Review by Robin Mackay - Conscience and Pain, Tragedy and Truth 'The Last Men' (1996)

Robin Mackay/Texts/Essays/Review by_ Robin Mackay - Conscience and Pain, Tragedy and Truth __ 'The Last Men' (1996).pdf

P. 1
Penn State University Press Review: 'The Last Men' Author(s): Robin Mackay Review by: Robin Mackay Source: Journal of Nietzsche Studies, No. 11, Conscience and Pain, Tragedy and Truth (Spring 1996), pp. 72-73 Published by: Penn State University Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20717646 Accessed: 24-10-2015 09:34 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/ info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org. Penn State University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of Nietzsche Studies. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 128.42.202.150 on Sat, 24 Oct 2015 09:34:20 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
P. 2
Mac Daly and Ellis Sharp, "Engels on Video" "TheLast Men' Robin Mackay Engels on Video consists of some eight surrealisticandmeandering tales concocted around Engels, Nietzsche, Freud, and other figures"famousfor theirfacial hair and authorshipof strange,difficultbooks'. Itsunique admkture of academic spoof and jauntypicaresque relies on a steadyfabricationof exegetical and apocryphalephemera. Nevertheless,Daly and Sharp's of prose generous use of cod-academic gags, gratuitousjuxtaposition, and unnecessary floridity may ringa fewbells with avid culturevultures. Yes, at last academic philosophers have their own brand of postmodern trash. which anyhow is That such a volume should takeonNietzsche only adds to the irony, oppressivelypervasive. For of courseNietzsche has long since diagnosed theauthors' condition: "Pessimism indecline...as growingeffeteness,as a sortof cosmopolitan fingering,as Will toPower 10) "tout comprendre"and historicismf( This post-MontyPython sensibilityis exemplifiedwell enough by thesubjectmatter alone : an interviewwithNietzsche's moustache, a search forFreud's penis, Trotsky'smovie career and Engels' historical critiqueof theanarchic tendenciesof thevideo market "In postmodernist fiction, anything's a fact.." But anyonewho thinksthata level of ironycan save jokes such as thefollowing has both feet post- infestedcamp site,where a knowingwink planted firmlyin an aB-tc>o-familiar automaticallyadds quality to any detritus: The colossal philosopher loomed above them. "I hear he's a superman," Bulb remarked,as theyparked by theNO SMOKING sign. (In thesame story,a "muscularyoung disciple ofLyotard' wears wait for it a leotard).Of or lack of impetus tocome up with coursewe aremeant to laugh at theauthors indifference even less ideas -we cry,only ironic twistson the anythingbetter. There are no good jokes left old ones, and half-funnyjokes which are funnyfor thatvery reason.Both tragic(in theworst we know, sense) and cheerful (in themost vapid sense),we wheel out littleinventoriesofwhat and blink. We we took when at and laugh thedays say "irony', anythingseriously. thecamivalesque breadthof Daly and Sharp are undoubtedlyknowledgeable and energetic,and theirwriting is enticing. Indeed, "Theyare clever and know everythingthathas ever happened : so thereis no end to their mockery' (ZarathustraPrologue 5). Unfortunately,thosepassages 72 This content downloaded from 128.42.202.150 on Sat, 24 Oct 2015 09:34:20 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
P. 3
forexculpation,not least which suggest somethingbeyond parodic baiting are insufficient because theyare regularlyfollowed by theinevitableprosaic ormerely silly deflation ,a classic device forreproducingtiredcynicism.Genuinely amusingobservationbecomes unfavourablytemperedby thecitational imperative,and oftendegenerates intosardonic namedropping. derive (one characterasserts "I'm a character in an The latentnarcissismof thisself-referential a even to stretches Ellis Sharp story")which last-pageautoreviewf A POSTMODERN TOUR sometimessuggests thatthis ismerelywriting for the sake ofwriting. Nietzsche would have been bothvindicated and disappointed to see the ironicrecyclingof residual values unfoldwith such a sad predictability.But Daly and Sharp know thisof course, and no doubt it DE FORCE), raises yet anothersnigger. The oversaturationof an age with historyseems tome tobe hostile and dangerous to age intoa dangerousmood of ironyin regardto itselfand subsequently mood of cynicism.(On theUses and Disadvantages of into theevenmore dangerous life...Itleads an Historyfor Life) The only danger here is thatof a comprehensiveneutralization,thesecond-handmiming of irreverent destruction,a wilful squanderingof energy.Whether throughblind devotion to or ephemera lack of courage,Daly and Sharp have knowinglyfurnisheda finely tunedexample of everythingthat,throughitsall-pervasiveennui, "inexterrninable as theflea', self-fulfillingly predicts the impossibilityof real innovation. It's fun,butmore anodyne thandynamite. Engels on Video is available fromZoilus Press, PO Box 9315, London E17 4UU 73 This content downloaded from 128.42.202.150 on Sat, 24 Oct 2015 09:34:20 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions