Psycho Politics – Jacobite
Top
David Ramos / Flickr
Classical liberals are sitting-out the end of the world. Sitting out, mostly, in the way Norma
Bates sat out her son’s exploration of psychological diversity. Norman would know why she’s
not moving, if he could only remember.
Before even starting, we’re deep into the identity problem, and actually several. ‘Liberalism’ is
the most profoundly corrupted word in political history. Without any exaggeration, rhetorical
license, or metaphorical latitude, it’s the leathery sliced-off face of something murdered long
ago which now serves to disguise a foaming chainsaw-wielding maniac sharing none of its
DNA. That psycho-killer usage needs to be put to rest before even getting to Bates. Liberalism,
from this point forward, means nothing at all like state-happy progressivism. It is defined,
instead, as the polar opposite of socialism. Its sole commanding value is liberty. It is
https://web.archive.org/web/20220628213811/https://jacobitemag.com/2017/08/11/psycho-politics/[3/26/2023 10:59:21 AM]
Psycho Politics – Jacobite
individualist, only ever guardedly traditionalist, commercially and industrially oriented,
strategically neglectful of care, skeptical in respect to all purported public agencies, and
rigorously economical in respect to every dimension of government. It had a truly terrible 20th
century, and right now things aren’t looking any better.
At no time in recent history have liberal concerns been less relevant to public policy – even as
foils, or ‘neoliberal’ bogeymen. It might be necessary to return to the 1930s to find a time of
comparable eclipse. They aren’t being listened to, and they certainly aren’t the object of any
animated conversations, unless to slip into social media banter as the butt of jokes. Their
concerns seem eccentric, and even identifiably dated, to some point between the end of the
1970s and the Baby Bush quagmire. Where the right once nursed a secret ambivalence for
Pinochet, out of admiration for the Chicago Boys, today it’s only interested in the helicopters.
It isn’t – mostly – the gender and generational confusion of the Norma / Norman subpersonalities that make libertarians so Batesian. It’s the third alter, who goes missing in the
movie but not in the novel. Norman intermittently mistakes himself for Normal. Normal is the
one who thinks he’s just like everyone else. Liberalism does exactly the same thing. It goes
mad by thinking of itself as normal, when really it’s WEIRD.
Liberal universalism has aged badly in recent years. More specifically, it has aged badly in two
very different directions. To the left, liberalism has been consumed by universalism, becoming
a liberty-deriding globalist monster, while to the right it has been thoroughly demoralized, as
recognition has dawned about what its universalism actually means. To anyone still trembling
to some slight residual death-flutter of the liberal impulse, the discussion quickly becomes
nearly intolerable at this point. Withdrawal, psychic-shattering, and other manifestations of
traumatized craziness ensue.
Everything that the 2016 US Presidential Election was about is germane. Political correctness
and the Overton Window in general, race, immigration, gender, and social norms in particular,
every part of it caught upon an aspect of the liberal agony. Donald Trump was, in the strict
sense – and not just the depraved one – a drastically illiberal candidate. In his campaign,
public humiliation of universalism amounted almost to a platform. American politics had
become nakedly tribal.
That American dream girl who you were talking to over dinner? The one who might have been
the future? She bled-out from multiple knife-wounds in the shower. You killed her, Norman.
Yes, you did. It’s hard to believe, obviously, but we’re going to explain how.
To begin with the most heated dimension of identity politics, liberalism has a race problem.
Liberals tend to like immigrants a lot, while immigrants don’t like liberals very much at all.
Some quantitative evidence for this is provided by Hal Pashler, in a (2013) paper on U.S.
https://web.archive.org/web/20220628213811/https://jacobitemag.com/2017/08/11/psycho-politics/[3/26/2023 10:59:21 AM]
Psycho Politics – Jacobite
Immigrants’ Attitudes Toward Libertarian Values, which discovers:
… a marked pattern of lower support for pro-liberty views among
immigrants as compared to US-born residents. These differences were
generally statistically significant and sizable, with a few scattered
exceptions. With increasing proportions of the US population being
foreign-born, low support for libertarian values by foreign-born residents
means that the political prospects of libertarian values in the US are likely
to diminish over time.
