2
Theory, Culture & Society
communications around cybernetic and systems theoretical principles. ‘[T]hat effort’, he
writes, is ‘animated by a deep faith that when engineering replaces politics, the alienation
of mass society and the threat of totalitarianism will melt away [. . .]. Yet [e]ven as they
grant us the power to communicate with others around the globe, our social media networks have spawned a new form of authoritarianism’ (Turner, 2019). Some authors
(Bridle, 2018; Hannah, 2021) have used the metaphor of an intellectual ‘dark age’ to
describe the risks communications technologies pose to democracy (understood in terms
of cultural and intellectual decline rather than a lack of historical sources). For Hannah
(2021), ‘[w]hereas early Internet advocates predicted a utopian age of information access
and literacy, the twenty-first century has witnessed a paradoxical technological expansion of communications technologies and, at the same time, the growth and spread of
bizarre, vast, complex conspiracies’. Yet not all have been convinced of a solid distinction between early and present-day web ideologies. Chun (2021: 7) reminds us that in
1990s representations of cyberspace, dystopia was ‘the goal, not an error’. Rooted in the
apocalyptic and Orientalist visions of cyberpunk, cyberspace figured the internet not as
empowering-enabling but as an addictive and hallucinatory technology like that depicted
in William Gibson’s Neuromancer, from which cyberspace famously took its name.
Drawing attention to the settler-colonialist, Frontier mythology that it animated, Chun
writes that it ‘was the Wild West meets speed meets Yellow Peril meets capitalism on
steroids. This bodiless exultation and stealthy, rebellious power explain why “pioneers”
mislabelled the internet “cyberspace’” (Chun, 2021).
Indeed, to those for whom cyberculture was primarily an artistic concern, the consistencies between the information dark age and the giddy 1990s have proven to be
more salient than the distinctions. Italian and Dutch new media scholars were quick to
note the parallels between today’s far-right conspiracy theories online and ‘cultural
sabotage’ techniques developed by ‘tactical media’ art groups active in Italy, Britain and
the Netherlands – most notably in the case of QAnon and its links to the Italian media
activists, Luther Blissett (Wu Ming 1, 2021). In its strange narrative about Donald
Trump fighting to expose and punish a shadowy elite that controls society, the QAnon
conspiracy bore narrative similarities to the novel ‘Q’ that the group collectively
authored in 1999 – to the extent that the Twitter account of Wu Ming, a collective pseudonym formed from a subset of Luther Blissett, suggested QAnon might be a Q-inspired
prank invented to troll the alt-right (Wu Ming 1, 2018). Related to these currents has
been the rediscovery of the 1990s British cybertheory collective the Cybernetic Culture
Research Unit (CCRU) in the context of present-day accelerationism. In contrast to the
extropian optimism of what Barbrook and Cameron (1996) famously termed the
Californian ideology, the CCRU tried to bed down a gloomy, dystopian ‘British cyberpunk’ that emphasised the capacity of interconnected global media to generate disinformation, political polarisation, and culture war. The critical theorist Benjamin Noys has
written that this:
was a prescient thinking. Before our familiarity with the meme and the capacity of the global
Internet to generate fake news [Nick] Land and the CCRU, drawing on science fiction and
theory, had already captured something of the world to come. (Noys, 2022: 4)
Haworth
3
Figure 1. (a), Throbbing Gristle cartoon strip, first published in Re/Search #6/7: in Industrial
Culture Handbook (Vale and Juno, 1983), used with permission of Cosey Fan Tutti and Chris
Cosey; (b), Pepe the Frog suicide meme, derived from KnowYourMeme.com (2016).
Closer examination of the subcultures that influenced artistic cybercultures like the
CCRU closes the information utopianism-dystopian gap still further. Right after Trump’s
election, Cramer (2016) linked the alt-right’s visual culture and uses of irony to the transgressive positions taken by ‘extreme’ industrial, noise, and neofolk groups active largely
in Britain in the 1970s and 1980s. Figure 1 comparing a détourned comic strip by
Throbbing Gristle (TG) with a Pepe the Frog meme displays the types of affinities he
identified. In the suggestion that TG’s notorious ‘anti-music’ might drive someone to
suicide, or that a frog might harbour suicidal ideations, there is clearly dark humour and
irony. At the same time, they each hint at the psychological consequences of extreme
politics: the TG strip through the presence of the group’s insignia (which famously
4
Theory, Culture & Society
recalls the Nazi Schutzstaffel symbol), and the Pepe meme via the character’s assimilation into far-right symbolism. Yet considering their content alone is insufficient to understanding how they signify. Appearing in the San Francisco-based zine Re/Search in 1983,
the TG comic strip is unlikely to have been seen beyond fans of punk and industrial
music. Thus, any audience is likely to be literate in its codes and therefore able to resolve
its symbolic ambiguity as neither fascist nor pro-suicide. The same cannot be said of
readers of Pepe memes, which thrive on platforms like Twitter where multiple perspectives are assimilated to one – a phenomenon danah boyd termed ‘context collapse’.1
Indeed, the ability of Pepe to point in multiple directions at once was removed when it
was added to the Anti-Defamation League’s database of hate symbols in 2016. And differences in political context also matter. Subcultural posturing in the 1970s and 1980s,
when explicit far-right politics had no direct path to power in Britain and America, is not
equivalent to the same gestures after the 2010s, when it does.
However, one can perhaps charge the extreme music subcultures with complacency,
in not being attuned to the threat the far right posed in the 1970s and 1980s. For if both
the alt-right and extreme music subcultures made proliferate use of irony, then they
equally provided subterfuge for those who, in the words of Tuters (2021: 173), use youthcultural posturing ‘to dissimulate their true (political) intentions’. Indeed, reading the
American Neo-Nazi Andrew Anglin describe his grift as ‘[n]on-ironic Nazism masquerading as ironic Nazism’ (O’Brien, 2017), it is hard to ignore the parallels with long-celebrated extreme artists who used the cover of artistic libertarianism to toy with fascist
aesthetics, and who since have been outed as ‘true believers’ (Tuters, 2021: 173) – Tony
Wakeford of Death in June being the most famous case. The recent spate of exposés and
‘painful reflections’ published in the online music press attest to just how rapidly opinion
has turned on underground music’s transgressive past in light of the growing influence of
the far right.2
To date these associations between past and present subcultures have gone unexplored
beyond superficial observations. Yet they raise an intriguing possibility: that in narrating
the story of contemporary communications along the lines of a utopia spoiled, scholars
may have overlooked alternative ideologies of media that provide equally compelling
explanations for cultural politics in our digital present. This article explores this question
by analysing the changing media ideologies and aesthetics that developed around British
post-punk zines in the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s, leading to the early subcultural embrace
of the worldwide web. A key stepping-stone from past to present subcultures is the aforementioned Cybernetic Culture Research Unit (CCRU), whose lead figure Nick Land
became an intellectual figurehead of the neoreaction subculture, considered a precursor
to the alt-right (Kirchick, 2016). Noys’ assessment (cited earlier) of the CCRU’s prescience in a world of memes and fake news is widely shared among theorists, both advocates and critics. However, as this article shows, the media ideology they adopted was far
from new. It was inherited practically wholesale, not from 1990s rave and jungle as is
popularly assumed (Holt, 2019; Noys, 2014), but from left-libertarian new musick and
industrial culture fanzines of the previous decade. During the mid-1980s these zines
made a strenuous break with the values of democracy, egalitarianism, and grassroots
authenticity which were the default ideological ‘mode’ of DIY production, growing to
concentrate instead on the romantic-visionary personae of the zines’ editors and their
Haworth
5
eclectic interests in esotericism and the occult. Where the Californian ideology would
centre the summer of love and the politics of the New Left (or ‘new communalists’,
Turner, 2006), the zines ambiguously celebrated the nihilistic, authoritarian, and occult
vectors of psychedelia – tendencies that have been associated with the late 1960s and
1970s fate of the counterculture rather than its earlier heyday (Davis, 2014).
