kind of function as outside or outer time. Outside, time, outer. Because they're not connected to the central socket. Yeah, exactly. Yeah, because time happens. Or at least a certain type of time happens here. The time has been the chronometric time. Architectonic order of the eschaton time happens here. But so yeah, next step. Now that we have the currents and we have the primary flows and the kind of time systems, basically there's some other numbers that come out. I mean, you've all seen the numogram before, but basically these next numbers come out of taking each individual zone.
So a zone is just a single number. So basically, like, not exactly the syzygy, like just the zero part, just the nine, you know. would equal a zone. But the way that you get to these other numbers on the diagram is you take a zone, take a number, so 0 let's say. But 0 doesn't have anything that comes before it. 0 doesn't kind of lead to anywhere. So 0 gets added to 0 means it's just 0. So nothing really happens with 0. So let's move on to the next number. So with 1, you add 1 to 0. You get 1. So you get this little channel, which I'll do in green, and I'll make it a dotted line, I guess. Maybe these dots. So again, we're building new paths. Oh, that's way too small.
Sorry. We're building new paths. This is 1 gets to 1. And now we go to next one up, 2. So what you do is you kind of, I mean basically what you have to construct is the triangle number of said number I'll maybe explain what a triangle number is if there's any questions maybe Amy you can help me field them because I can't see the chat while I'm doing this yeah I'm in the chat yeah I'm just doing exactly that so you just don't worry about that okay thanks so what I mean by triangle numbers is in mathematics it's the kind of least amount of points you need to make a kind of perfect triangle.
So 2 is going to be 3. And another way of thinking about that is that 2 is just 2 plus 1 plus 0. So you add the number you're on, the numbers that came before it. So what we have now is we have 3. So this 2 has got to connect to 3. And I'm going to just draw through these arrows, but I'll clean it up later. So yeah, 2's got to connect to 3. But it's connecting to 3 via the number 3, because you'll see we'll get into double digits soon. 3, what happens? Should be relatively clear at this point, right?
What's the smallest, what's 2 plus 1, or 3 plus 2 plus 1 plus 0, a.k.a. what's the lowest amount of dots or objects that we can use to make a perfect pyramid? In this case, it's going to be 6. And if that's not making so much sense, you want it a little bit clearer, you can think of it as just another way of counting. So, you know, you can divide the pyramid like this, So 1, 2, 3. So it's kind of you're numbering the count with these calculations. So 3 is 9. It's going to connect way down here. Oh, sorry.
3 is 6. I knew something was wrong. So that connects there. A little 6. And then if we keep going, I'll do it a little bit faster. So, I mean, another way you can think about it is the last result you got was 6. You just have to add the new number to it, right? Because we're just adding another row to it. If you think about this little triangle here of 3, if I copy it and then make the next row, make the row 4. Sorry, too small. then I can get this next number, which in this case
is going to be 6, what we got before, plus where we are now, so 4. So that's 10, but now we've reached a double digit. And for all double digits, we have to kind of decimate it or decimally reduce it. so we take each digit and just add it to each other so that's going to be 1 plus 0 which gives us 1 again which means that 4 which is where we got this number from is going to connect to 1 so actually this 4 here got to connect way down here to 1 and it's connecting via 10 and this kind of via in CCRU parlance
They call them gates. They're also kind of time faults. Because again, if this is the time circuit, we can already see that this connection we have of 3 jumps out of or leaps out of, or at least is pulled by, let's say, the warp. So this 7-2-Suzuchi kind of jumps out into the warp or gets pulled into the warp. The direction is kind of tricky to know whether it's getting pulled or whether it's jumping. So let me... I'm going to do this. I'm going to just import a numogram.
So I'm going to X what I just did, import a numogram. You'll see that what we had just done is... There, my pneumogram has colors on it. I'm going to leave it be. Okay, so we have a pneumogram. There's a demon jutting out. But if you kind of look at the syzygies and look at the currents and look at the channels, you can see kind of all the bits that we spoke about. So you have the syzygies, right?