According to a wide range of metrics, foreign-born residents expressed significantly lower
support for limited government than the native-born population. Such effects would almost
certainly been strengthened further if the latter category had itself been broken-down by
ethnicity. When Americans were offered a binary choice between smaller or larger
government, an expansion of government was favored by only 27% of Whites, but by 55% of
Asians, 64% of Blacks, and 73% of Hispanics. More precise ethnic categories only sharpen the
pattern. The Hajnal Line, which divides Europe’s most committed (north-western) outbreeders from their more tribalistic neighbors, summarizes a gradient of individualism, among
other distinctive liberal traits. Emmanuel Todd’s ethnography of family types and their
associated ideological tendencies binds liberalism to the (North-West European) ‘Absolute
Nuclear Family.’ Common law traditions are peculiar to Anglo-Saxons. Weber and Sombart
ethnically identify capitalist dispositions with Protestants and (modern) Jews. It begins to seem
extremely unlikely that liberals would represent a random sample of the world’s peoples.
Liberal gender-skew is scarcely less striking.
Did Women’s Suffrage Change the Size and Scope of Government? ask John Lott and
Lawrence Kenny. It certainly looks that way:
We find that government continued to grow as female voter turnout
increased over time. Since suffrage was granted to women in different
states over a long period of time extending from 1869 to 1920, it is unlikely
that World War I is the key. These data also allow us to address causality
questions in unusual ways. The central issue is whether giving women the
right to vote caused government to grow or there was something else that
both contributed to women’s getting the right to vote and also increased
government growth. We find very similar effects of women’s suffrage in
states that voted for suffrage and states that were forced to give women the
right to vote, which suggests that the second effect is small.
https://web.archive.org/web/20220628213811/https://jacobitemag.com/2017/08/11/psycho-politics/[3/26/2023 10:59:21 AM]
Psycho Politics – Jacobite
The era of big government and that of female emancipation don’t seem to be easily
distinguishable. In the incautious words of Peter Thiel:
Since 1920, the vast increase in welfare beneficiaries and the extension of
the franchise to women — two constituencies that are notoriously tough for
libertarians — have rendered the notion of “capitalist democracy” into an
oxymoron.
The hideously compelling but utterly illiberal conclusion seems to be that women and nonwhites have used their rising political influence to massively expand the scope of government.
To which a third factor can be added, which is marriage. Quite simply, singles are communist
maniacs, comparatively speaking. In regard to US partisan politics, Steve Sailer calls it ‘the
marriage gap.’ It isn’t small. In the 2012 Presidential Election, married women (in general)
broke for Romney over Obama by 55%, married white women by 63%, and married white
men by 67%. (Romney’s share among black single women was 2%.)
As liberal demographic, political, and social policies have been entrenched, classical liberals,
steering the course of modern social evolution from a position modestly to the left of the old
monarchical and ecclesiastical establishment, eventually became libertarians, railing
ineffectually against the plunge into socialist tyranny from the position of a stranded,
alienated, and derided outer right. Throughout the whole of this process, liberalism has
consisted – almost without exception – of white men. These have typically been white men in
denial, admittedly. Across the entire sweep of world history there has never been a population
group more neglectful of its own privileges. And thus they destroyed themselves.
Anyone who has reached the “Oh, my God, the stereotypes!” stage with this is onto something.
That has been a central part of the learning process. All the stereotypes are true (basically).
That’s science, too, if it helps, though it rarely does. Unless inflated, or dogmatized, beyond
the range of usefulness as broad epistemological heuristics, stereotypes have vastly greater
reliability than – for instance – ideologically-motivated cognitive commitments. What’s more,
classical liberals used to know that. It’s a Burkean expectation.
Stereotypes are spontaneous social products, like natural languages, common law, and metallic
money. To say all this explains why classical liberals are conservatives, characterized by a
principled acceptance of the way things have turned out. What had been, historically, a
reasonably sanguine view of centralized state government was based on how little of it there
had ever been. The mere existence of the gargantuan social-democratic welfarist state makes
such conservative liberalism (or liberal conservatism) impossible. Radically frustrated
https://web.archive.org/web/20220628213811/https://jacobitemag.com/2017/08/11/psycho-politics/[3/26/2023 10:59:21 AM]
Psycho Politics – Jacobite
revolutionary libertarianism takes its place.
It’s easy to see what pushes Bates over the edge. He’d thought he was Normal, but it turns out
he’s a WASP. By a further mad twist, he recognizes the one thing WASPs will never do is
defend their own culture – that’s an essential ethnic tradition. Libertarianism has been crazily
WASPish that way, when he looks at it, which he can’t for long. It’s an intractable paradox
that leads through incoherence into fragmentation. To have protected his identity would have
been something only another could have done. Perhaps his mother would look after him? But
she’s dead.
The identification of classical liberalism with WASP culture is a strong approximation. Few
socio-historical correlations are more robust, but the coincidence can only be statistical. There
are socialist WASPs, and classical liberal non-WASPs, although not enough of either to
seriously disrupt the pattern. When the French, in particular, refer to Anglo-Saxons
stereotypically, they know what they are talking about, and so does anybody else who is
paying attention. Hubert Védrine puts it best:
[L]et’s admit it: Globalization does not automatically benefit France. […]
Globalization develops according to principles that correspond neither to
French tradition nor to French culture. These principles include the
ultraliberal market economy, mistrust of the state, individualism removed
from the republican tradition, the inevitable reinforcement of the universal
and ‘indispensable’ role of the United States, common law, the English
language, Anglo-Saxon norms, and Protestant — more than Catholic —
concepts.
It all makes sense from outside, but for WASP culture itself – which is to say for liberalism –
identity politics is madness. That leaves it with nowhere to go. The leather-face schizoMaoism of the contemporary Anglophone left is not any kind of plausible option, but neither is
anything opening up on the popular right. As the Alt-Right consolidates its passionate affair
with identity, it sounds ever more like Hubert Védrine. Individualism is derided. Its suspicion
of free-trade owes more to Friedrich List than to the Scottish Enlightenment. Its criticism of
labor arbitrage is often almost indistinguishable from that familiar from socialist traditions,
marked by the same current of moral outrage at the fact that Capital – despite itself being
competitively disciplined by footloose consumers – is permitted to shop around for its human
resources. Wage competition, and even price competition more generally, is an increasingly
common object of attack. At its dynamic, racial edge the Alt-Right promotes solidarity among
Whites, or Europeans, as if either could ever be a WASP thing. Europe is what liberalism has
always sought to escape. Populism demands grievance politics, which means default antipathy
https://web.archive.org/web/20220628213811/https://jacobitemag.com/2017/08/11/psycho-politics/[3/26/2023 10:59:21 AM]
Psycho Politics – Jacobite
to market dominant minorities, and thus – in the Western context – an irrepressible inclination
to anti-Semitism. None of this describes a place that even maddened liberals can go.
Because the word ‘fascism’ has been so ruined by incontinent polemical usage, it is difficult to
employ without apparent rhetorical over-reach. This is unfortunate, because in its cold,
technical sense, the word is not even merely convenient, but even invaluable. It literally means
the politics of bundling. Fasces are sticks bound together. Liberals are essentially defined by
their dissent from that. If WASP culture has a core, it is loose association. There’s no real
possibility of simply sticking it back together. Pirates and cowboys don’t do national
solidarity. That would be a different culture altogether.
As for Bates, he knows his mother is dead by now, and even that he killed her – kills anyone
like her. Bad thoughts flood in. It’s difficult to move on, but at least he has confidence in his
own inviolable non-aggression principle. There’s no way it could have been as they say,
because he wouldn’t hurt anyone. Not even a fly.
Nick land is an independent writer living in Shanghai.
Share this:
Related
Bring Out the Bodies
April 4, 2020
In "Culture"
TAGS
DEMOGRAPHICS
NICK LAND
Sarah Jeong and the Only
Direction
August 8, 2018
In "Culture"
HUBERT VÉDRINE
IMMIGRATION
The Intellectual Dark Web's
Unwise Center
July 10, 2018
In "Philosophy"
LIBERALISM
LIBERTARIANISM
PETER THIEL
https://web.archive.org/web/20220628213811/https://jacobitemag.com/2017/08/11/psycho-politics/[3/26/2023 10:59:21 AM]
Psycho Politics – Jacobite
Previous Article
Next Article
A QUESTION OF MERIT
HOW MESSAGE-BOARD CULTURE
REMADE THE LEFT
RELATED POSTS
GARDEN-VARIETY GEOPOLITICS: A
REVIEW OF <I>THE JUNGLE GROWS
ENDING THE LONG 20TH CENTURY
BACK</I>
By Nicolas Hausdorf - March 12, 2018 -
By Michael Shindler - December 20, 2018 -
COVID-911
COVID-911
Cody Wilson - April 16, 2020
Cody Wilson - April 16, 2020
ARCHIVES
November 2020
March 2020
July 2020
February 2020
June 2020
January 2020
May 2020
April 2020
December 2019
https://web.archive.org/web/20220628213811/https://jacobitemag.com/2017/08/11/psycho-politics/[3/26/2023 10:59:21 AM]