CONTENT
2
XENOGENDER
Dan Wu
12
KINSHIP:
TOWARDS A XENO THEORY OF RELATIONALITY
Alice Escorel Boudreau
18
REASON ≈ INSTRUMENTALITY
Roland Mbessa
26
BIRTH OF XENO
Ghalas Charara
42
LILITH AND THE JUDAS GOAT:
A XENO-PROCESS OF FORMATION
Marguerite Davenport
54
TRAPS IN THE LOOP:
INSTRUMENTAL THINKING
Joo Young Hwang
64
LEARN AND RUN!
THE DEVIATION OF HUMAN NATURE
Nadia Elamly
76
LABYRINTH:
THE STRUGGLING NOT AGAINST NONHUMAN ALIENS,
BUT AGAINST HUMANITY’S OWN KIND
Léa Gallon
82
DEONTOLOGIZING HUMANITY
Fatima Wegmann Guinassi
90
ALIEN-HUMAN EROTICS IN OCTAVIA BUTLER’S DAWN
Chloe Sugden
100
RECIPROCATION FIELD
Laila Torres Mendieta
106
‘YOUR BODY SAID ONE THING. YOUR WORDS
SAID ANOTHER.’
Maïté Chénière
112
XENO-KNOWLEDGE
Shima Asa
ALIEN COMMUNITY
HUMAN COMMUNITY
MALE / FEMALE / OLOOI / NEW HUMAN GENDER
MALE / FEMALE
denaturalization
neurochemical modification
NEW HUMAN
GENE TRADER
XENOPHOBIC
attempt failed
attempt to conform
3
KODWO ESHUN AND DAN WU’S DISCUSSION ABOUT
OOLOI [ALL EMPHASIS ADDED]
Dan: So, here is my diagram: XENOGENDER, in which I study
the gender attributes of ooloi in Lilith’s Brood. Before I start
to talk about my diagram, I would like to ask some questions
that arose while I read the book regarding what exactly the
ooloi is. Let’s look at the end of p.21, where Jdahya talked
about the ooloi for the first time. He says:
‘My relative is not male—or female. The name for its
sex is ooloi. It understood your body because it is ooloi.
On your world there were vast numbers of dead and
dying humans to study. Our ooloi came to understand
what could be normal or abnormal, possible or impossible for the human body. The ooloi who went to the
planet taught those who stayed here. My relative has
studied your people for much of its life’
Then, he continues to explain how ooloi study:
‘They observe. They have special organs for their kind of
observation. My relative examined you, observed a few of
your normal body cells, compared them with what it had
learned from other humans most like you, and said you
had not only cancer, but a talent for cancer. […] Maybe
perceiving would be a better word…’
Well, from these excerpts, the point which confuses me regards ooloi attributes. As I understand it, human gender
is an attribute of the human body, as in when we say ‘she is
female’ and ‘he is male’. But when Jdahya talked about ooloi,
it sounds to me like he is talking about a special, separate
kind of being. It’s like an ‘it’. But in fact, ooloi is the third gender
of oankali. So it is a kind of attribute, right?
Kodwo: Yes… What he is talking about is the fact that ooloi
have special qualities: ‘They have special organs for observation’. This is what ooloi do, they have a special capacity,
or perception for studying. […] In human terms, they are neutral, they are not female or male. Of course, Oankali is not
really female or male either, but ooloi are some kind of OTHER
GENDER. And in the book, this question of different sex is
denaturalized. This means the relation of sex to gender is one
that cannot be understood in terms of a so called ‘natural
relationship’, so the relation between sex and gender undergoes denaturalization. This means you can’t differentiate
10
gender from sex, and you don’t understand what gender is
anymore, and you don’t understand what sex is anymore. And
that is related to not understanding what a body is anymore.
So this is the ooloi. The ooloi is sex, gender and body denaturalized. The oankali are as well, but the ooloi are even
more so. So this is the point of the book, which is these aliens,
oankali, ooloi, these aliens are something like thought experiments in denaturalization. An alien is an experiment, a fictional
experiment in thought. So, that’s why it’s difficult to understand what’s going on here. What you describe is one example,
or a case. So, in your statement, these questions of sex and
gender have to be related to this question. This is the most
important process in the book: denaturalization. Or we can put
it in another way, you can say:
ontology = being;
ontogenesis = becoming;
deontologization = the undoing of being.
So, it’s ontology unbound. So all of these questions: sex,
gender, attributes, qualities, capacities, individualities, all
of these are undergoing denaturalization. This means that
they now operate differently, under different rules, under
different conditions in different way. So the point is denaturalization—it’s easy to understand it in terms of, say, the
environment, if we say the environment is being denaturalized, it’s clear that the environment is changing, it’s much
harder to understand the denaturalization of sex and gender
and qualities and capacities. It’s difficult for humans to
grasp the denaturalization of the human. And so this is why
the ooloi are so fascinating, […] the ooloi are a study in
denaturalization, they are the denaturalized parts of the denaturalized part. They are the super-denaturalized element.
Because the oankali are already denaturalized, but the
ooloi are the most alien of the alien, they are like the aliens
of the aliens.
Dan: Oh… The aliens of aliens!
Kodwo: Yes, that’s what they are.
XENOGENDER
This diagram is actually a summary statement. It’s an
example which shows why and how the Human community
and Alien community try to change each other’s gender
status, and what the subsequent result is. The relation between Oankali and Human is opposition and unification.
They resist each other, but they also need each other. So,
I chose the element from Taijitu (Yin Yang Symbol) to represent these two communities. Here, I classify the gendermodified human as alien. I call them the ‘new human being’.
The Oankali form new human beings whose gender is fluid.
However, the new human beings’ fluid gender troubles the
‘human resisters’ in the story because most of them still
think gender has to be stable. The ‘human resisters’ notion
of gender as a stable attribute compels them to regulate
every subject whose gender is different from theirs. Humanity
is intrinsically xenophobic1. The Human community cannot
understand or perceive the gender fluidity of the Oankali, nor
do they understand ooloi’s sex attributes. Then, the stable
gender human attempts to conform the gender-fluid humans
whose gender had been modified by Oankali, but those
attempts fail.
Then, what made new human beings gender-fluid? I believe
it was the ooloi’s attributes. Frida Beckman, in her book
Deleuze and Sex, describes concretely how the ooloi operate
in Oankali’s sex relations and how the ooloi connect Oankali
and human bodies. She says:
‘Male and female Oankali have two arms, but ooloi have
an additional two “sensory arms” through which they can
form direct neurochemical connections with humans
and other Oankali. Via these connection, ooloi are able
to heal, modify human anatomy, perform genetic repairs,
and bring about interspecies reproduction. During neurochemical contact with an ooloi, the ooloi secretes an
“ooloi substance”, which imparts intense pleasure to humans and Oankali alike, while at the same time instilling
deep bonds of attachment, which Lilith describes at one
point as “literal, physical addiction to another person”.