The data aesthetic that prevailed in these resources was the sublime-inflected quality
of ‘immersion’ in esoteric phenomena. Knowledge acquisition was framed as at once a
personal adventure in gnostic study and a suspension of criticality and reason. The configuration of the ‘user’ as an independent-minded knowledge seeker was of course ubiquitous in early internet culture, manifest in encyclopaedic links pages that point to strange
and arcane destinations on the web, and traceable at least as far back as the Whole Earth
Catalogue, with its emphasis on self-education (cf. Turner, 2006: 80). Yet the artistic
libertarianism of the zines shifted the emphasis towards transgression through contact
with censored or samizdat literature. Immersion therefore implies a kind of radicalisation
through media. My contention is that this same rhetorical understanding of media can be
found in online political subcultures of the present. Rapid Eye, two British post-punkcum industrial culture zines from the 1980s; the subcultural web directory Internet.
Underground.Guide; and the web 1.0 site for the Cybernetic Culture Research Unit. As
well as demonstrating a direct line of historical influence from industrial culture zines to
the CCRU, the artefacts show how consistent media imaginaries were remediated amid
profound changes in their underlying conditions – from zines printed on paper, to links
directories, to digital websites. Building on recent historical work on zines in Britain
(Bland, 2018; Worley, 2015), my analysis shows how the zines developed into independent media entities in their own right, whose effects could be as influential as the groups
they chronicled.
From Post-punk to Cyberpunk: Vague
Vague magazine was founded in 1979 at Salisbury College of Technology and Art by
Tom Vague together with the illustrator Perry Harris and the photographer Iggy
Zevenbergen. While most of the independent punk zines covered ‘real punk’, Vague followed the ‘more experimental or avant-garde’ strand that at the time would have been
understood to lie between new wave and new musick (see Cateforis, 2011: 27), but retrospectively was categorised as post-punk. Vague’s first issue featured Siouxsie and the
Banshees, Adam and the Ants, The Cure, The Specials, Madness, Swell Maps, and Red
Crayola, with most of the features being interviews and reviews (Figure 2). Despite the
differences in musical coverage, however, the zine’s aesthetic and ideological positioning was closely related to the wider punk zine ecosystem which it distinguished itself
from.3 It emphasised democracy, claiming to ‘create an alternative media in which ordinary people can get their views across’; egalitarianism, in its stated aim to try to ‘make
this one relate to the layman more and not the big music scholars that read the music
press’; and radical left politics, via its purported kinship with ‘the tradition of radical
pamphlets’, in contrast to ‘DIY style mags or Big Issue prototypes’.4 Prefiguring the
imaginary that would later be animated by the web, and that has been celebrated by
6
Theory, Culture & Society
Figure 2. Cover of Vague 1, November ’79 edition, used with permission of Tom Vague.
authors such as Shirky (2009) and Duncombe (1997), Vague therefore offered a kind of
informational utopianism.
Tom Vague later narrated the zine’s early period as one characterised by his own, ultimately failed, attempt to break into mainstream music journalism.5 Yet a series of changes
pushed him away from this aim. The most important was the mutation of elements of
new wave and new musick into the more commercially oriented ‘new pop’. Adam Ant,
the pre-eminent figure of the early Vague and the subject of Tom Vague’s unpublished
book, pivoted strongly towards new pop, famously declaring to Sounds in 1980 that ‘cult
is just a safe word meaning “loser” [. . .] I want success’ (Reynolds, 2005: 312). Seeking
a more sustainable underground, Vague went the other way, leaning into the darker, more
esoteric elements of new musick. Contemporary critics and historians often elide new
musick with the later category of post-punk (see Cateforis, 2011; Reynolds, 2009
Haworth
7
Beckett, 2016).6 Yet, as Haddon (2020: 25) notes, teleological readings of this kind
smooth out the tensions and inconsistencies that were in play during the period when
these terms were under negotiation. For Jon Savage, who alongside Jane Suck and Sandy
Robertson coined the term, the definition was largely driven by the pop-avant-garde
crossings of Throbbing Gristle and Cabaret Voltaire, even if later they would be more
enduringly associated with ‘industrial’. Reflecting in the ‘Industrial Culture Handbook’
issue of RE/Search, itself an important influence on Vague and Rapid Eye, Savage
described five principles that industrial took from new musick: organisational autonomy;
access to information; use of synthesizers and anti-music; extra-musical elements; and
shock tactics. Savage’s description is useful for understanding the formal development
of Vague, for two reasons. First, it imagines a non-hierarchical relationship between
music and other media, where zines exceed their role as secondary ‘fan’ media to dwell
in a flattened ‘information’ space of music, text and image. Second, it gives the zines a
renewed purpose, from reports on scenes and subcultures to providing a platform for
‘extra-musical elements’, defined as ‘literary elements (discussed) in a thorough – as
opposed to typical pop dilettantism – manner’ (Savage, 1983: 5). For new musick musicians, zines embracing ‘literary elements’ would provide a crucial plank of the crossover
from pop into avant-garde. For magazines like Vague, it would supply them with an
independent purpose untethered to the wax and wane of subcultural styles.
After 1984 Vague shed the punk-ish cut-and-paste aesthetic, its design incorporating
artistic photography and its commentary roving further into analysis of the urban environment, youth culture, Situationist theory, and anarchist politics. Vague was also forging alliances with the fringes of other fields, many of which were central to the industrial
universe. An issue from 1984, titled CONTROL DATA MANUAL: Programming
Phenomena and Conspiracy Theory, lists conspiracy theories, William Burroughs, the
Situationists, cyberpunk, Red Army Faction, Charles Manson, the occult, and Data
Control as its features, suggesting an underground culture defined across literature, politics, theory, the arts and theology (Vague, 1984). And where previously Vague himself
had tended to disappear into the bands and scenes the zine chronicled, the new curatorial
eclecticism served to turn attention towards his authorial persona, which increasingly
resembled the ‘visionary’ romanticism of figures like William Burroughs and William
Blake. What I want to highlight, however, is the aesthetic and ideological transformations that the post-1984 ‘turn’ brought. Like most zines Vague had been hand cut-andpasted, mixing image and text in a way that could occasionally be hard to read. However,
with the departure from post-punk this collision of image and text became more oppressive and psychedelic – the images more solarised, the text often bordering on the illegible. One piece in the 1984 issue demonstrates this atmosphere. In a review article on The
Family: The Story of Charles Manson’s Dune Buggy Attack Battalion by Ed Sanders, the
author Lucian K. Truscott IV describes the descent of the values of the counterculture
into authoritarianism and ‘psychedelic fascism’:
Psychedelic fascism. In a way it was inevitable. The drugs, beginning in the fIower-power days
of yesteryear, and their accompanying expanded consciousness, got weirder and weirder. As
Ken Kesey predicted on the front of his bus in the early days, everything went further. (Truscott,
1970)
8
Theory, Culture & Society
Figure 3. ‘Psychedelic Fascism’, Vague 18/19 (1984): CONTROL DATA MANUAL: Phenomena and
Conspiracy Theory used with permission of Tom Vague.
