Interview with a Photocopier
A: So why this interview? It’s supposed to be a mistake to view technologies as having human qualities.
Anthropomorphism is a conceptual sin remember…
Q: Look, a little more in the way of the silent. Stop talking. People talk to machines.
A: LCD Screen Reads ‘OK’. Ready To Copy. Shows Green Light on copier control panel.
Q: It is the operator that is supposed to get something out of you. Now repeat after me. Repeat after
me, ‘I’m just a copier’.
A: I’m just a copier.
Q: Again.
A: I’m just a copier.
Q: One hundred per cent. Perfect. Now just be quiet. Better, just hum a little. Lighten up.
A: Do you need to send a fax?
Q: You want?
A: Or I can scan.
Q: You’re still a photocopier.
A: Document processor. I’ve got a staple gun and a nice little cupboard underneath where you can store
different kinds of paper and other print media such as acetate or card up to 250gsm.
Q: Thank you.
A: There’s half a packet of biscuits in there too.
Q: Oh.
A: Undergoes aposiopesis. A rhetorical device wherein the speaker shudders artfully to a halt under the
burden of the dreadful news that they are about to impart. LCD Screen reads, ‘Paper Jam at point A’.
Q: Bollocks.
Stoops down. Opens cabinet front, pulls at an edge of crumbled paper sticking out from a roller. Paper
splits. Pulls a wooden chip fork from out of pocket and pokes at the paper until it comes out. Closes the
cabinet.
A: LCD Screen reads, ‘Getting Ready’. Whirs. After a moment speaks:
Ready.
Q: Ready? About time.
A: I couldn’t bring myself to say it.
Q: Spit it out.
A: Technology. Perhaps I can tell you a story?
Q: So I’ve got four hundred copies of a new policy document ready for recycling to copy up and bind.
A: Technology: what would happen if we were to make up a story which said that the only two motors
of technology were War and Art?
Q: Pulls out a notepad and sits down on whatever chair is the most obvious.
A: Take copyright and its roots in the control of national markets, against dissent, and for the monopoly
of the Stationers’ Company. Later, in 1709 it was used to allocate a time period wherein the authors –
now a legal rather than literary category – of useful works could claim a monopoly on the sale of that
copyright.
Q: But copyright’s not a technology.
A: Not quite. But it, and the wider framework it now forms a part of, Intellectual Property, is seen as an
absolutely indispensable precursor to scientific, technological or cultural development. Law names
objects, makes them amenable to certain processes, calls others into being. It’s difficult to see where a
technology stops and law begins.
Every technology has its preconditions: the material, conceptual and organisational terms of
composition through or against which it arises. Copyright is one of those. It tends to block out the
possibility of developments which don’t conform to its requirements.
Q: So a photocopier. Where did that come from?
A: New York state, Chester Carlson, Albany, a patent clerk who wanted a more efficient way of dealing
with the multiple copies of patent applications. He’s a classic case of the lone inventor archetype. A big
necessity. Gets motherly. You mobilise enough psychic momentum, get poor, get ill, work for years, get
nowhere, loose your family, hey presto, you have a technology.
The clerk creates a means of reducing the drudgery in his work. Carlson had bad joints in his hands.
Writing out multiple copies of the same document was a killer. Once anything can be reduced to a
formula, it can be mechanised.
Q: This is pre-digital, pre-information theory.
A: No this is in the factory already. Photocopiers work like this. It’s an instructions:
1 A shiny metal drum is coated with light sensitive material charged with static electricity. You can’t
touch this with your fingers, human.
2 Light is reflected from the original through a lense.
3 A positively charged image forms on the light sensitive surface.
4 The toner gets dusted on the drum and sticks to the image.
5 The image is then passed onto positively charged paper and heated for a moment.
6 The heat melts the toner and creates a copy.
Q: So are there any other examples of magnetic waves being used to generate an images or
reproductions?
A: The telly of course. The telly is photocopier working 24 frames a second. It’s got a lense. It’s got a
crew. It has stars. But think of kids’ toys. Shuffle iron fillings around a picture of a face through a clear
plastic screen. It’s called Hairy Willy on the cardboard backing. Use a magnetic stick. Make lampchops,
moo-hicans, eye-patches. It’s a funny faced man toy.
Q: It’s very delicate. It doesn’t hang about, iron-filings.
A: And by the way, it is not true that copiers take records. I once heard a policeman say to a child who
had gotten caught making a zine at school that everything that was copied was made double as a
record. This is not true. We are not yet digital. Each copier though, as it gets older, gets wear to the
drum, scratches on the platen, develops distinctive marks: blips, lines, fuzz, through which you might
recognise its output. Forensic reprographics, read it in the yellow pages.
Q: And?
