Shanzhai: China’s Collaborative Electronics-Design
Ecosystem
theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2014/05/chinas-mass-production-system/370898
May 18, 2014
Technology
In Shenzhen, there are hundreds of smart watches, not just design prototypes. Here's
why.
By Silvia Lindtner, Anna Greenspan, and David Li
Silvia Lindtner
May 18, 2014
Saved Stories
Cyberspace, both as word and as vision, entered the popular lexicon through William
Gibson’s 1984 cyberpunk novel Neuromancer. But as it turns out, Gibson wasn’t
interested in the Internet until he started buying watches on Ebay. In a 1999 Wired
article, he details his compulsive addiction to bidding for vintage mechanical watches—
what Gibson calls “fine fossils of a predigital age.” Little did Gibson know that thirty years
after Neuromancer, watches and cyberspace would fuse—not only because it is now
commonplace to buy watches online, but also thanks to “smart watches” set to become the
latest portal into cyberspace.
1/8
That smart watches might usher in the next wave of techno-gadgetry should come as no
surprise. Watches have long been low-hanging fruit for the fantasy coupling of networks,
bodies, and objects, now known as ubiquitous computing (ubicomp) or the Internet of
Things (IoT). For centuries, the wristwatch has been the only widespread wearable
technology (besides glasses, which are also in the process of becoming “smart”). Mark
Weiser’s article The Computer of the 21st century, which is often credited with
spearheading the field of ubiquitous computing, begins with the sentence: “The most
profound technologies are those that disappear.” Watches are deeply familiar, pervasive
and essential to daily life, and as such the perfect instance of that adage. When someone
stops to ask if you have the time, the answer comes automatically. Andy Clark calls the act
“one of the most characteristic movements of the modern world.” With the watch,
technology disappears; what we see is the time. Watches, Clark writes, are the most
“humble examples of cyborg technology” symbolizing the inevitable transition to
technological transparency.
Today, one of the most visible smart watches is Pebble, which retails for about $200. For
the burgeoning hardware start up scene, Pebble is a triumph. After failing to attract
traditional investors, Pebble received most of its funding from a record-setting $10
million Kickstarter campaign.
Pebble Technology
But a less virtual reality lurks behind the crowdsourcing success. Once the Kickstarter
campaign ended, Pebble had effectively promised to ship over 50,000 watches, a volume
that was far beyond the company’s previous experience. So Pebble CEO Eric Migicovsky
2/8
came to the Southern Chinese city of Shenzhen, the global hub of electronic
manufacturing, to bring the product to market at scale.
Some think that ramping up production is just a matter of spending more money to
receive more goods, but the transition from making a few things to making many things is
not a simple or easy one. Migicovsky encountered a string of problems and delays in the
assembly and manufacturing process, which led to late shipments, disappointed
customers, and bad PR. Migicovsky seems to have considered manufacture late in the
process, only after the completion of the initial prototype used to pitch his Kickstarter
horde. Transitioning to commercial scale was thus seen as an uncreative process of mere
execution. As a result, Pebble didn’t pay enough attention or respect to the system of trial
and error experimentation embedded in the manufacturing culture of Shenzhen.
A different story emerges in the burgeoning wearable electronics market of Southern
China, one that is based on a rapid, flexible and open ecosystem called shanzhai 山寨.
Take, World Peace Industrial (WPI), a Taiwanese electronic sourcing company located in
Shenzhen, as an example. The company’s application technology unit (ATU) spends
millions annually to develop reference circuit boards, called gongban 公板 (“public
board”). A gongban can be used by a variety of different companies, who either
incorporate it in their products directly or build atop it as they please via modifications.
ATU develops 130 gongbans annually in areas ranging from smart phones, tablets, smart
watches, smart homes, and industrial controls—and distributes the designs for free. WPI
then makes money by trading in the boards’ components.
"We call this shanzhai in Shenzhen. It’s a mass production artwork,” explains Lawrence
Lin head of the Application Technology Unit at WPI. Thirty some companies in Shenzhen
are shipping their own smart watches with gongban from ATU and gongmo (‘public
case’) sourced from the massive shanzhai ecosystem, which consists of tens of thousands
of companies that manufacture and distribute goods.
Shanzhai used to refer to knock-off retail, and later end-consumer electronics, such as
mobile phones of major brands like Nokia, Motorola and Ericson, often specifically
designed for non-Western markets in China, South East Asia, South America, the Middle
East and Africa. The ecosystem grew rapidly and by 2010, it was producing 200 million
phones annually and was responsible for a quarter of the global mobile phone market.
Since then, the shanzhai ecology has moved beyond cloning and enabled a wealth of
iterative innovations including dual-SIM for frequent travelers to avoid roaming charges,
seven-speaker phones for workers to listen to music at construction sites, and customdesigned phones for migrant populations unable to afford the latest smartphone.