The author predicts a growing ‘age of psychedelic fascism’ that, inaugurated by the
Manson Family killings, was now incubating in the new religions of the early 1970s and
the subcultural trend for video trading of snuff movies. His moral position is clearly
expressed throughout in the warnings about ‘a locust-swarm of eviloids that are devouring some of the best young minds of the country at this very moment’ (sic). Yet its presentation in Vague makes it provocatively ambiguous. First, it is printed in black atop a
dark red and white print of Manson’s face, which gives it an oppressive, immersive
intermediality, making the text difficult to read and aestheticizing the concept of psychedelic fascism (Figure 3). Second, Truscott’s text is followed by an excerpt from Manson’s
‘Last Will and Judgement’, allowing Manson to have the final say on the killings, and
implicitly making the murders into a two-sided affair that the reader can arbitrate
Haworth
9
between. The horrors of the Manson Family killings are first simulated in the détourned
Truscott text, and then equivocated via the presentation of Manson’s response.
Although music was de-emphasised in the later Vague, projects like Psychic TV and
the Temple Ov Psychic Youth still featured on the grounds that they were ideologically
aligned. The nature of that alignment can be seen in the next, related illustration: Rapid
Eye Movement.
Proto-web Occulture: Rapid Eye Movement
Rapid Eye Movement (REM) was a contemporary of Vague, and there are similarities
between the two. Both started in 1979 as new-wave-cum-new-musick zines, and both
went in radically different, more experimental and literary directions, all but abandoning
music in the 1980s. Both, too, were edited by writers with close relationships to the
bands and musicians they wrote about—in REM’s case this was Simon Dwyer. Like
Vague, Rapid Eye Movement stressed its commitment to independence and distinction
from the mainstream music press, asserting that ‘we are not interested in sales graphs and
charts [. . .] more ideas, less lists’ (Dwyer, 1979: 3). However, the zine undeniably had a
more professional, more legitimate feel than Vague. Dwyer’s early writing on the anarcho-punk band Crass landed him a job writing for the weekly music magazine Sounds,
and this proximity to the mainstream meant he could draw on his contacts for interviews
and articles at REM. The first issue featured a discussion between NME writers Julie
Burchill and Tony Parsons, for instance, which lent the zine an overground legitimacy
that Vague never achieved.
The REM archive is spotty so it is difficult to assess how it developed after the first
few instalments in the late 1970s and early 1980s. Those issues show a punk, anarchopunk, and post-punk emphasis in coverage, which is framed by fine art photography
bearing a Victorian gothic aesthetic (Figure 4). Sometime in the 1980s REM ceased,
being relaunched as Rapid Eye in 1989. In keeping with Savage’s definition of industrial
culture, the renewed zine embraced an expanded informational space as literature, poetry,
philosophy, film, television, and visual art were introduced alongside or in place of
music, and in issues that were closer in length to journals. This was aligned with an editorial-stylistic shift from ‘reportage’ to actively defining the culture that it addressed.
This can be observed in the introduction to the first issue, in which Dwyer defines the
category of ‘occulture’:
This new word obviously suggests both Culture and the Occult. To me, this ‘oculture’ is not a
secret culture as the word might suggest, but a culture that is in some way hidden and ignored,
or wilfully marginalised to the extremities of our society. A culture of individuality and subcults, a culture of questions that have not been properly identified – let alone answered – and
therefore, do not get a fair representation in the mainstream media. It is a culture that has been
misinterpreted. Not because it is ‘evil’ or wrong, but because it is generally apolitical and
amoral, unashamedly artistic, experimental, undogmatic, intellectual and oddly evolutionary. It
is a sub-culture that is forming a question that ‘reality’ alone cannot answer. Which is why it
makes people nervous. (Dwyer, 1989: 3)7
Going by the content of the first issue, the category of occulture traversed anti-human
theory (William S. Burroughs, Brion Gysin), Western occultism (Aleister Crowley),
10
Theory, Culture & Society
Figure 4. Rapid Eye Movement, Issue 1, Winter 1979 (no permission).
Eastern esotericism (Tantra), fictional or reality-hacking art movements (‘Situationism’,
Neoism), outsider art (Austin Osman Spare), conspiracy theories (Nazi UFOs), experimental and ‘transgressive’ writers and artists (Kathy Acker, Derek Jarman, Mr Sebastian),
new religions and cults (Charles Manson, Jim Jones and The People’s Temple of Christ).
To the extent that music was covered, the focus was overwhelmingly on industrial music
– particularly Psychic TV (PTV) and the associated artistic collective and self-styled
‘cult’, the Temple Ov Psychic Youth (TOPY). The appeal of these projects to the industrial culture and new musick zines was threefold. First, they can be seen to have performed the same extra-musical expansion that Rapid Eye and Vague had participated in,
and that was described by Savage in the Industrial Culture Handbook. Although TOPY
is often remembered as a secondary ‘fanclub’ to PTV, the relationship between the two
was more complex, and certain TOPY ‘access points’ (city-based nodes in the TOPY
mail network) were almost entirely independent of PTV and Genesis P-Orridge.8 Rapid
Haworth
11
Eye followed suit. It was the most forceful advocate for TOPY and PTV among the
British industrial culture zines, and it reported on its activities as a magazine would.
However, it was also an independent component in it, feeding in extra-musical contents.
The concept of occulture, for instance, was absorbed by TOPY after Dwyer defined it. In
this way, TOPY were seen to harbour the same relation to PTV as the reformed punk
zines did to ‘popular music’ – as collaborators in a flattened-out information space.
Second, TOPY and its related projects appealed on the grounds of their infamy and
related under-representation in the mainstream press. Beyond Belief (Addicott, 1992), a
Dispatches documentary, helped cement the view that TOPY were a depraved, brainwashed cult who engaged in erotic rituals mixing sex, violence, and child abuse. After
this, mainstream outlets became nervous around the group, with record deals and pending shows being cancelled and the police, HM Customs, Royal Mail and BT investigating the group on separate grounds. To Rapid Eye and Vague, this secured their underground
and countercultural credentials. Put simply, there was no danger of PTV migrating to the
mainstream as Adam Ant had done in 1981.
