsverge on a bifurcation, thereby forcing deterritorialization, with a complementary reterritorialization, by displacing " figures intensive spatial on-thresholds: The difference between macrohistory and microhistory has nothing to do with the length of the durationsenvisioned,long or short, but rather concernsdistinct systems of reference,depending on whether it is an overcoded segmentedline that is under consideration or the mutant quantum flow (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p.221). To understandthe function of micropolitics as a non-unified, non-hierarchial process, it is first necessaryto dissectthe historical fragmentsthat led to such a diverse system in interaction. However, examining such a movement of the reterritorialization of of space,and the processof segmenting,placing barriers and obstacles,is: entering a labyrinth of micro-history-a dark chronicle of the tractlands' (Davis, CQ, p. 160) of L. A. 's housing. The genealogy motivating this narrative will situate the role has in interactions in L. A., as well as providing a glimpse contemporary geopolitics into other models of emergentpatterns,that expedite the disassemblingof the fabric of the Statethrough the multiplicity arising from capital. Absolute deterritorialization is the reservoir by which capitalism perpetuatesitself: or is constituted in it' (ATP, p.313). Within the context of this chapter, the functions pertaining to rhythm and chaos composethe molecular composition of meshwork-s. 28SceDelcuze & Guattari, ATP, p. 54.

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 134 Both in each individual country and internationally, capital presses outwards from the centrer-in other words, its historic birthplaces-towards the edge.It constantlytries to extend itself to new domains,to convert new sectorsof simple reproduction of commodities into spheresof capitalist production of commodities (Mandel, LC, p.47). One particular interesting period in this emergenthistory occurred a hundred years influx into in founded The A. 1781. L. the core city not only was population after placed Los Angeles as a basin for trade and industrialization, but sparkedthe active process for urbanized clusters that were to participate in the segregatedmodels of had increase Soja As Edward the significant remarks, population separation. for in the the would urbanization: role city play consequences The rapid population growth which occurred between 1880 and 1920, when Los Angeles County expandedfrom 35,000 to nearly a million, was thus shaped primarily by the social and spatial relations of the Corporate City [ ] After 1920, the city never again experienced an ... intercensuspopulation growth rate greater than the rest of the country (Soja, PG, p. 194). The motivating model of the reterritorializing processthat occurred in the L. A. City during the 1920s,was to exclude and minimize any movement of the Black and other into Racial tension coupled with territory. predefined an already minority populace fear led to the homogenizationof spaceby segmentingand rendering signpostswithin 2' the the patchwork of City. The intricate grid of the urban core organized itself infiltrated from being by homogeneity the the to the preserve crusade around did: but '[ ] they since not rather movements, complement convergenceof minority ... thwart and break through the great worldwide organization' (Deleuze& Guattari, A TP, 'This led well into the 1940s,as in the following: 'One of the largest urban industrial zonesin the Black from downtown, through segregated and cutting rigidly areas of stretched southward world still has during 1930s 1940s' (Soja, White the there ten thousands and of whom migrated workers, of poor PG, p. 186).

Chapter IV: Geopolitics: Antisystemic Movements of Resistance 135 " Specifically, this organization consistedof Homeowners' Associationsset up 216). p. by concernedcitizens organized to protect their regions from being decodedby the influx of Blacks: Homeowners' associationsfirst appearedon the political scene in the late 1920s as instruments of white mobilization against attempts by Blacks to buy homes outside the ghetto [ ] white homeownersbanded ... together as 'protective associations'to create racially specified 'block restrictions'. In this fashion 95 percent of the city's housing stock in the 1920swas effectively put off limits to Blacks and Asians (Davis, CQ, p. 16,1): These Anti-African Housing Associations, as they becameto be known, represented an enclosure that encompasseda reterritorialization of space. By controlling the development of land to particular classes, manifesting the criteria of colour, religion instated Association Homeowners' the a coding system that affiliation, and political had solutions built into the system as its base. The coding apparatuswas a direct imposition of the solution insofar as it was fulfilling a direct task set up by an function demand is This the that the to which sets up opposed axiomatic authority. 3' is to market resolve. As Mike Davis points out, these 'restrictive covenants', or exclusionary codes in Los Angeles: [ ] established the national legal precedent for zoning districts ... exclusively for upscale, single-family residences[...] their overriding homogeneity [ ] Private to was ensure social and racial purpose ... restrictions, for example, normally included such provisions as for home costs construction, and exclusion of all minimum required non-Caucasians(and sometimesnon-Christianaswell) from occupancy, 'Specifically, racism is explicated in the production of transcendent identity structures.*It is essentialto the formation of not only identity but also political apparatuses.See Deleuze & Guattari, AO, p.85ff. Also see chapterV regarding the transcendentidentity of race. 3'Refer to chapter I concerning the differencesbetween coding versus axiomatizing. For a further discussionon the role of axiomatics, refer to Dcleuze and Guattari's What is Philosophy?: 'In contrast with the ancientempiresthat carried out transcendentovercodings,capitalism functions as an immanent axiomatic of decodedflows (of money, labor, products). In an axiomatic, models do not refer back-to transcendence[ ...]' (p. 106).

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 136 except as domestic servants (Davis, Q0, p.161). As Deleuze and Guattari state: 'Desire is never an undifferentiated instinctual energy, but itself results from a highly developed, engineered setup rich in interactions; a whole supple segmentarity that processes molecular energies and desire fascist determination' (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p.215). gives a potentially Flows that instigate movements of not only reterritorialization, as with the Homeowners' Association,-but also the movement to deterritorialize,-by 'fragmenting arborescentroots and propelling the flows to migrate onto other surfaces, are the 32 beliefs and desire of every interaction. The determination that led to the allocation land housing, the to within economy of places control, of particular molar aggregates or as Deleuze and Guattari suggest,fascism, to: '[ ...] its molecular or micropolitical is body [ ]' (ibid, for it 215). The a mass movement: a cancerous p. power, ... 'individual' as an autonomous component is displaced in the massification of the molar coupling. The machine, evidenced by the political apparatus of the Homeowners' Association, takes us back to our earlier discussionon coding. Systems that replace archaic codes with a universal: '[ ...] overcoding, and the lost territories in [ ] [takes] place an overcoded geometrical space' with a specific reterritorialization ... (ibid, p.213). As Deleuze and Guattari specify, segmentation is the outcome of an (to that recodes systemically only decode) a geo-terrain. abstract machine 'Geographical areascan only harbor a sort of chaos, or, at best, extrinsic harmonies between (ibid, temporary equilibriums populations' p.48). The of an ecological order, temporalization that arises between population packs is the nomadic, splintering "I'licy are the two aspectsof every assemblage.For a further discussion, refer to Dcleuze & Guattari, ATP, p.219.

Chapter IV: Geopolitics: Antisystemic Movements of Resistance 137 portrait of intensities,that however much are harbouredby a molar disjunction, always break and emergewith other zonesto once again be assimilated by other formations. All that is representedis a cartography of emerging and dissipating intensities that perpetually converge and egress.The rhizomatic is: understood increasingly in terms of populations, packs and colonies, collectivities and multiplicities; and degreesof development in terms of speed,rates,coefficients, and differential relations (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p.48). Mapping areas by overcoding temporalizes or sedatesspace onto a homogeneous spreadby withdrawing intensities (that would otherwise traverse on the body without organs) from its field. The spatial as absolute deterritorialization is displaced by emerging into variedly fused patterns of interaction. But with the intervention of is in behaviour overcoding such accordanceto an authorial model that supplicates 33 movementto a vertical empowerment. The grid then of 1920sLos Angeles portrays the co-existence of not only the territorial synthesis, but also the overcoding of the its with second, privatized Jim Crow laws prohibiting movements within the city's social boundariesby: [ ] distributing bodies in space,allocating eachindividual to a cellular ... partition, creating a functional space out of this analytic spatial ideal: became both In the this end arrangement. spatial matrix real and a hierarchical organization of cellular space and a purely ideal order that was imposed upon its forms (Boyer, DRC, pp.70-71; cited in Davis, 'UC', p.9). The repressivemechanismsof spatial control, and the partitioning of group segments in the Los Angeles basin, sustained its empowennent throughout this century. Stratification via zoning laws permeatedthe developmentof the city and also assisted in the exclusion of Blacks by territorializing their movementswithin the confines of "nius the despot.

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism gheftoS'34 138 that reapedhigh-unemployment,poverty stricken welfare parents,andviolent " battling for According to the 1980 turf. themselves neighborhoods amongst spaceor Census: '[ ] Los Angeles County was nearly 13 percent black, but 53 of its 82 cities ... had Black populations of I per cent or less' (Davis, CQ, p. 168).36Furthermore, the intense migration that occurred to the 'edge-cities' in the post Watts riots of 1965 further assistedthe confinement of Blacks within the central core of Los Angeles. As new jobs -and corporations-settled- into- the -new fringes of -the ýCalifornia-suburban dream, federally assisted programmes diminished year by year." Indeed, such movementsof reterritorialization by an empoweredrace entailed major shifts of power ignoring led the troubled and that to structures and control governmental agencies problematic regions of the core city. For instance,federal contributions to city budgets declined from 18% in 1977 to an overall low of 2% in 1985.38 'For a closer examination of the developmentof ghettoizedsectorsthrough cellular spaceenclosed within city limits, and the apparatusof overcodingterritorial divisions, seeSonenshein,p.27ff- 'Housing restrictions were instrumentalin creating the first Black ghetto in Los Angeles'; and Boyer's illustration of urban planning that composedtightly knit groups within disciplinary space in the US: 'Zoning, the division of the American city into a structure of cells, hierarchically controlled and rearranged,was a technical solution meant to secure an orderly and stable development of the urban land market. Promoting a disciplinary order, with its values of efficiency and ftinctionality already etched out in the planning mentality by 1914. The core purpose of zoning was to remove and separateconflicting lands uses and dysfunctional districts that might impede or destroy solid investmentsin land' (DRC, p. 153). "For an in-depth analysis of the Los Angeles economic impoverishment in the segregatedsectors, is 'Who Killed Los Part Two: The Verdict Given'. Also, see City of Mike Davis's Angeles? to refer QuarLz,p.296ff- 'The absoluteincome gap betweenBlack and white Angelenos dramatically widened. Median incomesin SouthcentralL. A. declined by almost a tenth, and Black unemploymentskyrocketed from 12 per cent to 20 per cent (30 per cent in Watts)'. 'The following presentsanotherperspectiveon the inflirx of Blacks into Los Angeles, even though their movementwas largely confined to certain urban topographieswithin Los Angeles: 'While in 1940 Blacks had comprised 3.1 percent of the population, they constituted 8.7 percent in 1950 and 13.5 percent in 1960' (Sonenshein, p.29). By being: '[ ...] strongly inhospitable to minority political representation'(ibid, p.31), the political homogeneityin Los Angeles virtually deniedBlacks any access to governmental change. 37In 1970 for example,78.3% of the Metropolitan Core of L. A. consistedof Whites, as opposedto 37.2% in 1990 (U. S. Bureau of the Census,Population, 1970 and 1990). 'U. S Bureau of Census,City GovernmentFinances, 1977-78 and 1984-85, respectively.

Chapter IV: Geopolitics: Antisystemic Movements of Resistance 139 [ ] (A)lmost the entire white working-class of the older southeast ... industrial belt-some 250,000 people-moved to the job-rich suburban fringe during 1970s and early 1980s [ ] African-Americans, by ... contrast, have been trapped in place in Los Angeles [ ...] the suburbanization of Black Los Angeles primarily represent[s] the territorial expansionof the traditional Southcentralghetto into adjacent, but separately incorporated cities [ ] when this quotient of 'ghetto ... shift' is deducted from 1990 censusfigures, what remains of Black suburbanizationin Southern California is a mono-trend movement to blue-collar suburbs [ ] (Davis, 'WKLAP, p. 16). ... *** The emergenceof postmodernacceleratedcapital placed Los Angeles in the forefront of technologically based industries as it tried to shake off its industrial sector as a "' manufacturing city. Not only does Los Angeles present a geographicalpivot for the increasingly restructuredfinance, capital and the internationalization of commerce,but it is the hub for the Pacific Rim's transactionsin North America 40However much . investment and finance poured into the L. A. region, the decoding apparatusof the been had from blind 1920s, the to the that obstructed areas, capitalist processappeared from labour market liquidation. The trend to divide and separatewithin a manifest destiny of spacevia hierarchial power is the stratification or the mutating of niches, enclaves, zones of impoverishment to seal or ward off any mechanisms of for advancement the Black and minority classes.In this process the convergenceof capital's impulses emerged into dissident eruptions forcing their way through the hierarchy to only be squashedand downtrodden once again." 'The administration of "For a further discussion on L. A. 's conversion to an intensive capitalist process, refer to Edward W. Soja's Postmodern Geogrqphies. ý The Reassertion ofSpace in Critical Social Theory (PG), p. 20011. "As Edward Soja suggests:'Positioned increasingly as a "capital of capital" in the Pacific Basin, Los Angeles has been surging toward the ranks of the three other capitals of global capital, New York-, London, and Tokyo (its Pacific Rim cohort)' (Soja, PG, p.210). "As in the Watts rebellion of 1965, the empoweredStateset a laborious and sometimesviolent grid of mandating any misconduct that attemptedto bring down the city-state apparatus.

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 140 a great molar security has as its correlate a whole micro-managementof petty fears, a permanent molecular insecurity [ ...]' (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, pp. 215-216). Recall the excerpt by Mike Davis in The City of Quartz regarding economic micro-systems, and the ability for crack to have found its presence in L.A. 's new 'world city' economy, presents us with a relay into the functioning of meshwork interplays within economic and political boundariesthat enshrinethe nation-state,and what defines it: namely, movements of resistance.The relation to space within the format deterritorializes A. 's further-within the confines L. of precinct post-industrial of what capitalism sets as its limit. The thrust behind Anti-Oedipus' discourse lies precisely in the fragmentation of capital, as it dissolves under its own expansion, thereby driving itself into what Deleuze and Guattari call schizophrenia. By investigating these meshwork movementsinto capitalism's limit we can diagram the convergenceof economic micro systemsthat decodethe striated spaceof the nation" legislative modes of operation. state's With crack finding its way into the global economy, the marginalized groups in the L. A. city are placed in a 'hyper' terrain that the State cannot penetrate.The "The following polemical questionneedsto be asked:is the nation-statereally the enemyany more for Deleuze and Guattari's Capitalism and Schizophrenia?Utially, yes, since models of control that for instituted or exacerbated are of concern; example, monopolies advocatedby the are maintained, State. Braudel sug ests such monopolies were the precursors to capitalism. However, on a closer 119 examination, we find schizophreniais not so much the enemy of the State,but rather of the monopoly, determining from by Homogeneous sectors prices and commodification capitalism. evidenced as advanceencouragethe developmentof monopoliesto preside over exchanges.This movement towards axiornatized flows of commodification (monopohes/capital)polarizes schizo-movementsand capital formations. To answerthe above question then, it is necessaryto teaseout the link that binds the State and monopolies together, and to examinethe role of late capital in relation to the State.As Deleuze and Guattari suggest, capitalism: j ] liberates the flows of desire, but under the social conditions that ... define its Emit and the possibility of its own dissolution, so that it is constantly opposing with all its drives it that toward this limit. At capitalism's limit the the strength movement exasperated deterritorialized socius gives way to the body without organs,and the decodedflows throw themselves into desiring-production' (Delcuze & Guattari, AO, pp.139-140). With meshwork structures we find systems moving from homogeneousmonopolies to heterogeneousconsortiums that communicate on molecular intensities. This will be discussedshortly.