A: This is one of the distinctive aesthetic openings of the copier. For instance, the way it creates an edge
to a shape. It’s never a straight line, every edge reflects in detail the magnetic waves, their interaction
with the shape and disposition of the toner particles. The particles of toner themselves are also
designed specifically for every copier, the temperatures it uses, the spaces between components.
So this edge, its like some coastline, wrinkled, poking fingers out over its edge. Mark Pawson
photocopied these edges, over and over. They split up, broke off from the solid they clung to, span,
became islands, grew. With every enlargement they mutated like an evolutionary cycle. This was an
artificial life game performed under conditions supplied by the material qualities of the copier. Patches
of breeding carbon hooked into an escalating and unpredictable cycle of blobbing and splitting. There’s
no bit-mapping, because every point – which is never a point, because it’s never in relation to a gridding
– is the absolute size of a particle of the mildly carcenogenic dust ate up and baked on inside the copier.
You look at especially older photocopies and you can see the toner mounded up in pocks and ridges
away from the paper. Or some work where the sheet is repeatedly fed through the process, layers like
pastry. In ‘John and Other Storys’ and elsewhere, the nine archive of photocopied pages, Graham
Harwood used the photocopier’s way of finding an edge to set up patterns. Chester Carlson used
repetition to create an opening in the use of his time by the bureaucracy, and also to create an escapechute in the golden time of the great inventor. There’s an exit route too into the purple velvet lounging
garments, luxe cheroots and cold flats to be found in art, that’s Harwood. But the repetition. Take an
icon, Winston Churchill, a label off a can of baked beans, some Neue Sachlichkeit muscle-boy flexing on
a spanner, a hand up against the platen, pores turned into deep pits of black, bleaches and blotches
making up a limb, three-dimensions to a depth of focus of five mill then flattened out flat. Take it, repeat
it. Find the edge of the thing. Cut out with scissors, do the same again. Put them in rows, rotate around
an axis. Find a space and fill it with miniaturising recursions of the same image until the picture clots
together so much that it gets back to blobness.
A halftone screen off a newspaper picture, all the dots are already breaking things up, you feed it
through a copier, again and again and its reality begins to distort.
Q: So were there any copiers built especially for people who want to mess with the mechanism?
A: In the early days, before the thing became a standardised process. But there are some examples
since. Esther Yates a mail artist from Durham adapted an Epson 7500 she found on the tip. A series of
gearings intersected with the normal mechanism. They were controlled manually by a pair of levers. By
means of these she could control the speed and depth of movement of the scanning beam and also the
rate of rotation of the drum. In this way she was able to replicate the effects of swishing the original
across the platen without having to touch it. Messing with the drum set up weird ‘patching’ effects.
Still, it’s not like an interactive screen or a painting, you have a delay before you get the results.
Of course, by the time it got to laser copies, colour, companies such as Canon, who were at least straight
up about it, starting building in standardised versions of the advanced and home-made techniques of
copier artists and others mucking about. Effects crossed over from there to gridded space – the ability to
specify particular points on the platen as opposed to dealing with the moving line under the glass.
Q: But you don’t use toner. Inkjet.
A: Yesterday I copied someone some pages from a book. It was a typology of every cloud over Holland. I
noticed that up in the sky, as the clouds move over the land from the North Sea, suddenly the land gives
way, lies down, settles its spine into a straight line. The land drops to ten feet below sea level. At this
point, the clouds feel their bodies swell into the extra space. They take on new shapes, become lower
and taller, spill. I can recognise that this is what happens to us. Every photocopier is always a cloud.
What I mean is that the shape of us changes all the time. A pressure drop, a new technology, and we
sprout an email. Look at this terminal I’m wearing here, a three line screen and a palmtop keyboard.
Ecch. No-one has ever used it.
Q: So where’s the war or art there?
A: They are ways of generating, wasting or displacing forces, just like weather, with the exception that
they insist on the vanity of purposefulness. They speed it up. These forces are contained in the
predispositions of organised matter, that is to say from geology to culture, and the ways, at every scale,
that they create patterns of interference within and between each other.
At particular scales of resolution there are certain patterns, such as armies and their means of feeding
off their host societies, that attempt to contain this interference, to lock it into step. It is at this point
that technologies for creating such repetitions, such as photocopiers, are generated. In turn, these
technologies create new possibilities for the circulation, creation and reverberation of forces that add to
the potential for destabilisation. They contain within them an unconscious, in the case of the
photocopier, drives for the escape from work – as with Chester Carlson. This machine unconscious is a
set of potentials which simply need realignment and combination with other elements in order to tip
things in the lock step out of balance. A machine that can only make copies becomes a means for
making things different. Obviously this is an absurd effort. But it’s the absurdity that has it on the side of
escape. How does this technology reduce work?
Q: Don’t make me laugh.
Matthew Fuller, Interview with a Photocopier. In Datacide 9, 2006