The reproductive unit in the creation of “constructs”
consists of a male-female human couple, a male-female
Oankali couple (typically siblings), and an ooloi, both
couples profoundly bonded to the ooloi, and the group
of five functioning as a monogamous pentad (if one can
speak of monogamy in such a configuration). Sexual
contact between the human male and female takes place
only through the ooloi’s simultaneous neurochemical
manipulation of the couple, who do not physically touch
one another; the same is true of the Oankali couple’s
sexual interaction with the ooloi. Through contact with its
mates, the ooloi extracts semen and ova from the human
couple, extracts comparable substances (never specified)
from the Oankali couple, creates optimal mixtures of
the extracted genetic materials, and then implants one
embryo in the human female and another in the Oankali
female (since the human couple and the Oankali couple
do not have sex with the ooloi at the same time, it is not
clear precisely when the embryos are implanted, whether
during subsequent sexual contact or while the ooloi is
connected to the female alone in some sexual or nonsexual way).’
By reading her description we can better understand the left
part (Alien community) of my diagram. The Oankali are natural
genetic engineers, and are driven to seek out new lifeforms
and trade with them in order to keep themselves from overspecializing and stagnating. Oankali are gene traders. The
ooloi puncture and inject neuro-chemical material into the
human body with their ‘sensory arms’ in order to modify
humans’ genes. Ooloi denaturalize the human body, and then
form new human beings whose gender is fluid, unstable,
and have the same gender status as the aliens by the second
penetration of Oankali body. It is the super-denaturalization.
Via this example I want to point out this question about ooloi’s
gender attributes:
ooloi = xenogender = new human + ooloi + new human
alien = oankali = denaturalization
ooloi = alien of alien » undergoing denaturalization
ooloi + human = new human » the becoming alien of gender
{new human + ooloi + new human}
= {new human + alien of alien + new human » gender outside
of the natural order of gender}
= superdenaturalization = xenogender
Dan Wu
1. ‘A true xenophobia—and apparently she was not alone in it.’ p.23
11
KINSHIP:
TOWARDS A XENO THEORY OF RELATIONALITY
The previous diagram takes the point of view of the Oankali
and demonstrates that their notions of kin are fluid. The
diagram represents Oankali kinship formation from an Oankali point of view. To the Oankali, both their interrelations
and intrarelations are reciprocal relations formed through
acquisition. Acquisition takes on new meaning from the Xeno
perspective of the Oankali. The non-hierarchic and xenophilliac characteristics of Oankali society open up the concepts of kinship, reciprocity, and acquisition. When Lilith
asks Jdahya, ‘are they plant or animal?’ referring to the ship,
she receives the mystifying answer ‘both, and more’. This
excerpt is demonstrative of the blurred hierarchies and boundaries that most humans hold between Human, Animal, Plant,
and Mineral. Whereas humans would create hierarchies
between cell, tissue, organ, organ system of the organism
to understand the level of importance, the Oankali do not
appear to make this distinction/differentiation which demonstrates their non-hierarchic worldview. Oankali relationalities
are ones humans would understand as symbiosis. This is described through/with their relation with the ship, their place
of dwelling, their source of nourishment, transportation, and
survival which simultaneously, is dependent on its Oankali
kin for survival. The relation between the Oankali and the ship
is one of mutuality, reciprocity, and interdependence:
‘There is an affinity, but it is biological—a strong symbiotic
relationship. We serve the ship’s needs and it serves ours.’
Going on to describe the interdependence, ‘It would die
without us and we would be planet-bound without it’. The
Oankali have a ship growing tradition and they pass down
ships from generation to generation. Their ancestors grew
their ship and they have the responsibility of growing
another ship for their descendants. This implies that this
giving life fosters a relation of mutuality, also described
as love: ‘The human doctor used to say it loved us’.
Oankali’s xenophiliac drive is alluded to throughout the book
and is demonstrated by their ability and need to make kin
with non-Oankali beings. Their very existence depends on
acquiring Xeno DNA from humans who in turn survive beyond
Humanicide. Therefore, Oankalis intra and inter relations are
ones of acquisition. In other words, the ship and the human
kinship ties are forged by Oankali acquisition. However, in
a non-hierarchical/egalitarian society acquisition becomes
Xeno and pushes the limits of our understanding of acqui16
sitional/reciprocal relationality. The common understanding
of acquisition is one of an uneven dominant-submissive
binary between the acquiree and the acquired. The act of
acquiring from Oankali worldview is a simultaneous act
of survival, where mutually beneficial inter and intra relations
are formed. Acquisitional relationality becomes a relation
where the power struggle between acquiree and the acquired
dissolve into acquiree/acquiree or between acquired/acquired. Oankali kinship is fluid and xenophillac begging the
rethinking of acquisitional/reciprocal relationality within
a non-hierarchical Xeno society.
Alice Boudreau
REASON ≈ INSTRUMENTALITY
In Octavia Butler’s Lilith’s Brood trilogy, Lilith Iyapo, an African
American woman, awakens in a cell many centuries after
the human race has effectively destroyed itself with nuclear
weapons. She, together with a small number of other survivors, have been taken by a nomadic alien species called
the Oankali. That species is searching the universe for new
genetic information to keep evolving in order to expand their
intelligence. Now the last number of humans must combine
their DNA with the alien in order to redesign a new race purged
of humanity’s self-destructive, hierarchical tendencies. Lilith,
the chosen one, must become the mother of a new (in)-human
race in order for humans to survive, in whatever form, on Earth.
Humans have an incredible potential—cancer. The Oankali, the
gene traders, who trade themselves through the Ooloi have
an interest in cancer. The Ooloi perceives the cancer as a way
for their species to evolve.
Aside from cancer, humanity also has a mismatched pair of
genetic characteristics: hierarchy and intelligence. These two
together led the world to humanicide. For Jdahya, cancer
and the two characteristics are similar and because of that,
humanity has to reexamine itself periodically as long as
it possesses these incompatible characteristics. Hierarchy
is the older of the two terrestrial characteristics. The problem
with humanity occurred and occurs when human intelligence
serves hierarchy instead of guiding it.
In my diagram, for Lilith the dotted lines represent the possibility of a future that can or cannot happen because she
serves the intelligence and the Oankali at the same time.
How to show the distinction between serving and guiding?
My diagram does not have arrows so that we read every
vector, every line, in two ways: does intelligence serve hierarchy or does intelligence guide hierarchy? Does hierarchy
guide intelligence or does hierarchy serve intelligence?
There are four relations here and we do not know which one
is on top because they are co-constitutive—they are coupled
together. What is the nature of this coupling?
Intelligence is always coupled with hierarchy but is this coupling a serving hierarchy or a guiding hierarchy? Is intelligence
serving or guiding? This is a complex question. On top of hier24
archy, Octavia Butler imposes serving-guiding. So we have
intelligence-hierarchy and serving-guiding.
Roland Mbessa
BIRTH OF XENO
This diagram grapples with the impossibility of narrating the
becoming xenophile of Lilith. Throughout Dawn, and more
precisely in the first two parts, Womb and Family, I tracked
and collected the changing terms, attributes or nouns Lilith
the narrator uses to designate herself in her relationship with
the Oankali. Her reflections and self-redefinition each time
follow an exchange with them or an action that repositions
her in the power structure. Beyond the move from object to
subject and her regaining—always relatively—her agency, she
also lives a new, developing relationship towards herself,
triangulating between the Oankali and other humans.
I hesitated to do a timeline, but the words figured here do not
punctuate specific moments of the narrative but infuse it as
they fluctuate in and out from her interior monologues to her
loud addresses. This movement is a word-becoming, Lilith’s
lexicogenesis where terms breed and couple in an effort to
enact a more complex definition of Lilith as seen by Lilith.