Chapter IV: Geopolitics: Antisystemic Movements of Resistance 141 bordered districts, areasthat were already marginalized in the 1920s, fail to capture and thwart the drug trade, since the businesshas converged with capital. However territorial the sellers may get with each other over specified regions within the L. A. confines, it nevertheless portrays a mechanism for antisystemic movements of resistance,resulting in a profitable and economically viable trade. Compared with privatized Jim Crow laws that the molar apparatusmobilized through private property, --- there is -also-a patchwork displacementof segmentationthat results in,the drug trade...--..-ý On the one hand, there is a reactionmy territory, and on the other, is the rewiring of capital that dissipatesthe strategy of the despotic market in racism. There are two components to territory: a segmentarity and d circulation of flows. The contemporary cocaine trade is a stunning example of what some political economists [...] are now calling 'flexible accumulation', on a hemispheric scale. The rules of the game are to combine maximum financial control with flexible and interchangeable deployment of landscapes (Davis, CQ, across variable national producers and sellers p.310). With the public sector's role for employmentof the African-American classdevastated by intense cut-backs," the 'hype' surrounding the glamour of cocaine salestakes on frontiers takes shape.Space element, as experimentation with new market a subversive decodesnot as a reterritorialized form of segregation,but as a new market of sales in which to traversecommerce.ft is an economicmicro-movementplunging forward into more abstract meansof production. 43'Fifly-thousand public-sector jobs, most of them gained since Tom Bradley's election in 1973, constitute the economic bedrock of Black Los Angeles' (Davis, 'WKLAii' p.44). This, however, has diminished recently due to the post-cold war recession.Furthermore, this 'bedrock-' of opportunity divided the community internally, for on the one band, the civil workers that found stable employment rose to the middle income strata,while on the other, the unemployed (or occasionalworkers) stagnated within Los Angeles: '[ ...] the Black community became more internally polarized as public-sector craftwork-ers,clericals and professionalssuccessfullyentrenchedthemselveswithin the city, county and federal bureaucracies'(Davis, CQ, p.302).

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 142 Peddling the imported, high-profit rock stuff to a bipolar market of final consumers, including rich Westsiders as well as poor street people, the Crips have become as much lumpen capitalists as outlaw 44 (Davis, CQ, 3 10). proletarians p. As Anfi-Oedipus expounds on the deterritorialized socius resulting from capitalism, there is on the one hand, a decoding, while on the other, an axiomatizing, abstract " former. The gang-related to the quantitative machinery striving catch up with peddling is not an incorporated, hierarchial structure," rather trafficking is the decoding of striated, reterritorialized spacethat hindered movement from the 1920s, within the L. A. Ramparts Division's territory." 'Capitalist production has unified space, which is no longer bounded by external societies' (Debord, SS, § 165). Specifically, it is not a decoding of flows that defines capitalism, rather the: '[ ] generalized decoding of flows, the new massive deterritorialization' (Deleuze & Guattari, AO, p.224), assiststhe mode of production to cross into new zones giving rise to micro-economical, anti-national desire. Being the pre-cursors to Clinton's ambitious plans to further NAFTA by incorporating the two Americas in a free trade pact, the traffickers are already engaged in the free trade agreement, since by The significance of the Crips (and Bloods) trafficking in the drug trade stems from a 1989 investigationby the GeneralAccounting Office, estimatingthat together,they controlled: fully onethird of America's crack market' (The Economist, 17 December 1994). "These are the two sides of the same coin-decoding and axiomatization-within the capitalist apparatus.Consequently schizophrenia is displaced to the exterior limit of capitalism-the absolute limit-by which the schizo processesare allowed to flow, but only in accordancewith the axiomatic abstractingcodes along the way; for instance,only under the regulated control sequencesinstituted by capital. In the 'Apparatus of Capture' (ATP), Delcuze and Guattari wam that the decodingmechanisms of capital detcnitorializes the socius only through the intercessionof axioniatics. And finally, in AntiOedipus: '[ ] schizophrenia is not the identity of capitalism, but on the contrary its difference, its ... divergence,and its death' (p.246). '6'Aff of which is to say that the Southcentralgangsare definitely in the drug business,but as small businessmennot crime corporations (Davis, CQ, p.313). "This is referring more to the curfew laws instigated by the LAPD RampartsDivision, see Mike Davis's City of Quartz, p.284ff.

Chapter IV: Geopolitics: Antisystemic Movements of Resistance substituting: 143 money for the very notion of a code, it has createdan axiomatic of abstract quantities that keeps moving further and further in the direction of the deterritorialization of the socius' (ibid, p.33). Between 1985 to 1987 (the real take-off years for crack) the 'cash surplus' in the Los Angyles branch of the Federal Reserve system increased 2,300 per cent to $3.8 billion-a sure index, according to federal experts,of the volume of illicit coke dollars (Davis, CQ, p.312). The latest survey by The Economist details wholesale prices of cocaine have been fluctuating around $16,000-20,000a kilo, a significant decreasefrom $50,000-60,000 in the early 1980s. The reasonsfor this are varied, but the supply meeting demand ratio seemsto have balanced due to co-opei-ativeor cocaine exchangenegotiations betweenthe Colombians and the distributors in the US. Once again, the gang-related trafficking, nor the Columbian commodifies-styleexporters' association are cartels by any means, since a: '[ ...] cartel is a coalition of producers acting together to restrict " drive the the up supply and prices of product'. As The Economist suggests: '[ ] although there is evidenceof co-ordination among different cocaineproducers,and of control by certain specialists over aspects of the business such as transport and is little evidence that certain traffickers [ ] ever tried to restrict there smuggling, ... supply, and none that they succeeded'(p.25). The enterpriseis more of a consortium that has membersvoluntarily engagein particular businessventures if they so desire, latest for implementing have been by the technology they refinement, and able to distribute large quantities within the US, particularly L. A., thereby bringing down the 'The data gatheredhere concerning the cocaine exchangeis from The Econonfist,24 December-6 0 January 1995, pp.23-26, unless otherwise stated.

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 144 prices and keeping a constant supply of the substancefor their consumers." Los Angeles has had the lowest cocaine price throughout the 90's when comparedto the other large cities in the US, due to the competition between the distributors and 5' sellers. It appears as if the risk involved in transporting the drug within the US placesthe heaviestburden on the distributors, since it is estimatedto increasethe price " by '[ between farm ] 200 (p. 24). Thus times: the the the product coca of and street' ... "'Sergio Uribe, a consultantto the United Nations and author of Colombia's forthcoming national anti-drug plan, saysthat growers have introduced new high-yielding Peruvian varieties. And using new methods(involving gasoline and powered cement),it is possible to extract more usablematerial during the first stage of processing' (p.26). Furthermore, as the Colombian officials fought to stamp out refinement factories by seizing the 'precursor' chemicals utilized to produce cocaine, the cocaine exchangeinitiated: 'chemical recycling into their laboratories' (The Economist, 13 February 1993). In sum, these co-opet-alivesfor the past fifteen years have increased their yields by threefold, thereby allowing averagewholesale prices to drop by 75% (p.24). '017orinstance, the price of a kilogram averagedbetween $12,000-28,000 in 1991 compared to S14,000-29,000in New York, and $15,000-20,000to $17,000-22,000in 1994, respectively (p.25). "The Drug Enforcement Agency calculatedthat in 1990: j I the cost of raw coca amount(ed) to ... less than 1% of the retail price of refined cocaine in the United States' (The Economist, 13 February 1993). As this chapter will discuss shortly, the Government's strategy to block the flow of cocaine, coupled with the statistics surrounding the production and refinement of coca, implies a meshwork structuring that by-passeshomogeneouscontrol. For example, in 1992 the United Statesdispersed$2 billion to curtail the advancesof cocaine distribution in North America. They had hoped to interdict the flow by attempting to: '[ ] seize, or to help other countriesto seize' such narcotics. As The Economist ... suggests:'For all the drama, interdiction has had little impact on the supply of cocaine.'Me suppliers * distribution, large down the chain of stocks, all maintain ready to be drawn upon if supply is disrupted [ ] and, accordingto the GeneralAccounting Office, smugglers' profits are so high that they can easily ... absorb occasional losses' (ibid). Initially, the intensity by which the distribution network functions is reminiscent of Marx's analysis of capital, and the ever-expansiveinfiltration (or the axiomatization) of market forces, always nearing schizophrenia: 'Thus, while capital must on one side strive to tear down every spatial barrier to intercourse, i. e., to exchange,and conquer the whole earth for its market, it strives on the other side to annibilate this spacewith time, i. e., to reduce to a minimum the time spent in motion from one place to another.The more developedthe capital, therefore, the more extensive the market over which it circulates,which forms the spatial orbit of its circulation, the more does it strive simultaneouslyfor an evengreater extensionof the market and for greater annihilation of spaceby time' (G, p.539). Yet, the 'anti-market', or the abstract machine of stratification, acting within a given meshwork-milieu, provides other possibilities to track the phylum head of abstractcapital. This, in turn, leads to new, non-linear interpretations of the 'microphysical fabric' escaping the zones of central power. Ile centralpower is the State'srole in mandatingmonopolies,while the non-linear multiplicities consist of the segmentsof drug trafficking. Marx's excerpt regarding the molar organization's desire to seek, or to conquer, spatial boundariesdepicts only one side of the continuum. One could argue that drug flows are not non-linear multiplicities, but are insteadrigidified cartels, aligning trafficking to the (ibid, samelevel as Marx's capital ('capital by its very nature derives beyond every spatial barrier p.524)). This will be discussedshortly.

Chapter IV: Geopolitics: Antisystemic Movements of Resistance 145 Clinton's vaunted WestemHemisphei-eFive Rade Agi-eemetilis operating profitably, and independently of the government between the US and the South American countries, that now includes Venezuela, Ecuador, Brazil, as well as, Bolivia and 52 Columbia (p.25). The only limit levelled againstthe expansion of the drug trade in South America has beena political anti-drug war costing the United States$50 billion since the Bush administration. As the figures imply: '[ ...] Latin America's illegal drug industry is booming' (p. 23) 13Taking, into consideration the Andean Pact-consisting . of Peru, Bolivia, Ecuador, Colombia and Venezuela, as well as the Mercosur 52For example, Venezuela has shipped 500 tons of cocaine worldwide, while Bolivia is now: '[ ] ... the world's second-biggest producer of refined cocaine, which provides $700 million in export revenue and jobs for 20% of the working population' (The Economist, 29 August and 12 December 1992, respectively). Meshwork structures incorporate heterogeneous formations, thereby providing potential sources by which to realign regions to late capital: 'If capitalism is the exterior limit of all societies, this is because capitalism for its part has no exterior limit, but only an interior limit that is capital itself and that it does not encounter, but reproduces by always displacing0 it' (Deleuze & Guattari, AO, pp. 230- 231). "Mr. Bush had planned to cut the amount of cocainereaching his shoresby 10% in two years, and a further 50% in ten years. Enacted by the United States,The Andean Initiative consistedof economic and military aid designedto impede the influx of cocainereaching US shores.Targeted specifically at Bolivia, Peru and Columbia, the Initiative attackedthe processingunits that refined the substance.In addition to striking at the crops, peasantswere tempted with converting their fertile land to legitimate production, such as fruit or coffee. Since these markets have been traditionally controlled by monopolistic enterprises(the fulcrum of the'anti-mark-et'), the chancesof a successfulyield turning into a tangible profit was vezy unlikely for the peasants.The peasantfarmers cunningly turned in their land for rewards (for example, the Bolivian government pays $2,000 per hectare (2.5 acres) of coca surrendered),to use the eradicationgrants to purchasericher soil for coca cultivation. As The Economist is quick to point out: 'Coca is hardier than most alternative crops. It does well on virgin land, taking only one year to mature. It is then ready to be picked four or even six times a year. Crop substitution will remain a failure unless it is made much more profitable. This is becauseof coca's main attraction to growers: its capacity to bring in money' (13 February 1993). Moreover, a recent State Department increased by 8% in 1991. 'Since America's retail cocaine the that of coca suggests production analysis market may be worth anything between $30-150 billion a year, and the potential for coca production in the Andes is practically unlimited, the chanceof cutting it always looks slim' (ibid). There are other sources suggesting that the Cali Cartel ('a transnational marketing corporation'), one of the largest commodities-style exporters' association in Central America, has estimated: 'assets of one trillion dollars' (or, their turnover is believed to be $100 billion a year (Vie Economist, 21 December 1991)). Furthermore,they argue that: 'The war on drugs is a counter-insurgency,a defensive strategymounted againstthe tactics of subversion[ ...] cocainecreepingup the coast-linesof Central America and through the veins of corporate America, followed by other, newer, more insidious flows. The deepest subversiveshave already broken into the system(Plant & Land, 'Cyberpositive'). Mr. Bush's anti-drug war has failed (The Economist, p.23). Colombian economists speculate that the consortium have repatriated: j ...I at least $1.5-2.5 billion a year for the past decade' (ibid). -

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 146 agreementfurther south,which includes Argentina, Uruguay, Paraguayand Brazil, the realization of VaUTA seems imminent, since most of the regions have already consolidated(Chile is the noticeable exception) sub-agreementsallowing mutual free trade. Theseovercodingsand reterritorializations (and decodings-deterritorializations) denotethe simultaneity of the two processesportraying the two movementswithin the does bring 'The the other system to a halt: the flow rigid system not phylum: continuesbeneaththe line, forever mutant [ ..]' (Deleuze& Guattariý,A TP, p.22 1).This is the role of the historian/philosopher to find the lines intersecting, as well as diverging, on the body without organs." The deterritorializing fluxes bring about the accumulative overhauling of reterritorialization the system, thereby forming the basis for (ibid, p.220). Tracking the phylum head of abstract capital situates intensive rhizomatic connectionsthat bridge other meshwork milieus together." By simulating the patterns of the strata in Los Angeles, tools for exploration from in interplay be developed to to the the the mid-1980s present a map out can dynamics important ]a be '[ It to theory the create: ... of meshwork structure. would functions' by interdependent their together producers meshed of networks of smaller "Philosophy is a geophilosophy in precisely the same way that history is a geohistory from Braudel's point of view' (Deleuze & GuattariyIVIP, p.95). To further the above excerpt from What is Philosophy?, the following describes the political and geophilosophical method of investigating the complementarity that (co)cxists on each strata belt. The fossilization that testifies to an escaped assemblageon the different levels of the strata: '[ ...] designate(s) the "period!' of coexistence or simultaneity of thesetwo movements(decoding-deterritorializationand overcoding-reterritorialization). For the duration of this period, one distinguishesbetween the molecular aspect and the molar aspect: on the one hand, massesorflows, with their mutations, quanta of deterritorialization, connections,and accelerations; on the other hand, classes or segnients, with their binary organization, resonance, conjunction or accumulation, and line of overcoding favoring one line over the others' (Delcuze & Guattari, ATP, p.221). Deleuze and Guattari allocate this 'task' of 'designation' to the historian (here they are thinking of Braudel) and to geophilosophers. "'The rhizome pertains to a map that must be produced, constructed, a map that is always detachable,connectable,reversible, modifiable and has multiple entry-waysand exits and its own lines of flight' (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p.21).