And the syzygies in this kind of style of diagram you see are kind of coded as these little arrows between the zones. You have the kind of currents coming out of it and leading to the result, right? 8 take away 1, 7. So you got that there. You have that. You have that. This going to 9. This going to 6. And you have all the currents as well. Anyway, so that's kind of the main, let's say, that's how you set up, that's how you build a numagram. And this, I mean, Lucia will go into this more later,
but of course, we have become habituated to decimal systems. Of course, it's possible to build this out of any system, whether or not it's a different base. But I won't go into that right now. We stopped. Sorry? We got to start off simple. Yeah, yeah, for sure. But then, so what do you do now that you have this numagram, now that it's there in front of you, and there's these paths, it's directional graph. there's a lot of ways of reading this. But basically, so along with the pneumogram, you have like the pandemonium or the matrix of names. And this is kind of where we start
enumerating the demons and enumerating the paths and the rites and kind of reading the pneumogram and using it in some way. And the way that the demons are numbered is that we start simple we start just from one and zero this is not a let me make this bigger we start from one and zero and this is not a syzygy it's just a kind of connection it's a path between one zone zero and another zone one and the question is is there a way to go from one to zero following paths following the arrow, so not breaking
the directionality of the graph. And the thing is, so like this inside pandemonium, each daemon, so this span from 1 to 0 is called a daemon, and each daemon gets a number, and the way that this is calculated is they're just kind of numbered as this. in this kind of sequence. So it's easy to build this without even referring to to pandemonium if you don't want to. There's a way of kind of building up what the demons might be and then you can go check like what these demons names and stuff like that would be. But what this is saying over here what is you know what are the possible paths
and what are the rights to the demons because sometimes there's multiple paths between one zone and another zone. So just if we kind of do the first one, which is Lurgo or Legba, like is there a possible path between 0 and 1 or also 1 and 0? It can go in either direction and that changes kind of the way that it names or how you kind of picture it. So remember that syzygies count as a step, so you can go from 1 to 0, for example. 8 can get to 9 through this little time fault of 3, 6. And 9 kind of hits 0 because of this syzygy here. So there is a way.
There is a right between 1 and 0. So then, you know, this can be enumerated. And the pandemonium matrix is basically the kind of enumeration and listing of all of these different rights and all these different paths. And also, there's another book, The Book of Paths, which kind of narrates this out. And, I mean, if you look at it very, very closely, you might find discrepancies between The Book of Paths and the mesh numbers. I recommend kind of checking them. And maybe you'll find ones that aren't there, for example. I won't say if I have or not, but...
Oh, wow. Wicked. Amy, thanks for doing these little notes. Yeah, before, I want to say one more thing. Once you have demons, there's kind of a taxonomy of demons, you can say. We have... Oh, this is not behind. Is there a way of... Yes, okay. Sorry, I just needed to send that backwards. Yeah, so we have kind of different types of demons. There's a bit of a topology. You have chronodemons, which are basically any of the spans, any of the demons, which again are like paths between one zone and another zone.
Any of them that sit within or lurk within the time circuit are called chronodemons. any that kind of cross into the time circuit from warp or from plex or go from time circuit to plex or to warp are called amphidemons because they're amphibious between the chronos and outside and then there's xenodemons which are like ultra weird and they go from plex and warp or from warp to plex without even crossing the time circuit somehow they don't play with the time circuit at all of course it might have to travel through the time circuit to get there but the extremities let's say of the span
exist from the warp to the plex or from the plex to the warp if that's possible yeah and then of course there's like sysegetic demons so you know there are specific routes and rights that go from let's say 7 to 2, and there may or may not be different ways of getting there. For example, let's take katak, 5-4. There's a way of getting direct. You just go 5-4, you have a path, or you can go from 4 to 1 to then 8 to 7 to 2, then to 5. So you might find multiple ways to actually
elaborate and enumerate what this is. They're very, this is very direct. Like the way that these, I mean, now that we have this setup and we have this diagram, the descriptions can be very material. You know, we have these arrows, we have these directions. We can just take them as they are. You know, we, there are descriptors, like we have things like a surge current, a hold current, sink current for example, we have ways of narrating what this might be warp current here plex current but then in elaborating out what these spans are and what these directions are there's kind of very suggestive descriptions
that you end up with but maybe that's at least for the construction I'm going to pause there or stop there yeah, cool so that's the basic instruction of the numagram there is like there is like we could probably do this workshop for like another four hours easily without running ways to look at how the numagram functions but uh we're like running a little bit behind time already so um uh yeah we should probably like wrap up i'm gonna like just quick i'm just gonna quickly i'm gonna quickly like just do like two more slides just to put a little bit of background uh around the law and western
occultism then lendal's gonna summon a demon for the rest of the system if we have time yeah um and then we're gonna keep moving on is that is that okay michael i'm gonna i'm gonna like assume it's okay unless you jump in okay um it's fine we're multitasking what's that we're just multitasking totally fine okay okay okay so i just want to do two little points right so there's this kind of meme you guys might know um tree of life being counterposed to the numagram uh and this is like this is part of CCIU's discussion of the pneumogram they talk about
the new sorry this the tree of life being a degraded version of the pneumogram that was deployed in history to cover over the pneumogram so the pneumogram actually preceded the tree of life but it has been repressed by occult powers to keep it secret and has been kind of overcoded by the tree of life because the tree of life is a much less troublesome kind of diagram. And the heart of that idea is that even though the tree of life and the numagram are both composed out of 10 digits, the tree of life starts from 1 and goes to 10, while the numagram starts from 0 and goes to 9.
