HYBRIS nr 22 (2013)
ISSN: 1689-4286
RAFAŁ ILNICKI
UNIWERSYTET IM. ADAMA MICKIEWICZA W POZNANIU
CYBERPHILOSOPHY — OUTSIDERS OF BODY AND
THOUGHT
[Nick Land, Fanged Noumena. Collected Writings 1987–2007,
Falmouth-New York: Urbanomic 2011]
I have found out about existence of Nick Land by Internet search.
What stroke me the most, was that fresh neo-deleuzian/neo-guattarian
language mixed up with cybernetic vocabulary. After receiving this
book I thought that all the articles will be written like this and even I
could find a creative development of such an application of language. I
was not disappointed, but either I haven’t felt intellectual satisfaction.
First essays are from history of philosophy. They do not
introduce original thought, but the composition and language itself is
very interesting. Land’s reading of Georges Bataille, Friedrich Nietzsche,
Immanuel Kant is proper, but unfortunately I can see no newness, no
own interpretation, just pointing out what have been accomplished by
“philosophical giants”. There are many brilliant assumptions, many
shortcuts that expanded could give rise to very original problems, but
this is the specificity of Land’s writing style — poetic, cybernetic, and
what is most important — unwilling to force itself under the strict
criteria of academia writing. There are footnotes, references, erudition
data, but reader must be feeling like approaching distant planet,
because of excessive usage of unpopular words, aphoristic summation
and metaphors. Thus I don’t find it faulty, but rather in terms of
constant experimentation.
I would like to focus on Land’s notion of artificial death, which is
represented by Synthanatos (p. 326). He states that this concept
represents virtual machinic circuits, in which time can’t occur. In this
sense, he encompasses, Synthanathos as an function of unconscious is
Rafał Ilnicki
Cyberphilosophy – Outsiders of Body and Space
timeless. This passage is very Deleuzian — one may say, that as all
Land’s writings, but this fragment especially resembles passages from
Difference and Repetition. What is most important and worthy
mentioning — synthetic death is today’s quest for immortality.
Although I don’t have intellectual satisfaction from this passage,
because Land jumps from one conclusion to another without expanding
his thought and arguments. So there is a benefit and a loss from being
academic outsider — if not in the sense of complete depart from
university, then in weaker meaning as one that don’t have to use all the
methods of history of philosophy validated by local scientific
committees. We should remember about Land’s writing style —
philosophically infused, but essayistic. Returning to the concept of
Synthanathos — I can’t fully agree with Land’s assumption, that
“Inorganic Thanathos wrecks order, organic Eros preserves it, and as
carbon-dominium is softened-up by machine plague, deterritorializing
replicants of nomad-cyberrevolution close in upon the
reterritotrializing reproducers of the sedentary human security system,
hacking into the macropod” (p. 330). I think that Land misses one thing
— when talking about cybernetics and using it as an method such a
binary oppositions wouldn’t be necessary, because all that is would be
located as an bio-technical form. So as in the material, visible, machinic
plane of existence, same “laws” should inherit obligation to cross basic
distinctions for life/death, organism/inorganic, living/machine and so
on. Ludwig Wittgenstein said that “philosophical problems arise when
language goes on holiday”. Land’s language haven’t been anywhere but
in holidays. It’s not an accusation, but exposing a plain fact, when we
use technical methods of expressing our thought and ideas, we have to
look into consequences of such a freedom of articulations of relation
between philosophical, psychoanalytical and cybernetic terms. His
literary style is very smooth and surely there is no re-mixing concepts
from mentioned disciplines to delude potential reader.
Although there are too much metaphors, not literally, but when
Land uses philosophical and cybernetics notions and combines them I
could not get the impression, that essence of this writing is pure
metaphoric with a little or none reference to the external world, where
real-material technologies (even considered in their ontological and
metaphysical function) interact at the plane of existence.
[123]
Rafał Ilnicki
Cyberphilosophy – Outsiders of Body and Space
In the essay Cybergothic Land’s focus goes to the hybridization of
opposite domains of reality. First of all he states that “Anthropomorphic
surplus-value is not analytically extricable from transhuman
machineries” (p. 347). So the tendency of transhumanization have not
only begun, but became inseparable from, what we could name —
transcendental imagination. Whenever (trans)human thinks about his
being in the world, he makes a reference to the transhuman state of his
body and mind. This is important, because the problem is not
delineated to the future, but radically close to our contemporary
existence. We could ask if we are still human in such a circumstance?
Before giving and reply we must consider what folds to this state. Land
asserts that “Markets, desire and science fiction are all parts of the
infrastructure” (p. 347). So we are speaking about industrialization of
imagination, that is already implemented in our transhuman futures
and serves as reservoir for our fate scenarios. Such a postapocalyptic
approach definitely is unique and important, because it reveals that
transhumanism as an movement opposed to humanism or
posthumanism is basically a metaphysical tendency no more than it is a
technological one.
Concluding — Land’s work plays for me, and I assume that other
readers will find it intellectually satisfactory in the same way, a role of
inspiration. When I’m reading Land a thought comes to my mind, that I
have read it or heard it before, but speaking in his unique manner there
is a kind of newness present in the process of mental working through
of his imaginative style. I recommend this book not only to Gilles
Deleuze and Felix Guattari scholars, but to all which want to acquire
new schemata, see that things could be expressed differently. In this
collection of essays there are many crystals of thought, that explode
with interesting ideas and conclusion. Lands writing is an unique
phenomenon, which shouldn’t be omitted or forgotten.
[124]