Finally, TOPY represented a particular way of remembering the 1960s, which emphasised the darker, more paranoid, anti-human qualities of the counterculture. This is best
represented by Psychic TV’s 1985 single, ‘Godstar’. A tribute to the late Rolling Stone
Brian Jones, the song both propagates the conspiracy theory that he was murdered rather
than drowned, and tries to create a deity of him. Seen on TOPY’s own terms the song was
a piece of cultural engineering that ‘hacks’ into mainstream media – the charts – in order
to unsettle with images of conspiracy and cultism. Within Rapid Eye and Vague it offered
one plank of an assemblage of references that, together with such artefacts as Charles
Manson’s testimony to the courts about the Tate-LaBianca murder and William
Burroughs’s anti-human literature, created a 1960s ‘darkside’.
Occulture Remediated: From Zines to the Worldwide
Web
Dwyer’s ‘occulture’ echoed Savage’s definition of industrial culture. Yet the coinage
added something important, which was to frame the zine format less as a bearer of content than as a particular kind of technology – one that, like the non-Western spiritualisms
that often featured on its pages, demanded personal experience and discovery on the part
of the user. This configuration of the zine audience as a ‘user’ rather than a ‘fan’ would
be an important point of ideological contact between the zines of the 1980s and the early
web. ‘Transitional’ media artefacts like Internet.Underground.Guide (Ludovico, 1995)
integrated the two, fusing the zine with the more ‘practical’ technology of the hyperlinks
directory, and privileging the arcane and hidden knowledge that could be found online.
My final illustration shows how this same ethos was carried across to the web: it is the
website belonging to the Cybernetic Culture Research Unit, and dating from 1999. The
CCRU were a group of philosophy lecturers and PhD students based at Warwick
University whose core group, at the time their website was created, included the cultural
critic and music journalist Mark Fisher; the electronic musician and founder of Hyperdub
records Steve Goodman/Kode9; the theorist and art curator Suzanne Livingston; the
12
Theory, Culture & Society
media scholars Anna Greenspan and Luciana Parisi; and the philosopher Nick Land. As
an academic research group whose discipline is philosophy, the CCRU stand out from
the examples discussed so far, but from another perspective they are similar. First, music,
and particularly the popular electronic dance music of the 1990s, was at the heart of the
CCRU’s collective writing and thought, and it is in large part thanks to the later musicrelated activities of Goodman and Fisher that the group have received any attention at all.
Second, although the group was born in an academic philosophy department, it acquired
notoriety as an intedisciplinary art-theory collective operating beyond academia, an
ethos that was embodied in the group’s publications, which were typically either zines or
web texts – the former being sold in the same independent bookstores as Vague and
Rapid Eye.9 Third, following the exit from academia the ‘research interests’ of the CCRU
underwent a self-conscious shift from a postmodern mix of cybernetics, continental philosophy, dance music, sci fi and cyberpunk literature, feminism and gaming, to esotericism and occulture.
This shift from academia to subculture was narrated by the CCRU themselves as a
‘descent into madness’. Later, those at the centre of things revealed it to have been partly
driven by the real psychological breakdown experienced by the group’s academic lead,
Nick Land.10 Either way, it had a strong literary-aesthetic dimension. The 1997 web page
retrieved from the Wayback Machine (Figure 5), and advertising a work in progress
seminar, shows the CCRU as an open, democratically organised group. By contrast, the
independently hosted web page from the same year, produced following the group’s
departure from the university, keeps the reader at a distance (Figure 5). Written in the
third person, and offering cryptic evasions as to its function and membership (the group
were anonymous in the style of tactical media groups like Luther Blissett), it presents the
CCRU not as an open research group but as a clandestine and cult-like organisation.
Although conveyed through radically different media, institutional arrangements, and
organisational forms, the shift therefore mirrors that of the post-punk zines: from informational democracy to enclosure and immersion.
Aesthetically and ludically, the post-university web presence clearly draws influences
from the occultural zine ecosystem. We see this in the 1999 iteration of the site pictured
in Figure 6. In the banner at the top, the name ‘Cybernetic Culture Research Unit’ is written alongside a hand-drawn spiral pattern symbol recalling the secret society imagery
commonly used by industrial musicians. Below it is a row of seven categories, one of
which is notably titled ‘occultures’ and contains descriptions of invented ‘subcultures’
the CCRU experimented with in their writing (e.g. AOE, Hyper-C, Lemurs). Below that
sits a self-authored occult system for summoning demons called the Numogram.
However, it is on the humble links page that we find the clearest retention of 1980s
occulture. Already the vernacular metaphors associated with web experience conjure
images of ludic immersion in information, from the ‘information superhighway’ to ‘web
surfing’. ‘Liminal’ artefacts like the aforementioned Internet.Underground.Guide sought
to swerve links directories towards the darker side of occulture with its pages on UFOs,
conspiracy theories, and the occult. The CCRU links page amplified these qualities,
aligning web surfing with sublime revelations of unconcealment and gnosis. Navigating
the web with ccru.net as the starting point, one would be guided towards arcane destinations such as: the Aleister Crowley library; the Ordo Templi Orientis Phenomenon; the
Haworth
13
Figure 5. (a) CCRU institutional website (top), vs (b) CCRU independent website (bottom).
Both date from 1998 and were retrieved via the Wayback Machine.
14
Theory, Culture & Society
Figure 6. CCRU independent website (1999). Ccru.net. Used with permission of Suzanne
Livingston.
horology index; the I Ching and number theory; maps of plate tectonics; a chronology of
H.P. Lovecraft’s mythos; artificial intelligence and robotics research pages; conspiracism
on alien abduction; cyberpunk resources; Mesopotamian magic and myth; and more – 70
destinations in fact. As Table 1 and Figure 7 show, the blizzard of strange and esoteric
references remediate those that could be found in the aforementioned 1980s post-counterculture revival zines. And like those zines, the experience that is invited oscillates
between the epistemological and the aesthetic – between the personal acquisition of
‘knowledge’ and an anti-critical immersion in the arcane and otherworldly.
Positioning links pages as immersive media shows the remediation of the aesthetics
and ludics of zine media for the early web. After Bolter and Grusin (2000), remediation
is the representation of one medium in another, and a common logic of development in
the design of media technologies – arguably more so with digital media. However,
immersion was not only remediated via the re-presentation in another medium of its
signifying content. Closer examination of the CCRU’s web page shows that it was also
redeployed using web-idiomatic means. Listed inside the page source code, visible in
Figure 8, are 53 keywords that the site designer scripted into the page. Surprisingly, the
keywords give names to the anonymous members and associates of the CCRU.
