The Tour
ROBIN MACKAY: This field trip came about as something of an
accident: It was, if I’m not mistaken, around five hundred million
years ago when the material that would become Earth, having
detached itself from the sun, underwent something of a crisis,
producing the differentiated planet we know and love, forming the
hard crust upon which all of our diverse activities unfold, and which
protects us from the inner fire. This moment is recognized by the
discipline of geotraumatics as a primal scene whose repressed
memories can be divined from the enigmatic yet evidently pained
planetary countenance. All of the processes described by geology
can be traced either to the influence of the sun—the climatic
processes that alternately irritate and sooth the surface of the earth,
or that of its repressed runt sibling—the inner sun, the molten core of
the earth, trapped beneath yet constantly liable to resurface rudely
and protest against its entrapment—only to solidify and crust over
once again; the plutonic, or deep earth, processes.
What we know of the earth’s formation through this deep
astrophysical history has put an end to the great debate that raged at
the dawn of geology, that between the neptunists, who insisted that
geological phenomena owed solely to the influence of climate and
catastrophic floods; and the plutonists, who argued that they found
their origin in the great subcrustal abyss. However, we should not
believe that Pluto has entirely vanquished his watery foe. For both
the climatic processes driven by the sun and the plutonic processes
driven by the core of the earth, are lubricated, so to speak, by water.
From this, geotraumatics draws the conclusion that all that moves
upon the face of the earth, from the lowest forms of life to the highest
forms of human thought, are all expressions of what is known as the
Hydroplutonic Conspiracy—that is, the strange complicity between
water and the burning core of the earth. The validity of this thesis
being granted, the special status afforded to so-called Kernovian
Syndrome by certain scholars remains disputed, and is a source of
no little tension among geophilosophers, as we saw with the
infamous disruption of the twelfth international congress of
neoplutonists in 1979 in Moscow. In any case it’s certainly true that
in the region we are about to explore, we find some exquisitely
perplexing, even extravagant, developments of the cosmically
ancient bond between water and the plutonic depths, and as we
shall see, the mining industry brought with it manifold peripheral and
associated activities all of which boasted watery rapports of one kind
or another.
But who are we to assess the heady claim that humans, through
their actions on or below the surface, merely relay or exacerbate this
cosmic drama; that, seduced by the mineral riches of the earth,
themselves the product of H2O and magma, they become an active
agent in the already vexed relations between water and the infernal
depths? Happily we have with us today some experts who will help
unfold this drama. Shaun Lewin is a transversal ecologist; James
Strongman is a geologist and petrologist of great renown in these
parts; and Dr Iain Hamilton Grant a speculative physicist and expert
on geotraumatics, having, like myself, studied with professor Daniel
Barker in the years before his…unfortunate exit. Kenna Hernly
supervises Urbanomic’s Hydroplutonic Archive and the Spryling
Bequest. And Paul Chaney you’ll know as a prominent neoagrosophist and Field Club revivalist.
Therefore you will have the opportunity to judge for yourselves
today the value of this extravagant hypothesis which brings together
in an artful if undisciplined manner the resources of geology,
mineralogy, philosophy, and exonomics—and to decide whether
Cornwall deserves that dubious accolade which Professor Marvin
Talisker bestows upon it when he writes that
for geotraumatics, Kernovian Syndrome marks the point at which the earth’s
endlessly frustrated quest to belch up its internal solar trauma devises its most
devious tactic yet: opening up its glittering depths, it beckons to what will
become its most glorious instrument yet: those humans who will become the
first life form ever to enter geological time in advance of their own extinction.
I am going to ask Ms Hernly now to distribute the Fault-Map we have
prepared especially for this occasion and which I am sure will help
you to locate and orient yourself during the tour. Subsequently we
will depart for our first destination. Please fasten your seatbelts.
***
JAMES STRONGMAN: It’s going to be an exciting trip. We’re going to
be looking around the mineralisation of the Carnmenellis and Carn
Marth batholiths, part of the Cornubian batholith which underlies the
whole of Cornwall and parts of North Devon, Dartmoor and Bodmin
Moor, and Lands End, and we’ll see how fluids and fluid processes
are crucial to the mineralisation associated with the Cornish granite.
It’s probably best to start with a bit of context about how the granite
is formed. Basically, we need to go back about four hundred million
years to a time when where we are now would probably have been
around the equator; there would have been no Atlantic Ocean; we’d
have been on a palaeocontinent known as Avalonia, and that would
have been colliding into another continent called Baltica (you can
imagine where Baltica is now). There was a sea called Iapetus, and
this sea was between Avalonia and a much bigger continent known
as Laurentia, which you may have heard of before. A lot of sediment
had been deposited in Laurentia, and that would be the source of the
later mineralisation. And this is where our metals will be sourced,
and more importantly, along with them, some of the fluids that will be
crucial to the transportation and deposition of these metals.
As Iapetus starts to close up, about three hundred million years
ago, Baltica and Avalonia collide progressively with Laurentia.
During this collision you get uplift, and lots of faults; you can actually
see these faults today, and they are very important to some of the
hydrogeology of the area. As this collision takes place, the crust gets
thicker and thicker, and it heats up and we get melting, and this is
where the granites come in. The intrusion of granite into sedimentary
rock and its slow cooling is the engine behind mineralisation. As the
granitic magma heats and assimilates the rocks it’s intruding into, it
also releases fluids that are driven through the surrounding rocks
into which the granite is intruding, and as these fluids circulate they
scavenge the metals, leaching them out of the rocks. The
composition of the fluids is quite particular to Cornwall, because the
rocks they’re going through are very rich in one element, boron,
which we see in a mineral called tourmaline. Boron, which is actually
a very stable element, is crucial for scavenging tin, because when
you have very high boron, the concentrations in your fluid can
dissolve tin. This area is richer in copper than tin, though, and
copper is scavenged by chlorine. Rocks that have been deposited in
an ocean are very rich in chlorine, and therefore we have very
chlorine-rich fluids.
So as these fluids move through the rocks, they scavenge and
build up a store of metals, resulting in a reservoir of metal-rich fluid.
As the granite gets nearer and nearer to the surface, the fluids
become more and more concentrated, because the thing that’s
keeping the metals in suspension is getting reduced because it’s
turning into a mineral. All of these fluids are under a lot of pressure,
so they’re looking for weaknesses, and some of the weaknesses
they find are some of the old faults from the earlier, mountainbuilding phases. The fluids exploit these faults, and as they move
into the fractures, the pressure drops, so the solubility of the metal
decreases and the metal starts to precipitate into these fractures,
which is what creates the metal veins. We’ll see some of these
fractures, and hopefully we’ll see some of the mineralisation,
although a lot of it has already been mined out and is long gone now.