In the emerging area of smart watches, WPI and other solution houses
create gongban, which provide common electronic functions including Bluetooth
connectivity to mobile phones, and sensors to measure the wearers' movement, as well as
monitor heart rate and other vital bodily statistics. These gongban are designed to fit into
a variety of gongmo that are ready to be branded on order. The flexibility to mix and
3/8
match gongban and gongmo enable companies to quickly put together their own smart
watches with customized functions and styles for various niche markets. Today,
customers of WPI ship close to 100,000 smart watches per month.
A smart watch depicting gongban, the board, and gongmo, the casings(Anna Greenspan)
For years now, mobile- and smart phones have challenged watches’ monopoly on timekeeping. But what seemed like a shift may soon prove an anomaly. Among youth, even the
basic “dumb” watches have come back in to style. Unlike tablets or smart phones, watches
bear the status of a relic, fossils of a pre-digital age William Gibson thrust upon them. The
world doesn’t need a company like Apple to define the form or style of a watch. Rather,
watches draw on a long history of rich and varied designs (from the elegance of fine
jewelry to the useful, playful or funky cheap accessory). Therefore, they have the potential
to counter a scarcity of design, in which wearable “smart devices” come from engineers
rather than fashion designers or jewelry makers.
We may soon see many more designers from all over the world come to Shenzhen to
harness its vast, open, experimental manufacturing culture to make their creations
intelligent. After visiting the recent Shenzhen Maker Faire, Make magazine founder Dale
Dougherty noted that “because the resources for making anything are so widely available
in China and the expertise is so broad, they are hungry for new ideas and they can turn
them into products faster than anywhere.” Smart watches could do more than spearhead
the next wave of technology. They might also change the ways in which technologies are
created as well as the culture and geographies within which they are produced.
4/8
Clocks were invented in China in the eleventh century, but their true power was not
unleashed until three hundred years later when the technology was rediscovered in
Europe. The first of these machines, the mechanical clock, severed time from the events
that occurred inside it. Clocks unhinged temporality from the movements of the planets,
the cyclic repetition of seasons and the light/dark rhythms of the days. Absent this spatial
and qualitative bias, clock time became distinct from the rituals and rhythms of
traditional life. In the words of social historian Lewis Mumford, clocks became the “key
machine of the modern industrial age,” producing an abstract, ordered, and scientifically
measurable model of time within which life could be structured, disciplined, and
rationalized.
Today, we are at the cusp of another revolution in time-keeping technology. The process
through which clocks become intelligent will involve an engagement between China and
the world, but this time a synchronized one. In a globalized world, which now keeps the
same time, products emerge simultaneously in several places at once. The development of
smart watches requires more intimate connections between those who design new
products (wherever they may be) and the Chinese ecosystem of mass manufacturing that
knows how to produce them at scale. This new relationship, which is only now being
forged, is poised to change the development of smart devices of the future.
This post is based on research from the Intel Science and Technology Center for Social
Computing
Silvia Lindtner is a research scientist at the University of California, Irvine, and at Fudan
University, Shanghai. She is a co-founder of Hacked Matter, a research hub focused on
technological production in China.
Anna Greenspan is a professor of urbanism and digital culture at NYU Shanghai. She is a
co-founder of Hacked Matter, a research hub focused on technological production in
China.
David Li is the co-founder of XinCheJian, the first hackerspace in China. He is also a cofounder of Hacked Matter, a research hub focused on technological production in China.
Most Popular
1. Do Not Allow Even One Fruit Fly Into Your Kitchen Compost
Collecting food scraps in your kitchen can invite insect invaders. But there are
plenty of ways to outsmart them.
Katherine J. Wu
5/8
2. The New Pro-life Movement Has a Plan to End Abortion
And it doesn’t care if American voters don’t agree with it.
Elaine Godfrey
3. Fox News Lost the Lawsuit but Won the War
The network will pay $787.5 million to Dominion Voting Systems as the price of
retaining its audience.
David A. Graham
4. California Isn’t Special
No one wants “California-style” housing prices. But the state’s policies are not
unique.
Jerusalem Demsas
6/8
5. Nutrition Research Forgot About Dads
When it comes to their influence on kids’ eating habits, dads are far less studied
than moms. But they may leave just as big a mark.
Virginia Sole-Smith
6. What Your Favorite Personality Test Says About You
Are you a Myers-Briggs person, an Enneagram person, or something else? The
Atlantic made a quiz to help you find out.
Kelly Conaboy
7. The Fox Lawsuit Was Never Going to Save America
The only real solution is to prevent those operating under delusions, or the
politicians beholden to them, from wielding power.
Adam Serwer
10.
9.
8.
7/8
Make your inbox more interesting.
Each weekday evening, get an overview of the day’s biggest news, along with fascinating
ideas, images, and people. See more newsletters
Ideas that matter.
Subscribe and support over 160 years of independent journalism.
Subscribe
8/8