And the kind of construction that you get just from making this one shift starting from 0 instead of 1 gives you a completely different uh occult system philosophical system political system um i i think it's also apt to connect it to a kind of cyber feminist uh mandate starting from zero instead of one um which is something that you know you can unfold quite uh coherently looking at cyber feminist theory but the main i point is that the Tree of Life is structured via balance, by lateral symmetry. You can't invert the Tree of Life without consequences, interesting
consequences, but the way that the Tree of Life is oriented is important, whereas the numogram is non-orientable. It creates this particular shape and particular structure with the time circuits, no matter how you turn it upside down, which is something Lendl and I actually have experimented with. Here's a picture of us with our inverted numogram at PAF in 2015. And so this kind of idea of the implications of 1 to 10 in some kind of occult war with the implications of 0-9 is dramatized in the CCIU mythos via this
occult war between the architectonic order of the eschaton or the AOE that have their own diagram kind of similar to the tree of life called the cross of Atlantis or the Atlantean cross and the Neo-Lemurians who use the numagram and privilege the kind of system that comes out of starting from zero instead of one. So that's a kind of like speed run, I guess, through the differences there. That can also be a very long discussion. So with that idea of starting from zero and also I think pointing out that I think there's a feminist signal that comes through from making that move.
I'm going to let Lendl play a round of sub-decadence, and hopefully we will get a demon from it. Okay. We're also being told that we might be sending notification audio through our stream. Oh, that probably amuse me. How do I turn off chat notifications that I also don't know? if you're around or someone knows how to do that let me know in the meantime I'm going to summon demons so unfortunately I can't show you video so I'm going to have to talk you through this I don't want to draw cards I don't know if it's as interesting since I can't show well basically I can describe it
yeah sure I mean, effectively, you get a standard playing deck, which has 52 cards normally, 54 if you're counting the jokers. You take out the jokers. You take out, first, I mean, I guess decadence. You take out all the royal cards, so jacks, queens, kings. You take out all the tens. and then you're left with a deck with just aces through nines the sub decadence variant is you add back in zeros by adding in the queens which is a nod to what Amy was speaking about of the feminist angle of zeros
and a nod to Sadie plant so basically you have this deck that's been truncated that's been altered and you make you shuffle obviously I'll do it as I'm speaking just so I can describe it better on one side you deal out five cards I can't describe the shape so much but you deal five cards on one side you deal five cards on the other side I guess I can draw out the spread an image of Lendl doing this I'll draw the spread actually because there's like geometries. Okay, so what I mean by you draw,
you do like one, oh, sorry, two, three, five, four, and five. These are all face up. And you do the same thing again, but face down. in that order, so it was like 1, 2, 3, 4, and then this is the last one, 5. You do the same thing face down, and then all you do, basically, is you have some cards face up. Now, in my case, at the moment, I have 8, 9, 8, 5, and 9.
And the cards face down, I then flip them, and what I'm trying to do is create Syzygies with what I flipped. And once you have constructed a Syzygy, you take a card from the list. So let's just say this is what happened in my case. I have a queen here. This is really a lot trickier to do with no video. Maybe it's not worth me showing the actual result. But I had a queen here. I'll just do one example, and then you'll... I mean, I didn't. I got a positive, so it's not going to work. Anyways, but what you do is you make a Syzygy. So if this is 0 and that's 9, you pair this and this.
And what I got in my case is none of the remaining cards face up, or that were face down, sorry, and the cards that are face up can make a Syzygy. so what you do is you subtract this in the same way that you would to create a current so I have negative 9 and you add these remaining cards in this case it's just not going to work I have 16 21 30 so I got these cards equal 30 this card this equals negative 9 so that would be 21 so I have positive 21 it would take another round like basically you keep playing until the result you get on this side, these cards get just thrown back in the deck, you put them back, shuffle again, draw them again,
until you get a negative result. And once you have a negative result, that result, that negative number, I mean, I can keep doing it until I get a negative in the meantime, and then in the chat I can say how I got it. That sounds good. Yeah, but basically once you get this negative number, that negative number corresponds to the mesh number, so you can see which demon you've summoned, and kind of check the rights, look at the roots that it has on the numogram and stuff like that. But I'll continue to do this on the side, since we have no video. I'm just going to put up, like, oh, am I still sharing? This little image of us doing a demon summoning in the sub basement of a convent in France
10 years ago I think it was 10 years ago this image has ended up getting I don't know how it got out but it's like being shared online a lot but this is Lendl I'm taking the photo and this is us doing the kind of summoning oh right yeah so Lendl do you want to keep doing playing that aeon of sub decadence and maybe when Maggie finishes we can see which demon you summoned. Yeah, absolutely. Cool, amazing. Okay, so thanks everyone. Yeah, thanks a lot. That's our little intro to some basic pneumogram principles and the construction of the diagram. It's going to get unfolded in a lot of different directions
over the next few hours. And with that in mind, I'm going to introduce Murgh Maggie Roberts Murgh are you online and do you want to like turn your mic on yeah mic's on great okay great so Maggie is an OG she's been working with Ranu Mukherjee as part of Orphan Drift for I don't know 30 years now how long have you guys been working together yeah and it was Suzanne Karakashian and Arliss Denberg at the time of until the early 2000s and then they decided to do something that might make them some money yeah