From a reactive position she slowly learns to view herself recursively. Could the genesis of the Xeno be the birth of Lilith
to herself, finally becoming her own mother?
Ghalas Charara
40
LILITH AND THE JUDAS GOAT:
A XENO-PROCESS OF FORMATION
In Octavia Butler’s Dawn, Lilith refers to herself and is likened
to a Judas goat, a biblical reference to an animal trained to
associate with sheep or goats, often to lead them to slaughter.
The diagram examines this xeno-process of formation, in
which Lilith, under conditions of abduction by the Oankali,
moves from states of homophily towards states of xenophily,
or in this case, her reference to the Judas goat. Specifically the scene in which Lilith notices and asks for objects,
utensils and access to artifacts of her history to record
or ‘learn’, which are represented in the diagram by a state
of homophily or familiarity, are denied by the Oankali. Lilith’s
denied access to these objects and artifacts of familiarity
is represented in the diagram as examples of erasure of her
history, which are strategic in her xeno-process of formation
by the Oankali, and a specificity of her alienation.
The diagram is specific to the scene in which Lilith asks Nikanj
to see the records, such as books, tapes, disks and films that the
Oankali kept of people’s ‘history, medicine, language, science’,
which Nikanj denies. Lilith states that ‘the Oankali had removed her so completely from her own people-only to tell her
they planned to use her as a Judas goat. And they had
done it all so softly, without brutality, and with patience and
gentleness so corrosive of any resolve on her part’ (p.67).
Although her alienation is intentionally ‘soft, patient and
without brutality’, her process of formation is under a violent
condition of abduction. Octavia Butler’s text questions the
erasure of history under conditions of abduction in the formation of Lilith as the Judas goat, through an ongoing process
of alienation from records, language tools, cultural objects and
artifacts. The diagram illustrates how the process of formation
in this scene of the book is relational to the xeno or outside
becoming, the birth of the outside, or direct encounter with
the outside’ in Dawn.
Marguerite Davenport
52
TRAPS IN THE LOOP:
INSTRUMENTAL THINKING
∞ FUTURE
OANKALI
ENTRY POINT TO VIOLENCE & TRAPS
LILITH
PAUL
T1
OANKALI’S TRAP FOR PAUL & LILITH
T2
PAUL’S TRAP FOR LILITH
T3
LILITH’S TRAP FOR PAUL
54
TRAPS IN THE LOOP:
INSTRUMENTAL THINKING
Paul is the first human Lilith encounters on the Oankali’s ship.
The Oankali set them to meet each other in order for them
to mate. However, Lilith refuses and Paul violently tries to rape
her. Throughout and after the rape attempt, Paul sets traps
for Lilith by preemptively considering the Oankali’s perspective
about them and instrumentally using that to manipulate Lilith
into behaving in a certain way.
There are three traps:
1. The Oankali set a trap for Lilith and Paul to try and get
them to mate so that the Oankali can have true trade.
2. By understanding themselves as instruments of the Oankali, Paul tries to set a trap for Lilith to get her to behave
in a way that the Oankali would not expect. Paul’s preemptive understanding of the Oankali’s perspective about
them is that theirs is a hunter’s perspective of a prey,
which Paul in turn attempts to instrumentalize.
3. Lilith sets a trap for Paul by convincing him of the high
probability that some of the females that he has impregnated are his relatives.
Paul Titus hadn’t had any encounters with women for mating.
However, he fell into Lilith’s trap nonetheless, becoming
shocked with the possibility of having engaged in the anthropological taboo of incest—not the incest resulting from
the heterosexual or so-called ‘natural’ order of reproduction—
but that caused by multiple replications of reproduction by
the Oankali, which results in a higher probability of him
having impregnated his female relatives. Although the Oankali
denaturalized ‘natural reproduction’, Paul was not free from
the constraints of the taboo of incest. The Oankali blurred the
boundary between reproduction and replication through
their technological capacity.
Lilith and Paul, the two instruments of the Oankali, engaged
in a relationship of negative solidarity rather than one of commonality-based instrumental solidarity.
Joo Young Hwang
62
LEARN AND RUN!
THE DEVIATION OF HUMAN NATURE
becomes possible—leading to an inevitable hybridization; first
of knowledge and behavior, then of species.
This diagram is an attempt to schematize the deviation of the
initial learn and run plan set by Lilith to escape the Oankali’s
gene trade.
This point is what the human survivors seem to want to avoid
at all costs: the ultimate corruption of humanity through
a sexual union. This rejection makes them resist the learning
process in order to avoid that ultimate step, a reaction that
will bring them to the impasse revealed at the end of the book;
the choice between death or coming back to the Oankali—
humanity as known by the humans before the Humanicide is
destined to extinction. Then the only possibility for the Awakened to survive is to live as xeno.
The first appearance of this plan comes at the very beginning of the ‘Nursery’ chapter, right before Lilith must start
choosing which human individuals to awaken to form the first
group she will have to prepare to be the Oankali’s new trade
partners-instruments. Anticipating the violent reaction of the
awakened humans once they understand the process of
genetic trade in which they are caught, and thus the impossibility for it to happen without more violence, Lilith elaborates
a plan for her and the other captives to escape the Oankali’s
genetic engineering scheme.
As Lilith thinks about that plan, the notion of survival appears:
on an individual scale—to avoid being put back into suspended animation or be killed at the slightest manifestation
of resistance—as well as a species—to avoid having alien
babies. The only hope remaining in order to survive and bypass the Oankali’s gene trade is to learn and run: since there
is no way to escape the ship, their only chance is to accept
their captivity and obey the Oankali until they are considered
ready to be put back on Earth, where they finally will be able
to flee the hybridization process.
The intention for this diagram is to represent the deviations
of Lilith and the Awakened from this initial plan. Those deviations reveal the illusion present at the core of this plan; the
hope to escape hybridization and to save humanity as known
before the Humanicide. Since the very beginning of the story,
everything the human survivors were familiar with is not
homo—the same—any more. From the genes of their own body
to planet Earth, the intervention of the Oankali constituted
an irremediable change.
The very moment the Oankali intervened to save some
humans from the Humanicide, these survivors, the ‘Awakened’,
have been caught in the Oankalian genetic engineering
scheme making hybridification inevitable from and within a survival perspective. As Lilith witnesses it, being on the ship
implies an impossibility of escaping captivity. But going along
with this captivity involves the process of learning—the process of familiarization with the Oankali until a sexual relation
74
Through her novel, Octavia Butler sets a situation where survival means or implies going through a constant process
of xenogenesis. We could make a connection between such
a process and an inhumanist perspective on the ontology
of humanity, the philosophical position that considers humanity as a project of constant revision and that tends to
subvert a conservative conception of ‘human nature’ and its
normative implications. Humanity could be seen as a nonlinear trajectory. Such a perspective on ‘human nature’ could
be connected to the deviations of Lilith and the Awakened
from the initial learn and run plan—their exponential distancing
and estrangement from their fixed conception of their own
human nature.