Obviously, after the metals were deposited, there was a later phase
of enrichment, and this is where weather processes come in. In the
first stage, chlorine-rich sea water was involved, and now it’s rain
and river water. The important thing about cassiterite is that tin is a
very stable element. In the form of tin oxide it’s very dense, its
density’s six times greater than water, it has a hardness comparable
to or slightly harder than quartz—so it’s as hard as all the things
around it, and much heavier. When it gets into a stream, then, it will
tend to always sink to the bottom. Which means that anywhere
where there’s a depression or a river, the tin will always fall out,
whereas other, lighter minerals will get washed away, washed into
the sea. Over thousands of years, therefore, this process produces
beds which are very rich in tin. These weather processes enrich the
tin, which is where Cornish mining began: on the rivers and the
alluvial systems. This slow build-up of enriched metal in the
riverbeds is lying in wait there to become the target of industry, so
this is the first invitation, if you will, for our entanglement in the
hydroplutonic plot.
RM: A new breed of scavengers now enter onto the scene, sifting tin
from the stream, consolidating and concentrating it. Humans are
already becoming implicated in the Hydroplutonic Conspiracy; but of
course, their involvement accelerates when, seduced by what may
lie beneath the surface, they can no longer rely on climatic
processes, and begin to move into the depths of the earth in search
of deeper veins. The thirst for metal that these first tantalising
deposits unlocked is what will drive the development of the steam
engine, which will enable miners to be dragged ever further into the
bowels of the earth…. But as we’ll see in our first location, having
long ago assisted in depositng the metals, well before the
deployment of steam, water was also exploited as an energy source
in their extraction.
1. Kennall Vale: Hydraulic Capitalism
Stithians Parish is intersected by the Kennall River, which descends
from the granite heights of Stithians through Kennall Vale through
Ponsanooth and Perranarworthal, a river whose outlet to the sea we
will see later at Devoran, and which was used at Perran Foundry as
an energy-source for smelting. Indeed, within the roughly fifteen
square miles of the river and its tributaries, its hydraulic resources
were heavily employed. We know as early as 1659 of a blowing
house in Kennall Vale for smelting tin, with a water wheel to power
bellows, and leats, and in a text from 1824 we read:
This river from its source to its union runs about five and a half miles, in which
short distance it turns thirty-nine water wheels all in active and full employ. It
may be doubted, if with the same short distance another such stream can be
found in England.
The old settlement of Ponsanooth (the Stag Inn was once a hunting
lodge for Saxon gentry) was thus a most prosperous place during
the pre-industrial mining period because of its dual asset of being
near to a sea port (Devoran and Perranarworthal) and having access
to this natural source of energy, which was exploited in the many
subordinate industries that grew up around mining. And here we are
at one of the few remaining sites where this energy supply was
exploited to produce gunpowder to loosen the precious ore from its
rocky matrix.
The gunpowder mills at Kennall Vale were founded in the early
nineteenth century by Ben Sampson of Gwennap Churchtown. The
works contained a dozen wheels and employed around sixty men at
its height. Established between 1812 and 1820, the mills expanded
rapidly from 1820 to 1844, with a doubling of the works, and
expansion into the adjoining Roches Wood in 1844. An on-site
saltpetre refinery was added in 1850, only for the works to fall into
rapid decline at end of nineteenth century. They were closed in 1910.
The most notable of the remaining buildings are the seven
conjoined pairs of incorporating mills, with their wheel pits fed by
stone-lined leats. These leats should be noted as a particular
manifestation of the prominence of ‘hydraulic capitalism’ in industrial
Cornwall: the waters of the river were routed and rerouted to be used
many times by the multiple waterwheels. This use of gravity as
natural capital, through the medium of water, seems a clear
indication of the Hydroplutonic Conspiracy at work.
We can also find here some remains of what were once thirty
associated structures: offices, carpenters shops, cooperage, packing
house, timber shed, sawmills, manager’s house, and so on. The
complexity of the process of producing gunpowder can be
appreciated by these many structures: Grinding charcoal and
sulphur; refining of saltpetre; mixing in rotating wooden barrels in the
mixing house to make ‘green charge’; and thence to the
incorporating mills to be stone-ground; pressed into cakes in the
‘press house’; broken up in the ‘breaking-down’ or ‘corning house’;
dried in the ‘gloom stove’, the dust removed in the ‘dusting house’,
graphite added in the ‘glazing mill’, and finally to the ‘packing house’.
The remains of these facilities are set in what is now a nature
reserve—rather ironically, since most of its trees were planted for the
express purpose of buffering the outside from potential explosions.
And indeed Kennall Vale was the site of many a celebrated accident:
Local legend has it that one explosion decapitated a worker, whose
head landed and was later discovered a mile away. This appears to
be a conflation of several verifiable accidents, since in the Royal
Cornwall Gazette of Feb 25 1826 we read:
A melancholy accident occurred at the powder mills near Ponsanooth on
Friday last. About half past twelve o clock, on that day, the mixing house, in
which were four persons at their usual employment, was blown up. Two of the
men escaped without injury, but the woman, named Rutter, died on Friday
night. The third man named Weeks, survived until Sunday morning. Although it
is generally difficult to account for accidents in powder mills, the present was
occasioned by the old woman who had been roasting potatoes at a
considerable distance from the works, and had unconsciously carried a spark
of fire on her clothes to the mill. This was seen immediately on her entrance,
but before it could be prevented, it fell, and the explosion instantly followed.
Corroborating the mileage, the West Briton of 18 May 1838 reports:
Five mills blew up in succession, and part of a roof was found a mile from the
premises.
And, substantiating the tale of a violent decapitation, in the West
Briton of 15 Jan 1851:
On Saturday last, an inquest was held at Ponsanooth, before J. Carlyon esq.,
Coroner, on the body, or to speak more correctly, the fragments of the body
(for the poor fellow was literally blown to pieces) of John Martin. From the
evidence, it appeared that the deceased […] was engaged in removing some
powder from the glossing mill [when] the mill was blown up in the air with a
tremendous explosion, which was heard for many miles around, and shook the
houses a considerable distance off. The head of the deceased was discovered
about a quarter of a mile from the spot, and other parts were afterward
collected from different places. Verdict, accidental death.
SHAUN LEWIN: So we’re standing here in a beautiful forest. How old is
it? Perhaps two hundred years at most. Often when we stand in
these sorts of places we’re transported into some sort of romantic
idea of what nature could be, should be. In fact, this is a
postindustrial landscape akin to a car park or a quarry: this is a postmetal forest.
I’m going to start off by making a salvo of generalisations about
how organisms exist, and then go on to elucidate how transversal
ecology makes use of the Hydroplutonic Conspiracy to bring into
solution discrete entities: economics, plant growth…, and then from
that solution precipitate out some crystals that maybe can lead us
into an understanding of humans’ interaction with the soil, with the
air, and with the core of the planet.