Surprisingly, the keywords give names to the anonymous members and associates of the
CCRU, alongside musical genres, critics and publications that the group oriented their
work towards (breakbeat culture, garage, jungle, 2-step, darkside and drum ’n bass; The
Wire and i-D mag; Simon Reynolds and Kodwo Eshun); essays, concepts, institutions
and theorists that members of the CCRU might be known for (e.g. ‘Meltdown’ by Nick
Land; Steve Goodman’s Katasonix label; Y2K; Deleuze, Guattari, DeLanda and Virilio);
and more overt references to Cold War paranoia and psychedelia (‘drugs’ ‘Nato’, ‘CIA’).,
alongside musical genres, critics and publications that the group oriented their work
towards (breakbeat culture, garage, jungle, 2-step, darkside and drum ’n bass; The Wire
and i-D mag; Simon Reynolds and Kodwo Eshun); essays, concepts, institutions and
theorists that members of the CCRU might be known for (e.g. ‘Meltdown’ by Nick Land;
Steve Goodman’s Katasonix label; Y2K; Deleuze, Guattari, DeLanda and Virilio); and
more overt references to Cold War paranoia and psychedelia (‘drugs’ ‘Nato’, ‘CIA’). Not
all of these are hidden on the public face of the website (especially Kode9 and Orphan
Haworth
15
Table 1. ‘Contents’ Rapid Eye 1, 1989.
CONTENTS
THE FALL OF ART
William S Burroughs
1
FROM ATAVISM TO ZYKLON B
Genesis P-Orridge & The Temple Of
Psychic Youth
Simon Dwyer
5
SYBARITE AMONG THE SHADOWS
An invocation Of Aleister Crowley
R. C. McNeff
47
DREAMACHINE
An information Montage
Simon Dwyer
52
BECAUSE AND COSMOS
C. John Taylor
56
THE VIDEODROME
Situationism & Death TV
Mark Downham
64
WORDS FROM A ROOM
An Interview With Hubert Selby jnr.
Pat Hollis
72
DEAD FINGERS TALK
An interview With William $ Burroughs
V. Vale
79
THE JOHNSON FAMILY
William S Burroughs
84
SMILE
THROUGH A SCREEN, DARKLY
An Audience With Derek Jarman
Simon Dwyer
135
THE GEMSTONE FILE INVESTIGATION
Who Killed The Kennedys?
Nick Toczek
151
THE SECRET LANGUAGE OF ALCHEMY
Kenneth Rayner Johnson
164
“BRAZIL”
The Last Of England
Simon Dwyer
171
SEX, CRIME AND THE OCCULT
Colin Wilson
209
I AM THE BEAST
The Trial Testimony Of
Charles Manson
214
A REVOLUTIONARY SUICIDE
Transcript of Rev. Jim Jones
& The People’s Temple of Christ
Simon Dwyer
224
TWO DRAGONS PLAYING WITH A PEARL
The Ancient Art Of Footbinding
Nancy MacKenzie
230
BODYSHOCKS
An interview With Mr. Sebastian
Simon Dwyer
233
(Continued)
16
Theory, Culture & Society
Table 1. (Continued)
CONTENTS
An Introduction To Neoism
A Rapid Eye Report
87
TIME MIRRORS
The Art Of Austin Osman Spare
Genesis P-Orridge
111
THE UNDYING MONSTER
Hitler & Nazi UFOs
lan Blake
116
THE BLACK BOX
Kathleen McAuliffe
238
HIS NAME WAS MASTER
in Memory Of Brion Gysin
Genesis POrridge
242
Epiloque:
A THANKSGIVING PRAYER
William S Burroughs
247
I BECOME A MURDERESS
Kathy Acker
124
TANTRA
An introduction
Sahajanath
131
Figure 7. Visualisation of visible links from links page of ccru.net.
Haworth
17
Figure 8. Visualisation of ‘named entities’ hidden in source code of ccru.net.
Drift), but most are, so it is a strange thing to encounter for a group whose commitment
to collective anonymous authorship has retrospectively provoked such intrigue. In fact,
the hidden keywords offer exactly what one might expect to find on a conventional links
page – the personnel, interests, and associates of the group. Indeed, they offer examples
of aspirational hyperlinking: ‘the anticipatory projection by one party of wished-for relations with and valorization by another – relations that are not (yet) reciprocated or actualized, but in which the potential for an inflationary cycle [of prestige/cultural capital] is
sought’ (Born and Haworth, 2017: 612)
Why did whichever member designed the website choose to undermine the cool
secrecy and closure of the CCRU? One interpretation is that the source code contains
traces of a tactic – now obsolete – to influence search engine results. The functionality
this relies on was deprecated with the ascent of Google’s PageRank technology after
about 1998, but in a pre-Google world a site designer could hard-code ‘named entities’
into a website so that they would be discoverable via search. (Indeed, the presence of
‘cybernetic culture research unit’ and ‘ccru’ in the keywords suggests a designer trying
to anticipate various possible queries.) This means that a search for ‘The Wire’, ‘Simon
Reynolds’, or ‘2-Step’, for example, could lead a web user to ccru.net, from where
they would find occultism, conspiracy, number theory, time travel and so on. Thus,
rather than arriving at The Wire or i-D from ccru.net, the site appears as a detour, or
better, interrupt, upon searching for these music-related organisations. A naïve visitor
to the site via this route might be aware that the CCRU had some relationship to
18
Theory, Culture & Society
underground and experimental music, but quite what their function or purpose is
remains unclear.
The CCRU’s website therefore performs a kind of web-based subcultural infiltration,
where music and other subcultural interests are switched out for esoterica. To continue
the analysis begun with Vague, we can say that the naïve visitor to ccru.net is immersed
– the term conjuring both aesthetic immersion and a kind of radicalisation into the symbolism and mythos of the CCRU.11
Conclusion: From 1990s Occulture to the 2016 Culture
Wars
When the alt-right emerged into the mainstream during the 2016 US presidential election
it drew legitimacy from a host of far-right intellectuals, from contemporary neo-reactionaries (NRx) like Curis Yarvin (aka Mencius Moldbug) to more traditional conservatives
like Jordan Peterson. Somewhere among them were a handful of figures who had made
their name amid the political upheavals of the late 1980s and early 1990s and were being
rediscovered: the Russian political analyst and philosopher Aleksandr Gelyevich Dugin
was one, and Nick Land of the CCRU was another. As has been widely discussed (cf.
Hawley, 2018; Hermansson et al., 2020; Nagle, 2017), the chief driver of Land’s new
popularity was ‘The Dark Enlightenment’, a blog series starting in 2013 that critiqued
liberal democracy’s ‘relentless trend to (intellectual) degeneration’ and toys with neoreactionary themes including ‘race realism’ and ‘human bio diversity’ (Land, 2013). At
the same time, the fact that Land was listened to at all was a product of the cultural prestige he had amassed as a philosophy lecturer and guru to a new generation of cultural
theorists. In article after article across both liberal and right-wing media, Land’s background as the expelled Warwick academic-turned-crazed-leader of the CCRU featured
strongly. Users of political forums like the 4chan/pol (‘politically incorrect’) board in
turn mythologised the connection, producing esoteric memes that positioned Land as a
William Blake-like visionary who had glimpsed the neofeudalist future (Dean, 2021) at
a time when others were talking up the dotcom boom.
We see this in a meme posted to the /pol/ board, a political forum on the Reddit platform (Figure 9). In the image, a pyramid is depicted upon which various online subcultures are ironically piled up in an ‘interlocking chain of command which constitute(s)
the power structure of our invisible world government’ – they include the ‘Land-Dugin
Syncretic Brotherhood’, the ‘CCRU Remnant Enclave (Shanghai)’, and other CCRU
references (e.g. ‘Architectonic Order of the Eschaton’). The title of the meme is ‘Who
Runs the World?’, a reference to the varyingly anti-socialist, anti-semitic New World
Order conspiracy theory which posits a totalitarian political system run by either
Marxists or Jews. Thus, while it would be poor historicism to suggest, as Noys and others have done, that Land and the CCRU gave rise to extreme right political subcultures
of the last ten years, we can nevertheless assert that the subcultural esteem Land enjoys
turned attention backwards, to the strange, remediated new-religion atmosphere that the
CCRU cultivated following TOPY. Rather than see the path of historical succession
between the occultural web and the forms of occulture that characterise subcultural
communication among the far right as a linear and molecular line of ‘influence’, then,
Haworth
19
Figure 9. [WHO RUNS THE WORLD?] (2020), CCRU meme.
we might instead characterise it in terms of a structure of protentions and retentions.12
The traces of 1980s and 1990s occulture in today’s subcultural communication act upon
the earlier occulture ‘in such a way as to frame it, retroactively, as being a more or less
straightforward cause of the later’ occulture’s effect (Haworth, 2018: 618; see also
Born, 2005).
Yet although figures like Land might like to believe that there is an inevitability
between their acts in the present and their future repercussions, historical criticism should
return our attention to the contingent and unsettled nature of events during their own
present. This article has attempted to foreground this uncertainty by situating 1990s
occulture within a much wider subcultural network that grew out of punk, and was to an
extent a reaction to punk’s ideological emphasis on democracy, egalitarianism, and
grassroots authenticity.13 The industrial dimension of what Savage, Suck and Robertson
termed ‘new musick’ retained punk’s organisational autonomy, augmenting it with an
20
Theory, Culture & Society
elevating turn to the ‘extra-musical’ fields of outsider art and literature. Later, when subcultural groups in Britain turned their attention to the web, this ‘extra-musical’ culture –
later termed occulture – informed what they found there.14 One of the continuous logics I
have tried to emphasise within this turn is an aesthetic of immersion. In Tom Vague’s
Vague, immersion describes the textual-visual sublime that transforms a text about Charles
Manson into an aesthetic cipher of psychedelic fascism. In Dwyer’s (1989) Rapid Eye, it
describes venturing into ‘apolitical and amoral’ thoughtforms that have been ‘hidden
and ignored, or wilfully marginalised to the extremities of our society’ (p. 3). In Nick
Land’s CCRU, occulture is remediated and immersion augmented with the disorienting
tactic of subcultural infiltration.
Immersion should put us in mind of contemporary far-right memes that sit at the intersection between media and politics. Key NRx concepts are the notion of the cathedral
and of ‘taking the red pill’: the former describing the liberal-progressive-elite whose
power in terms of its control of the media, higher education, and institutions of power
serves to suppress independent thought and enforce conformity (Tait, 2019: 194), and the
latter describing the perspective-shift required to see the world outside of this prism.
Typically, this entails becoming ‘aware’ of purported Jewish media control (as with the
racist George Soros conspiracy theories), ‘innate’ biological racial or sexual differences,
or social problems associated with multiculturalism (Hawley, 2018: 83). Both concepts
evoke the libertarian ethos of the zines, and particularly Rapid Eye in its desire to catalyse ‘experimental, undogmatic, intellectual and oddly evolutionary’ thinkers, unbeholden to mainstream taste and opinion. As much as content, however, it is the ideologies
they carry as media that ensure contact with enlightenment. From underground zines and
handbooks to the contemporary ‘deep vernacular web’ (de Zeeuw and Tuters, 2020),
each styles itself as a portal to gnosis. Indeed, it is possible to see media being imbued
with magic and mysticism, a theme that has animated analyses of the internet both in its
early stages and in the present (cf. Davis, 1998; Lachman, 2018).
Immersion, in my understanding, differs from the merely sensory-aesthetic definition
that dominates in contemporary art scholarship, and that is usually contrasted with the
mental-conceptual. What is important is not only the implied desire to suspend ‘critical
thought and differentiation’ (Schrimshaw, 2015: 156), but the imaginaries that inform
immersion in the unknown. Arun Saldhana’s Psychedelic White compellingly describes
how ‘white people become white’ through their ‘constant urge’ to engage with spaces
different to them, whether they be surreal, exotic or otherworldly (Saldanha, 2007: 17).
Indeed, the desire for transcendence can come at the risk of losing their bearings entirely
(Saldanha, 2007). After their ‘visionary’ turns, Tom Vague, Simon Dwyer and Nick Land
used everything from structural anthropology to Victorian-era new religions to ‘make
strange’ the new media, so that reading a zine or surfing the web could become akin to a
state of altered consciousness – similar to Aldous Huxley’s experiments with mescaline
or Timothy Leary’s with LSD. To talk of whiteness in relation to digital media of course
recalls longer debates on cyberculture, from the ‘white liberal in disguise’ figure of the
posthuman that Weheliye (2002) describes to the frontier-settler rhetoric that was grafted
onto early encounters with cyberspace, and that has been analysed by many (cf. Barbrook
and Cameron, 1995; Streeter, 2011; Turner, 2006). What I have tried to do here, however,
is to analyse the localised cultural politics of British and European cyberculture, where
Haworth
21
the digital vanguard was chiefly associated with artists, theorists and creators (Barbrook,
1998), and where zines and other music media of the previous decade provided the most
important subcultural coordinates. In these contexts, whiteness manifested in the protection from harm it provided to authors and artists to immerse themselves in the antirational, abject, and censored – including explorations of right-wing esotericism or the
supernatural thinking that informed the Third Reich.
Political theorists like Nancy Love and Ana Teixeira Pinto have highlighted how easily art worlds were infiltrated by new right-wing movements like NRx and the alt-right
after 2016. Love (2016); Pinto (2017, 2020) has stressed the need to develop ‘critical
listening publics’ who are able to ‘crack the not-so-hidden codes of white supremacy’
that have coursed through alternative musics in the last ten years. To this I would add that
we also need to develop historical and media literacy. Because although 21st-century
fascism seemed to emerge in an entirely different way in the previous decade – most
notably in the strong role played by culture and cultural politics – this is not to say that
there were not precedents.
Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank John Eden, Niall Gallen, Michael Haworth, Mimi Haddon, Patrick
Quick, Ed Spencer and Marie Thompson for comments, suggestions and dialogue that helped to
improve this article. Funding for this research was provided by the AHRC Leadership Fellowship
Music and the Internet: Towards a Digital Sociology of Music, grant number AH/S00744X/1.
ORCID iD
Christopher Haworth
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0587-1465
Notes
1. Context collapse was first described in relation to broadcast media (Meyrowitz, 1985), and
later extended to digital media (and named) by boyd (2002) in her Master’s thesis. Philips and
Milner (2017) analyse ambivalence and ironic detachment as products of context collapse.
2. See for example Siepmann (2019) and Miller (2019). Thompson (2019) has offered a thoughtful critique of the industry in op-eds on ‘past transgressions’.