Chapter IV: Geopolitics: Antisystemic Movements of Resistance (Delanda, 'MAIM'). 147 Being autonomous from a centralized agency" illuminates the emergent properties that have led up to the infusion between segregatedeconomic sectors,and the materializing of regional trade within the limits of capital. Population groups bifurcating within the socius are, as Delanda suggests,deterministic, since the dynamics involved are governed by an attractor: '[ ] the population in question ... [would] be strongly bound to behave in a particular way' (Delanda, 'VEESR') However, this is not to imply that other possibilities for the system do-not-existjsince, ,[] populations have "choices" between different "local destinies" that enable transitions from one stable state to another state by an external shock' (ibid). Even though there are other possibilities for the population to 'destine' to another point if however is he dubious, Mike Davis that the estimate of. out since points attractor, [ ] 10,000gang membersmaking their livelihood from the drug trade ... is anywherenear correct, then crack really is the employer of last resort in the ghetto's devastatedEastside-the equivalent of several large auto " hundred (Davis, CQ, MacDonalds 314). p. plants or several Experimentation is the locus for movement on the molecular plane." By dismantling in form, in State, the the the segregation as of only molar not centralized structures 'Furthermore, the disassembling of gang related, internal conflicts, confirmed by the 'unity decision, five Rodney King to the took that supports the above claim. months prior place movement' See Mike Davis's 'Who Killed Los Angeles?: The Verdict', p.34ff. "Furthermore, a 1992 survey by the National Institute of Justice discovered approximately: j ] ... 5,000 gangswith 250,000 members in America's 79 biggest cities; there are probably many more that do not make it into the police figure' (The Econondst, 17 December 1994). This is not to suggest all gangs are in the drug trafficking consortium, but rather the potential for such a 'market' system is available for post-industrialized cities, such as, South Central Los Angeles. "This is how it should be done: Lodge yourself on a stratum, experiment with the opportunities it offers, find an advantageousplace on it, find potential movementsof deterritorialization, possible fines of flight, experiencethem, produce flow conjunctionshere and there, try out continuums of intensities segmentby segment,have a small plot of new land at all times [ ...I We are in a social formation; first seehow it is stratified for us and in us and at the place where we are; then descendfrom the strata to the deeperassemblagewithin which we arc held; gently tip the assemblage,mak-ingit passover to the side of the plane of consistency' (Dclcuze & Guattari, ATP, p. 161).

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 148 of housing and terrain, geopolitical movementsarise on the molecular level, where the possibilities for group-formationsemerge.Speculatingon the consequencesof the drug trade surrounding South Central Los Angeles, and its incorporated cities, a transformation from a grid of segmentedspace to a commodified arena has arisen, where: '[ ...] traditional gang topography is being radically redrawn by the emergence of a myriad of micro-gangs,more interestedin drug salesterritories than neighborhood turf in-the -old-fashioned-sense' -(Davis, CQ, p.316).'9 The, grid, is- continuously - "Mike Davis's discourse on socio-economic systcms-interacting within gang topographies-is restricted to molar configurations, as opposed to the perpetual field of interaction that defines such movements. (71be 'perpetual interaction', or meshwork structure, is between the State and the nomad, see Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p. 360. ) Dclcuze and Guattari provide instances of various mechanisms introduced in packs (or gangs) to prevent stabilization, or institutionalization, of power. One such example is the BogotA street children cited by Jacques Meunier, where he: '[ ...] emphasizes the degree to which the fate of the ex-gang member is jeopardized: not only for health reasons, but because he finds it hard to integrate himself into the criminal underworld, a society too hierarchical, too centralized, too centered on organs of power for him to fit into' (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, note 13, p. 553). While Davis fails to take into consideration the internal, micro dynamics of gang behaviour, Delcuze and Guattari tend to navigate between the molar and molecular processes of interaction; however, both approaches, or interpretations, falter regarding gang formation. Granted, the limited studies that are available also fail to provide an accurate picture surrounding the patterns of gangs, trafficking and the war machine; but as this chapter argues, antisystemic movement provide the groundwork by which such formations arise within a socio-economic lattice. Recent studies or texts on the organization of gangs do not account for such questions as the following: is there a role for a homogeneous leader, as in a despotic regime, in gangs? Furthcrmorc, is the hierarchy top-down, or does it arise from a meshwork integration? And, finally, is the trafficking of drugs a monopoly, and if so, does it resemble a Statemonopoly (or 'anti-mark-et')? A clue to such inquiries is explored in an exemplary text by an ex-Los Angeles gang member, Sanyika Shak-ur, ak-aMonster Kody Scott, where he stresses the heterogeneous banging falls flows: '[ ] interplay interactions schizo short within of of gang a meshwork appropriation ... being formally founded institution the level that the on premise of of, say, was organization an of of him, has duty No individual is to there assigned a specific no compartmentalization. structured, so banger finds himself be by Therefore, his the superior. serious often monitored a can efficiency where handling several "jobs" in the course of his career. At any given time I was the minister of information, declaring included walls, writing on who we were and who we wanted as such responsibilities which to kill, and verbalizing our intent at gangland supremacy on street comers, on buses, in school yards, and at parties; minister of defense, which entailed organizing and overseeing general troop movement and maintaining a highly visible, military able contingency of soldiers who, at a moment's notice, could be relied upon for rapid deployment anywhere in the city; teacher of war tactics, which I guess, would fall under the heading of instructor, and combat solider and on-the-job trainer' (Shakur, M, p. 78). The by fluid, Monster Kody Scott: the eates narrative a mass movement nomad war machine pui This is Pamet's discussion by Deleuze into taken generally up and one another. andfeeding accelerating on becoming-the movement of mass as a molecular assemblagc7-bifiircating within a given society deterritorialization', flight. its fluxes is in The 'points deterritorialization, of of everything already where diagram speed as the determining intensity on the molecular plane: 'being a gang-gangs live through the worst dangers; forming judges, courts, schools, families and conjugalities again. But what is good in a gang, in principle, is that each goes about his own business while encountering others, each brings

Chapter IV: Geopolitics: Antisystemic Movements of Resistance 149 deterritorialized with only the intervention of axiomatics stratifying along the border of the body without organs. By: '[ ...] enlisting in the crypto-Keynesian youth employmentprogram [ ...]' (ibid, p.309)' in Los Angeles,the African-Ameri canshave fabricated a smooth space of integrating capital: It is as though, at the outcome of the striation that capitalism was able to carry to an unequaled point of perfection, circulating capital necessarilyrecreated,reconstituted,a sort of smooth spacein which the destiny of human beings is recast.The multinationals fabricate a kind -of,deterritorialized smooth space-'inwhich the points of occupation-as well as poles of exchange become quite independentof the classical paths to striation [ ...I the essentialthing is [...] the distinction between striated capital and smooth capital, and the way in which the former gives rise to the latter through complexesthat cut acrossterritories and States [ ] (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p.492). ... The emergent complexity in tracing the 'probe head' in geohistory is not a theorizing nor a transcendent analysis, rather it is situated within the properties materializing towards planetary capital, the closest simulation of the body without organs. In other words, there is no central controlling agency producing the positive in his loot and a becoming is sketchedout-a block startsmoving-which no longer belongs to anyone, but is "between" everyone [ ]' (Deleuze & Parnet,DIA, p.9). ... 'Mike Davis unfortunately makes the error of labeling the cocaine-exchangeas a 'cartel' (Davis, CQ, p.309), leading him to dismiss the intensive grid of global capital emanating from regionalized Moreover, his socialized disposition cries out for a heavier financed, economies, such as WMA. governmentalintervention to createjobs ('Southcentral L. A. has beenbetrayed by virtually every level of government'), at a time when the Stateis collapsingunder the pressureto deregulateeconomies,begs the question: do you want a dozen military-contracted factories churning out anti-ballistic missiles in order for the impoverished to have 'a modicum of dignity'? For example: 'the post-Cold War erosion of manufacturing employment has been sudden and extreme. One-fifth of the industrial work-force=ncarly200,000workers, including 85,000union members-have lost theirjobs, with countless more sackings and shutdowns yet to come [...I Blacks and Latinos, less than 20 per cent of the aerospacework-force,constitute an extraordinaiy 53 per cent of the layoffs so far' (Davis, 'WKLAii' p.46). The Economist places this predicament on a national scale, whereby: 'California remains the fourth most defense-dependent statein America, after Alaska, Hawaii and Virginia. Lastyearitgot2l% of the S123 billion paid out by the Defense Department.But that was a 15% decline, in real terms, since 1989' (13 November 1993).

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 150 feedback." The abstract machine is the innovator and selector, producing a geological stratification arising from the sedimented and filtered properties, forming the basis for an: '[ ...] independent, worldwide axiomatic that is like a single City, megalopolis, or "megamachine" of which the States are parts, or neighborhoods' (Deleuze & Guattari ATP, pp.434-435). If there is stratification within the strata, then there is a code, and every time there is stratification, there is a singularity bifurcating. Every time there is a State coding; such as in the-privatized Jim Crow laws in-L. A. 's housing,-then-there is always a spilling to the edge, as evidenced by the drug trade." Moreover, these intermediary statesalways have a machinic relationship to the most abstractzone of the machinic,phylum.63With 100,000Black youths curTentlyin Los Angeles, Davis's socialist perspectiveassertsthat the presentstyle of the consortium enterprise is: [...] the only alternative to the dissolution of a community fabric heroically built up over generationsof resistanceto racist white America' (Davis, CQ, p.77). The importance lies precisely in the molecular fabric tracking the particular levels of the social "This needs to be taken with caution. Even though meshwork-structures are contrary to what transcendentheories claim, they neverthelesspresenta polemic of their own, namely, the quantitative element of axiomatics. Axioms infiltrate through the molar, as well as the molecular, like a virus, recoding the connective processesfrom the bottom-up. Rather than a relief within capitalism, axioms can be more threateningbecausecontrol has already been invaded by economic and psychoanalytical abstraction.This diffuses and insinuatesitself by dispersing and existing everywhere-only that which is in accordancewith the axiomatic is allowed to exist. 'Monetary flows are perfectly schizophrenic realities, but they exist and function only within the immanent axiomatic that exorcisesand repels this reality. The language of a banker, a general, an industrialist, a middle or high-level manager, or a government minister is a perfectly schizophrenic language,but that functions only statistically within the flattening axiomatic of connections that puts it in the service of the capitalist order' (Deleuze & Guattari, AO, p.246). Whilst the above reported passageportrays an 'anti-mark-et' perspective on economics,this chapter has dealt with systemsthat allow price developmentsto take place within the 'market', thereby disallowing homogeneousmechanismsof repression to take place. 0 CO "Or, as Soja remarks: 'There is thus always room for resistance,rejection, and redirection in the nonethelessstructured field of urban locales, creatingan active politics of spatially, struggles for place, space,and position within the regionalized and nodal urban landscape' (PG, p.235). "Capital is no longer the invisible center which directs the mode of production: its accumulation spreads it all the way to the periphery in the form of tangible objects. The entire expanse of society is its Portrait' (Debord, SS, §50).

Chapter IV: Geopolitics: Antisystemic Movements of Resistance 151 phylum; a seeking of the diverse strata levels that unhinge heterogeneityto spreadon the molar apparatusof the body without organs.It is always a combination of the two intersecting in processes capital: a geophilosophyand a geopolitics.

Chapter V Palimpsest: Toward a Minor Literature in Monstrosity

In Kafka's writing, this kind of deterritorialization of languageis obvious. That is, his work is located on an edge, a border, at the limit of a huge aggregatein order to deterritorialize, a way of fighting, a kind of "en-sobering", of making sober, an active hadn't it, in fact, language. but So, I to thought sobriety of about return one could make an equation by saying that whenever a marginality, a minority, becomesactive, takes the word power (puissancede verbe), transforms itself into becoming, and not it, identical its but in to with condition, active, processional merely submitting becoming, it engenders a singular trajectory that is necessarily deterritorializing because,precisely, it's a minority that begins to subvert a majority, a consensus,a great aggregate.As long as a minority, a cloud, is on a border, a limit, an exteriority is it's that something rejected, something that is, by definition, of a great whole, marginalized. Mix Guattari, interview (1985)

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 154 I There is no mother tongue, only a power takeover by a dominant languagewithin a political multiplicity (Deleuze& Guattari, ATP, p.7). Motion has been my closest companion,from room to room, houseto house,streetto street,neighborhoodto neighborhood,school to school, jail to jail, cell to cell-from one man-madehell to another (Shakur, M, p. 103). A tablet, a parchment,or stratum that is overcoded,decoded,and once again, recoded is an apl3fication of inscription, a:processof stratification,,that binds multiplicities to a homogeneousapparatusof capture (the State). The Unity of the despot allocates blockages and compartments to divide multiplicities into cellular partitions, an difference between This the an of reterritorialization. activates absolute operation layers of the strata, thereby assuring a division between heterogeneouselements, a conversion to homogeneity. By assembling a mutually comprehensive, stable from heterogeneous the withdrawal machinic systems, strata are a machinery out of intensity. There is nothing in the composition of the strata that will shield it from other influences, other than the processof stratification. Even though the strata tend to be distributed by free intensities, the achievement of the layers of the strata lie difference in in territorialization, nature and whereby an absolute precisely coding and is Reminiscent Franz Kafka's homogenization thresholds of without achieved. a intensity homogeneity through a central processing the the of stratum processes stories, unit-a vast bureaucracythat inscribesthe Law on tablets,parchmentsor strata,but the having Through depend the apparatusof writing, the escaped. on something strata State perfectly coincides with the despot's inscription. Writing demonstratesthe new, despot's defined An the stratification. with a strategy, event massively rigorous and written word is the absolute explosion that overcodesany language it comes across.

Chapter V: Palimpsest: Toward a Minor Literature in Monstrosity 155 The weight of stratification produceseffects: a record keeping, a meticulous recoding through machinic expertise. The despot always has a distributed sphere by which spatiality ceasesto be immanent. Thus, we can say that the despot is a threshold in which something immenseslides into history in a single stroke, a temporality beyond ' is is looming horizon. that the response;and yet, also a mega-singularity always on It is the capacity for global power. Of particular interest is the binary opposition that links -multiplicities ýto a uniformly stable relay that rises up to-the super-stratum.The individualization of mass through a constructedsystem of Unity is the function of binary oppositions, whereby: '(t)he fluxes are tidied away, controlled and overencoded by means of the writing machine' (Guattari, MR, p. 122). Deleuze and Guattari's Capitalism and Schizophi-eniais a pragmatics specializing in the mapping form higher intensities deterritorialize, but to that also reterritorialize of not only layers on the strata.2 By composing a map, as opposedto a tracing, of particular strata levels, certain geographical assemblages converge to bifurcate the existing homogeneity into multiplicities. Deleuze and Guattari provide various descriptions of this process,most notably, packs, mass and gangs. A map is a singular, functional element that addressesthe molar organization of confinement or stratification. The 'A critique of transcendentstratification becomesa schizoanalysisof the super-stratum.The superstratum is, on the one hand, an objective movement at the heart of application, and on the other, the in if it is from a disconnectedregion, an impositional that appears a single stroke, as sphere super ulterior realm. This is the basic condition for the super-stratum,insofar as it acquires a norm through which identity arrives from somewhereelse, a Unity. The super-stratumpredicatesbehavior that is not immanent to its functioning, a transcendence,whereby the mapping of the strata will resolve the incongruity that is always lingering on the periphery ofproduction. Somethingwill always escape:'That is why bands in general [ ] are metamorphosesof a war machine formally distinct from all State ... apparatusesor their equivalents, which are instead what structure centralized societies' (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p.358). 'For an extended discussion relating to the process of deterritorialization with a complementary reterritorialization, seeDeleuzeandGuattari, ATP-.'Deterritorialization must be thought of as aperfectly has is has degrees (epistrata), threshold that always relative, and reterritorialization and positive power has its flipside or complement' (p.54).