Nadia Elamly
LABYRINTH:
THE STRUGGLING NOT AGAINST NONHUMAN ALIENS, BUT AGAINST HUMANITY’S OWN KIND
1
HIERARCHY
2
MASCULINITY, GENDER, HETERO-NORMATIVE
3
RACE, NATIONALITY, PLANETARY
4
HUMAN VIOLENCE
5
HUMANITY
HUMAN IN TRAINING FLOOR
OANKALI SHIP/LEARNING LABORATORY
76
LABYRINTH:
THE STRUGGLING NOT AGAINST NONHUMAN ALIENS, BUT
AGAINST HUMANITY’S OWN KIND
There is a possible correlation between the struggle that awakened humans have to wage against their own human kind
to reform their species in order to survive, and the Labyrinth
myth. Theseus the male hero from Greek mythology must
fight and destroy the Minotaur which is the personification
of his internal trouble.
To be reformed, human kind has to undermine—here thanks
to the genesis of a outside—humanity, masculinity, race,
gender, nationality, and the planet which had germinated,
bloomed, expanded. The damage is done, it has inflated,
grown and become a general cry, a universal chorus of hatred
and proscription.
This epic confronts philosophical questions through the possibility of renarration thanks to fiction. In this labyrinth there
is no Theseus. As the potential ‘hero’, Lilith, doesn’t fit with
the male hero archetype. The labyrinth centre has been
multiplied. Instead of a proper centre there is a multitude
of decentralized centres: the cores of the human being.
The awakened humans would be the Ariadne thread that
would allow their own survival as species through the denaturalization of their heteronormativity. In order to do that,
they need to channel their violent human nature to survive
as a collective subject.
Léa Gallon
80
DEONTOLOGIZING HUMANITY
In Xenogenesis, the future of humanity is undetermined.
The Oankali, an alien species, saved humans from humanicide and captured them to inhabit earth. In order to reproduce and have children, humans have no other choice
than to interbreed with the Oankali. They have intervened
into the reproduction capacity of humans; therefore it seems
that the human race as we know it has no futurity. The concept of humanity is not only revised by the fact that human
reproduction is over, but also by the fact that human genes
can be changed by Oankali’s technology.
Inhumanism is a commitment to the project of humanity
because it revises what it means to be human constantly.
To keep this commitment all the way, we need to take into
account the reversibility of the human project and accept
that, in order for humanity to embrace futurity, we might
need technology and all the indeterminacy and contingency
that comes from it.
Fatima Wegmann
Their technology is also capable of activating some latent
abilities that humans have inherited from their non-human
ancestors. Humans have a non-human potential that is latent.
We are brought back to the moment of hominization or
anthropogenesis, which is the moment before the formation
of Homo Sapiens. Thus technology exposes humanity to
threats and reveals that humanity is a reversible project. It
also exposes the unknown unknowns of the human trajectory
by unveiling the other possibilities that could have taken
place. Hence, the concept of humanity is constantly challenged and needs to be revised relentlessly.
Humanity is a reversible project. It is not an essence. We were
never human in the first place. Humans need to understand
themselves as hybrids from the start of the process of becoming human. In Octavia Butler’s novel, inhumanism1 is already
happening whether humans like it or not. Lilith knows that to
be able to survive, she has to accept Oankali’s technology
and seize a more non-human nature. She is more afraid of
what the others would think of her than her own transformation. Lilith’s commitment to humanity could be qualified as
inhumanist because she is not afraid to revise what it means
to be human rather than trying to keep a ‘human essence’
in the future. That could be explained by the fact that she’s
a Nigerian American woman and thus, she’s already not
compliant with the supremacist and canonical self-portrait
of the human2.
1. ‘Inhumanism is the extended practical elaboration of humanism; it is born out of a diligent commitment to the project of enlightened humanism. As a universal
wave that erases the self-portrait of man drawn in sand, inhumanism is a vector of revision. It relentlessly revises what it means to be human by removing
its supposed evident characteristics and preserving certain invariances. At the same time, inhumanism registers itself as a demand for construction, to define
what it means to be human by treating human as a constructible hypothesis, a space of navigation and intervention’. Reza Negarestani, ‘The Labor of the
Inhuman, Part I: Human’, e-flux Journal #52 , February 2014.
2. Ibid.
88
Bibliography
Majaca, Antonia. Parisi, Luciana. ‘The Incomputable and
Instrumental Possibility’, e-flux Journal #77, November 2016.
Negarestani, Reza. ‘The Labor of the Inhuman, Part I: Human’,
e-flux Journal #52, February 2014.
Negarestani, Reza. ‘ The Labor of the Inhuman, Part II: The
Inhuman’, e-flux Journal #53, March 2014.
Reed, Patricia. ‘Xenophily and Computational Denaturalization’, in Artificial Labor, e-flux Architecture, 2017.
Wolfendale, Pete. ‘Rationalist Inhumanism’, https://www.
academia.edu/26697819/Rationalist_Inhumanism_Dictionary_Entry_ (accessed on April 17, 2018).
89
ALIEN-HUMAN EROTICS IN OCTAVIA BUTLER’S DAWN
HUMAN TRANSCENSION FROM
THE INSTRUMENTAL LOGIC
90
OANKALI-HUMAN
SEX RITE
DEIFIC ALIEN SUBJECTHOOD
instrumentalisation overcome
HUMAN’S DIVINE INITIATION
Lilith
DIVINE TRANSCENSION
ALIEN-HUMAN EROTICS IN OCTAVIA BUTLER’S DAWN
Out of the flesh of our Mothers come dreams and
memories of the Gods.1
For the magi of the left-hand path, sexuality is even
more than ‘a primary mode of being’—the altered state
of extreme erotic ecstasy is a potentially divine mode
of being, the chaotic dance of two magnetically attracted
opposite energies that allows for the creation of a third
power transcending the human.2
Defining the libidinal current of the Oankali aethyr3
In Octavia Butler’s Lilith’s Brood trilogy, the human race has
near-obliterated itself in nuclear war. Post-humanicide, those
few who survive are abducted by a nomadic alien species,
the omniscient Oankali. The Oankali are advanced, supernatural sky-beings who are repairing Earth for recolonisation.
They are also nomadic gene traders, scouring the universe for
other species whose DNA is useful to their genetic engineering program. In the first book, Dawn, Lilith Iyapo, an AfricanAmerican woman, is Mother of a new order of humans. Lilith
wakes in solitary confinement on the Oankali ship after 250
years in incubation. This ship—the realm that she has literally
and figuratively ascended to—is equal parts earthly, celestial
and hellish. The threefold division of underworld, earth
and heaven is murky in this aethyr. Lilith slowly learns that
she has been chosen by the Oankali as the leader of the
other humans. Her role is, in part, to wake others from their
centuries-long slumbers and facilitate an Oankali-human
breeding program. Lilith’s designated role as instrument, and
her ecstatic, or divine transcendence of this role through
Oankali-human sensuality, mark the end of a humanist, earthbound eroticism.
There is a disruption or queering of homophilic4 sexual
identity in the Oankali regime, as erotic gratification lies far
outside normative sexual behaviour. Introducing its third sex,
the ‘ooloi’ Oankali, Nikanj, gives Lilith and her lover, Joseph,
an intimacy ‘beyond ordinary human experience.’ Further,
Nikanj experiences the same immense (psycho)sexual
pleasure that it gives. In Nikolas and Zeena Schreck’s words,
a ‘multi-bodied panorama of polymorphous delight’5 takes
place. Erotic acts of copulation with the Oankali subvert all
beliefs about what it is to be human. As humans consent
to—moreover, succumb to their deep seduction by—Oankali
intercourse, an aroused acceptance of a (genuine) alien
sexual invitation arises.