There are two primary interactions of organisms with their
environment. Firstly, everything that’s alive is engaged in the
modulation of rates: we’re attempting to speed things up. I say ‘we’
in the broadest sense—I’m speaking for myself as a human being,
but also for a locust, also for this sycamore tree, for all of us….
So for example this tree is slowing down the rate at which nitrogen
is released into the atmosphere by locking it into its wood. It’s also
drawing carbon dioxide into itself via its leaves, taking it out of the
atmosphere at a far higher rate than would be happening in its
absence. This whole process, all of these accelerations and
decelerations, have to use energy somewhere. Plants, being
nonhuman, tend to use a solar source: they consume the energy
from the sun, destroy it, burn it off, and transfer it into matter. Equally
within my own body, I am taking energy from…well…in a
fundamental sense, still from the sun, but also I’m taking energy from
economic actions and increasing the range of calcium accumulation
within my body. This is only one half of the actions that we living
organisms engage in. This modulation of rates presupposes that we
are selecting things for our environment that we’re more interested
in. For example, this tree, by its sheer existence, is shading out the
ground beneath it, preventing anything from growing there unless it
can handle low sunlight. This tree therefore has created a new
environment around it.
As with a tree, so with the mining activity that took place in this
area. Humans came to this area and made use of the flux of water
as a source of energy, and they transferred that energy into
structures—firstly into the tangible structures we can see around us,
into these buildings, but also a more pervasive and intangible
structure which I call the business of trading, and of manipulating the
environment to create something new and valuable to them. Actually,
much of the forest that we see around us isn’t some sort of
endogenous response to the soil conditions and the light conditions
or even to the availability of seeds in the area. It’s actually a
deliberate attempt to make this whole area into some sort of green
blast-chamber to prevent explosions from travelling too far in any
direction.
Of course the most interesting thing about we humans is that we
have really taken this whole process of habitat manipulation and rate
modification as far as it can possibly go. So, superimposed on
factors as blind as the chemical weathering of rocks and the cycling
of nitrogen within the soil, we’ve also, through a process of
accelerated erosion, taken metals from beneath the surface of the
planet and released them into an economic flux which would have
first started in maybe the Bronze Age when people in the Middle
East recognised that their existing copper supplies would make
much better weapons if they could mix them with the tin that was
extracted from the rivers here. This process then became
accelerated through the transfer of value, so that what initially would
have been a relatively passive process of sifting and selection of
things from the environment, ore from the environment which was
useful to the endogenous human population, then became
accelerated gradually through the use of available energy sources—
water power, for example—and it became possible to bring more and
more of this material to the surface, to send more and more of this
material to the economic centres of the Bronze Age, which would be
Mesopotamia, I guess, and the Mediterranean.
Finally, with the conceptual leaps that make mankind so powerful
on this planet, we transferred our energy sources from water, from
things that occur in the environment, through to chemical materials,
such as gunpowder, which again accelerated the rate at which
materials were released from the subterranean mass of this area.
With this acceleration, given the principle of the conservation of
energy, there has to be a deceleration somewhere. And this is the
net effect of human actions here: we have decelerated the rates of
the natural accumulation of matter. This forest, if it had been
unperturbed, would have been a temperate rainforest analogous to
what we find in Western Canada: a colder version of the Amazon,
effectively. However, through the release of materials into the soil,
and the constant disruption caused by human activity, we’ve kept it
at a level which I would say is equivalent to the forest that would first
emerge after the retreat of a glacier. Or alternatively, and more
appropriately considering the formation of this area, what we see
here are the sorts of plants that we’d expect to see as green life
returned to the slopes of a volcano following its eruption.
As humans, we want to try and arrest this process, because we
always want to derive more energy from the environment and deny
that which the forest would take for itself. So, for example, the area
surrounding this would probably be engaged in some sort of
agricultural production which would be, I would say, the maintenance
of an artificial grass ecosystem. Something that would normally be
found on the retreat of a glacier, as the tundra started to vegetate, or
indeed at the birthplace of mankind on the savannah of Africa.
Interestingly though, with the introduction of the potentials that had
been liberated by the Hydroplutonic Conspiracy, we have no need
anymore for reliance on the sun as source of primary production: the
ability of the sun to grow plants is irrelevant, we’ve actually got a
better source of value here, which is the metal that we can get out of
the ground. The consequence of this is that there’s no real interest in
maintaining a viable soil structure here, or a healthy plant
community, so we can allow toxins to build up in the surface. Later
on we’ll be seeing an arsenic works which has had similar effects,
and I’m sure that around here the soils are completely useless to
agriculture, partly for topographic reasons, because it’s hard to work
them, but also owing to the scattering of contaminants, gunpowder
byproducts, and the sheer amount of felling and destruction that
must have gone on here.
Elsewhere, we would have seen a gridding of the land surface, a
separation of the fields into a stratified organisation, a matrix of land
ownership. Here, however, owing to the eruption of metal-rich
materials, there was no requirement to engage with this sort of
division of solar resources. Instead, there is an activity more akin to
some sort of hunter-gathering, a scavenging, the pursuit of a prey
through a three-dimensional medium, which in this case turns out to
be the sub-crust. Interestingly, the only other thing that’s like this in
the area is fishing, another activity in which effectively the watery
bodies of the earth have been exploited for their riches.
It’s now a nature reserve. That’s because this area has low value
to economic production and, I would assume, like many other
contaminated sites in Britain, has very little attraction to developers
—personally I wouldn’t want to build a house on some sort of mineral
toxic spoil. Sites like these generally fall out of use, and they develop
a sort of negative value in terms of property development. As the
economic flux that drove the Hydroplutonic Conspiracy in this area
ebbs to a halt, as the potential difference between tin production
here and bronze production elsewhere starts to level out, there is
less and less interest in the use of these areas for mineral extraction.
Gradually, maybe through some enhancing of global consciousness,
perhaps simply through some sort of realpolitik, it becomes easier to
designate these areas as nature reserves, and thereby endow them
with some sort of surplus value which is still congruent with the
conditions that we find here. Critically, it’s a way of using this land
without actually spending too much money redeveloping it, once the
Hydroplutonic Conspiracy has passed through.
2. Perran Wharf and Foundry: Bringing the Port
to the Mine
During the eighteenth century Perranarworthal, just outside
Falmouth, was developed into the first major port serving the
nascent mining industry in the Gwennap area.
The Foxes of Falmouth were a wealthy Quaker family who had
settled in Cornwall, having come from Wiltshire in the seventeenth
century, initially at St Germans. As Quakers they were excluded from
pursuing professional careers, consequently became very rich
through commerce, and latterly made important contributions to
science and natural philosophy.
George Croker Fox was already established as a successful
shipping agent and merchant in Fowey. He came to Falmouth in
1759 and George Croker Fox and Company began business as
consuls, shipping agents, and ship owners. In 1769 Fox took out a
99-year lease on what were at the time wastelands, where the old
mediaeval estate of Anworthal had been. He subsequently
developed Perran Creek in Kennall Vale into Perran Wharf, an
industrial and commercial complex that served the rapidly-growing
tin and copper industries of the area (from 1800–1850 Cornish
copper production was worth over £13 million, a phenomenal
amount for the period—the equivalent of around £7 billion in today’s
money). Fox’s idea was to ‘bring the port to the mine’ rather than, as
was previously the case, having to use pack mules to carry coal and
timber across uneven and steep terrain to the mine sites. His sons
George Croker Fox Jnr (1752–1807) and Robert Weir Fox I (1754–
1818) carried on the business after him. Fox was evidently one of
the first to realise that there was much money to be made out of the
peripheral industries around mining. As early as 1775, there are
records of exports via Perran Wharf of copper, and imports of coal
and timber—and also guano.
PAUL CHANEY: Guano. It’s shit. Bat and seagull and seal shit, mined
off the coasts of Peru and brought around the Cape and all the way
here to be used in all sorts of industrial processes, basically as a
source of nitrogen—concentrated nitrogen that could then be
combined with other chemicals and processed into what we actually
need for gunpowder, which is potassium nitrate. So the guano
unloaded here would have gone to the gunpowder works at Kennall
Vale. The other half of the recipe is wood ash: they used to bring it
here and probably left it in huge great big stinking pits to fester and
stew and purify and strengthen, quite a mucky business.
ROBIN MACKAY: Opposite us, we see the famous Perran Foundry,
which opened in 1791, making heavy castings for the beam engines
that drew water from Cornwall’s mines. We’ll talk more about the
engines later, but for now, note that the number one problem once
the mines began to go deeper was getting rid of the underground
water. When you see the emblematic Cornish engine house, that’s
what most of them were used for, drawing up the water using beam
engines. In 1840 Perran Foundry built a famous 85-inch engine for
Taylor’s Shaft at United Mines. in 1842 which achieved a ‘duty’ of
107 million (107 million pounds of water raised 1 ft by 1 bushel of
coal). These were big machines.
The foundry was established by the Fox family and also
manufactured parts for the Redruth-Chacewater Railway, which was
used to transport ore down to Perran Wharf. So there was a massive
complex here of leats, foundry buildings, stores, facilities for
transport; by 1860 it was a six-acre site employing 400 men, and it
remained in operation until 1849.
Perran Foundry drew its energy from the Kennall River, which er
already saw running through the gunpowder works. The lords of the
manor of Arworthal—which became Perranarworthal later—had
used the Kennall River in mediaeval times for the manorial mill. As
we’ve already seen, it was not the only industrial enterprise that,
throughout the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, continued to
draw on this source of power which flows from the Stithians
Reservoir and flows out into the creek here at Perranarworthal.
The foundry was also important in the development of the steam
engine and the furtherance of Cornish engineering knowledge. When
the aforementioned enlightened George Weir Fox II was in charge,
the workers were invited to discuss their suggestions for
improvements of the machinery, and it was as an extension of her
meetings with the engineers that George Weir’s daughter Anna
Maria Fox formed the Cornwall Polytechnic Society, which was
bestowed Royal Patronage by William IV in 1835, and played a
major role in industrial development throughout the nineteenth
century.
We’re going to stop briefly at the Norway Inn. Extant since the early
nineteenth century, when this road was opened as a turnpike, it
takes its name from the Norwegian Ships that brought in the timbers
for lining mineshafts and tunnels, at Perran Wharf. At that time the
river, which, as we can see across the road from the Norway Inn, is
now marshland, was far deeper, and it was even possible for small
sailing vessels to discharge upstream from the Inn. At high tide,
timber was floated up from the large ships docked at Restronguet
Creek and stored in specially constructed timber pits. As our driver is
pointing out to us, there was a system of these pits—still visible as
marshy areas to the south of the canal cut—where the timber was
left in the salt water so it would then have a longer life in the fresh
water underground in the mines.
PC: Perran Foundry built some of the largest industrial machines of
their age, really: the one Robin mentioned, the 85-inch pumping
engine—you’re talking about a piston that’s about seven feet across,
a piston as big as this bus.
Currently the Wharf building is falling to bits and has been under
development as a chic housing complex for years, stalled by some
strange quango between planning officers….
But the Fox company which developed the site had an even more
expansive empire, reaching out along the supply route into South
Wales, where they bought up iron ore mines and smelting works and
factories.
RM: There is speculation among geophilosophers that the Fox family
were able to capitalise upon some prior knowledge of the importance
of Kernovian Syndrome and its link to the Hydroplutonic Conspiracy.
At least, we know that G. Croker Fox’s grandson Robert Weir Fox II
(1789–1877, buried at the Quaker Burial Ground at Budock), who
lived at Rosehill (now Falmouth Art School on Wood Lane) was a
very early contributor to geophysics, the first scientist to investigate
hydrothermal mineralisation. He was a Cornish ‘natural philosopher’
whose research into the internal temperature of the earth—having
spent forty years from 1815–1855 observing the temperature in the
Gwennap mines—proved for the first time that temperature
increased with depth, and led him to hypothesise a source of
emanative heat at the core of the planet. This work is detailed in his
papers for the Royal Geological Society of Cornwall ‘On the
Temperature of Mines’ (1822) and ‘Some Further Observations on
the Temperature of Mines’ (1827), and (in the Edinburgh New
Philosophical Journal) ‘Some Remarks on the High Temperatures in
the United Mines’ (1847); not to mention his ‘Report on the
Temperature of Some Deep Mines in Cornwall’ for the British
Association for the Advancement of Science (1858). The first of
these papers opens as follows:
I believe most persons acquainted with mines are aware that a great degree of
warmth is experienced at considerable depths under the surface; but this fact
does not appear to have attracted so much notice as it probably deserves.
—and concludes that ‘many important operations of nature seem to
depend’ upon the emanation of caloric from the interior of the earth.
In the second, he records a measurement of the water
pumped from the Gwennap mines […] through different branch adits, into a
large adit or tunnel. The temperature of this accumulated mine-water, near
where it is discharged into Carnon Valley, was 69.25 degrees in 1822, and the
quantity discharged was computed at 60,000 tons per day.
Not only does Kernovian Syndrome exacerbate the Hydroplutonic
Conspiracy; in fact, Cornwall is the site of its becoming selfconscious.
Iain enters the bus
Let’s ask Iain if he’d like to speak a little about the prevailing
theories of the earth during this period.
IAIN HAMILTON GRANT: Yes, hello everybody, sorry I’m late—but it’s
only ‘late’ if you consider things very very locally in terms of
timescales….
Theories of the earth to which the problem of heat responds divide
into two classes: neptunist and plutonist. It’s about heat, but it’s also
about water. The greatest avatar of neptunism—the theory that water
is the cause of the formation of the earth—was a miner named
Abraham Gottlob Werner in Saxony at the close of the eighteenth
century. Through his mining academy went Novalis, and went also a
medical doctor Gottlob Heinrich Schubert who wrote some fantastic
reflections entitled Observations from the Night Side of Physics—it’s
clear that he was taking various chemicals in order to enhance his
ability to write about said night side of physics, this can be easily
read, if one consults his documents…. And also the geologist Henrik
Steffens, who was Norwegian by origin, and wrote one of the most
significant of the Wernerian geological accounts in 1801, entitled
Inner Natural History of the Earth. To this day, for some reason, it
has never been translated. The only copy I’ve seen is one that was
owned by Coleridge and is in the British Library, it’s filled with
Coleridge’s excited notes, it’s great to see it, not only to see what
one writer, inspired by a miner, should derive therefrom in order to
construct a complete theory of the earth; but also what this did to the
head of a poet who was otherwise frankly oblivious of the natural
world.
In any case, that was the neptunist hypothesis: that water was the
principal agent in the formation of the globe. The other one,
plutonism, concerns the inner heat, the central fire, stating that the
earth was in a state of constant igneous fusion. The idea that the
earth’s core was in a state of igneous fusion would, of course,
account for it getting hotter as one approached nearer to that core.
And the observations of Fox as he approached via the mines would
have provided evidence at least that there was indeed heat towards
the earth’s core. The principal architect of plutonism, James Hutton,
was the founder of modern geology and he was a contemporary of
Joseph Black, the chemist under whom Humphry Davy, the great
Kernovian poet-chemist-geologist, studied in Edinburgh in the 1780s.
Hutton’s account was based on having observed the effects of
pressure and heat upon rocks. Notably, he discovered at Siccar
Point, a rocky outcrop near Edinburgh, that there was no way the
formation of the rocks there could be explained by any means other
than their having been thrust out of the earth and buckled into their
present shape. That was the theory of heat as the central agent in
the formation of the earth.
Both of these theories, however, take a crucial hint from a far older
theory of the earth promoted by Buffon, whose 1788 Epoch de la
Nature hypothesised that it was both a fiery igneous mass and the
result of flooding that produced the earth in its current form. He had
the idea that the earth as we inhabit it is the result of a giant
catastrophe. Basically, an asteroid struck this body, this completed
system of nature, and forced the earth into its current position,
heating it, melting its ice, and turning it into its current form. The
Earth was therefore, according to Buffon, cooling from a state of
igneous fusion. Others opposed this view, and insisted that it was
heating up—this was a debate going on at the end of the eighteenth
century.
So fire and water, the Hydroplutonic Conspiracy, are etched into
the very origins of the theory of the earth.
3. Devoran Quays: Entrepot of the Mines
Perran Foundry closed in 1879, although Perran Wharf continued
trading until the early twentieth century, when the river silted up. But
it can be seen as a kind of prototype for our next location, which was
to become what one eighteenth-century writer called ‘the entrepot of
the mines of this district, by which, indeed, it was entirely created’—
Devoran, a village that owes its existence not to mining itself, but to
the enterprise of ‘bringing the port to the mine’.
Devoran Quays succeeded Perran Wharf as the principal port
serving the Gwennap area. Metal ore headed for South Wales,
travelling via the pioneering Redruth-Chacewater railway which ran
right to the quayside, was stored in the stone hutches you can still
see here, ready for loading onto the one-hundred-tonne vessels that
used to dock here, moored to the stone bollards that are still
standing.
After 1870 the decline of mining brought with it the relative disuse
of the port. Then, in 1876, the same fate befell Devoran as had
befallen Perran Wharf: the County Adit—of which more later—which
drained water from the Gwennap mines, became blocked near its
mouth upstream at Twelveheads. The following winter it broke
through and so much mining waste was deposited as the cataract
gave way that Devoran became silted up to the extent that vessels
could no longer reach the quay.
KENNA HERNLY: Devoran simply means ‘waters’. This was the busiest
port in Cornwall from the 1830s to the 1860s. As you can see on
your map, we’re located on the main artery of the circulation system
of the Hydroplutonic Conspiracy, where a panoply of materials went
into and out of the local system, serving the many mines of the area.
Here the tidal waters swallow up the two rivers that play an important
part in our tour, the Carnon and the Kennall, and go on to meet the
Fal just around the corner. So this was a really important place.
Large ships were able to dock just over there in Restronguet Creek,
and then the materials were brought up by tug, or, when the weather
was good, smaller boats were able to sail in to dock here. The
railroad came right down along the quay here, and its individual
tracks spurred out from the main branch to serve ships that brought
the materials in and out. And this was basically all because of the
Redruth-Chacewater railway.
In the 1820s, a man named John Taylor bought the lease on
Consolidated Mines and United Mines at St Day, which we’ll be able
to see from Carn Marth later. These mines had been used in the
1750s during the first peak in the copper mining industry in Cornwall,
but subsequently closed during the huge depression at the end of
the late 1700s. Taylor laid down more money than anyone had ever
seen in Cornwall, brought these huge 90-inch engines, reopened
these mines. And within a year he had found the largest copper lode
anywhere in the world. So he’s up on the hill, and he’s got tonnes of
copper ore, but he’s bringing it down to the Fal River by packhorse,
as had been done for years, and then taking coal from Wales and
timber from Norway back up. And during the winter there are often
months when the horses can’t get through. So what does Taylor do?
He goes up to London, appeals to parliament, gets a lot of money
from his lenders, and builds a railway. It’s the first real railway in
Cornwall—there was a small tramway owned by the Foxes and
Williams families up in Portreath, but this outshone them by far, and,
importantly, unlike most of the infrastructure here, it wasn’t owned by
the Fox family—they weren’t even allowed an investment.
The railway opened in 1826, and had four branches (although the
Chacewater branch was never completed). It served mines all the
way from Redruth down to Devoran, through Consolidated Mines,
and terminated here. During its peak in the 1830s it was bringing up
to 60,000 tonnes of cargo per year. This was still horse-drawn, but
the railway lines made it far more efficient and it could operate in all
seasons. On your way down you may have noticed on your left these
ore bins, that’s where the railway ran, just along the back of them, to
tip the rail cars into the ore bins, and then the ore was stored there
until it was able to go out—originally, before they had a crane, with
men and horses working to transport it out to the ships.
The fact that the coal, which was the main cargo being transported,
was coming in from South Wales, eventually led to the decline of
Devoran. Tin ore had been brought down to the Fal River from the St
Day area right back to the mediaeval period. And John Taylor had
just carried on in this tradition, reusing this area as the port. But
really, since the coal mines were in South Wales, to dock on the
North Coast of Cornwall would make a whole lot more sense,
because you wouldn’t have to go around Land’s End and The Lizard,
which were really treacherous navigations at that point. Up to fifty
boats a year were being lost coming around to these harbours. The
Williams and Fox families owned Hayle and Portreath ports, and
they started to build a railway to serve them and would entice the
copper and coal people to go up there. That competition eventually
led to Devoran’s demise. But up until the 1850s there was still
enough copper ore coming out of Gwennap to make it practical.
Remember, there were something like six hundred mine shafts in
this ‘richest square mile in the world’.
So, by the 1850s John Taylor could see that he had to make his
railway much more efficient, and he introduced steam. He buys a
couple of steam engines from Glasgow and within a year has them
operating down here. And they completely change the whole thing:
you couldn’t have such steep gradients and tight curves with steam
engines as you could with horses, so they restructured a lot of the
tracks and reinforced the tracks—with iron from Perran Wharf—to be
able to carry the engines. The sleepers were granite, which mainly
came from the quarry at Carn Marth, which we’ll see later. So this
was all part of a tightly integrated local industrial ecosystem.
PAUL CHANEY: The road we walked along to get here was very flat,
and that was part of the railway, and the road we’ll be driving along
to get to the next location is also a part of the remains of the railway
bed.
Copper was exported to smelt, it was too expensive to smelt here
because you needed coal and, since the coal came from Wales, it
would have been too expensive to smelt copper in place. So it was
instead exported and smelted elsewhere in places where coal was
ready to hand.
During the period we’re talking about, they mainly used it to make
bronze and other alloys that were essential for any machinery, very
hard and corrosion-resistant, a metal you can mill and make into
cogs and engine parts. So in that sense this operation was supplying
the whole Industrial Revolution.
KH: The steam railway did very well until the 1860s, when there was
a huge crash in the copper industry owing to mines opening in South
America and South Africa. Since the beginning of the century,
Cornwall had accounted for fifty percent of the world’s copper, and
most of it came from Gwennap. But in the 1860s suddenly the
market was flooded and prices plummeted so drastically that many
investors who had interests in Cornwall just pulled out. Taylor was
left with this railway, and he extended it further into the Redruth area
to service more of the tin mines that were still working.
This will give you a sense of just how quickly the industry declined:
profits in 1869 were about £8000, in 1870 they were £5000, and in
1871, £400. And that was with all the managers taking a pay cut,
and not paying any interest on their loans. A drastic decline, which
had its effects across the whole area:
Carharrack, Gwennap and St Day villages were particularly hard hit by the
recession. Once so populous and busy, grass now grew in the half-deserted
streets. Thousands of miners emigrated to Australia, to the Americas and to
South Africa, tramping to Padstow or Falmouth for passage on an emigrant
ship. What few remained had to seek work where they could in the mines that
continued working for tin, in Wheal Basset, Wheal Buller, and the other
surviving mines around Redruth. The mines here, and in Camborne, turned to
the tin that lay beneath the worked-out Copper but in Gwennap no mine was
continued long enough to either prove or disprove whether the same state of
affairs existed.1
Over the next thirty years, there were a few revivals in tin, but in
general the industry was never the same again after the 1830s. The
only respite came with the rise of the arsenic industry, as arsenic, or
‘mundic’, formerly thought of as a troublesome waste product,
became increasingly important as a raw material for the chemical
industry.
4. Point Mills Arsenic Works: The Sublimation of
Mundick
In the 1860s, 10,000 tonnes of arsenic per year was passing through
Devoran port. The importance of this mineral, if not its toxicity, was
recognised early, as we can read in William Pryce’s 1778
Mineralogia Cornubiensis:
Mundick: An exceeding ponderous Mineral, whitish, beautiful, and shining, but
brittle […] Mundick, whose great emporium is Cornwall […] we find it very
plentiful in Lodes of Tin, Copper and Lead; with which it is so intimately mixed,
that it commonly impoverishes the value of each of its companions,
notwithstanding every known method is used by fire, water, and various
manuductions, to separate and cleanse them from it.
[...] Mundick is such a mortifying inmate, as by its communication corrupts the
goodness of the Metal, and renders it harsh, brittle, and ill coloured.
Arsenic was thus frequently found clinging to the lodes of tin and
copper. As Pryce says, it was regarded as a nuisance, but equally, a
maxim among miners insists that despite its troublesome nature, it
also serves as an indicator of a good vein of metal: ‘a large lode of
Mundick commonly rides a good horse’.
Arsenic has been celebrated as ‘the cinderella of British mining’.
Today enough deposits of arsenic have been discovered worldwide
for it to be of very low value; but in the nineteenth century the
nascent chemical industry saw it in high demand, for use in pigments
(the fashionable green of Victorian wallpapers), insecticides, sheep
dip, mordants (used to fix colour in fabric), to make shot, and as a
decolouriser in glass manufacture.
ROBIN MACKAY: In early alluvial stream mining, the arsenic was no
problem—weathering simply removed it slowly. It was in proportion
to the increasing depth of mining as it sought out the primary
lodestuff that the arsenic problem arose. Miners called the substance
‘mundic’, ‘silver mundic’ or ‘mispickel’ and recognised it by the fact
that, when struck, it gave off a ‘stale-onion-like smell’ (which indeed
you can still smell here).
Arsenic in underground lodes, concentrated because it had not
been washed away naturally, had to be removed artificially in order
to purify the ore. So miners used to heat the ‘black tin’ that came out
of the mines, oxidising the arsenic, which would be carried off in the
fumes. As early as the seventeenth century there were wellestablished procedures to burn off mundick:
Mundick in our Tin (which spoils it by making it britly hard, and not malleable)
[…] we are necessitated to burn away this Weed in the Kiln […] While the
Mundick burns the flame is blue, afterward yellow.
The more black tin was thus relieved of its arsenic, however, the
more effect this had on the locale, as the hot gaseous oxide
released, cooled, and fell on the surrounding countryside as powder
(‘white arsenic’). The removal would be carried out in blowinghouses; but as mines became larger and more commerciallyminded, they preferred to integrate the arsenic removal process
themselves since they could then achieve a higher price for the tin.
This enterprising spirit belongs to the early nineteenth century’s
surge of entrepreneurial activity in the area, to which we also owe
the local manufacture of gunpowder, as we have seen at Kennall
Vale—a sort of early ‘horizontal integration’.
This went even further, as it was realised that in the amounts it was
being removed, arsenic could prove a valuable product in itself. And
so, in 1817, Dr Richard Edwards of Falmouth set up the first works at
Perranwell to prepare refined arsenic from mine waste. He
encouraged mines to build collection flues onto their mines—what
would become known as ‘lambreths [labyrinths]’, convoluted
chimney shafts where the arsenious oxide would collect as clear
crystals, which then had to be dug out by hand, with miners being
sent in to scrape it out and facing the risk of festering wounds owing
to the corrosive effect of the crystals. This product was then
delivered to the arsenic works to be further purified through various
processes of refinement or ‘sublimation’.