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 156 strata demarcate zones of intensity, a process of differentiating space, whereby overcoding locks intensive processesinto regimented,periodic loops within the circuit of the strata.In other words, intensitiesthat deterritorialize are reterritorialized into the space of signification, an overcoding into the strata of globalization or universalization.Stratification, or the lateral dispersionof intensities into homogeneous wholes, is the circuit that binds the layers together. This always takes place with a deterritorialization coupled with a complementaryretenitorialization: An organism that is deterritorialized in relation to the exterior necessarilyreterritorializes on its interior milieus [...] Every voyage is intensive, and occurs in relation to thresholds of intensity between which it evolves or that it crosses. One travels by intensity; displacementsand spatial figures depend on intensive thresholds of (and different deterritorialization thus on relations) that nomadic simultaneously define complementary, sedentary reterritorializations (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p.54). Thus the relative deferritorialization's supplemovementto destratification, a cracking is defined belts, the territorialized with a complementary reterritorialization. of rigid, By critically juxtaposing relative deterritorializationto the elementsof minor literature, this essay situates the current political and literary voices emerging out of South Central Los Angeles. Despite its subscription to a signed subjectivity, Monster: The Autobiography ofan LA Gang Member generatesa collective assemblagethat decodes the stratification of language into minoritarian politics of desire? This is the functioning elementof becoming.Written from a California maximum security prison, Monster's portrayal of mass movementswithin the grid of Los Angeles illuminates the destratification of molecular becomingsthat are recapturedby the State apparatus between deterritorialization The that oscillates and movement of recoding. 'Throughout this chapter,the title of the autobiographyis occasionallyshortenedto Monster in order to designatethe minor collectivity Shak-urgeneratesthrough the writing-machine.

Chapter V: Palimpsest:Toward a Minor Literature in Monstrosity 157 reterritorialization allows for a mapping of becoming, even though population packs are in constant flux: 'The two factors [code and territoriality] neverthelesshave the same "subject" in a stratum: it is populations that are deterritorialized and reterritorialized, and also coded and decoded' (Deleuze & Guattafi, ATP, p.54). Shakur's Monstey-presents the possibility of mapping heterogeneous multiplicities that homogeneous discusses This the through power centres. chapter stratified are heterogeneous;ecological niches that the strata uniformly attempt to-recodein-relation to Shakur's minor literature.4 The processby which the strata solidify multiplicities is addressed,as well as the function of the minor in South Central Los Angeles. This locates not only the political turbulence of the west coast, but the consequences resulting from institutionalized power structuresengagedin the monitoring of masses ' into do fit the the equation of that molar organization. With the influx of a not 4Refer to Deleuze and Guattari, ATP, 'November 20,1923: Postulates of Linguistics', for an examination of minor literature in connection to a major language: 'Minor languagesare characterized not by overload and poverty in relation to a standardor major language,but by sobriety and variation that are like a minor treatmentof the standardlanguage,a becoming-minor of the major language.The problem is not the distinction between major and minor language; it is one of a becoming. It is a question not of reterritoriali zing oneself on a dialect or a patois but of deterritorializing the major language' (p.104). 5By this I am not only suggestingthe current cybernetic technologies that are being implemented to reterritorialize the 'public' and 'private' space into a unified stratification of surveillance in Los Angeles (seeDavis, 'UC'); but also the State of California's claim to be the leader in prison systems: 'Since the early 1980s, California has made prison-construction its main form of infrastructural investment, spending over $5 billion on 19 new prisons, and has raised the number of people incarceratedfrom 23,000 in 1980 to 125,000 today [ ] Vacaville (near Sacramento)is now home to ... the world's largestprison, a title soon to be taken away by planned expansionof SanQuentin. A federal court has just ruled that Pelican Bay, the state's "model" high-security prison, violates constitutional protections against inhumane torments' (Walker, 'CAL', p.60). Though this chapter does not present an in-depth study of architectural space,it is interesting, however, to note the similarities between the developmentof the American city, particularly Los Angeles, and the structure of prisons narrated by Shak-ur.For instance, the architects of zoning exemplify the allocation of land uses to predefined solutions of homogeneity: 'Zoning, the division of the American city into a structure of cells, bierarchical1ycontrolled and rearranged,was a technical solution meant to securean orderly and stable developmentof the urban land market. Promoting a disciplinary order, with its values of efficiency and functionality already etched out in the planning mentality by 1914, the core purpose of zoning was to destroy dysfunctional districts impede lands that or solid uses and might and separate corifficting remove investmentsin land' (Boyer, DRC, p. 153).And, Shak-ur'sconfinementwithin the Youth Training School (Y. T. S.) in 1981: 'A maximum-security prison, it comprised three units, each divided into quarters.

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 158 periphery into the core area of Los Angeles, the current role of urban politics and minor literatures unleash desire into the circuit of the city. The machinic process of becoming a peripheral minoritarian is unparalleled in Shakur's autobiography, as in the following: The term "institutional security" is so far-reaching that whenever there is nothing to lock a prisoner down or harasshim for, staff, correction officers, and most any figure of authority in any institution will pull out this ambiguous term. It is precisely this wording that has me locked --deep-withitythe bowels of Pelican Bay today. I am-a threat;--and'proud-of it. If I wasn't a threat, I'd be doing something wrong (Shakur, M, p.221). An American who locks you in a cage, counts you to make sure you haven't escaped,holds a weapon on you, and, in many instances, in fact Add that the to this us grew up an eighty most of you. shoots percentNew Afrikan community policed-or occupied-by an eighty-five in is force American to that clearly antagonistic any male pig percent the community, displaying this antagonismat every opportunity by any imagination force brute they the and sadistic necessary with all means can muster (ibid, pp.223-224). H In '1227: Treatise on Nomadology: -The War Machine', in A Thousand Plateaus (pp.351-423) Deleuze and Guattari forward a cartography of sedentary space that appropriatesthe rhythmic movementsof autonomouspacks, a nomadic war machine. Deleuze and Guattari juxtapose not only a geological compassdirected towards the super-stratumthat envelopesrhizomatic movementsto a topography of overcoding, Each quarter was subdivided into halves, and each half was again divided into banks, or tiers. Every door had his Each to of solid steel with a small glass own cell. cell a sliding was assigned prisoner window for observationby staff' (Shak-ur,M, p.204). Shakur furthers this with detailed descriptions of the function of the three units-each consisting of four 'companies' alphabetically arranged-designed to reorientate the inniates for society. The importance of the above stems from how stratification is devised and implemented, whether it be through zoning laws, judicial confinement or transcendent apparatusesofracism; andthe construction of a molecularwriting-machine within the despoticoperation die de Genet Sade From Marquis fractures to inscription through that molar systems of suppression. of George Jackson and, presently, Sanyika Shakur, the highly reterritorialized forms of incarceration dissipate that the strategiesof the mechanismsof capture: writing-machines with molecular converge 'Language is a map, not a tracing' (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p.77).

Chapter V: Palimpsest:Toward a Minor Literature in Monstrosity 159 but also position a genealogical optic by which the State apparatusemerges.These two processes of appropriation-deterritorialization and reterritorialization-are inextricably entwined, since the application of overcoding can be traced on both aspectsof the molar and molecular lattice, or planes of strata. To composea study of the strata, a stratigraphy, would enable a lateral tracing of the layers upon layers of sedimentationthat have stackedto form a super-stratum,or most notably, the despot. The belts or,-Iayers-ofthe strata are -intensitiesthat have been-capturedby the-superz lateral intensity The that gets application of overcoding. stratum-an movement of imprisoned to form another belt on the strata is overcoding by the super-stratum.In other words, intensity that escapes through the fissures of stratification is reterritorialized by being folded back on itself The super-stratum perennially orchestratesthe appropriation of intensities by this avenue of conversion. The result is the stratification of heterogeneousmultiplicities imprisoned within a homogeneous, arborescentsuper-stratum.This is an instanceof high-level control, a: phenomena of centering, unification, totalization, integration, hierarchization, and finalization' (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p.41): the despot.The processof overcoding also acts as a memory system by which the super-stratumcan navigate the direction of particular homogeneouswholes. The myriad layers that constitute the stratum are captured intensities that form a zone of articulation, a memory or an inscription. The storage machine of memory operates within a relative stasis, a homogeneous binds intensity The that to a stratification of memory mechanism reterritorialization. eliminatesthe machinic drift and variation that assemblesa pack. 'The memory blocks desire, make mere carbon copies of it, fixes it within strata, cuts it off from all its connections' (Deleuze & Guattari, K, p.4). The strata imprison intensities through a

Axiornatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism double operation that couples deterritorialization with 160 a complementary reterritorialization. The complementarity is a double bind that has the opposite dynamic of deterritorialization. By exciting intensities to spill out of the strata, complementary reterritorializations capture flows and lock the machinic assemblage of desireinto suppression.Deleuze and Guattari provide numerousdescriptionsfor this overcoding, such as a lobster and God. ---- Howis it possibleto re-influence the-stratawith machinic potential-a point of convergencebetween behaviour that has become frozen and code that has become rigidly stratified? It is to construct a machine,a map, a diagram or a practice instead of discourse,to dismantle the homogeneousstasisthrough an intensively continuous variation. However, will this movement connect the strata to a process,whereby a diagrammatic drift will link to destratification of code and flux, and in turn, will bifurcate intensities to other heterogeneouselements?The site in which to answerthis lies precisely in the function of minor literature: '[ ]a becoming that includes the ... maximum of difference as a difference of intensity, the crossing of a barrier, a rising or a falling, a bending or an erecting, an accenton the word' (Deleuze & Guattari, K, p.22). It is always a question of becoming: geographical assemblagesattracting a language, immediacy, deterritorializing and the 'collective assemblageof geopolitical ' enunciation'. A map of becoming can be sketchedas a molecular intensity rupturing, do flight How line to the machinic that zones of multiplicities. connects other a of it is important function? To this to answer question, assemblagesof packs and gangs refer back to 'The Treatise on Nomadology', and the discussion on Numbering Tor a further discussion concerning the three characteristicsof minor literature, see Deleuze and Guattari, K, p. 1811.

Chapter V: Palimpsest: Toward a Minor Literature in Monstrosity 161 Number, to initiate the assemblage of minor literature: 'All of thought is a becoming, a double becoming, rather than the attribute of a Subject and the representation of a Whole' (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p.380). The Numbering Number functions as a collective assemblage of enunciation whereby the subject processes multiplicities. The elements that bifurcate to form a multiplicity share the same properties as packs. There is no subjectivity that can be counted, or isolated, within the multiplicity: 'The number is no'longer a means of counting or measuring but of moving: it is -the'number itself that moves through smooth space' (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p. 389). The collective assemblage of enunciation is correlated to Deleuze and Guattari's critique of the analyst/patient dichotomy in psychoanalysis: a theatre in which subjects speak on their behalf-a hallucinatory image of private speech.' Rather, the collective assemblage of enunciation speaks/acts as an organ of the molecular: a numerical, intensive ' divides into itself. Since there is no difference between multiplicities that multiplicity dividing into themselves and connecting up with other heterogeneous intensities, a multiplicity can only grow by changing in nature--a metamorphosis. Its nature is defined by a threshold crossed at a singular point in its growth. A becoming. A generic, numerical entity, such as a wolf, or a monster. What is it for a pack to be 7Refer to '1914: One or Several Wolves?' (Deleuze& Guattari, ATP), for a criticism surrounding Freud's analysisof private speech:'There are no individual statements,there never are.Every statement is the product of a machinic assemblage,in other words, of collective agentsof enunciation [ I' (p.37). ... And, 'November 2,1923: Postulatesof Linguistics': "Mere is no individual enunciation. There is not even a subject of enunciation' (p.79). 8Shakur'saccount of the war-machine composition and the molecular, numeric heterogeneity that assemblesmultiplicities elucidates this process: '[ ...] we'd used numbers as codes of affiliation to circumvent police repression. All Trays, including three-time sets such as the Playboy Gangsters, Altadena Block Crips, and Marvin Gangsters,wore three golf-ball emblems on their hats. In contrast, Neighborhood sets and two-time sets like the 5-Deuces,6-Deuces, and Raymond Avenue Crips wore two golf-ballemblems on their hats' (Shakur,M, p. 165).Earlierinthe autobiography,Shakur designates the geographicalmatrix from which collectivities emerge: 'A member of a gang might belong to the West Side Crips, Eight Tray Gangsters,North Side Eigbty-third Street, or West Side Harvard Park Brims, Sixty-second Street.These are noted by street and initials or abbreviations' (ibid, pp.78-79).

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 162 divided, and yet, still compose an assemblage?Granted the pack is perpetually partitioned and segregated, but the variation in its magnitude is always heterogeneouslyintensive. 'There are only multiplicities of multiplicities forming a single assemblage,operating in the sameassemblage:packs in massesand massesin packs' (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p.34). Packs are liminal: a boundary, or a zone, that is not categorically localizable. Their relationship to multiplicity is of a pragmatic leverage'that esdapesfrom Unity, Totality --ora transcendentmodel -of -articulation: This is a divergence from the molar apparatusthat counts from the outside. The transcendent,homogenizedNumbered number is a numerical lineage that constitutes line flight. As Deleuzeand a of a complementaryreterritorialization-the recapturingof Guattari suggest: '[ ] the use of the number as a numeral, as a statistical element, is ... proper to the numbered number of the State, not to the numbering number' (ibid, p. 390). The molecular fragments stratified intensity and maximally populatesitself in order to function. It is not a function of copying or tracing a map, rather rhizomes add a map to a specific territory: '[ ...] the rhizome pertains to a map that must be produced, constructed, a map that is always detachable, connectable, reversible, modifiable and has multiple entryways and exists and its own lines of flight' (ibid, p.21). By adding changes in the territory, intensities bifurcate to form other has be Guattari Deleuze Thus that to treated as and affirm multiplicity assemblages. a substantive,an intensive difference, as opposedto the category of Plurality, which differences: has 'A neither subject nor object, multiplicity only provides quantitative dimensions increase in determinations, that cannot number magnitudes, and only without the multiplicity changing in nature [ ...]' (ibid, p.8). Speedand temperatureare

Chapter V: Palimpsest: Toward a Minor Literature in Monstrosity 163 examples provided by Deleuze and Guattari to designate the distinction between intensive versus quantitative intensity. Intensive difference, for instancespeed,is only decomposableinto other speedsand is irreducible to molar difference. This is basic to intensity since they never enter into relations of proportionality. The mutual process of deterritorialization with a complementary reterritorialization, is a self excitation that departs from all reference to strata, or reliable framework, down-loaded from the-super-stratum.Thus the Iine Of flight is a clandestinemovement branching out of homogeneousrelations that posit application. The heterogeneitythat drips through the cracks and fissures of the strata ceasesto be in a complicity to categorical systems of Unity. The machinic assemblageis a lingering, yet constant, camouflaged movement that interferes with the pattern of codedprocesses:a micro-practice of becoming.It is a construction, or an engineering tool, for exploring trajectoriesof destratification,a probing of edgesand potentialities. The trajectory is the escaping ingredient back into space; a becoming-minor. A convection that situates the mass movement to destratification. A catalyst for minor literature. A war machine. 1111 It is an affair of cartography. They composeus, as they composeour map (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p.203). "Who is Monster Kody?.J am Monster Kody a person, a young man, ... know is black No, I jMt Monster that else? not of man-Anything a ... .. Kody? A Crip, an Eight Tray, a Rollin' Sixty Killer a black ... ... (Shakur, black " BLACK MAN... M, pp.225Black man, man, man... 226). Monster: The Autobiography of an L.A. Gang Member chronicles the first phase of Shakur's life, by charting the early initiation rites into the gang world through to his first killing in low-intensity warfare to being shot seventimes himself. It is during this

Axiornatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 164 period Shakur acquires the name Monster. At the age of thirteen Shakur is struck in the face by a man he is trying to rob; the man attemptsto escapebut is 'tripped' by Tray Ball, a fellow Crip, who then holds the victim while Shakur 'stomps' him for twenty minutes: '[ ]I learnedthat the man had lapsedinto a coma and was disfigured ... from my stomping. The police told bystandersthat the personresponsiblefor this was ' (Shakur, [ ]' At sixteen Shakur is "monster". M, The 13). a name stuck ... p. imprisoned for the first time: 'Not a door, not a window, -but bars. Since then I have had an indelible scar on my mind stamped"criminal"' (ibid, p. 138). Upon his release, Shakur has numerous skirmishes in South Central Los Angeles with other gang sets, as well as law enforcement agencies that eventually place him in the California Youth Training School for four years. As Shakur portrays, each gang in the training school mobilizes accordingto 'geopolitical' boundariesthat stretchfrom Northern to Southern California. The dynamics by which each set recodesaccording to territory produces larger conflictual groups designatedby 'lines of race'. To complicate matters more, tribalism seversNew Afrikans into warring factions: 'Tribalism was most prevalent into (ibid, began Crips Afrikans, Bloods' New then and who as one split amongst 'Due to this chapter concentratingon Deleuzeand Guattari's minor literature in relation to Monster, it will not be possible to discussthe molecular structure of the gang environment that envelopsyoung Shak-ur'slife. However, the Crips appropriate numerous aspects of nomad war machines, such as dehierarchizedpower structures,fluid levels of interaction within the organization, and interchangeable parts or positions that mutate according to need: '[ ...] banging falls short of the level of organization formally founded being is institution the there that on of structured, so was premise no say, an of, compartmentalization.No individual has a specific duty assignedto him, where his efficiency can be monitored by a superior. Therefore, the serious banger often finds himself handling several "jobs" in the course of his career. For years I found my position in the set to be manifold. At any given time I was the minister of information, which included suchresponsibilities aswriting on walls, declaring who we were and who we wanted to kiU [ ...] minister of defense,which entailed organizing and overseeing general troop movement and maintaining a highly visible, militarily able contingency of soldiers who, at a moment's notice, could be relied upon for rapid deployment anywhere in the city; teacher of war tactics, which, I guess,would fall under the heading of instructor, and combat soldier and on-the-job trainer' (Shakur, M, p.78). The above reported excerpt has already been discussedin the previous chapter.