Yet erotic impulse in the alien-human sexual dynamics of
the Oankali realm is not easily placed. All of Dawn’s protagonists inhabit a space where earthly distinctions between
humans and animals are dissolved, decaying the homophilic
order. Lilith cannot entirely grasp the transcendental power,
or shockingly Other physiology of the Oankali, even as she
grows fluent in their tongue and adopts some of their alien
physiology. As John Berger argues, ‘the relation between
what we see and what we know is never settled… the knowledge, the explanation, never quite fits the sight.’6 Initially,
the Oankali are terrifying to humans in their carnal fluidity;
they cannot be defined within the primary categories of
species. Before their systematic deprogramming, humans on
the ship understand Oankali physiology as a denaturalised
perversion of homophilic human physiology. However, as this
alien regime thrives by denaturalising and instrumentalising7
humankind, I must consider how human anthropic disgust is
converted to desire, attraction and sexual submission.
The Oankali arouse psychosexual affect in humans—desire,
attraction, fear—firstly, through their godlike abilities to
manipulate human biological functions. Secondly, through
1. British artist and occultist, Austin Osman Spare quoted in Drury, Neville. Stealing Fire from Heaven: The Rise of Modern Western Magic. Oxford: Oxford
University Press, 2011, 153.
2. Schreck, Nikolas, and Zeena Schreck. Demons of the Flesh: The Complete Guide to Left Hand Path Sex Magic. London: Creation Books, 2002, 4.
3. Drawing on Egil Asprem’s writing, I use the term ‘aethyr’ in an Enochian sense. In the Enochian tradition, an aethyr denotes one of a series of successive worlds,
or planes, which penetrates and extends beyond the material world. See Asprem, Egil. Arguing with Angels: Enochian Magic and Modern Occulture. New York:
State University of New York Press, 2012, 98.
4. I use the term ‘homophilic’ to refer to the social tendency of humans to maintain relationships with other humans who are similar to them. After their awakening on the Oankali ship, humans gradually shift from a homophiliac to xenophiliac erotic structure and libidinal economy. (See: xenophiliac, note 8.)
5. Schreck and Schreck, 4.
6. See Berger, John. Ways of Seeing. London: Penguin Books, 1972.
7. Antonia Majaca and Luciana Parisi explore Lilith’s experimental approach to instrumentality at length in their article, ‘The Incomputable and Instrumental
Possibility.’ e-flux, no. 77 (November 2016). They ask: ‘Doesn’t the instrument itself possess its own “ends,” as Lilith does?’.
94
the deific allure of their biological difference, or their divine
weirdness. The Oankali’s sensory limbs (or tentacles, organs),
through which alien-human sex occurs, are textured surfaces
by which the human agent participates in a hidden divine
reality. In other words, through the tentacular sensory limb,
the xenophiliac8 human body connects with the Oankali
body as an extension of its divine alien corporeality. Like the
ancient Greek deity, Pan (‘ruler of All’), the Oankali are also
‘unpredictable, lascivious, lecherous’9 and may be regarded
as devilish. Unlike Pan and other mythological deities, however, the Oankali are not derived from human beings whose
lives, at some time, became mythical—they have no cultural
origins on Earth. Where Pan’s horns and hooves stand for natural, earthly energies, the Oankali’s pleasure-giving sensory
tentacles stand for the denatural, extra-terrestrial energies
of xenophily. The xenophiliac human body exists in this realm,
far beyond its earthly lifespan, as a result of divine Oankali
intervention in the Apocalypse, or Armageddon. The Oankali
is the Pan of a new, xenophiliac nature—the abstract ruler
and God of all living xenophilic nature. Oankali are the saviours and creation deities of the new alien-human species;
benevolent, godly figures of a new age, giving unimaginable
sensuous and spiritual pleasure (and at times, pain) to their
(once-)human counterparts.
In diagramming the denaturalised, divine erotic structure of
Oankali/human intimacy, there are infinite factors to consider.
At a bodily level, forces such as the electrochemical, the genetic, and the biochemical, entwined with the verbal, are at play.
(The biochemical generally overpowers verbal dissent in xenophiliac sexual submission.)
One must also consider the transition from homophilia to
xenophilia, as denaturalisation gives way to xenophiliac submission. Further, as I will later discuss, the Oankali-human
sex rite may be diagrammed as the human’s initiation and transcension into a deific alien subjectivity, as they overcome
an instrumental logic. These multiplying, fluid forces form part
of an incomplete system of erotic ethics for an age beyond
humanism—a xenophiliac vocabulary for alien-human
spiritual-psychosexual dynamics and desire structures.
The Oankali-human sex act as divine initiatory rite; Lilith’s
transcension from instrument to deific alien subject
In their essay ‘The Incomputable and Instrumental Possibility,’
Antonia Majaca and Luciana Parisi fashion Lilith as a ‘sorcerer’
who innovates outside the traditional logic of the instrument.
They argue that Lilith does not refuse her instrumentality, but
‘acknowledges,’ ‘politicises’ and ‘ultimately transcends’ it.10
According to Serenity Young, the human desire to be in contact with ‘sky-beings’ is a ‘longing for transcendence.’ Young
argues that to transcend (through sex rite or by other spiritually embodied, initiatory or ritualistic means), is to surpass
others and what has been done before; to be free from constraint (from instrumentality).11 Lilith symbolises the ancient
human desire to break through restraints; the yearning to pass
through the terrestrial, reaching new heights of extraterrestrial, embodied spiritual experience. She becomes a magical
female alien-deity through sex acts with Joseph and Nikanj—
acts which allow her to transcend a traditional instrumental
logic as she sexually consecrates her alien divinity.
Lilith’s transcendent approach to the logic of the instrument—
explored, in this instance, through alien-human erotics—shares
affinities with the Schreck couple’s descriptions of left-hand
path sex magic in their book, Demons of the Flesh. Schreck
and Schreck distinguish between the ‘profound pleasure’ of
sex enjoyed for sex’s sake—as an embodied and aesthetic
experience—and that sex which is utilised for ‘authentic magical or initiatory purposes.’ They describe the ‘third power
transcending the human’ that is created in ‘taboo-overturning’
left-hand path sex magic. Throughout Dawn, Butler hints at
those many modern autocracies that have maintained their
power by severely ‘curbing the full development of sexual
power in their subjects.’12 As such, Lilith and the Oankali species, together, represent a ‘third power’ that demystifies flesh
from taboo. They initiate Lilith into their divine aethyr through
8. The word ‘xenophily’ or ‘xenophilia’ is derived from the Greek terms ‘xenos’ (ξένος; stranger, unknown, foreign) and ‘phila’ (φιλία; love, attraction). The word is
not found in classical Greek as it is a modern term coined to articulate an affection for the unknown. See Liddell, Henry, and Robert Scott, eds. A GreekEnglish Lexicon. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996, 1189. By extension, the acts of love and sexual intercourse between humans and Oankali on board the ship
may be expressed as xenophiliac.
9. Drury, 158.
10. Majaca and Parisi, n.p.
11. Young, Serenity. Women Who Fly: Goddesses, Witches, Mystics, and Other Airborne Females. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018, 6.
12. Schreck and Schreck, 5.
95
sexual rites. Post-initiation, Lilith and the Oankali work together as, for lack of a better term, sexual guerrillas who destroy
fundamental understandings of erotic relations; they ‘reinstate
sexuality as a primary mode of being.’13
The mythological figure of Lilith first appears in Sumerian
mythology in the third millennium, before entering the Jewish
tradition in the Talmudic period.14 In the Zohar (the Book of
Splendour; 2001 CE)—the foundational text in Jewish mysticism, known as Kabbalah—Lilith is depicted as the arch-shedevil, Mother of demons and feminine counterpart to Samael
(Satan), with ‘the defective light of Lucifer animating her.’
She is described as ‘the end of all flesh’ and ‘the end of days,’
Goddess of the Underworld and the secret force of nature.15
Similarly, in Dawn, Lilith belongs to the category of the monstrous-feminine.16 The most unnatural, or de-natural of human
females, Lilith displays both Oankali and human sympathies
and features—including fluency in the Oankali tongue and
possession of some of their supernatural powers. (These alienhuman psychological and physiological dualisms terrify the
humans whom she wakes.) The intergalactic Oankali aethyr
contains a divine potency which cannot be understood or
articulated except through the mirror of a (pre-humanicide)
earthly realm. As such, Lilith exists in-between, negotiating
the economy of both human and Oankali erotic drives. Her
infinite and mobile sexuality—her unbridled eroticisation
of both Oankali and human subjects—is highly experimental.
Innovative in her role as instrument, and transformative in
her flesh and sexuality, she further ruptures and expands
once-earthly human sociality.
Majaca and Parisi are in accord with these sentiments, arguing that Lilith does not desire autonomy from the (Oankali)
gods: ‘she embraces her abduction and starts to reason with
the instrument […] [experimenting with an] entirely alien
model of subjectivation’. Lilith ‘places trust […] [in her] hyper-
denaturalised nature.’ Throughout Dawn, the Phallic period
is over and Lilith narrates through her hybrid body—her denatural skin, her denatural energy. She audaciously inhabits
her Oankali-human form, using ‘carnal and passionate body
words’.17 Hélène Cixous describes woman’s body as a ‘limitlessly changing ensemble, a cosmos tirelessly traversed by
Eros, an immense astral space not organised around any
one sun that’s any more of a star than the others.’18 She
writes:
Who, surprised and horrified by the fantastic tumult of her
drives […] hasn’t accused herself of being a monster?
[…] A woman’s body, with its thousand and one thresholds
of ardour—once, by smashing yokes and censors, she
lets it articulate the profusion of meanings that run through
it in every direction—will make the old single-grooved
mother tongue reverberate with more than one language.19
Lilith’s (inescapably) anthropomorphic descriptions of erotic
sex acts with the Oankali inform us about her embodied,
transcendent experience of divinity on the ship. In Dawn, she
can only state in a vague manner, for example, that there is
‘nothing more seductive than an ooloi [Oankali; the third sex,
after female and male] speaking in […] [a] particular tone,
making [a] particular suggestion.’ According to Elliot Wolfson,
‘kabbalists maintain that the spiritual entities can be described in human terms, for the tangibility of the human body
is determined by the divine body to which it corresponds’.20
Similarly, Lilith’s anthropomorphisms are not a mere testament
to the limits of humanist reasoning and rationality. Her use
of human body language accommodates human understanding of the higher, divine Oankali power, its corporeality,
and her libidinal and spiritual connection and fusion with this
alien species.
13. Ibid.
14. Drury, 158.
15. Rabbi Yehuda Shalom Gross’s writing on Lilith appears in the Ohr haZohar (1:148 (אור הזוהרa-148b (Vayetze: Passage 23). Originally published in Hebrew
(Israel, 2001 CE). I quote the Zohar from Scholem, Gershom and Melila Hellner-Eshed. ‘Zohar’. Encyclopaedia Judaica. Eds. Michael Berenbaum and Fred
Skolnik. Vol. 21. 2nd ed. Detroit: Macmillan Reference USA, 2007, 647–664.
16. Young describes the ‘monstrous-feminine’ as a mythical female entity with both animal and human features: ‘the Gorgons, Sirens, Furies, and sphinxes of
Greco-Roman mythology, demonesses of all times, and that most unnatural of females, Athena’. See Young, 8.
17. Cixous, Hélène. ‘The Laugh of the Medusa’. Translated by Keith Cohen and Paula Cohen. Signs 1, no. 4 (Summer 1976): 875–93, 886.
18. Ibid, 889.
19. Ibid, 876.
20. Wolfson, Elliot R. ‘Bifurcating the Androgyne and Engendering Sin: A Zoharic Reading of Gen 1–3’. In Hidden Truths from Eden: Esoteric Readings of Genesis
1-3, edited by Caroline Vander Stichele and Susanne Scholz. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature Press, 2014, 88.
96
Some closing remarks; Reflections on a modern Hermeticism (against technocultural instrumentalisation)
As demonstrated, when the Oankali introduce their third sex
to the human DNA structure, a complex, xenophiliac system
of erotics emerges. In the Oankali-human libidinal economy,
as I have described, there are electrochemical, genetic,
verbal and biochemical factors at play. These factors instil
desire, attraction and fear in the human instrument, who
becomes denaturalised when anthropic disgust transmutes
to sexual submission. Eventually, I argue, this sexual submission transcends to a liberatory, xenophiliac divine sensuality.
Yet, what does this xenophiliac pleasure and spirituality truly
entail? Is Lilith’s sense of sexual salvation the final, most deceptive illusion in an all-consuming instrumentality?
In discussing alien spiritual, sexual and political subjectivity,
I must acknowledge the deep techno-cultural intelligence
metaphor, obvious to contemporary Dawn readers. AI, Big Data
and deep learning intersect with human sexuality, the desire
structure, biochemistry and emotion regulation. Contrarians
to my argument may contrast the Oankali, the alien Other,
with the vast, emergent networked form, which maintains
instrumental control over the human by dispensing similar
desire, fear and attraction. Any notion of pleasure or desire
fulfillment may be argued as, in itself, a paradoxically potent
illusion. In its centralised form, xenophiliac submission to
Oankali domination could be perceived as bringing defilement rather than salvation—the naïve intellect of the (once-)
human macro-being ruled over by an extraterrestrial superintelligence—most poignantly through perceived pleasure
and, in Lilith’s case, divinity.
Yet all dehumanising activity need not be defiling. I stand by my
argument that Lilith’s use of sexual rites to transcend to an
alien subjectivity, (dehumanised, denaturalised), is an occult
mechanism of autonomous power against instrumentality.