3. See Vague and Fisher (2016: 78) for a list of zines Vague saw as competing.
4. All quotes from Vague issue 1, 1979.
5. Vague in the late 1970s was writing drafting a book on Adam and the Ants, although it failed
to connect with a publisher (Vague and Fisher, 2016: 491).
6. Cateforis (2011: 26) writes that the ‘more overtly experimental and radical musical deconstructions’ of post-punk were initially termed ‘new musick’ by taste-shaping journalists like
Jon Savage.
7. Christopher Partridge has become associated with the concept of occulture through a series
of theoretical texts which draw influence from a range of sources, including the Temple Ov
Psychic Youth (Partridge 2013a, 2013b, 2013c). However, its origins in Dwyer’s Rapid Eye
seem little known. (cf. Partridge, 2013a, 2013b, 2013c).
8. Siepmann (2019) describes PTV as a ‘front organisation’ for TOPY, which has some fidelity
to how PTV saw themselves, but less to the individual communities at the city-based ‘access
points’.
9. Mark Fisher was an enthusiastic reader of Vague magazine, writing in his blog that Vague
22
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
Theory, Culture & Society
‘understood that the (70s) stand-off between Old Media and fanzines presaged a conflict
that you are participating in now’ (K-Punk, 2007). Fisher singled out two articles from
Vague, both by Mark Downham, arguing that they presaged the CCRU. ‘Certainly, there
would have been no Ccru without Downham’s two treatises, “Videodrome: the Thing in
Room 101” and “Cyberpunk”, which – years before such connections would be academicrusted into familiarity – patched together Gibson, Debord, Moorcock, Tesla, Baudrillard,
Apocalypse Now, in a form that accelerated what Ballard had done in The Atrocity
Exhibition’ (K-Punk, 2007).
Robin Mackay writes: ‘let’s get this out of the way: In any normative, clinical, or social sense
of the word, very simply, Land did “go mad.” Afterwards he did not shrink from meticulously
documenting this process, as if writing up a failed (?) experiment’ (Robin, 2012).
In recent years, prominent electronica artists like Oneohtrix Point Never, Chino Amobi, and
Lee Gamble have explicitly name-checked the CCRU or drawn from their writings in their
work, while concepts like sonic fiction recirculate around sound art and sound art theory.
This concept is taken from Alfred Gell, who initially drew on Edmund Husserl. Georgina
Born has adapted the concept for the music disciplines.
It is important to emphasise, however, that the left-leaning attributes that have been associated
with punk frequently did not bear out in practice. Egalitarianism and especially anti-racism
often turned out to be retrospective claims made upon the genre from the vantage point of the
‘politically correct’ 1980s and 1990s, while punk’s overtly racist aspects were ignored (Sabin,
1999: 199).
Retrospectively, P-Orridge (2010: 11) claimed that ‘[t]he first generation developers of
“cyberculture” were certainly aware of – and some of them even active in – TOPY and its
ideas and ideals’.
References
Addicott, Graham (dir.) (1992) Beyond Belief. In: Dispatches series. Broadcast: 19 February,
Channel 4.
Barbrook, Richard (1998) The Holy Fools: A Critique of the Avant-Garde in the Age of the Net.
London: Hypermedia Research Centre, University of Westminster.
Barbrook, Richard and Cameron, Andy (1996) The Californian ideology. Science as Culture 6(1):
44–72. DOI: 10.1080/09505439609526455.
Barbrook, Richard and Andy Cameron (1995) The Californian Ideology. Mute https://www.metamute.org/editorial/articles/californian-ideology
Beckett, Andy (2016) Promised You a Miracle: Why 1980–82 Made Modern Britain. London:
Penguin Books.
Bland, Benjamin (2018) ‘Don’t do as you’re told, do as you think’: The transgressive zine culture
of industrial music in the 1970s and 1980s. In: Subcultures Network (eds) Ripped, Torn and
Cut: Pop, Politics and Punk Fanzines from 1976. Manchester: Manchester University Press,
pp. 150–169.
Bolter, Jay David and Grusin, Robert (2000) Remediation: Understanding New Media. Cambridge,
MA: MIT Press.
Born, Georgina, and Christopher Haworth (2017) From microsound to vaporwave: Internetmediated musics, online methods, and genre. Music and Letters 98(4) : 601-647.
Born, Georgina (2005) On musical mediation: Ontology, technology and creativity. TwentiethCentury Music 2(1): 7–36. DOI: 10.1017/S147857220500023X.
Boyd, danah (2002) Faceted ID/entity: Managing representation in a digital world. Master’s thesis. Massachusettes Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Haworth
23
Bridle, James (2018) New Dark Age: Technology and the End of the Future. London: Verso Books.
Cateforis, Theo (2011) Are We Not New Wave? Modern Pop at the Turn of the 1980s. Ann Arbor,
MI: University of Michigan Press.
Chun, Wendy Hui Kyong (2021) Discriminating Data: Correlation, Neighborhoods, and the New
Politics of Recognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cramer, Florian (2016) Alt-right: A lecture. Available at: https://evening-class.org/2016/12/13/
alt-right-a-lecture-by-florian-cramer(accessed 26 February 2022).
Davis, Erik (1998) Techgnosis: Myth, Magic and Mystery in the Age of Information. Serpents Tail.
Davis, Erik (2014) The counterculture and the occult. In: Partridge, Christopher (ed.) The Occult
World. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, pp. 635–645.
de Zeeuw, Daniël and Tuters, Marc (2020) Teh internet is serious business: On the deep vernacular
web and its discontents. Public Culture 16(2): 214–232.
Dean, Jodi (2021) Neofeudalism: The end of capitalism? In: Lewis, Penny, Holm, Lorens, and
Santos, Sandra Costa (eds) Architecture and Collective Life. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge,
pp. 42–54.
Duncombe, Stephen (1997) Notes from Underground: Zines and the Politics of Alternative
Culture. London: Verso Books.
Dwyer, Simon (1979) By-pass today. In: Dwyer, Simon (ed.) Rapid Eye Movement, issue 1,
Winter, Self-published.
Dwyer, Simon (1989) Introduction. In: Dwyer, Simon (ed.) Rapid Eye 1, 1st edn. R.E. Publishing
Ltd.
Haddon, Mimi (2020) What is Post-punk? Genre and Identity in Avant-garde Popular Music,
1977–82. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Hannah, Matthew (2021) QAnon and the information dark age. First Monday online first. DOI:
10.5210/fm.v26i2.10868.
Hawley, George (2018) Making Sense of the Alt-Right. New York, NY: Columbia University
Press.
Haworth, Christopher (2018) Protentions and retentions of Xenakis and Cage: Nonhuman actors,
genre and time in microsound. Contemporary Music Review 37(5–6): 606–625. DOI:
10.1080/07494467.2018.1577639.
Hermansson, Patrik, Lawrence, David, Mulhall, Joe et al. (2020) The International Alt-Right:
Fascism for the 21st Century? Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
Holt, Macon (2019) Pop Music and Hip Ennui: A Sonic Fiction of Capitalist Realism. New York,
NY: Bloomsbury Publishing.