Chapter V: Palimpsest:Toward a Minor Literature in Monstrosity 165 p.207). With numerous sets combatting with each other for hierarchical domination in the institutionalized environment, Shakur begins to question the foundation of tribalism and the 'wider reality' of New Afrika. Moreover, Monster's graphic descriptionsof South Central Los Angeles under constant surveillance from the State apparatus,coupled with the threat of feuding warring factions shooting a 'homie' (comrade), places Shakur's role as a Crip member into question. The position of preserving the- 'hood through -retaliatory attacks to writing encrypted messageson South Central walls, comes under critical examination when Shakur realizes he does not even own a brick in the United States, and yet, since the age of eleven, has defended a territory which is not really his own. On the one hand, the nomad is a trajectory that does not possessany territory through enclosing or striating space,yet still demarcatesa zone of actuality through a landscape,a smooth spacethat is the removed perimeter from the apparatusof recoding. 'It is in this sensethat nomads have no points, paths, or lands, even though they do by all appearances'(Deleuze Guattari, ATP, p.381). And, on the other hand, the stratum once again reterritorializes-inscribes-the nomadic trajectory decoding from the belts. It is the deterritorialization of institutions on the cusp of madnessthat the strata can once again intensity into back homogeneity. despot As the the the molecular with recapture from deterritorialization folds back itself that to unprecedented an on socius results form another strata. And, with Shakur, we find him in back in prison, a recoding of the body of a black man, a gang member,a Crip and a killer. The institutional holding cell is the apparatusby which his identity is reconfigured, an etching or a memory is deterritorialization It the this within strata: criminal. movement of and reterritorialization betweenthe different thresholdsof the strata,that a movementfrom

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 166 being prisoner to becoming-monsteris conjugated. Shakur's movement of decoding and recoding from gang member to prisoner back to gang member, constitutes a double movementthat is constructedand dismantledto form a singularity. The series, becoming-monster, is as much a gang member as a prisoner, that proliferates a machinethe strata cannotrecode.The production of zonesthat Monster assemblesand disassemblesare molecular intensities escapingfrom the componentsof confinement. Sirwe'coding, signifies difference by-flattening out quantitative"entities --through-a universalization in advance,the super-stratumthat demarcateseach cellular position in relation to each subjectivity cannot code immanently localized assemblages.Thus to designateintensities is to localize singularities, micro fissures that deterritorialize the molar organization. Thus the metamorphosisto becoming wavers betweentactics is being by Monster the of maintaining a region and not captured super-stratum. such a formula: Prison was like a stepping stone to manhood, with everything depending on going and coming back. Going meant nothing if you never came back. The going was obligatory, but coming back was it host didn't just Going a of mean prison, circumscribed voluntary. obligatory deeds.Go shoot somebody,go take a car, go break into that house, go rob that store, go spray-paint that wall, or go up to that school. The glory camenot in going but in coming back. To come back showed a willingness to "stay down." It fostered an image of the set as legitimate, and each individual who could go and come back brought look, (Shakur, M, talk, way of writing something new-walk, pp.163-164). While confined to the Youth Training School, Shakur's allegianceto the New Afrikan IndependenceMovement becomesvisible, but is not fully developedtill his involvement in the ConsolidatedCrip Organization (C.C.O.). " The importance of the "Me C.C.0 was eventually dismantled when the leaders realize their assemblage,Clandestine Revolutionary Internationalist Party Soldiers (CRIPS), is static, as opposed to futuristic (Shak-ur,M, p.352). For further details regarding Shak-ur'scommitment to these movements, see the following

Chapter V: Palimpsest: Toward a Minor Literature in Monstrosity 167 biographical excerpt lies in Shakur's coining of the term, 'Machine in Motion, to designatethe molecular, anti-systemic rhizome." The assemblageis an impermanent, temporal intensity that extinguishesitself when connectedto other multiplicities: this is what it is all about-the discovery of assemblagesof immanence and their dismantling. To dismantle a machinic assemblageis to create and effectively take a line of escape[ ]' (Deleuze& Guattari, ATP, p.59). The machine is a singularity that ... maps allmitforitarian possibilities by bringing into question the role of the -dominant; suppressivemolar organization.The 'Machine in Motion' initiates all that is stratified into an active collectivity of enunciation, a cadence,to a point where the emergence of becoming is produced. There is no difference betweenthe map that is collectively composedthrough the assemblageand the territory upon which it inscribes itself. It is a question of locality that brings into question the Unity of the majority. The 'Machine in Motion' sketchesa geopolitical, molecular intensity that is a catalyst for deterritorialization. It is an intensity that ruptures that strata to seek a line of flight, an interacting zone immersedin a geopolitical immediacy. Deterritorialization is never defined by its speed,but through its nature to 'jump from one singularity to another following a nonclecompos able, nonsegmentaryline [ ...]' (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, is becoming Thus, 56). never coordinatedby a tracing of the strata, but through the p. drawing of heterogeneouslines of flight, a howling that invades the linkages to homogeneous to that would otherwise attest a stasis. subjectivity With Shakur's immersion into the 'Machine in Motion', what role does his chaptersin Shakur, M. '48 Hours', 'Reconnected' and 'Nation Time'. "'Machine in Motion' is the Universal Crip Cadencecited by the inmates and led by Shak-ur.I am encompassing 'Machine in Motion' to designate the supple molecularity by which a process to immanence is generated.See chapter, '48 Hours', for the messagecontained in the Universal Crip Cadencethat pertains to the transformation from tribalism to unity (Shakur, M, pp.306-309).

168 Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism proper name have in the equation to multiplicity? Kody Scott, Monster Kody, and Sanyika Shakur ceaseto denotea subjectivity, but insteaddiagram a writing-machine, a program that has a local, variable functionality within the strata; a pragmatics destratifying the universalization of identity structures. These are the effects of intensities raging againstthe organs of the body. There is no difference between the proper name and becoming-monstrosity, for both envelope and deterritorialize the coding mechanismsof stratification.,The-organismare stratifications-of identity/unity that cause binary oppositions to saturate multiplicities into rigidified wholes. The bifurcation excites the molar operation of identity by seeking the point of becomingimperceptible. A writing-machine that encompassesthe 'impossibility of not writing' is the construction of assemblagesinventing lines of flight from within the major language (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, pp. 16-17fo. The collective enunciation of minor literature severs the suture of the overcoding subjectivity that is stratified into a homogeneouswhole, a Unity. A writing-machine seeking molecular connectionsby which a line of flight can be compassed,is an assemblagethat has numbering number as its component, drifting through the molar topography of the strata. Proper names in discontinuous be designated then or effects; other assemblages, as singularities, can it intensive If both numbering number mark a singularity. proper names and words, is possible to designatea singularity, then the strata is coding an infinite amount of intensity: 12 something always escapes'. By subordinating an autobiography to is, initially, linear due to the socius there the topography a chronicle of subject, a `Uiis relates to chapter 9, '1933: Micropolitics and Segmentarity', where Deleuze and Guattari addressthe sectors of 'impotence' that defte power centres. This, of course, locates antisystemic movementsof resistance,or micropolitics, as a massthat thwarts the perpetuation of the super-stratum (ATP, p.217).

Chapter V: Palimpsest:Toward a Minor Literature in Monstrosity 169 layering uniformed mechanisms of recoding. The machinic, subterraneanflows of deterritorialization are perpetually reconfiguring the dynamics of the system, thereby pushing the subjectivity behind the narrative into a collectivity. This doubling, namely, a life chiseled on a palimpsest and the mutant lines of intensity that perpetually decode the strata, is a becoming writing-machine. The communication between the different strata intertwine at proximate levels of bifurcation. Deleuze and Guattari term this,mediation the K-function; -to'de8ignatenot--onlythe singularity that destratifiesthe strata, but also the recodings that infiltrate the heterogeneousmass. K, the K. -function, designates the line of flight or deterritorialization that carries away all of the assemblages but also undergoes all kinds of reterritorializations and redundancies-redundancies of childhood, village-life, love, bureaucracy, etc. (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, pp. 8889). 13 Situating Shakur's Monster within an assemblage,or a becoming writingmachine,is complex and perplexing. The cocking of a handgunto shoot an enemy and inscribing a life, an autobiography,onto a palimpsestis a problematic function on the samecircuit that fracturesthe stratification of identity: both relay a multiplicity within a pack that localize movement; both deterritorialize transcendentsystemsof Law and language, respectively; both initiate movements to the periphery, a minoritarian assemblage;and both are destratified zones in which communication reaches an immanent threshold.14The schizophrenic dispersion of identity through the cocking 13 And: 'The letter K no longer designatesa narrator or a characterbut an assemblagethat becomes all the more machine-like, an agentthat becomesall the more collective becausean individual is locked into it in his or her solitude [ ]' (Deleuze & Guattari, K, p. 18). ... "The smearedwalls in South Central Los Angeles, upon which Shak-urmarks his affiliation to the CriPs, also function as a palimpsest.The walls that house the graffiti are in a fluid transactionof being codedwith particular markings of a gang, to only be decodedby anotherset, and iinafly, to be recoded by, yc4 anothergang. The processof identiýring with territoriality is perpetually in a state of flux. The walls provide a compassof directionality that usual streetsigns fail to indicate. The molar cartography of South Central is diffused into a tactile space of interaction, a molecular mapping. 'The Miller

Axi0matics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 170 of a hammer, locateseachbody within an immanent exchange,a mapping of decoded subjectivity. 'I rememberraising my weaponand him looking back-for a split second it was as if we communicatedon another level and I overstood who he was-then I pulled the trigger and laid him down' (Shakur, M, p. 11). The circulation through which communication decodesto its molecular component, is the destratification of geological plates of identity, whereby a smooth space initiates a realigning of tenitory. 15,Furthennore, -Shakur's account of movements that -are,not -situated -within homogeneous, cellular units, but derive their degree of intensity through local variations, place each molecular gradient to an immanent mutation. The molecular is a swarm of collective behaviour; a multiplicity whereby the machinic processexploits stratified thresholds of strata. 'Like a temperature or a speed', the equation of singularities modifies thresholds of systems.The numbering number is not a random element, but a collective ensemble,a molecularity. IV Gangsterswere from clear acrosstown. 120th Street. It's possible that they didn't know where they C, were. Or it could be that they did know but had little respect for our 'hood, since they had never had open confrontationswith us. I'd tend to believe the latter. This is why it's necessaryto read the writing on the walls. Fuck street signs. Walls will tell you where you are' (Shakur, M, p. 169). "Smooth space is an area of immediate contact, a field of heterogeneousparticles traversing the super-strataand attracting multiplicities that will pushthe systemto transform into diversecollectivities. I am thinking, specifically, of the concluding pagesto Alphonso Lingis' '111cSociety of Dismembered Body Parts' (SDBP, pp.301-302),where the eloquenttreatmentof late capital's voyage to schizophrenia is unsurpassed.As Lingis poetically states, the apocalyptic vision of dispersed body parts will not reinscribe upon the earth, as in the primitive societies; rather, the schizophrenia that Delcuze and Guattari conceive, is the 'dismemberment of body parts' that shatter notions of identity in order to rcconfigure assemblages,a monstrosity. The transcendentidentity is fractured, or laid out, as immanent movementsof disparateand localized intensitiesconvergeon thresholdsof deterritorialization. The hand that cocks a gun is a body part (or intensity) being distributed 'across the social field'. 'The social body is being laid bare, laid out, laid, excited metamorphosedwhen hands clasp in greeting and in understandingand in commitment and in sensuality and also in parting [ ...] Where the car on cruise control racesthe Los Angeles freeways,the hands free to dial the cellular phone, cut the fines of coke, or cock-a handgun' (ibid, p.301). Cocking the hammer ascertainsa directional movement within the confines of the topography of South Central: 'Guns were our tools of communication [ ...] Instantaneous communication' (Shak-ur,M, p.228). For Shakur,South Central Los Angeles is the zone through which mutant lines of flight molecularize a cartography of becoming.

Chapter V: Palimpsest:Toward a Minor Literature in Monstrosity 171 It is certainly not by using a minor language as a dialect, by regionalising or ghettoizing, that one becomesrevolutionary; rather, by using a number of minority elements,by connecting,conjugating them, one invents a specific, unforeseen,autonomousbecoming (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p. 106). Considering the machinic heterogeneity that constructs a writing-machine, through which Shakur assembleshis line of flight, we are struck towards the end of Monster by the molecular escape folding back on itself This is not to imply Shakur's confinement-in Pelican Bay is a,molecular reterritorialization; but;-Tather,his tabling of racial separation.Before venturing into this stratification, it is important to focus on the doctrine of racial differentiation that Shakur provides. This occurs in numerous places, particularly so with his emphasison America's genealogical suppressionof minoritarian race(s). 'The contributing factors are many, and no singular person or group has the absolute solution. From what I've studied and seen it would seemthat this country's 130-year-old experiment of multiculturalism has failed. Perhapsit was never designed to work [ ...] My personal belief is that separation is the solution' (Shakur,M, pp.381-382). This is problematic, for the differentiation of colour, derived from a homogeneousproduction of numberednumber, measuresand divides through a melanous partitioning of race. It is a folding back of a decoded intensity, a minoritarian assemblage,into a regimentedwhole that is another stratification on the 16The layers 'supremacy'. that the constitute molar's position of preexisting myriad K-function falls prey not only to redundanciesof childhood regressionsof familism, but recodingsof a sedentaryspacemore devastatingthan anything envisioned before: 16 For instance,the cartographicalseparation,or 'spatial apartheid', that has manifesteditself in Los Angeles, presentsa stratified zoning of race through economics.Since the urban uprisings of the 1960s, the white flight into the suburban ffinges of Los Angeles has placed most Black Americans in an economicmoratorium, as most employment opportunitieshave moved out of the core city into the safe, surrounding havens of Los Angeles (see Davis, 'WKLAi', pp.14-20).

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 172 a construction of identity that suppresses becoming. Thus the K-ftinction is architecturally modeled within a homogeneousrealm, through which the molar organization provides a definition for becoming. A division of the race that Shakur desiresto evoke within the socius, is founded on the notion of the oppressionof one and the supremacy of the other, and by imposing what it implies to be a minor, Shakur is folding back onto the samenotion of identity that the oppressoremploys to globalize and perpetuatethe -stratification of machinic-,assemblages:Thus-Shakur's recoding of the becoming-minor takesplace on the sameplane, or palimpsest,that the super-stratumimplementsto stratify minoritarian becomings.As Deleuze and Guattari suggestin Capitalism and Schizophrenia,race is not predicated on purity, but exists only through being oppressed:'[ ...] there is no race but inferior, minoritarian; there is no dominant race; a race is defined not by its purity but rather by the impurity conferredupon it by a systemof domination' (Deleuze& Guattari, ATP, p.379). More importantly, race cannot be rediscoveredthrough 'mythical' voyages that tend to be aligned with microfascisms,a theatre of representationproviding a nostalgic narrative of identity. For instance, returning to the process of becoming-imperceptible, the function of proper namesis not to stratify within a representationof race, but a zone that convergeswith other minoritarian assemblages,regardlessof molar attributes,that share the same production of becoming. Deleuze and Guattari term this interactive phylum 'a class of effects', which locatesa movement that encompassesall totalities " the within machinic process. Shakur is misguided when he emphasizesthe purpose 17 1 am referring to Deleuze and Guattari's analysis of racial constructs, as in the following: '[ ] ... identifying races, cultures, and gods with fields of intensity on the body without organs, identifying personageswith states that fill these fields, and with effects that IuIgurate within and traverse these fields [ ] there is no ego that identifies with races,peoples,and personsin a theater of representation, ... but proper names that identity races, peoples, and persons with regions, thresholds, or effects in a production of intensive quantities' (Deleuze & Guattari, AO, p.86).

Chapter V: Palimpsest:Toward a Minor Literature in Monstrosity 173 separation will have in this new configuration of identity: a characterization that retains a static definition of what a class of effects will produce, is none other than " dominant language. The depiction of the transcendent the a molarization within minority, as a peripheral rhizome, lies in its 'connection' to other ruptures that produce elements the strata cannot recode. The significance of Monster: The Autobiography of an L.A. Gang Member is the machinic,line of flight that connects to -Imperceptible'localities; that would otherwise be' recoded,by the-sfipet-str4tuni through globalized identification, such as a criminal in the prison system, the explication of racism and segregation.The supplemolecularity of the writing-machine is to delimit the cartographyof representation,to accessthe molar stratified layers that unify suppressionand racism, to bifurcate models of the dominant language and to create a trajectory of escape on a smooth space of interaction. '[ ...) The more a language has or acquires the characteristics of a major language, the more it is affected by continuous variations that transposeit into a "minor" language' (Deleuze & Guattari, A TP, p. 102). The criticism that can be levelled at Shakur in his recoding that separatesrace, is not to reject the collective assemblageof enunciation he has generatedwithin the confines of Pelican Bay. Shakur's strength in becoming-monster lies in the reevaluation of the planes of strata that bind and suppressminoritarian becomings. To dismantle the apparatusof capture that thwarts such multiplicities 18Shak-ur'smacro-politics of separating race is not realistically attainable within the current climate in the United States. Moreover, since this chapter focuses on the micro-political assemblage that is generated from Shak-ur's autobiography, it is not possible to assessthe viability of racial macro-politics. As Deleuze and Gualtari suggest: 'Ile response of the States, or of the axiomatic, may obviously be to accord the minorities regional or federal or statutory autonomy, in short, to add axioms. But this is not the problem: this operation consists only in translating the minorities into denumerable sets or subsets, which would enter as elements into the majority, which could be counted among the majority' (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p.470).

Concluding Remarks: "Class Consciousness" and the "American Rhizome"

The strata are phenomena of thickening on the Body of the earth, simultaneously molecular and molar: accumulations,coagulations,sedimentations,foldings. They are Belts, Pincers, or Articulations. Deleuze and Guattari

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 176 [ ] Capitalism has a very particular character: its lines of escapeare ... not just difficulties that arise, they are the conditions of its own operation. It is constituted by a generalized decoding of all flux, fluctuations of wealth, fluctuations of work, fluctuations of language, fluctuations of art, etc. It did not create code, it has set up a sort of accountability, an axiomatic of decoded fluxes as the basis of its economy.It ligatures the points of escapeand leapsforward. It expands its own boundariesendlessly and finds itself having to seal new leaks at every limit [...] It puts itself in alarming situations with respectto its own production, its social life, its demographics,its borders with the Third World, its internal regions, etc. Its gaps are everywhere [ ] But ... it is certainly the prohlem of the marginalized. to plug all these lines of escape-into a'revolutionaiy- plateau (Deleuze, 'CAP', - pp.66-67; emphasisadded). 'Class consciousness'and the 'American rhizome' are two distinct processesthat occur in Deleuze and Guattari's analysis of the capitalist world-economy. By discussingthesetwo processes,we can concludeour study of the minoritarian and the identifying with a particular socio-econornicclass.(An identification with problems of a socio-economic class is an instance of the majority (marxism) critiquing the stratification of the capitalist world-economy). We examine this critique by the majority in relation to America and Deleuze and Guattari's work, in particular the 'American rhizome' that is located in the West. The West has an important role in Deleuze and Guattari's writings on literature and the destratification of the apparatus of capture. The smooth space of communication between the phyla of heterogeneous particles is the circuit of desire. The flows that escapefrom the apparatusof capture ' found Guattari This is not issues. the that tags are within nomadic exchange as minor "I do not believe in universal literature or philosophy but rather in the virtues of minor languages. So the question becomesrather simple, either a minor language connectsto minor issues,producing particular results, or it remains isolated, vegetates,turns back on itself and producesnothing' (Guattari, Chaosophy,pp.37-38).

Concluding Remarks: 'Class Consciousness'and the 'American Rhizome' 177 to suggest that minorities, or minoritarian becomings (movements), do not have definable molar attributes that produce elementsof capturewithin their heterogeneity. Rather, their significance stems from their ability to 'trigger' levels of deterritorialization that would otherwise not be generated:'Minorities, of course, are objectively definable states,statesof language,ethnicity, or sex with their own ghetto territorialities, but they must also be thought of as seeds,crystals of becoming whose value is to trigger uncontrollable movementsand deterritorializations-of the mean or majority' (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p. 106). Deleuze and Guattari argue that minorities and minoritarian becomingshave molecular reterritorializations, producing molar systems that the strata can then recode through apparatusesof capture. The significance of minoritarian becomings,however, lies in their geopolitical immediacy that connectsthem to social movementsthroughout the socius.Without such a process to machinic becoming, we would not have the revolutionaty potential to deterritorialize the strata that imprison desire. Capitalism is stratification: a levelling of axioms and models of realization; but It doesnot effect the "conjugation" of the deterritorialized and decoded flows without those flows forging farther ahead;without their escaping both the axiomatic that conjugates them and the models that reterritorialize them; without their tending to enter into "connections" that delineatea new Land; without their constituting a war machine [a] revolutionary movement (ibid, pp.472-473). However temporary the nomadic exchangemay be, it is, nevertheless,a minoritarian becoming. By not specifically concentratingon the exploitation that is inflicted on the 'worker'-resulting from de-industrialized Los Angeles (particularly in South Central Los Angeles)-this study diagrams movements that realign the peripheral (Third World) 'worker' into new zones of exchange.These zones of exchangehave been

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 178 discussedby diagramming antisysternicmovementsof resistancethat map geopolitical becomingsand minor literatures onto the surface of Los Angeles. Los Angeles is the medium by which the cartography of desire is examined. The Third Worlds that are internally placed in the Centre zone chart contemporary,material interactions that are has its Late to antisysternic. capitalism perpetuallyredraw boundariesto accommodate the influx of Third Worlds into the core of its Centre. By deterritorializing peripheral sectors that -are *stratified - by the Centre, *antisystemic movements- of resistance challenge the present homogeneous configuration of late capitalism, locating heterogeneous elements that subvert the apparatus of capture, and designating minoritarian assemblagesto micropolitics. The inability to construct axiomatics that will imprison flows from escaping through the cracks of the stratified world-economy, we find the Centre having to continuously reterritorialize on its own Third Worlds, to assurethat the apparatusof captureis not absolutely deterritorialized, to sustaina level of power over minoritarian becomings,to implement limits to thwart the flows of desire, and to reconfigure the dynamics of late capitalism.' Models of realization are implemented to continue the stratification process of binding desiring-production to the strata. Late capitalism by flows in functions deterritorializing that turn, are of surplus-production, always Deleuze Guattari's with and analysis of the a complementarity. reterritorialized apparatus of capture states that, it is not a question of whether minorities, or 'As Braudel states, it is only through the coordination of peripheral zones do we get a Centre controlling the capitalist world-economy. 'There can only be a world-economy when the mesh of the network is sufficiently fine, and when exchangeis regular and voluminous enough to give rise to a central zone' (Braudel, cited in Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p.468). However, with late capitalism the Centre is in a precariousposition, since the Earth has to be continuously remapped,not only with other regions or territories, but also internally. Ile Centre is always re-axiomatizing its surplus-productivity to sustain a level of control. See chapter I for a detailed examination of the Centre's role in late capitalism.

Concluding Remarks: 'Class Consciousness'and the 'American Rhizome' 179 minoritarian assemblages,can viably create Stateswithin the capitalist system: '[ ] since in the long run they promote compositions that do not pass by way of the capitalist economy any more than they do the State-form' (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p.470). These compositions are antisysternic movements of resistance. Even though minorities are placed in peripheral Third Worlds in the capitalist world-economy, Deleuze and Guattari argue that the revolutionary potential of ibinoritarian-ass'emblagesis the'antisystemic movement that -destratifies-particular constructs that level class consciousness(code) to their becoming: '[ ...] if they are revolutionary, it is becausethey carry within them a deepermovementthat challenges the worldwide axiomatic' (ibid, p.472). To identify with a majoritarian system that levels class consciousnessas the medium by which to critique capitalism, only leads to anotherreterritorialization on the already existing codesof the myriad layers of the imPlemented identifies The the the with more majority molarity, more codesare strata. to sustain the high-level control of the strata. In other words, to identify with particular homogeneousbelts is an operation that is still within the confines of the strata. As Deleuze and Guattari explain: 'The power of the minority, of particularity, finds its figure or its universal consciousness in the proletariat. But as long as the working class defines itself by an acquired status, or even by a theoretically (variable it "capital, " State, as a part of capital appears only conquered leave does the plan(e) ofcapilar (Deleuze & Guattari, not capital), and ATP, 472).3 p. By arguing that capture precedes oppression in the development of the capitalist 'This is not to suggest that the minority does not have a 'universal figure', but that figure is precisely a molecular trajectory that does not posit a universalization in advance: 'There is a universal figure of minoritarian consciousnessas the becoming of everybody, and that becoming is creation. One doesnot attain it by acquiring the majority. The figure to which we are referring is continuousvariation, as an amplitude that continually overstepsthe representativethreshold of the majoritarian standard,by excessor default' (ibid, p. 106).

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 180 world-economy, Deleuze and Guattari resist identifying minorities, or minoritarian assemblages,with a class consciousnessthat sees itself oppressed,an instance of coding . To do so leads us back into the strata, and a movement to the periphery of the capitalist world-economy is not achieved. For instance, marxism critiques the capitalist world-economy by levelling exploitation and oppressionas the basic element of stratification. As Deleuze and Guattari suggest, such a critique reterritorializes marxismýinto a majority, -producing a -universal consciousnessin the proletariat. 'Majority implies a constant,of expressionor content, serving as a standardmeasure by which to evaluate it' (ibid, p. 105). In appropriating molar categories, such as oppressionand exploitation, the machinic potentiality of the minoritarian folds back itself The end result of the folding back processis a class consciousnessthat posits on oppression as the underlying system of stratification. By recoding antisystemic movements in accordanceto oppression, the majority's critique is still within the axiomatized structure that the capitalist world-economy utilizes to leap forward. This is an instanceof capture by the strata, a reterritorialization. Categoriesof oppression in the capitalist world-economy are molar recodingsonto the belts the exploitation and strata utilize to perpetuatethemselves. The 'figure' that identifies with oppression finds itself caught between the double-pincer, unable to coordinate a movement of resistance.The models of realization that producea macro-political identification with class oppression(or universal consciousnessin the proletariat), capture revolutionary desire by reterritorializing it back onto the matrix that has already been set-up by the capitalist world-economy. As Deleuze and Guattari recommend,it is more a question of minoritarian directions that are to be travelled, a construction of a geopolitical immediacy to the social stratum, as opposed to class structures that are to be

Concluding Remarks: 'Class Consciousness'and the 'American Rhizome' 181 " domain the the understood within of strata. By drawing lines of flight that deterritorialize the layers of capture, we can map the strata that sediment desire into homogeneoussystems: 'A determination different from that of the constant will therefore be considered minoritarian, by nature and regardless of number, in other words, a subsystemor an outsystem' (ibid, p. 105). Or, antisysternic movements of resistance. Deleuze and Guattari specify that the majoritarian cas a constant and homogeneoussystem' (ibid) poses difficulties, as in the following -excerpt:--------One could even imagine, in blood and crisis, a more radical reversal that would make the white world the periphery of a yellow world; there would doubtless be an entirely different axiomatic. But what we are talking about is something else,somethingeven that would not resolve: women, nonmen, as a minority, as a nondenumerable flow or set, would receive no adequateexpressionby becoming elements of the majority, in other words, by becoming a denumerablefinite set. What is proper to the minority is to asserta power of the nondenumerable, even if that minority is composed of a single member. That is the formula for multiplicities (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p.470).' Is there a connection between what Deleuze and.Guattari tag as minoritarian and what they diagram to be America? Can the discussion concerning the identification with a constant, such as class consciousness,be located in the United States?Finally, what function is America serving in Deleuze and Guattari's analysis of becoming? The concept of the rhizome is the medium by which to answer these questions concerning America and Deleuze and Guattari's writings. The 'American "The line no longer forms a contour, and insteadpassesbetweenthings, betweenpoints. It belongs to a smooth space.It draws a plane that has no more dimensionsthan that which crossesit; therefore the multiplicity it constitutesis no longer subordinatedto the One, but takes on a consistency of its own. Theseare multiplicities of massesor packs, not of classes;anomalousand nomadic multiplicities, not normal or legal ones [ ...]' (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p.505). 'Deleuze and Guattari continue their formulation of becoming by stating that: 'The issue is not at all anarchyversusorganization,nor even centralismversusdecentralization,but a calculusor conception of the problems of nondenumerablesets, against the axiomatic of denumerablesets. Such a calculus may have its own compositions, organizations, even centralizations; nevertheless,it proceedsnot via the Statesor the axiomatic processbut via a pure becoming of minorities' (ibid, p.471).