Here, there is a connection between unorthodox (veiled, undemocratic) spirituality and political power. The libidinal economy
is essential to the sciences of ‘brain-washing, mind-control,
advertising, “public relations” and propaganda.’ In the opening
of Konrad Becker’s Dictionary of Operations: Deep Politics
and Cultural Intelligence, Hakim Bey reflects on these sciences
as a ‘form of magic that happens to work’.21 He highlights the
age-old connection between ‘Intelligence (spying) and Magic,’
including stage magic, illusion and occultism. Bey suggests
that Hermeticism can be used ‘to free yourself from these vinculae and attain a relative autonomy or freedom from […]
the hex or fix that disempowers you—perhaps even for the
Big Lies that pass for Consensus Reality’.22
So, what is Hermeticism? Wouter Hanegraaff defines the esoteric tradition of Hermeticism as the teachings and doctrines
in the philosophical Hermetica, including the treatises of the
early Christian-era Corpus Hermeticum.23 Their authors were
convinced that divine revelation leads to truth. The Hermetica
teach ‘a way by which the soul can ascend to a divine realm
above the sphere of the fixed stars.’ There, the soul ‘mingles
with’ the divine powers, and by knowing God, becomes ‘absorbed’ in God.24 The Hermetic text, Poimandres explains: ‘This
is the final good for those who have received knowledge
[gnosis]: to be made god,’ or master of oneself. In this sense,
as discussed, Lilith becomes an alien god—a near-equal
to the Oankali and relatively autonomous—through sexual
initiation, and her subjecthood is regenerated. Hanegraaff
supports this argument, stating that such a deification can
be an experience attained before death.25
In Giordano Bruno and the Hermetic Tradition, Frances Yates
gives an account of the Corpus Hermeticum. She explains
that treatises in this collection describe:
[…]The ascent of the soul through the spheres of the
planets to the divine realms above them…[and give] ecstatic descriptions of a process of regeneration by which
the soul casts off the chains which bind the material
world and becomes filled with divine powers and virtues.26
Yates goes on to paraphrase the Italian Renaissance physician
Marsilio Ficino’s assertion that ‘material forms in the world
21. From Hakim Bey’s introduction in Becker, Konrad. Dictionary of Operations: Deep Politics and Cultural Intelligence. Brooklyn: Autonomedia, 2012, 7.
22. Ibid.
23. Frances Yates explains that it is not known when the Corpus Hermeticum was first put together as a collection, but that it was known in this form to Psellus in
the eleventh century. See Giordano Bruno and the Hermetic Tradition. London: University of Chicago Press, 1964, 3.
24. Wouter, Hanegraaff. Gnosis and Hermeticism from Antiquity to Modern Times. State University of New York Press: New York, 1997, 5.
25. Ibid.
26. Yates, 3.
97
of sense can be […] reformed when they have degenerated,
by manipulation of the higher images on which they depend’.27
E. Garin describes this process as the reconstruction of higher
images in a way that divine influences are ‘recaptured and
reconducted into the deteriorated sensible forms’.28
In line with this thinking, Bey refers to modern Hermeticism
as ‘esoteric hermeneutics’, or ‘ta,wil, as the Suffis called it’—
‘an exploration and unpacking of things back to its origins’.29
As Lilith encounters the divine—by engaging in unknown,
initiatory, alien ritual sex acts—she demystifies and recaptures,
reconducts erotics and sexuality from the modern, homophilic
hegemony. Her homophilic sex drive deteriorates and she
accesses a higher, alien sense of spiritual, strengthened selfhood. This divine world she experiences is part of a reality
we all discover through our sense perceptions. The Hermetic
field’s emphasis on the mage as influencing and manipulating
the (de)natural divine is pertinent. Bey suggests that modern
esoteric Hermeticism may be used as a gesture of refusal,
a radical dialectical weapon, for ‘the protection of life’ against
the instrumentalising ‘antibiosis of [networked, algorithmic]
Capital in its spectral form’.30 Lilith’s alchemy is her ability to
transcend her captivity—through occult initiatory rite, she
transforms enslavement to salvation and autonomy. Sex is
the ‘secret key’ to her salvation.
Extract from Trojan Woman
Let me go into my ecstasy.
Do not hold me from my ecstasy.
I must go down, down
Into the pit, beyond the pit
of human darkness
to find my special light.
I will go down, down
beyond the dreams of murderers
beyond the murderer’s blood on the black axe
beyond the black axe sunk in the bottomless swamp
beyond the thoughts of horror that are half-stopped by
fear
—Euripides (480-406 BCE)31
In a Western world where Eros has been reduced to shocking
banality, Dawn offers an empowering esoteric perspective on
defying the regulated, libidinal boundaries of a secular earthly
existence. As Majaca and Parisi emphasise, Butler fashions
Lilith as Mother of a new species who subverts a dualistic
master/slave, or enslavement/liberation logic of the instrument.
One method by which Lilith refuses instrumentalisation is
through initiatory sex rite.
Chloe Sugden
27. Ibid.
28. Ibid, 65.
29. Ibid.
30. Bey quoted in Becker, 7.
31. Extract from the Ancient Greek tragedy by Euripides, Trojan Woman (415 BCE). Quoted in Constantine, Peter, Rachel Hadas, Edmund Keeley, and Karen Van
Dyck, eds. The Greek Poets: Homer to the Present. New York: Norton and Company, 2010, 163.
98
Bibliography
Asprem, Egil. Arguing with Angels: Enochian Magic and
Modern Occulture. New York: State University of New York
Press, 2012.
Young, Serenity. Women Who Fly: Goddesses, Witches,
Mystics, and Other Airborne Females. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.
Becker, Konrad. Dictionary of Operations: Deep Politics and
Cultural Intelligence. Brooklyn: Autonomedia, 2012.
Berger, John. Ways of Seeing. London: Penguin Books, 1972.
Cixous, Hélène. ‘The Laugh of the Medusa’. Translated by
Keith Cohen and Paula Cohen. Signs 1, no. 4 (Summer 1976):
875–93.
Constantine, Peter, Rachel Hadas, Edmund Keeley, and
Karen Van Dyck, eds. The Greek Poets: Homer to the Present.
New York: Norton and Company, 2010.
Drury, Neville. Stealing Fire from Heaven: The Rise of Modern
Western Magic. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
Liddell, Henry, and Robert Scott, eds. A Greek-English Lexicon.
Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.
Majaca, Antonia, and Luciana Parisi. ‘The Incomputable and
Instrumental Possibility’. e-flux, no. 77 (November 2016).
Scholem, Gershom and Melila Hellner-Eshed. ‘Zohar’. Encyclopaedia Judaica. Eds. Michael Berenbaum and Fred Skolnik.
Vol. 21. 2nd ed. Detroit: Macmillan Reference USA, 2007.
Schreck, Nikolas, and Zeena Schreck. Demons of the Flesh:
The Complete Guide to Left Hand Path Sex Magic. London:
Creation Books, 2002.
Wolfson, Elliot R. ‘Bifurcating the Androgyne and Engendering
Sin: A Zoharic Reading of Gen 1–3.’ In Hidden Truths from
Eden: Esoteric Readings of Genesis 1-3, edited by Caroline
Vander Stichele and Susanne Scholz. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature Press, 2014.
Wouter, Hanegraaff. Gnosis and Hermeticism from Antiquity
to Modern Times. State University of New York Press: New
York, 1997. Yates, Frances A. Giordano Bruno and the Hermetic
Tradition. London: University of Chicago Press, 1964.
99
RECIPROCATION FIELD
To illustrate the depth of exchange between Oankali and
Human-hybrid (formerly human) it is instrumental to parallel
this process of exchange to that of stellar bodies.
92.92 million miles away, a 4.5 billion year old Yellow Dwarf
erupts in endless flares of combined gases (approx. 70.6%
hydrogen and 27.4% helium) originating a fascinating and
yet opaque phenomenon known as solar reconnection.
