Space is for peopleNick Land / text
P. 1
The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20130705162258/http://app1.chinadaily.com.cn/star/2003/1016/vo2-1.…
Space is for people
Shanghai Star. 2003-10-16
By Nick Land
"The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways; the point,
however, is to change it." These words from Karl Marx's "Theses on
Feuerbach", if twisted in an extraterrestrial direction, take on a special
pertinence in the age of space exploration.
They provoke the question: Does the human species have merely scientific
and speculative interests in the remainder of the solar system, or does it also
have practical interests there - development prospects in the most expansive
sense?
During the early years of space flight, dominated by the US-Soviet "space
race" both scientific and economic considerations were eclipsed by military
and diplomatic issues; missile technology and international prestige. While
astronauts became popular heroes in both societies, and throughout the
world, little seemed to have been achieved by sending people into space,
beyond the narrow confines of "rocket science" itself.
To date, the enduring economic benefits of space flight have been almost
exclusively focused in the area of communication satellites, where a human
payload is entirely unnecessary.
In respect to science, as well, critics of human space flight seem to have an
impeccable case. Robot probes and landers make far more efficient
information gathering tools than people, since human beings are not only
bulky and awkward in themselves, but also require elaborate life-support
systems, exacting safety standards and retrieval strategies. Seen more
positively, space exploration has provided a powerful impetus to - and
playground for - the development of robotics.
If extraterrestrial space were no more than an immense and fascinating
scientific object, the dismissal of manned spaceflight as a political stunt would
probably be impossible to counter. Such a perspective, however, is far too
limited to be accepted uncritically. "Outer space" is inextricably connected to
human - and trans-human - prospects even wider than the accumulation of
knowledge, marking a social frontier of unbounded potentiality for liberty,
development, practical experimentation and the transformation of nature
(including human nature itself).
Countless multitudes worldwide will celebrate China's bold venture into orbit
as an event marking a new wave of productive space competition, a global
expansion and deepening of human exploratory ambitions. These untold
millions will not merely be rejecting the narrow utilitarianism of elite - or
contemplative - space science. More comprehensively they will be renewing
their sense of participation in a tide of life, intelligence and freedom
implacably opposed to limitation and rigid constraint, drawn irresistibly to a
horizon of yet unimagined possibilities.
It is perhaps too conspiratorial to describe the US space agency NASA as a
bureaucratic institution relentlessly dedicated to keeping people out of space,
but such a judgment is far from being entirely false. It will require far greater
competition, both international and commercial, to ensure that extraterrestrial
expanses are conceived once again as places for the human species to grow
and change, rather than merely as a panorama to observe with ever more
ingenious instruments.