In 1835, this second refinery was built near Bissoe Bridge. And
once there were two companies in the area actively seeking arsenic,
the mines soon realised they could make money from selling their
soot…making the lemon of arsenic into lemonade.
In 1826, 83 tonnes of white arsenic were exported from Penryn,
West-Country arsenic had a particular reputation for being effective
at removing impurities from glass. The recovery of arsenic ran from
1815–1950, after which the value had fallen so far it was no longer
worthwhile. However, there were plans as late as 1912 to revive
Wheal Busy mine purely for the production of arsenic (a plan never
put into effect because of the advent of the First World War).
Early on, although the association between mundic and copper
was recognised, the exact family relation between them was
disputed, as Pryce tells us:
we know several instances of very large Mundick Lodes, answering the pursuit
of the concerned with abundance of Copper Ore in depth; from whence many
writers have maternalised this Mineral for Copper, which is bastardising the
daughter, whose real Mother is Gossan [a kind of imperfect iron ore]; and yet
Mundick does partly contain the feed or vitrioloick principle of Copper, and
therefore it may with propriety be termed the father, and Gossan the mother, or
matrix, to fecundate the feed.
The organic language here reflects the prevalent view that mineral
deposits grew and reproduced in the earth in the same way as other
forms of life—that growths in the depths of the earth were formed
just like the flora and fauna on the surface. This is something that’s
reflected in the practices of alchemy—if you think that tin is basically
the same thing as gold but at a different stage of maturity, then the
process of alchemy is that of the speeding up of the maturation of
the metal. But I’m going to ask Iain to say more about this.
IAIN HAMILTON GRANT: The idea that minerals might grow, that any
inorganic material might ‘grow’, strikes us as merely a use of a
metaphor, an analogy. And far from going in the other direction, and
saying that minerals are evidence that the whole earth is living, it
points to a problem regarding whether or not things can be
conceived as part of a system, as organised in some manner, or
whether things are extraneous to systems and not organised at all.
The very idea, for example, that arsenic ‘rides a good horse’, in
terms of finding rich ore deposits, tells you that there are systematic
relations between things. So the idea that a thing must be of organic
matter in order to be a living thing, in order to be organised, in order
to grow, develop, in order to perish, etc., all of these ideas are
secondary in relation to the question of organisation. And this
reflects, I think, a confusion around what sciences around the turn of
the nineteenth century regard as organicism, or what is regarded as
organicism when these sciences are discussed. This for all sorts of
reasons is a significant date for today’s exploration. I’m basing a lot
of the material I’m using on materials found in Humphry Davy’s 1805
lectures on geology as well as his 1811 lectures on geology; and the
precursors, the sources of those.
So around this period we start hearing about the death of
Newtonianism, we start hearing about the end of mechanism in
natural scientific explanation. The reason for this is quite simply that
mechanism posits that there are simple, individual, isolated,
asystemic bodies from which everything is composed. How those
are composed is not a question that is posed. So you find, for
example in Newton—the arch-mechanist, perhaps—a simple
dualism: there are two categories of things, one of them force, the
other atoms. We explore what happens when atoms combine to
make things, and that’s all we are exploring. That’s mechanism. One
can see already how phenomena of life, although clearly a part of
the natural world, cannot be explained in terms of the mere
combination of parts. Shelley’s romance Frankenstein is an
illustration of what else is required in order to make inanimate bodies
animate—the answer there is electricity. The idea therefore that
inorganic matter may be brought to life by means of electricity is
already lodged in the dawning consciousness of a world of
organisation that starts to appear at the end of the eighteenth and
beginning of the nineteenth centuries. There is a relation between
this and questions of alchemy and the development of chemistry,
which happens over the same period—Lavoisier’s Elements of
Chemistry is published in 1789—the reason that is such an important
date is that chemistry takes over from alchemy, but tries to do exactly
the same thing. In other words, it’s a simple dogma of chemical
explanation that we do not understand the thing in chemical terms
once we have merely broken it down into its constituent parts, its
elements or its atoms; we also need to resynthesize those things.
The big problem therefore that chemistry investigates is not simply
the analysis of the composition of things—what elements make up
what bodies—but also the production of things. Chemistry seeks to
reveal the secrets of how it is that nature produces stuff. Bodies are
no longer the things out of which everything is made, but rather late
consequences of the production process that is the earth.
In consequence of this, various theories began to emerge that
would help explain the relationship between all these various
organisations on the earth. On the one hand, geological, on the other
hand, biological—and thirdly, we might mention (mixing the means of
categorisation, but never mind), human activity. These three ranges
of activity, geological activity, biological activity, and human activity,
we might refer to as three stages that we are required to relate if we
are to produce a systematic theory of nature. And the way this was
done was via a theory called ‘recapitulation’. Recapitulation is a
fantastic theory. It holds, for example, that everything that we see in
late animals—so for example in man—is simply a recapitulation of
earlier ones. I will turn to a particular quote here—this is Lorenz
Oken, a notorious philosopher of nature from the end of the
eighteenth century who wrote a treatise on the philosophy of nature
that was some seven hundred pages long, it started with the
relationship between mathematics and protoplasm and ended with a
prayer for war…so clearly, a complete nutter! But along the route he
was one of the people who developed the theory of recapitulation
(although not the only one, and the way in which this theory finds its
way into what is subsequently known as ‘serious science’ is
instructive).
3034. During its development, the animal passes through all stages of the
animal kingdom. The foetus is a representation of all animal classes in time.
3035. At first it is a simple vesicle, stomach, or vitelus, as in the Infusoria.
3036. Then the vesical is doubled through the albumen and shell, and obtains
an intestine, as in the Corals.
3037. It obtains a vascular system in the vitelline vessels, or absorbents, as in
the Acalephae.
3038. With the blood-system, liver, and ovarium, the embryo enters the class
of bivalved Mollusca.
3039. With the muscular heart, the testicle, and the penis, into the class of
Snails.
3040. With the venous and arteriose hearts, and the urinary apparatus, into
the class of Cephalopods or Cuttle-fish.
3041. With the absorption of the integument, into the class of Worms.2
And so on…and at the end of this ‘so on’, we stand. So in other
words, Oken says that the reason a human foetus looks like a fish is
because it is a fish. It’s becoming a fish at a specific stage in its
development. So that latterly it will be born as a human being. But
we’ve all been fish. That’s one account of the theory of
recapitulation: it posits that between every stage of an animal’s
development, it passes through previous stages of all lower animals.
