Simulations of the past will almost certainly be produced indistinguishable from actually the original lived experience and quite how imminent it is is hard to say. Thank you.
There's a kind of collapse of straightforward temporal intuition that happens by exploring certain ideas in this zone. Somehow there's this extremely radical selection process that just, you know, it's absolutely this unknown thing that...
behaves collectively in a certain respect. It makes sense strategically to credibly threaten precursor beings in order to compel them to... I'm going to go.
So it's not as if one has to sort of invent some utopian transformation, it's not happening. One simply has to invest in already existing trends. Someone pursuing transformation should be focused on is anything that looks as if it's going to multiply. Independence, struggles of all kinds, you know, devolutionary processes. And I think all of these things are happening already.
Parents' technologies are going to be kind of themselves proliferate. What people need is machinery that will protect them. What are you trusting? Are you trusting God? Are you trusting the state? You know, anyone who's counting on arguments to protect them, I think, is not taking their security sufficiently seriously. I'm sorry.
The whole goal here should be for regime diversity. I would just be completely unqualified about it. I would just say, you know, absolutely none of your business. I'm sorry.
And that basically is the near reactionary plan. It's to aim for, rather than an elimination of government, to aim for a massive proliferation of government to the point that the bargaining position of any particular government becomes vastly less powerful.
The crucial duty of horror is to organize an encounter with the unspeakable. Suddenly you see the monster, you see the thing that you're supposed to have been the kind of unidentifiable brooding objects of horror and there's this massive deflation immediately, whatever, practically whatever is done with it, it's deflating.