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 182 rhizome' is the assemblagethat producesa trajectory of escapefrom the confines of the strata. (For instance, we have discussed particular aspects of the 'American rhizome' in order to arguefor the geopolitical immediacy that is found in the function of the minoritarian in South Central Los Angeles). Deleuze and Guattari specifically point to American literature to argue for the 'special case' that produces the 'American rhizome. By appropriating their mapping of American literature to our discussion of macro-political -class-consciousness,we can conclude our examination of minoritafian becomings. Deleuzeand Guattari explicitly statethat America is the zone where everything comestogether: '[ ...] everything important that hashappenedor is happeningtakesthe route of the American rhizome [ ...]' (Deleuze & Guattari, A TP, p. 19). And: 'The flow of capital produces an immense channel, a quantification of power with immediate "quanta," where eachperson profits from the passageof the money flow in his or her way: [...] in America everything comestogether, tree and channel, root and rhizome' (ibid, p.20). They suggestthat the lines of escapethat are generatedby the 'American found in literature, heterogeneous American the producing are elements rhizome' flows in all 'geographical directions'. In assembling a map, these geographical directions assistDeleuze and Guattari in their examination of America, and they also in is is America Europe. This to that the not suggest arborescence rhizomatic elucidate and Europe is stratified, since both encompass elements of stratification and destratification: 'There are knots of arborescencein rhizomes,and rhizomatic offshoots in roots' (ibid). Deleuze and Guattari's 'Introduction: Rhizome', in A Thousand Plateaus, explores America's 'map' in the West. They discuss the arborescent roots and

Concluding Remarks: 'Class Consciousness'and the 'American Rhizome' 183 rhizomes that continuously reconfigure the landscapein America. In particular, they are concemed with writers that either recode or decode the geological strata of America. As they suggest, the American landscape's relationship to the strata is intensified by the lines of escapethat leak out of the geological plates. The landscape produces dynamic flows that cross thresholds of stratification, creating immanent compositions(eventhough the flows may reterritorialize), 'shifting' layersthat capture intensity., and formulating a meshwork interactivity that allows for- heterogeneous elementsto flow on the body without organs.In order to gain a better understanding into levels divide America blocks by interaction, Guattari Deleuze these of of and mapping the directions that certain writers have charted through their work. The writers that they discuss have a unique place in Capitalism and Schizophi-enia.we have the East, a territory that recodes,or retums, to the Old World (Eliot); we have the South that overcodeson the slavery system (Faulkner); we have the North with its decoding capitalists (Dreiser); and we have the West, the zone that intersectswith line flight (Kerouac): '[ ] layers West the the the the of plays role of a of strata all ... combining travel, hallucination, madness, the Indians, perceptive and mental frontiers, the rhizome the of shifting experimentation, (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, levels destratification in The 18, 520). that of stratification and are occurring p. note these American blocks depend upon the relationship each of these zones has to Europe: 'And directions in America are different: the searchfor arborescenceand the is its [ ] in West East. But Old World the there the to the rhizornatic occur return ... frontiers' (ibid, limit, its displaced and p. 19). shifting ever-receding The West is tagged as a rhizornatic territory, a landscapethat is decoded by has becoming. 'frontier' The West the always a privileged of molecular assemblages:

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 184 place in Deleuze and Guattari's analysis of America. To understandtheir privileging of the West, we need to examine Deleuze and Guattari's relationship to Europe. The geographical distancethat separatesthe West from Europe plays an essentialpart in Deleuze and Guattari's writings of not only the West, but also of Europe. The West is particularly rhizornatic becauseits links to the 'Old World' are not as stratified as they are in the East. Moreover, they suggest that: 'Every great American author createsa cartography, even in his or her style; in contrast to what is done in Europe, each makes a map that is directly connectedto the real social movements crossing America' (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, note 18, p.520). The following questions need to be asked regarding America and Europe: why does America's line of flight have such an important role in Deleuze and Guattari's concept of the rhizome? In other in landscape, if layers American there the that of words, are such stratification continuously reterritorialize desiring-production into homogeneouswholes, then why do they differ so much from the stratification found in Europe? Why privilege one over the other? Perhapsthe following is an answer: At the same time, we are on the wrong track with all these geographical distributions. An impasse.So much the better. If it is a question of showing that rhizomes also have their own, even more rigid, despotism and hierarchy, then fine and good: for there is no dualism, no ontological dualism betweenhere and there, no axiological dualism betweengood and bad, no blend or American synthesis(ibid, p.20). And yet, earlier in the reported passage,they state that American books assemble 6 different lines of flight than their Europeancounterparts. The distinct processthat is occurring in Deleuze and Guattari's perspective on America and their critique of "American books are different from Europeanbooks, even when the American sets off in pursuit of trees. The conception of the book is different' (ibid, p. 19).

Concluding Remarks: 'Class Consciousness'and the 'American Rhizome' 185 Europe, is found in their analysis of marxist discourse that produces a universal consciousnessas the medium by which we can destratify the present homogeneous configuration of capitalism. Deleuze and Guattari argue that by levelling a 'constant of expression' through 'class consciousness',as an apparatusto critique the capitalist world-economy, we are not mapping the machinic potentialities that heterogeneously 7 converge with other elements within the machinic phylum. These convergences supersede-calegones-ofoppression and-exploitation. To isolate flows-within-a pre-w defined foundation of class consciousness is a reterritorialization of desiringproduction into molar systems of thought. The machinic heterogeneity that deaxiomatizes the stratification of the capitalist world-economy finds itself recoded by another layer. The internal Third Worlds are no longer able to converge with antisystemic movements of resistance, since they have already been defined by acquiring a 'status' within the planes of capitalism. Thus, the processof continuous 'becoming of everybody' is recodedby the apparatusof capture. it is by leaving the plan(e) of capital, and never ceasingto leave it, that a massbecomesincreasingly denumerable (Deleuze dominant destroys the the sets' equilibrium of revolutionary and & Guattari, ATP, p.472). By 'leaving' the homogeneous stratification of the majoritarian, micropolitics converge with minoritarian and geopolitical movements. Models of realization are the meansby which the majoritarian can produce an identification with an acquired status. For Deleuze and Guattari, such models of 'The 'guidance device' of the phylum head not only locates and designates the various heterogeneousassemblageswithin the constellation of stratification, but also draws the lines that detcrritorialize the Earth in relation to the nomad. Ile temporality of the machinic phylum produces the effect of stratification of intensive flows-, even though these flows vary immanently they resist actualization into cellular oTdersof temporality. They either prevent their capturethrough lines of flight body by the the the maintaining on of without organs as strata precipice continuous mutation, or intensive desire. By positing a class consciousnessin order to critique capitalism, we find that . ritarian assemblagesare once again rccoded by the majority.

Axiornatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 186 realization have saturated micropolitics in Europe. They contrast these models of realization that have reterritorialized desire in Europe to the machinic becomingsthat bifurcate homogeneous systems in the West. (For example, their discussion of American books to European books). Their privileging of the West levels a critique of the limitations of European discourse that places an identification within class structures, producing pre-defined systems by which to critique capitalism. The significance-of Capitalism andSchizophrenia lies precisely in its combat againstthese models of interaction that are present in Europeandiscourse.Granted, capitalism is a by implementing limits its to that growth continuously sets world-wide axiomatic models of realization to thwart flows of desiring-production from leaking out of the discourses Guattari Deleuze However, that specify minoritarian and strata. (micropolitics) should not construct another layer of stratum on the already existing layers of stratathat constitutethe world-wide axiomatic. Marxism is criticized for such becomings. deterritorializing layering minorities and minoritarian a of stratum onto Capture is the basic element of the strata, and until the strata can be mapped as a process of capture, we will not be able to formulate geopolitical movements that decode the capitalist world-economy. To create a class consciousnessby which all is be defined an endeavourthat will only perpetuatethe processes can minoritarian define The the apparatus of capture are the that cracks of capture. present system deterritorializing elements that minoritarian assemblagescan utilize to challenge homogeneoussystemsof thought. Marxism goesthe other way round by constructing an identification within the capitalist world-economy, as opposed to mapping the imprisonment for to the that sedimented resist geopolitical movements allow cracks but be The to the only of sedimentation need mapped, geological plates within system.

Concluding Remarks: 'Class Consciousness'and the 'American Rhizome' 187 through the crevices do we discover what these homogeneousplates imprison.' The West, for Deleuze and Guattari, is the 'map' where minoritarian trajectories are diagrammed within the matrix of the capitalist world-economy.' In other words, the West connectsitself to minor elementsthat push themselvesonto the apex of the apparatusof capture. It is only through deterritorializing a major language (as in minor literature), or decoding constantsthat bind us to the strata, do we push through to the limits that, are -instituted by -the apparatus of capture. By, dividing America into blocks, we can appropriateDeleuze and Guattari's distinction between: '[ ] the majoritarian as a constant and homogeneous system; minorities as subsystems;and the minoritarian as a potential, creative and created, becoming' (Deleuze& Guattari, A TP, pp.105-106).This takes place by each sectors' relationship to the Old World, and by designatingthe West as the zone of reversal, the 'American rhizome' finds its '[ ...] Orient in the West, as if it were precisely in America that the Earth came full circle; its West is the edge of the East' (ibid, p. 19). This reversal of direction is the convergenceof social movements and minoritarian becomings that traversethe body without organs.It is not a question of identifying with certain states, "From the viewpoint of micropolitics, a society is defined by its lines of flight, which are molecular. There is always something that flows or flees, that escapesthe binary organizations, the resonanceapparatus,and the overcoding machine [ ..] molecular escapesand movements would be nothing if they did not return to the molar organizations to reshuffle their segments,their binary distributions of sexes,classesand parties (Delcuze & Guattari, ATP, pp.216-217) power centersare dermed much more by what escapesthem or by their impotence than by their zone of power' (ibid, p.217). ýln an interview from 1985, Guattari explains the function of the 'American rhizome' in relation to becoming: 'America is entirely deterritorialized. "Deterritorialization" meansthat instead of having obstaclesor having land, things, curves, there are lines, trains, planes, everything crossing, everything sliding, demographic flows sliding everywhere, and on top of that, there are extraordinary reterritorializations. Henry Miller in Brooklyn, Faulkner [ ...] as an archaic writer of American life [.. ] Isn't it rather a mythical reterritorialization about deterritorialized America? [ ] How does one make ... oneself a body without organs, how does one make oneself a little territory, a life, a warmth, a childhood, in this American mess, in this whole mishmash spread out all overT (Guattari).

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 188 or homogeneoussystems, but of subtracting molar configurations and producing a variation within the immanence that is generated: 'Subtract and place in variation, remove and place in variation: a single operation' (ibid, p. 104). By reversing geographical directions through the 'American rhizome', these elementsof variation and substractionallow Deleuze and Guattari to map the continuous fluxes in the West. Thus, the West is privileged in Capitalism and Schizophreniadue to the possibilities it'gdnerateswithin its own deterritorialization of directions. Being the pivot point and mechanismof reversal' (ibid, p. 19), the West is continuously remapping its own designatedlimits and creating endlessfrontiers for minoritarian becomings,a process of endless 'creation'. Moreover, the West's relationship to Europe, according to Deleuze and Guattari, allows for the decoding of the Old World's recodings that implement boundariesthrough constantsof expression. The major and the minor mode are two different treatments of language, one of which consists in extracting constants from it, the other in placing it in continuous variation (ibid, p. 106). Without considering the machinic elements that create new heterogeneous possibilities, constants of expression level their own stratification onto minoritarian becomings.For instance,class consciousnessdoes not allow for other configurations within the capitalist economy, other than defining itself by an acquired status. These processeshave specific consequencesto Deleuze and Guattari's analysis of the strata that designatea Universalization in advance,in particular the majoritarian levelling oppressionas the basis of the capitalist world-economy. The issue for minorities, as well as minoritarian becomings,is that'[ ...] of smashingcapitalism [ ...] of constituting a war machine capableof countering the world war machine by other means' (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p.472). It is a question of designating peripheral zones that are

Concluding Remarks: 'Class Consciousness'and the 'American Rhizome' 189 capturedby the Centre. It is also a question of 'tearing' molecular flows from power Centresthat stratify desire. Whether this pragmatic approachconsists of the writingmachine or the mapping of the peripheralization of the Third World, the 'tearing' is the machinic process that deterritorializes the exteriority of thought." The 'revolutionary path' charts the elements of desire that traverse the body without organs. What is important to Deleuze and Guattari is the 'indexing of geographical diteiftioný' that constitute a movementto the peripheiy. Even though such movements may reterritorialize on themselves,it is still generatingan assemblagethat decodesthe homogeneous apparatus of the strata. The 'directions' assemble antisystemic movementsof resistance,a map of desire. In conclusion, Deleuze and Guattari's affinity towards America, in particular the West, is found in the zone that resists identifying itself with arborescentroots. Their resistanceto constructing an identity that places oppression as the underlying system of stratification, is found in their analysis of the West. Based on their critique, the identification with a universal consciousnessin the proletariat never quite crosses the Atlantic to reterritorialize naked labour in America. By '[ ] proceed[ing] both by ... internal exterminationsand liquidations [ ] and by successivewaves of immigration ... from the outside' (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p.20), the 'American rhizome' is populated with massesthat cannot be adequately appropriated within a universal '01am thinking of the questionsposedby Deleuze and Guattari in their book on Kalka, where they stressthe importance of minor language,and its struggle to 'tear' away from the organsof power that institute modes of subjective formations through libidinal investment: 'How many people today live in a languagethat is not their own? Or no longer, or not yet, even know their own and know poorly the major languagethat they are forced to serve?This is the problem of immigrants, and especially of their children, the problem of minorities, the problem of a minor literature, but also a problem for all of us: how to tear a minor literature away from its own language,allowing it to challenge the language and making it follow a sober revolutionary path? How to become a nomad and an immigrant and a gypsy in relation to one's own languageT (K, p. 19).

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 190 consciousness.Masses distribute desire through the circulation of flows that are continuously on the cusp of the twin process of deterritorialization and reterTitorialization. The importance of antisystemic movements of resistance lies identify in do their that molecular compositions not specifically with socioprecisely in is It the world-economy. classes capitalist essentialto uncover the strata economic that bind desiring-production to particular layers in the economy, as opposed to specifying a,class (proletariat) that is being oppressed.To allocate-the latter,:-namely destratify the capitalist system, only the that component will class consciousness,as leadsus back into the systemicmanipulation of the strata.It is precisely in finding the crackswithin the homogeneoussystemthat will allow the minoritarian the possibility of challenging its present axiom configuration in the world-economy. 'We are referring [ ...] to the coexistenceand inseparability of that which the systemconjugates, and that which never ceasesto escapeit following lines of flight that are themselves is Guattari, ATP, (Deleuze & 473). It only through the medium of the p. connectable' minor do we get the full apparatusof capture that is utilized to ward off opposition from within. It is not a power acquisition that the minor is seeking out by infiltrating the State's formation. It is rather a questionof destratifying the assemblagescoded by the State and creating a new line of becoming: '[ ...]a pure becoming of minorities' (ibid, p.471 ." A social field is always animated by all kinds of movements of decoding and deterritorialization affecting "Masses" and operating at different speedsand paces. Theseare not contradictions hut escapes (Deleuze & Guattari, ATP, p.220; emphasisadded). These movementsintersect at various points throughout the channels demarcatedby "'George Jack-sonwrote from prison: "It may be that I am fleeing, but throughout my flight, I am searching for a weapon"' (Deleuze & Pamet, DIA, p.36).