The next development of this entire process is the constitution, as I
said earlier, of a threefold parallelism between geological or earth
history, natural history or phylology, and human culture, civilisation,
and thought. This threefold parallelism is the work of Carl Friedrich
Kielmeyer, who was professor of comparative anatomy in Stuttgart,
in the Karlsschule. Among the luminaries who attended that school
and were taught by Kielmeyer is Georges Cuvier, who became
professor of comparative anatomy at the Jardin des Plantes in Paris,
a really important character in the science of morphology. So this is
the serious side of the same thing. And yet it is not Oken but
Kielmeyer who says that if there are parallel developments among
living creatures there must also be parallel developments amongst
inorganic matter, organic matter, and thought. So everything that’s
going on in the earth is recovered in the creature, in the living
creature. How is this so? His example was the skeleton. The
skeleton is simply the mineral being around which flesh, muscle, and
organ are wrapped. We are like earths, we are basically like clothes
hung off this great stalactite, we are stony-hearted besoms. So we
have, if you like, the recapitulation of earth history in our skeletons.
We have the recapitulation of natural history in our organs. You can
see Oken’s declination of the various organs and the creatures those
organs would be, in effect, if they were independent of the organism
that we constituted. We next then have to work in the problem of
thought: What is it that makes the earth become self-conscious?
How is it that nature becomes self-conscious? There is only one way
that we know of that nature becomes self-conscious (although
talking to Shaun about rats and their uses for urine, I’m not sure that
this theory holds water any more, so to speak). And that is through
us: we are nature’s way of generating ideas. This is Kielmeyer’s
great realisation. If Ideas are natural occurrences, brains have ideas,
brains put ideas out there, brains are natural products and therefore
ideas are natural products. So we get that threefold parallelism
already established. Or at least the grounds of that threefold
parallelism. Instead therefore of looking for the primitive bodies or
elements that lie at the root of things, what we try and do is recover
or recapitulate, repeat, literally, the constitution or organisation of all
these series in everything we do. In point of fact, we can’t help this.
As Novalis said, ‘our forefathers’ thoughts are merely the natural
product of a previous age, and whereas the earth’s history is layered
in strata, our forefathers’ thought, that element of natural production,
is in the leaves of a book’.
And there we have it—that’s a replacement account, if you like, for
atomism, and at the same time a prologue to understanding what’s
happening when you’re having an idea, in relationship to the rest of
the planet.
JAMES STRONGMAN: Copper and arsenic are very close in the
periodic table: copper’s 33, arsenic’s 29. So in terms of size, and
their properties, they’re very similar. During the mineralisation
process in Cornwall, as we discussed before, you’ve got this big
lump of granite which has melted, and many of the rocks that are
above it contain fluids rich in boron and chlorine, and these elements
are vital for dissolving metals. If you just put metal in a river it won’t
dissolve, you need these other elements in the fluid, circulating in
and around the granite, into the surrounding rocks, scavenging base
metals from the granite. And as the granite cools they get forced to
the top of the granite and concentrated there. As it cools further, the
boron forms a mineral called tourmaline which is quite a pure
Cornish granite.
So you’ve got this mountain-building episode going on, granite
underneath scavenging, and building and cooling. And as this
mountain-building episode slows down it relaxes, the pressure
comes off, and the fluids are always trying to find the easiest way to
the surface, and what they usually do is find old fault lines. One of
the classic faults was the Kennall Vale valley, which has its roots four
hundred million years ago in a really old fracture in the crust. But
many of the lodes strike in similar directions because they’re
following these pressure-release fractures. So, as the pressure
comes off, the first thing to deposit is the tin, because it’s the least
soluble and has the lowest mobility. So that’s why you get the tin low
down and near the granite. The copper and the arsenic and the zinc
carry on because they’re still in solution in chlorides. But as they get
closer to the surface and the temperature and pressure drop, they
start to precipitate. And they precipitate with another element,
sulphur, and sulphur has a atomic number of 16. So the arsenic and
the copper form sulphides, first, which is where you get chalcopyri
with copper and iron sulphide, you get some sulphides, and
arsenopyrite, which is the principal form of arsenic mineral.
So when they say you’ve hit a load of arsenic, mundic, you’re on a
good horse, it’s because if you follow that, you’ll get back to the tin,
which is further down below it. Sulphur is 16, arsenic’s got a value of
33, and together they can form arsenides. So instead of two sulphurs
you have one copper and one arsenic, so you can get these
minerals. And obviously when you’re mining these, it’s quite hard to
separate the arsenic from the copper, which is why it caused
problems for the early miners. In the Camborne and Redruth area
they actually left a lot of this in the ground until later they figured out
the processes to extract it. But here, they didn’t have that problem to
begin with, because they were mining near-surface deposits which
had been enriched by supergene processes occurring near the
surface, where rainwater that has percolated into the ground and
been heated by the rocks below circulates and oxidates the sulphide
ores. There are some really beautiful looking minerals, all the blue
and green oddball minerals that are famous in this area, they all
derive from this supergene enrichment. So the early miners, when
they saw their copper, it was almost in the form of copper itself, it
was copper oxide. But as they went deeper they found copper
sulphide instead, and that’s where the problems of arsenic start to
occur, and you release sulphur dioxide into the atmosphere, and
you’ve got arsenic going up into the air and getting deposited.
Obviously it’s not a great thing to be filling the air with. In fact, one of
the main uses of arsenic was that it was sent to the cotton fields of
America to be used as a pesticide.
SHAUN LEWIN: In a way this is like a slow volcano, pumping stuff from
the centre of the earth gently into the surrounding landscape. What
this means is that all these toxic deposits that are buried in the earth
are being, through an immense act of human generosity, brought to
the surface. One of the characteristic things about the soil around
volcanoes is that they’re dreadful places for life; and what we see
around us here is the first riposte of nature to this influx of inorganic
toxins. So what do I see? Some birch trees, for example, these are
classic species for colonising places that have suffered some kind of
immense catastrophe.
Gradually these reproducing species are finding any small foothold
in the area where they can persist for some length of time. Equally,
the yellow flowers of the gorse, that’s one of the plants that is in
many ways a signal, saying, this soil is desperately impoverished,
we’re going to have to nitrify it ourselves by drawing down nitrifying
materials from the atmosphere and locking them in the soil, because
the soil’s incapable of supporting plant life.
JS: The arsenic is still here now, it’ll always be here, it just depends
what form it’s in. In an oxide form, it’s quite mobile. When it’s
exposed to the air, when it’s oxidised, it’s quite soluble. In its
sulphide form, it’s almost completely insoluble, so it’s not going to do
anything. That’s the distinction between organic and inorganic
varieties of arsenic: If you ate arsenopyrite, you wouldn’t get arsenic
poisoning, it’d just pass through you. But there’s a lot of water in
these mines that will then oxidise any minerals that are brought to
the surface. So you have the potential for catastrophe here—like
what happened when the County Adit got blocked and the water
level rose, and you had all these freshly-oxidised chemicals pouring
out and into the water system.
1. D.B. Barton, The Redruth and Chasewater Railway (Truro: D. Bradford Barton
Ltd., revised edition 1966), 63.
2. L. Oken, Elements of Physiophilosophy, tr. A. Tulk (London: Ray Society, 1847),
491.