K-Punk (2007) A rupturing of this collective amnesia. Available at: http://k-punk.abstractdynamics.org/archives/009656.html (accessed 31 January 2022).
Kirchick, James (2016) Trump’s terrifying online brigades. Available at: https://www.commentary.org/articles/james-kirchick/trumps-terrifying-online-brigades/(accessed 26 February
2022).
Lachman, Gary (2018) Dark Star Rising: Magick and Power in the Age of Trump. London:
Penguin Publishing Group.
Land, Nick. 2013. The Dark Enlightenment. http://www.thedarkenlightenment.com/the-darkenlightenment-by-nick-land/
Love, Nancy S. (2016) Trendy fascism: White power music and the future of democracy. Suny
Press.
Ludovico, Alessandro (1995) Internet.Underground.Guide. Bari, Italy: Minus Habens Records.
Meyrowitz, Joshua (1985) No Sense of Place: The Impact of Electronic Media on Social Behavior.
New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
24
Theory, Culture & Society
Miller, Dylan (2019) Why we’re investigating extreme politics in underground music. Quietus.
Available at: https://thequietus.com/articles/25682-fascism-underground-music-racismindustrial-black-metal-noise (accessed 25 August 2022).
Nagle, Angela (2017) Kill All Normies: Online Culture Wars From 4chan and Tumblr to Trump
and the Alt-Right. Lanham, MD: John Hunt Publishing.
Noys, Benjamin (2014) Malign Velocities: Accelerationism and Capitalism. London: John Hunt
Publishing
Noys, Benjamin (2022) Burn out: Reflections on accelerationism. Available at: https://www.
academia.edu/64818298/Burn_Out_Reflections_on_Accelerationism (accessed 26 February
2022).
O’Brien, Luke (2017) Andrew Anglin: The making of an American Nazi. The Atlantic. Available
at: https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2017/12/the-making-of-an-americannazi/544119/ (accessed 31 January 2022).
P-Orridge, Genesis Breyer (2010) THEE PSYCHICK BIBLE: Thee Apocryphal Scriptures ov
Genesis Breyer P-Orridge and Thee Third Mind ov Thee Temple ov Psychick Youth. Port
Townsend, WA: Feral House.
Phillips, Whitney and Milner, Ryan M. (2017) The Ambivalent Internet: Mischief, Oddity, and
Antagonism Online. London: John Wiley & Sons.
Pinto, Ana Teixeira (2017) Ironie und alt-right. Springerin 4: 12–14.
Pinto, Ana Teixeira (2020) Illiberal arts. Pallaten. Available at: https://paletten.net/artiklar/
illiberal-arts (accessed 26 February 2022).
Robin Mackay (2012) ‘Nick Land - An Experiment in Inhumanism’, Umelec magazine, 16.
Reynolds, Simon (2009) Rip it Up and Start Again: Postpunk 1978–1984. London: Faber & Faber.
Sabin, Roger (1999) I Won’t Let that Dago By: Rethinking Punk and Racism. In: Roger, Sabin
(ed.) Punk Rock: So What?, Routledge, pp. 199-218.
Saldanha, Arun (2007) Psychedelic White: Goa Trance and the Viscosity of Race. Minneapolis,
MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Savage, Jon (1983) Introduction. In: Vale, V and Juno, Andrea (eds) Industrial Culture Handbook.
San Francisco, CA and Eugene, OR: V/Search Publications, pp. 4-5.
Schrimshaw, Will (2015) Exit immersion. Sound Studies 1(1): 155–170.
Shirky, Clay (2009) Here Comes Everybody: How Change Happens When People Come Together.
London: Penguin.
Siepmann, Dan (2019) Groupthink and other painful reflections on Thee Temple ov Psychick
Youth. PopMatters, 27 September. Available at: https://www.popmatters.com/genesis-porridge-groupthink-2640631583.html (accessed 31 January 2022).
Streeter, Thomas (2011) The Net Effect: Romanticism, Capitalism, and the Internet. New York,
NY: New York University Press.
Tait, Joshua (2019) Mencius moldbug and neoreaction. In: Sedgwick, Mark (ed.) Key Thinkers of
the Radical Right. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 187–203.
Thompson, Marie (2019) Past transgressions. Keynote given to Punk/Noise, the 6th Punk Scholars
Network Conference, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, 16–17 December.
Truscott, Lucian K. (1970) Psychedelic fascism. The Georgia Straight, 18 November, pp. 12–13.
Turner, Fred (2006) From Counterculture to Cyberculture: Stewart Brand, the Whole Earth
Network, and the Rise of Digital Utopianism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Turner, Fred (2019) Machine politics: The rise of the internet and a new age of authoritarianism.
Harper’s Magazine, January, p. 9.
Tuters, Marc (2021) Belief beyond belief: On fashwave’s esoteric future past. Krisis | Journal for
Contemporary Philosophy 41(1): 172–178. DOI: 10.21827/krisis.41.1.37162.
Haworth
25
Vague, Tom (1984) Control Data Manual #18/19: Programming Phenomena and Conspiracy
Theory. London.
Vague, Tom and Fisher, Mark (2016) Vague post-punk memories: A lecture by Tom Vague, and
conversation with Mark Fisher (11/12/14). In: Butt, Gavin, Fisher, Mark and Eshun, Kodwo
(eds) Post Punk Then and Now. London: Duncan Baird Publishers.
Vale, V and Juno, Andrea (1984) Industrial Culture Handbook. RE/Search 6-7, San Francisco,
CA: RE/Search Publications.
Weheliye, Alexander G (2002) ‘Feenin’: Posthuman voices in contemporary Black popular music.
Social Text 20(2): 21–47.
[WHO RUNS THE WORLD?] (2020) Available at: https://twitter.com/notjessewalker/status/1328328521211662336 (accessed 26 February 2022).
Worley, Matthew (2015) Punk, politics and British (fan)zines, 1976–84: ‘While the world was
dying, did you wonder why?’ History Workshop Journal 79(1): 76–106.
Wu Ming 1 (2018) Archivio dei tweet di Wu Ming 2009–2019. @wu_ming_foundt, 12 June.
Available at: https://twitter.com/wu_ming_foundt/status/1006664569920606211 (accessed
31 January 2022).
Wu Ming 1 (2021) The Q in Qonspiracy: QAnon and its Surroundings, How Conspiracy Fantasies
Defend the System. Rome, Italy: Edizione Alegre.
Christopher Haworth is Associate Professor in Music at the University of Birmingham. His
research spans a number of topics in 20th- and 21st-century musics, including electronic and
experimental musics; British popular music; music and politics; digital media; and music and the
internet. He is currently completing a historical monograph examining the relationship between
popular music and radical theory in 1990s Britain, as musicians, political groups, art collectives
and intellectuals retooled left-aligned theories of political change for the emerging world wide
web. Between 2019 and 2021 he held an AHRC Early Career Leadership Fellowship under the title
Music and the Internet: Towards a Digital Sociology of Music. His articles have appeared in such
journals as Computer Music Journal, Music and Letters, Leonardo Music Journal, and Organised
Sound, as well as several edited collections. He is also an electronic musician with releases on
Superpang, Head+Arm, Optophono and others.