Concluding Remarks: 'Class Consciousness'and the 'American Rhizome' 191 the myriad layers of capitalism. America presentsus with a perspectiveon the world that cannot be entirely designates by European that thought an acquired 'status' through a universal gauged consciousness.As this study has elucidated, America is negotiating its internal by its demographics to accommodateThird Worlds. Thus, there relations remapping (and deterritorialization of are continuousmovements reterritorialization) that open up 14yers'of lhe'Mrat4 to minoritafian. becdmings.' This is not to suggest that America does by back into but the possibilities to the reterritorialize recoding masses strata, not challengethe homogeneoustiers are always present.Deleuze and Guattari's emphasis on America stems from the minoritarian possibilities that are always looming, especially in the West. (Shakur's becoming-monsfrosity is such an example). The in be the the minority capitalist world-economy cannot peripheralization of appropriated within a matrix of class consciousnessthat defines desire through a constant.Geopolitics is the medium by which we can map the deterritorializing flows that traverse the body without organs,resisting the axiornatized apparatusof capture, producing minoritarian becomingsthrough micropolitics, and creating heterogeneous interactionsthat would otherwise be stratified within the matrix of the capitalist worldeconomy. Philosophy is a geophilosophy in precisely the same way that history is a geohisforyfi-om Braudel's point of view. Machines are always singular keys that open or close an assemNage, a lerritoty.

Tables

Tables 193 Table I Deterritorialization Immanence (Partial) Molecular Connective (libido/flow) Production Assemblage Territorial Production Disjunctive (numen/code) Distribution Distinction Despotism Conjunctive (voluptas/ intensity) Consumption Identification Capitalism Note: Transcendence/Territorialization (Global) Molarization Territorialization and deterritorialization do not presuppose a machine. Anything can be deterritorialized and reterritorialized, as long as it is able to exhibit a preferential localization. The processof coding and decoding does presupposea machine: only a machine can code or 0 decode. Coding and decoding presuppose a territory because the machine foresees a delimitation of a field. Territory is the limit for the system of stratification. The body without organs is the nexus of exchangefor coding. The Earth is the body without organs that codes and is plugged into all types and formations.

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 194 Table H Share of World Economic Regions and Countries in World Output GDP at international Billions prices and equivalenceof USS of purchasing power in 1980 1986 1967 1973 jýhin4. 1,167.; 3.8 4.0 UK France Italy 530.1 517.3 136.8 4.8 3.8 1.1 4.3 3.8 1.1 3.7 3.7 1 3.5 3.4 0.9 Japan 1,160.6 5.8 7.2 7.4 7.7 Soviet Union 1,475.0 11 10.8 10.3 9.8 Structure in % 1980 1986 7ý.S. Classification of World Regions and Countries According to Their Performance in Manufacturing Exports in 1967-86 1973/67 1980/73 1986/80 -0.6 0.5 4.2 UK France Italy -17.8 2.5 2.0 -8.7 -3.0 4.9 -13.1 -4.4 4.4 Japan 15.6 9.0 10.4 Canada -5.4 -4.3 -3.4 Source: CEPH, CHELEM data baseon international trade, 1989. Paris-basedCentred'Etudes Prospectiveset d'Infonnations Internationules.And the organization's data bank, Comples Harmoniscs sur Ics Echangesct i'cconornic Mondiale (Lafay & Herzog, CIF). (in 1/1000 parts of world trade) China

Bibliography L a/

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 196 BIBLIOGRAPHY: Arrighi, Giovanni, The Long Twentieth Centwy. Money, Power, and the Origins of Our Times, LTC (London: Verso, 1994). Artaud, Antonin, The Theati-eand Its Double, TD (translatedby Corti, V.), (London: Calder & Boyars, 1970). Blanch6, Robert, Axiomatics, A (translatedby Keene, G. B.), (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1962). Boyer, Christian M., Dreaming the Rational City: The Myth of American City Planning,'DRC (Cambridge,'Massachusefts:MIT Press, 1983). Braudel, Fernand, Civilization and Capitalism 15th - 181hCentwy. The Wheelsof Commerce,vol 2, CC (translatedby Reynolds, Sifin), (London: FontanaPress, 1985). Capitalism 15th 18th Centuty: The Pet-spective Morld, the and of -Civilization vol. 3, CCC (translatedby Reynolds, Sifin), (London: Fontana Press, 1985). Castells, Manual, 'The Infort-national Economy and the New Internal Division of Labor', 'LENI' in The New Glohal Economy in the Information Age: Reflections on Our Changing Morld, ed. by Martin Corny and others (Pennsylvania:The PennsylvaniaUniversity Press, 1993). Choucri, Nazil & North, Robert C., Nations in Conflict. National Growth and International Violence, (San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1975). Davis, Mike, 'Beyond Blade Runner: Urban Control and the Ecology of Fear', 'UC' (Westfield, NJ: Open Magazine Pamphlet Series, 1994). Quartz: Excavating Angeles, Future CQ (New Los York: in Verso the of -----City Press, 1991). 'Who Killed Los Angeles? A Political Autopsy', 'WKLAF #197 January-February,1993, pp.3-28. New Left Review, 'Who Killed Los Angeles?Part Two: The Verdict is Given', 'WKLAii' Review, #199, May-June 1993, pp.29-54. New Left Dean, Kenneth & Massurni, Brian, First and Last Empet-om, FLE (New York: Autonomedia, 1992). Debord, Guy, Society of the Spectacle,SS (Michigan: Black and Red, 1983).

Bibliography 197 Delanda,Manuel, 'The Geology of Morals: A Neo-Materialist Interpretation', 'TGM' manuscript. 'Homes: Meshwork or HierarchyT, 'HMIEV manuscript. 'Markets and Anti-markets in the World Economy, 'MAIM' manuscript. 'NOL' in Life', by Crary Incorporations: Zone 6, Jonathan & ed. ---'Nonorganic Sanford Kwinter, (New York: Zone Books, 1992). Environments Synthetic 'VEESR' Emergence Reason, the and of ----'Virtual manuscript. Tfar in the Age ofIntelligent Machines,WAIM (New York: Zone Books, 1991). Deleuze, Gilles, Bei-gsonism, B (translated by Tomlinson, H. & Habberjam, B. ), (New York: Zone Books, 1988). 'Capitalism: A Very Special Delirium' 'CAP' (translated by Sweet D. ), in Chaosophy, Mix Guattari (NY: Semiotext(e), 1995). (translated by Repetition, DR Patton, P), (New Columbia York: and -Diffei-ence University Press, 1994). Eir, iricism and Subjectivity. An Essayon Hume's Theory of Human Nature, ES (translated by Boundas, Constantin V. ), (Columbia PressUniversity: 1991). in Philosophy York: Zone Books, 1990). Spinoza, EP (translated by Joughin, M. ), (New F (translated by Hand, S.), (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1986). (translated Sense, by ), (New LS Lester, M. Columbia York: University of ----Logic Press, 1990). 'Postscript on the Societies of Control', Octohei-#59, Winter 1992, reprint. Deleuze, Gilles & Guattari, F61ix, Capitalism and Schizophi-enia,vol. 1, Anfi-Oedipus, AO (translated by Hurley, R., Seem, M., & Lane, H.), (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1990). IL8, nR=DeS.ae_ C Ler F.Q;-kvqy 6 ft, )výI, 11'0.1). and Schizophrenia,vol.2, A ThousandPlateaus, ATP (translatedby Massumi, B.), (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1988). 4, Qk"r-f ?) c4 vx, vi,,I. a., P'Ic"1*5toe (2±Sck.'+ cchre,A"Q_ c'QAAf (01, (\U. Cý' ecx .kY Minoi(translated by ), (Minneapolis: Literature, Towat-d K Polan, D. a -Kajka: University of Minnesota Press, 1986).

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 198 by Philosophy?, (translated H. Tomlinson, & Burchell, is WILP G. ), (New ----JVhat York: Columbia University Press, 1994). Deleuze, Gilles & Parnet, Claire, Dialogues, DIA (translated by Tomlinson, H. & Habberjam, B. ) (London: Athlone Press, 1987). Eiser, Richard, J. Attitudes, Chaos, and the Connectionist Mind, ACCM (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1994). Foucault, Michel, 'Intellectuals and Power: A ConversationBetween Michel Foucault and Gilles Deleuze', 91P' (translated by Bouchard, D. F. & Simon, S.), in Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews By lfichel Foueault, ed. Donald Bouchard,(Ithaca,NY: Cornell'University Press, 1977). Guattari, Mix, Chaosophy, (translated by Lotringer, S. and others) Semiotext(e), 1995). (NY: Interview, 1985, reprint. Molecular Revolution: Psychiatry and Politics, NM (translated by Sheed, R.), (London: Penguin, 1984). Guattari, F6a & Negri, Antonio, CommunistsLike Us, CLU (translatedby Ryan, M. ), (New York: Semiotext(e), 1990). Holland, John, 'The Global Economy as an Adaptive Process', 'GEAP' in The Economy as an Evolving Complex System, edd. Philip Anderson, Kenneth Arrow and Daniel Pines, Santa Fe Institute, Studies in the Science of Complexity, vol. 5, (Redwood City, Ca: Addison Wesley, 1988). Lafay, Gerard & Herzog, Colette, CommemeInternationaL La Fin des Avantages Acquises, CIF (Paris: Economica, for Centre d'Estudes Prospectives et d'Informations Intemationules, 1989). Lingis, Alphonso, Libido: The Ri-enchExistential Theoiles, L (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1985). 'The Society of Dismembered Body Parts, SDBP in Gilles Delelize and the Theatei-of Philosophy, ed. by Constanin Boundas and Dorothea 01kowski, (New York: Routledge, 1994). Lyotard, Jean-Frangois,'Energumen Capitalism', 'EC' (translated by Leigh J.), in Setniolext(e): Anti-Oedipus, vol. IL #3, (New York: Columbia University, 1977). ---Libidinal Economy,LE (translatedby Grant, 1. H.), CLondon:The Athlone Press,

Bibliography 199 1993). Mainzer, Klaus, Thinking in Complexity, The Complex Dynamics of Matter, Mind, and Mankind, TCCDM (New York: Springer-Verlag, 1994). Mandel, Ernest, Late Capitalism, LC (London: NLB, 1975). Marx, Karl, Capital, vol. 1, CI (translated by Fowkes, B.), (New York: Penguin, 1990). --Capital, vol. M, CIH (translatedby Fembach), (New York: Penguin, 1990). GrandrIsse,'G*(translatddby Nicolaus, 'M. ),' (London: Allen Lane, 1973). Mi-ifings, KMSW ---Selected Press, 1977). ed. by David McLellan, (Oxford: Oxford University Massumi, Brian, 'Everywhere You Want to Be: Introduction to Fear', 'EYW' in The Politics ofEveryday Fear, ed. by Brian Massumi, (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1993). ---A Usei's Guide to Capitalism and Schizophi-enia, UG Massachusetts:. MIT Press, 1992). McLellan, David, The 7hought of Karl Marx, TKM (Cambridge, (London: Papertnac, 1980). Negri, Antonio, Macchina Tempo, MT (Milan: Feitrinelli, 1982) in Molecular Revolution,F61ixGuattari (translatedby Darling, B.), (London: Penguin, 1984). Nietzsche, Friedrich, On The Genealogyof Morals and Ecco Homo, GM (translated by Kaufmann, W. & Hollingdale, R.J.), (New York: Vintage Press, 1969). Ormerod, Paul, The Death of Economics,DOE (London: Faber & Faber, 1994). Pan, Lynn, The New ChineseRevolution (London: Hamish Hamilton, 1987). Plant, Sadie, 'On the Matrix: Cyberfeminist simulations', manuscript. 'The Virtual Complexity of Culture', manuscript. Plant, Sadie & Land, Nick, 'Cyberpositive', in Unnatural.- Techno-Theory For A ContaminatedCulture, ed. by Matthew Fuller, (London: Underground, 1994). Prigogine, Ilya & Allen, Peter M., 'The Challenge of Complexity', 'TCC' in Seo,Otganization and Dissipative Structwes: Applications in the Physical and Social Sciences,edd. by William Schieve & Peter Allen (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1982).

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism 200 Prigogine, Ilya & Stenger,Isabelle, Order Out of Chaos: Man's New Dialogue ivith Natui-e, OC (New York: Bantam Books, 1984). Rodosh, Ronald, 'The Myth of the New Deal' in Yhe Ne)v Deak Analysis and Interpretation, 'MWD' ed. by Alonzo Hamby, (New York: Longman Inc., 1981). Shakur, Sanyika, aka Monster Kody Scott, Monster: The Autobiography of an L. A. Gang Member, M (New York: Penguin Books, 1994). Simon, Herbert, Economics, Bounded Rationality and the Cognitive Revolution, EBRCR edd. by Massimo Egidi & Robin Marris (Vermont: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 1992). Simondon, Gilbert, Lindividu et sa genise physico-hiologique, (Paris: PUF, 1964). Soja, Edward W., Postmodern Geographies: The Reassertion of Space in Critical Social 7beoty, PG (London: Verso Press, 1989). Sonenshein,RaphaelJ., Politics in Black and White: Race and Powet-in Los Angeles, (New Jersey:Princeton University Press, 1993). Spinoza, Baruch, Ethics, E in Classics of Mestern Philosophy, ed. by Steven Cahn, (Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 1985). Vifilio, Paul, Speed and Politics, SP (translated by Polizzotti, M. ), (New York: Semiotext(e), 1977). Waldrop, Mitchell M., Complexity.- The Emei-gingScienceat the Edge of Ordei- and Chaos, C (New York: Touchstone, 1993). Wallerstein, Immanuel, Geopolitics and Geoculture: Essayson the Changing Moi-ldSystem,GG (Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press, 1992). The Politics of JVoi-ld-Economy., The States, The Movements, and The Civilizations, PWE (Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press, 1984).

Bibliography 201 Journals: Arquilla, John & Ronfeldt, David Tyberwar is Coming! ', 'CYCI Comparative , Strategy, vol. 12, #2, pp.141-165,1993, reprint. Chase-Dunn,Christopher & Podobnik, Bruce, 'The Next World War: World System Cycles and Trends', 'NWW' in Journal of Morld-SystemsResearch,vol. 1, #6, 1995, reprint. Smith, Richard, 'The Chinese Road to Capitalism', 'CRC' May-June 1993, pp. 55-99. New Left Review, #199, Walker, Rich'ard,"California RagesAgainst the Dying of tlfd Light', 'CAL' Xýw Left Review, #209, January-February1995, pp.42-74. Newspaper and Magazine Articles: The Economist, 'Sniffing Victory: America's Cocaine War', 21 December 1991, reprint. The Economist, 'Doped Bolivia's Drug War', 29 August 1992, reprint. The Economist, 'Weary and Wary: VenezuelanPolitics', 12 December 1992, reprint. The Economist, 'Drugs War: High in the Andes, 13 February 1993, reprint. The Economist, 'Still Flying, just: California and the C-17% 13 November 1993, reprint. The E conomist, 'American Gangs: There are no Children Here', 17 December 1994, reprint The Economist, 'Colombia's Drugs Business: The Wages of Prohibition', 24 December-6January 1995, pp.23-26. The Economist, 'The Risk in Asia', 28 January 1995, p. 13. The Economist, 'Defense Technology Survey: The Ties that Bind, 10-16 June 1995, pp.18-19. TheEcotiomist, 'Fighting Crime: The Casefor Emptier Prisons', 9-15 December 1995, pp.55-56. Kristoff, Nicholas D., 'Foreign Investors Pouring into China', New York Times, 15 June 1992, reprint. Lee, Dinah and others, 'Long Hard Days- At Pennies an Hour', Business Meek, 31

Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitaliým 202 October 1988, reprint. Morris, Bailey, 'ProblemsWiden with Trade Pacts', Independenton Sunday,7 August 1994, p.5. Thomas, William, 'Cashing in on Chaos', Spirit, reprint. United States Bureau of the Census, Population, 1970 and 1990. United States Bureau of Census, City Government Finances, 1977-78 and 1984-85.