The Solar reconnection is an atypical process of magnetic
exchange between plasmas (gases that pose their own
magnetic fields) and the stellar bodies they encounter either
gravitating in a compound system or in the vacuum of space.
Although the triggers and modulations in these exchanges
are still obscure, it can be inferred that such processes of
exchange are reciprocal as the magnetic systems are affected by the behaviour of charged particles and vice versa.
The communication effect is complex, however, highly sensitive to variations and in a constant process of updating.
A similar process of stellar reconnection can be hypothesized
between [1] Human/Subject (Lilith) and [2] The Oankali ecosystem in which [3] parallels the process where plasmas come
into contact with elements from the atmosphere of a stellar
body and their magnetic fields produce an exchange. In this
case [3] as the sun flares, represent a new human code that
has been reengineered by the alteration of its inner ecosystem.
By being fed on a continuous loop of energy transfer represented by [4], the inflowing Oankali data input expressed in
[5] generates an internal bridge of energetic waves illustrated
in [6] that will in turn provide the Oankali with new altered
hybrid non-human exchanges, as seen in [7]while such processes will be supported by [8], which are the two sensorial
catalysts whose role is solely to stabilize the exchange.
To finalize the stellar metaphor, the mother ship [9] can be
reflected upon as a type of sun, as it is a source of selfsustainable life force in its own right. It nourishes Oankali
in many forms and provides them with the many tools/
resources and fuel, not only to survive the vacuum of space
but also to instrumentalize transactions on a molecular
level with other species.
Laila Torres Mendieta
104
‘YOUR BODY SAID ONE THING. YOUR WORDS SAID ANOTHER.’
It is true that The Oankali are the ones keeping the Humans on
their ship, but they are themselves, in a way, captive of their
own fascination for this particular species. Their move towards
evolution and survival is by way of mutating, or more precisely ‘gene trading’ which is a process that involves reproduction
with other species, and it is in that perspective that we can
understand their attraction towards the humans. On the other
hand humans have in general a physical and moral distrust/
defiance towards the alien.
In the excerpt chosen here, Joseph clearly states his reluctance/ refusal to ‘share’ sex with Nikanj (and Lilith) but the
Oankali have a slightly different notion of consent which
considers the bodily, or bio-chemical and its own independent/
distinct voice to be more important/relevant than what is
conscious or can be rationalized by the human mind. Ooloï
are really talented at pleasing humans (but not only), they
can read (their) bodies and, thanks to their sensory arms,
stimulate the(ir) nervous system to make optimum neuronal
connections. They offer a sort of ‘oneness’ service that is
highly addictive. The need for satisfaction goes beyond revulsion. Humans find themselves trapped against themselves,
craving for something that terrorizes them. They are alienated
because they have a partial/incomplete understanding of how
they function under Ooloï influence, and therefore no control.
Furthermore it is often during sex that changes in the body
chemistry are made. This addiction to ‘augmented sex’ is a
vector of alienation at a cognitive and biological level.
Maïté Chenière
110
XENO-KNOWLEDGE
Dawn begins with the awakening of Lilith. ‘Alive!’ Gasping
and in pain she situates/grounds herself and us in being alive.
Initial narrative threads form around Lilith’s consciousness
of her body, her memories and configuration of her surroundings. Imagination extends in and is exhausted by all her senses.
Time suspended and space, indistinguishable. Changes have
been made without her knowledge or consent and this is the
world we will know of.
First sign of another existence is a voice. Inside, in the isolation room with no borders, Lilith is being called. Jdahya,
the Oankali who came to take her outside calls her name
and asks her to get to know him, or rather to see him:
‘She was not afraid […] The unknown frightened her. The
cage she was in frightened her. […] “Show me”, she said.’
And so she makes a decision to know and steps forward confronting the alien:
‘What do your people call themselves?
We are Oankali.
What does it mean in your language?
Several things. Traders for one.
You are traders?
Yes.
What do you trade?
Ourselves.’
The Oankali (‘traders’ in their own words) have shifted the
identification of their race from exclusiveness towards modes
of exchange. Thereby opening the way for operative instrumentality of Xeno. Xenophilia for the Oankali, redefines
species as the site of knowledge production. From the
interactions between them and humans, we can see that
they practice power within their knowledge of humanity.
And it enables them to manufacture a genetically engineered evolution:
‘But what was the problem? You said we had two incompatible characteristics. What were they?
You are intelligent […] [but] you are hierarchical.’
Throughout the book the Oankali use both characteristics
of Lilith and other humans in order to train and prepare
118
a selected group for their return to the earth and for their
future function following the trade. Those human beings who
hold most tightly to their human identities are also the ones
who exhibit the worst elements of humanity. Lilith seems
alien to many, because of her knowledge and her adaptation.
Lilith is the only one with the choice of awakening other humans and becoming versed in the language of Oankali. Lilith
Iyapo becomes both the mother of a new race and a Judas
to humanity.
This diagram is based on a reading of four main characters
in the book -Lilith, Joseph, Alison and Gabe- and schematizes
their status in transitioning towards Xeno. Knowledge-Power
and Agency-Alienness perform the axis that define growth of
each character after her or his first awakening.
Shima Asa
THE OANKALI TURNED ITS TENTACLES TOWARDS ME was
diagrammed, written and edited by the students of the TheoryFiction Seminar of the CCC Research Master Program from
September 2017 to June 2018. The Theory-Fiction Seminar
is conceived and led by Kodwo Eshun.
THE OANKALI TURNED ITS TENTACLES TOWARDS ME is the
second edition in the publication series TERMS/ES initiated
by the CCC Research Master Program in Geneva.
TERMS/ES is an open format for publishing results developed
from research undertaken around a specific ‘term’ or ‘termes’
by seminars at CCC. It provides the space for the formulation
of new vocabularies in the expanded arts of the 21st Century.
TERMS/ES is published online and in print according to the
desires of the Seminar.
The CCC Research Master Program is headed by Doreen
Mende since 2015. CCC is one of the three Master Programs
of the Visual Arts Department at HEAD Genève. Its transdisciplinary and bilingual (English/French) curriculum consists
of Research Practice and Situated Art Practice Seminars that
discuss individual student research practice. Theory Fiction,
Critical Studies, Curatorial and Political Studies Seminars work
on new vocabularies. The Reading Group is a self-organised
collective practice led by Research Program assistants.
The CCC PhD-Forum operates in connection with the CCC
Research Master Program.
HEAD — GENÈVE
HAUTE ÉCOLE D’ART ET DE DESIGN
AVENUE DE LA CHÂTELAINE 5
CH-1203 GENÈVE
WWW.HEAD-GENEVE.CH
INFO.HEAD@HESGE.CH
CCC RESEARCH MASTER PROGRAM AND PHD-FORUM
VISUAL ARTS DEPARTMENT
HEAD — GENÈVE
BOULEVARD HELVÉTIQUE 9
CH-1205 GENEVA
HEAD.HESGE.CH/CCC
CCC.HEAD@HESGE.CH
TERMS/ES
EDITION 002
PRINTED IN MARLY, SWITZERLAND
IMPRIMÉ À MARLY, SUISSE
GENEVA/GENÈVE
JUNE/JUIN 2018